Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Future Oncol ; 20(8): 447-458, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37882460

RESUMO

Aim: We assessed relative efficacy and safety of amivantamab versus mobocertinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion (exon20ins) mutations who progressed on prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Materials & methods: This matching-adjusted indirect comparison used patient-level data from CHRYSALIS (NCT02609776) and aggregate data from a mobocertinib trial (NCT02716116) to match populations on all clinically relevant confounders. Results: While both agents had similar efficacy for time-to-event outcomes, objective response rate was significantly higher for amivantamab. 15 of 23 any-grade treatment-related adverse events reported for mobocertinib were significantly less common for amivantamab versus only two for mobocertinib. Conclusion: Results suggest that amivantamab has an improved response rate with similar survival and a more favorable safety profile versus mobocertinib in EGFR exon20ins non-small-cell lung cancer.


Assuntos
Compostos de Anilina , Anticorpos Biespecíficos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Indóis , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Receptores ErbB/genética , Éxons , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Mutação , Platina , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos
2.
J Comp Eff Res ; 7(5): 421-441, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29210593

RESUMO

AIM: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were conducted to determine the relative efficacy and safety of interventions for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients, as comparative evidence is scarce. MATERIALS & METHODS: Relative treatment effects of progression-free survival, overall survival and safety outcomes were estimated via network meta-analysis based on data identified via systematic literature review. RESULTS: Ibrutinib was superior in all pairwise comparisons for progression-free survival (probability to be better [P] range: overall population: 69-100%; fludarabine-ineligible population: 69-100%) and overall survival (P range: overall: 89-100%; fludarabine-ineligible: 91-100%) and had the highest probability of being best for all outcomes. CONCLUSION: Ibrutinib provides superior benefit in survival and safety compared with other front-line treatments of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.


Assuntos
Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/mortalidade , Metanálise em Rede , Piperidinas , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Vidarabina/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA