RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study evaluates tube-specific outcomes after primary placement of low-profile buttons (LPBs) compared with long gastrostomy tubes (LGTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All surgically placed gastrostomy tubes from 2015 to 2017 from a single institution were reviewed. Primary outcomes were tube dislodgement and tube-related readmissions within 30 d. Secondary outcomes were resource utilization and minor complications within 6 mo. RESULTS: 53% (n = 253) of patients received an LGT and 47% (n = 228) received an LPB. Groups were similar with regard to operative indication and approach, but LPB patients were slightly older (9 versus 6 mo, P = 0.02). Tube dislodgement occurred overall in 6% of patients, with 23% and 41% experiencing leakage and granulation tissue, respectively. LGT patients experienced higher rates of tube dislodgement (9% versus 3%, P = 0.006), but no difference in tube-related readmissions (P = 0.38). LGT patients were also more likely to visit the ER for a tube-related concern (43.9% versus 31.6%, P = 0.01) and report problems of leakage around the tube (27.7% versus 17.5%, P = 0.01). No difference was found for issues of peristomal granulation tissue or in tube-related readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Primary placement of low-profile gastrostomy buttons is safe and demonstrated superior tube-related outcomes compared with LGTs.