Factors associated with a tunneled dialysis catheter in place at initial arteriovenous access creation.

OBJECTIVE: Arteriovenous (AV) access is the preferred hemodialysis modality to avoid the complications associated with tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs). Despite efforts to create timely AV access, many patients still initiate hemodialysis through TDCs. Our goal was to determine the patient factors associated with having a TDC present at initial AV access creation and how this affects survival. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective review of all patients who had undergone initial AV fistula creation from 2014 to 2019. Patients with previous peritoneal or AV access were excluded. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify associations with a TDC present at initial AV access creation and patient survival. RESULTS: Of 509 patients who had undergone initial AV access creation, a TDC was present in 280 (55%). The mean patient age was 59.7 ± 14.1 years. The access types were brachiocephalic (47.2%), brachiobasilic (22.4%), radiocephalic (15.5%), and prosthetic (12.6%). The patients with a TDC compared with those without a TDC were less likely to be obese (68.9% vs 54.2%), more likely to be homeless (10.4% vs 4.8%), and more likely to be an inpatient (44.6% vs 18.8%). They were less likely to have seen a primary care physician within 1 year preoperatively (54.3% vs 88.6%) and a nephrologist within 3 months preoperatively (39.3% vs 93%; P < .05 for all). On multivariable analysis, the presence of a TDC at initial AV access creation was associated with no nephrology visit within 3 months preoperatively (odds ratio [OR], 25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.5-50; P < .001), homeless status (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1-6.2; P = .03), and the absence of obesity (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9; P = .02). The 1-year survival was similar for patients with (95%) and without (94.8%) a TDC (P = .36) as confirmed by multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.65-2.1; P = .63). CONCLUSIONS: The absence of a preoperative nephrology visit, homeless status, and the absence of obesity were associated with a TDC present at initial AV access creation. However, the presence of a TDC did not appear to confer changes in short-term survival. Targeted improvements in high-risk populations such as increasing the frequency of preoperative subspecialty evaluation might be warranted to reduce TDC placement before AV access creation at urban safety-net hospitals.

Higher body mass index is associated with reinterventions and lower maturation rates after upper extremity arteriovenous access creation.

OBJECTIVE: A patient's body mass index (BMI) can affect both perioperative and postoperative outcomes across all surgical specialties. Given that obesity and end-stage renal disease are growing in prevalence, we aimed to evaluate the association between BMI and outcomes of upper extremity arteriovenous (AV) access creation. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution review was conducted for AV access creations from 2014 to 2018. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and AV access details were recorded. BMI groups were defined as normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2), obese (30-39.9 kg/m2), and morbidly obese (>40 kg/m2). Perioperative complications and long-term outcomes including access maturation (defined as access being used for hemodialysis or the surgeon's judgment that access was ready for use in patients not yet on hemodialysis), occlusion, and reintervention were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 611 upper extremity AV access creations were performed on patients who were normal weight (29.6%), overweight (31.3%), obese (29.6%), and morbidly obese (9.5%). Access type included brachiocephalic (43.2%), brachiobasilic (25.5%), and radiocephalic (14.2%) fistulas and AV grafts (14.2%). Median age was 60.9 years, and 59.6% were male. Univariable analysis showed no difference between BMI groups for perioperative steal, hematoma, home discharge, or 30-day primary patency. Freedom from reintervention at 2 years on Kaplan-Meier analysis differed by BMI (44.5% ± 4.6% normal weight, 29% ± 3.8% overweight, 39.8% ± 4.3% obese, 34.7% ± 8% morbidly obese; P = .041). There was no difference in 2-year freedom from new access creation or survival. AV access maturity within 180 days differed between BMI groups (74.3% normal weight, 66% overweight, 65.7% obese, 46.6% morbidly obese; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, failure to mature within 180 days was associated with overweight (odds ratio [OR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-3.29; P = .002), obese (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.19-3.47; P = .009), and morbidly obese (OR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.85-7.3; P < .001) relative to normal weight BMI. AV access reintervention was associated with overweight (hazard ratio [HR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.34-2.5), obese (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.12-2.16), and morbidly obese (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.1-2.58; P = .02) relative to normal weight BMI. BMI was not independently associated with long-term readmission or survival. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is associated with higher rates of AV access failure to mature and reintervention. Surgeons performing access creation on obese patients must consider this for planning and setting expectations. Weight loss assistance may need to be incorporated into treatment algorithms.

Octogenarians and Nonoctogenarians Have Similar Outcomes after Upper Extremity Hemodialysis Access Creation.

BACKGROUND: Routine arteriovenous (AV) access creation in octogenarians is controversial. Our goal was to assess perioperative and long-term outcomes in octogenarians after undergoing upper extremity AV access to determine whether advanced age should influence AV access decision-making. METHODS: All AV access creations performed at a single institution from 2014-2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized as octogenarians and nonoctogenarians. Perioperative short-term outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Among 620 patients who underwent AV access creation, there were 40 octogenarians and 580 nonoctogenarians. Octogenarians were more likely to have private insurance, coronary artery disease, dementia, previous stroke, impaired ambulation, and less likely to be current smokers. There were no differences in outpatient status or tunneled dialysis catheter presence at creation. Access types were similar radiocephalic (12.5% vs. 14.3%), brachiocephalic (50% vs. 42.6%), brachiobasilic (12.5% vs. 26.2%), and grafts (25% vs. 13.8%). Univariable analysis demonstrated no differences in perioperative return to the operating room, hematoma, and patency loss. There were no differences in 90-day mortality (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0-2.5, P = 0.25), readmission (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.67-2.76, P = 0.39), maturation (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.46-2.01, P = 0.93), or reintervention (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.64-1.25, P = 0.53). Octogenarians had lower two-year survival (82.5% vs. 91.9%, P < 0.001), but there was no difference in reintervention-free survival (55% vs. 47%, P = 0.47) or occlusion-free survival (25% vs. 24%, P = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians and nonoctogenarians have similar outcomes after upper extremity dialysis access creation. Advanced age alone should not influence dialysis access creation.

A Rare Cause of Pain in a Patient Following Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy.

Introduction: Sump syndrome is a rare complication following bilioenteric anastomosis, most commonly following choledochoduodenostomy. This is only the third case in the literature of sump syndrome of the distal common bile duct (CBD) following end-to-side Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy (RYCJ). Case Presentation. A 69-year-old man with a history of end-to-side RYCJ for recurrent primary choledocholithiasis presented 3 years postoperatively with right upper quadrant (RUQ) abdominal pain affecting his quality of life. The work up revealed mild leukocytosis and computed tomography (CT) imaging that showed dilation of the distal CBD remnant. He underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with the removal of large amounts of debris with initial resolution of his pain, but the pain recurred after several months and after two further ERCPs with only short-term resolution of pain, he eventually underwent an open distal CBD excision and the pain has since resolved. Conclusions: This case report describes a rare case of sump syndrome following RYCJ that presented with abdominal pain alone. Sump syndrome may have a wide array of presenting symptoms, and the pathophysiology of sump syndrome varies based on bilioenteric reconstruction. Although it has rarely been reported to occur in the distal blind CBD remnant following either RYCJ or hepaticojejunostomy, it is important to consider this in the differential for patients with abdominal pain following any bilioenteric reconstruction.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patient Outcomes Following Restrictive Blood Transfusion Protocol.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of a restrictive blood product utilization protocol on blood product utilization and clinical outcomes. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed all adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients from January 2019 to December 2021. The restrictive protocol, implemented in March 2020, was defined as transfusion of blood products for a hemoglobin level less than 7, platelet levels less than 50, and/or fibrinogen levels less than 100. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the mode of ECMO received: venoarterial ECMO, venovenous ECMO, and ECMO support following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). SETTING: M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center. PATIENTS: The study included 507 patients. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred fifty-one patients (29.9%) were placed on venoarterial ECMO, 70 (13.8%) on venovenous ECMO, and 286 (56.4%) on ECPR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For patients on venoarterial ECMO (48 [71.6%] vs. 52 [63.4%]; p = 0.374), venovenous ECMO (23 [63.9%] vs. 15 [45.5%]; p = 0.195), and ECPR (54 [50.0%] vs. 69 [39.2%]; p = 0.097), there were no significant differences in survival on ECMO. The last recorded mean hemoglobin value was also significantly decreased for venoarterial ECMO (8.10 [7.80-8.50] vs. 7.50 [7.15-8.25]; p = 0.001) and ECPR (8.20 [7.90-8.60] vs. 7.55 [7.10-8.88]; p < 0.001) following implementation of the restrictive transfusion protocol. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a restrictive transfusion protocol is noninferior to ECMO patient survival. Additional, prospective randomized trials are required for further investigation of the safety of a restrictive transfusion protocol.