After scaling to body size hip strength of the residual limb exceeds that of the intact limb among unilateral lower limb prosthesis users.

BACKGROUND: Hip muscles play a prominent role in compensating for the loss of ankle and/or knee muscle function after lower limb amputation. Despite contributions to walking and balance, there is no consensus regarding hip strength deficits in lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users. Identifying patterns of hip muscle weakness in LLP users may increase the specificity of physical therapy interventions (i.e., which muscle group(s) to target), and expedite the search for modifiable factors associated with deficits in hip muscle function among LLP users. The purpose of this study was to test whether hip strength, estimated by maximum voluntary isometric peak torque, differed between the residual and intact limbs of LLP users, and age- and gender-matched controls. METHODS: Twenty-eight LLP users (14 transtibial, 14 transfemoral, 7 dysvascular, 13.5 years since amputation), and 28 age- and gender-matched controls participated in a cross-sectional study. Maximum voluntary isometric hip extension, flexion, abduction, and adduction torque were measured with a motorized dynamometer. Participants completed 15 five-second trials with 10-s rest between trials. Peak isometric hip torque was normalized to body mass × thigh length. A 2-way mixed-ANOVA with a between-subject factor of leg (intact, residual, control) and a within-subject factor of muscle group (extensors, flexors, abductors, adductors) tested for differences in strength among combinations of leg and muscle group (α = 0.05). Multiple comparisons were adjusted using Tukey's Honest-Difference. RESULTS: A significant 2-way interaction between leg and muscle group indicated normalized peak torque differed among combinations of muscle group and leg (p < 0.001). A significant simple main effect of leg (p = 0.001) indicated peak torque differed between two or more legs per muscle group. Post-hoc comparisons revealed hip extensor, flexor, and abductor peak torque was not significantly different between the residual and control legs (p ≥ 0.067) but torques in both legs were significantly greater than in the intact leg (p < 0.001). Peak hip abductor torque was significantly greater in the control and residual legs than the intact leg (p < 0.001), and significantly greater in the residual than control leg (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that it is the intact, rather than the residual limb, that is weaker. These findings may be due to methodological choices (e.g., normalization), or biomechanical demands placed on residual limb hip muscles. Further research is warranted to both confirm, expand upon, and elucidate possible mechanisms for the present findings; and clarify contributions of intact and residual limb hip muscles to walking and balance in LLP users. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: N/A.

Reorganization of motor modules for standing reactive balance recovery following pyridoxine-induced large-fiber peripheral sensory neuropathy in cats.

Task-level goals such as maintaining standing balance are achieved through coordinated muscle activity. Consistent and individualized groupings of synchronously activated muscles can be estimated from muscle recordings in terms of motor modules or muscle synergies, independent of their temporal activation. The structure of motor modules can change with motor training, neurological disorders, and rehabilitation, but the central and peripheral mechanisms underlying motor module structure remain unclear. To assess the role of peripheral somatosensory input on motor module structure, we evaluated changes in the structure of motor modules for reactive balance recovery following pyridoxine-induced large-fiber peripheral somatosensory neuropathy in previously collected data in four adult cats. Somatosensory fiber loss, quantified by postmortem histology, varied from mild to severe across cats. Reactive balance recovery was assessed using multidirectional translational support-surface perturbations over days to weeks throughout initial impairment and subsequent recovery of balance ability. Motor modules within each cat were quantified by non-negative matrix factorization and compared in structure over time. All cats exhibited changes in the structure of motor modules for reactive balance recovery after somatosensory loss, providing evidence that somatosensory inputs influence motor module structure. The impact of the somatosensory disturbance on the structure of motor modules in well-trained adult cats indicates that somatosensory mechanisms contribute to motor module structure, and therefore may contribute to some of the pathological changes in motor module structure in neurological disorders. These results further suggest that somatosensory nerves could be targeted during rehabilitation to influence pathological motor modules for rehabilitation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Stable motor modules for reactive balance recovery in well-trained adult cats were disrupted following pyridoxine-induced peripheral somatosensory neuropathy, suggesting somatosensory inputs contribute to motor module structure. Furthermore, the motor module structure continued to change as the animals regained the ability to maintain standing balance, but the modules generally did not recover pre-pyridoxine patterns. These results suggest changes in somatosensory input and subsequent learning may contribute to changes in motor module structure in pathological conditions.

Neuromuscular determinants of slip-induced falls and recoveries in older adults.

Is there a neuromuscular basis for falls? If so, it may provide new insight into falls and their assessment and treatment. We hypothesized that falls and recoveries from a laboratory-induced slip would be characterized by differences in multimuscle coordination patterns. Using muscle synergy analysis, we identified different multimuscle coordination patterns between older adults who fell and those who recovered from a laboratory-induced "feet-forward" slip. Participants who fell recruited fewer muscle synergies than participants who recovered. This suggests that a fall may result from recruitment of an inadequate number of muscle synergies to produce the necessary mechanical functions required to maintain balance. Participants who fell also recruited different muscle synergies, including one with high levels of coactivity consistent with a startle-like response. These differences in multimuscle coordination between slip outcomes were not accompanied by differences in slip difficulty or gait kinematics before or during the slip response. The differences in neuromuscular control may therefore reflect differences in sensorimotor control rather than kinematic constraints imposed by the slip, or the musculoskeletal system. Further research is required to test the robustness of these results and their interpretation with respect to additional mechanical variables (e.g., joint torques, ground reaction forces), responses to other fall types (e.g., trips), and within rather than between individuals. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Do falls and recoveries possess distinct neuromuscular features? We identified differences in neuromuscular control between older adults who fell and those who recovered from a "feet-forward" slip. Differences in neuromuscular control were not accompanied by differences in gait or slip kinematics before or during the slip response, suggesting differences in sensorimotor control rather than kinematics dictated the observed differences in neuromuscular control. An analysis of additional mechanical variables is required to confirm this interpretation.

Validation of the Narrowing Beam Walking Test in Lower Limb Prosthesis Users.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the content, construct, and discriminant validity of the Narrowing Beam Walking Test (NBWT), a performance-based balance test for lower limb prosthesis users. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratory and prosthetics clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Unilateral transtibial and transfemoral prosthesis users (N=40). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Content validity was examined by quantifying the percentage of participants receiving maximum or minimum scores (ie, ceiling and floor effects). Convergent construct validity was examined using correlations between participants' NBWT scores and scores or times on existing clinical balance tests regularly administered to lower limb prosthesis users. Known-groups construct validity was examined by comparing NBWT scores between groups of participants with different fall histories, amputation levels, amputation etiologies, and functional levels. Discriminant validity was evaluated by analyzing the area under each test's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: No minimum or maximum scores were recorded on the NBWT. NBWT scores demonstrated strong correlations (ρ=.70‒.85) with scores/times on performance-based balance tests (timed Up and Go test, Four Square Step Test, and Berg Balance Scale) and a moderate correlation (ρ=.49) with the self-report Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale. NBWT performance was significantly lower among participants with a history of falls (P=.003), transfemoral amputation (P=.011), and a lower mobility level (P<.001). The NBWT also had the largest area under the ROC curve (.81) and was the only test to exhibit an area that was statistically significantly >.50 (ie, chance). CONCLUSIONS: The results provide strong evidence of content, construct, and discriminant validity for the NBWT as a performance-based test of balance ability. The evidence supports its use to assess balance impairments and fall risk in unilateral transtibial and transfemoral prosthesis users.

A study to assess whether fixed-width beam walking provides sufficient challenge to assess balance ability across lower limb prosthesis users.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of fixed-width beam walking for assessing balance in lower limb prosthesis users. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Laboratory. SUBJECTS: Lower limb prosthesis users. METHODS: Participants attempted 10 walking trials on three fixed-width beams (18.6, 8.60, and 4.01 wide; 5.5 m long; 3.8 cm high). MAIN MEASURES: Beam-walking performance was quantified using the distance walked to balance failure. Heuristic rules applied to each participant's beam-walking distance to classify each beam as "too easy," "too hard," or "appropriately challenging" and determine whether any single beam provided an appropriate challenge to all participants. The number of trials needed to achieve stable beam-walking performance was quantified for appropriately challenging beams by identifying the last inflection point in the slope of each participant's trial-by-trial cumulative performance record. RESULTS: In all, 30 unilateral lower limb prosthesis users participated in the study. Each of the fixed-width beams was either too easy or too hard for at least 33% of the sample. Thus, no single beam was appropriately challenging for all participants. Beam-walking performance was stable by trial 8 for all participants and by trial 6 for 90% of participants. There was no significant difference in the number of trials needed to achieve stable performance among beams ( P = 0.74). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that a clinical beam-walking test would require multiple beams to evaluate balance across a range of lower limb prosthesis users, emphasizing the need for adaptive or progressively challenging balance tests. While the administrative burden of a multiple-beam balance test may limit clinical feasibility, alternatives to ease this administrative burden are proposed.

Neuromuscular responses differ between slip-induced falls and recoveries in older adults.

How does the robust control of walking and balance break down during a fall? Here, as a first step in identifying the neuromuscular determinants of falls, we tested the hypothesis that falls and recoveries are characterized by differences in neuromuscular responses. Using muscle synergy analysis, conventional onset latencies, and peak activity, we identified differences in muscle coordination between older adults who fell and those who recovered from a laboratory-induced slip. We found that subjects who fell recruited fewer muscle synergies than those who recovered, suggesting a smaller motor repertoire. During slip trials, compared with subjects who recovered, subjects who fell had delayed knee flexor and extensor onset times in the leading/slip leg, as well as different muscle synergy structure involving those muscles. Therefore, the ability to coordinate muscle activity around the knee in a timely manner may be critical to avoiding falls from slips. Unique to subjects who fell during slip trials were greater bilateral (interlimb) muscle activation and the recruitment of a muscle synergy with excessive coactivation. These differences in muscle coordination between subjects who fell and those who recovered could not be explained by differences in gait-related variables at slip onset (i.e., initial motion state) or variations in slip difficulty, suggesting that differences in muscle coordination may reflect differences in neural control of movement rather than biomechanical constraints imposed by perturbation or initial walking mechanics. These results are the first step in determining the causation of falls from the perspective of muscle coordination. They suggest that there may be a neuromuscular basis for falls that could provide new insights into treatment and prevention. Further research comparing the muscle coordination and mechanics of falls and recoveries within subjects is necessary to establish the neuromuscular causation of falls. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: A central question relevant to the prevention of falls is: How does the robust control of walking and balance break down during a fall? Previous work has focused on muscle coordination during successful balance recoveries or the kinematics and kinetics of falls. Here, for the first time, we identified differences in the spatial and temporal coordination of muscles among older adults who fell and those who recovered from an unexpected slip.

Increased neuromuscular consistency in gait and balance after partnered, dance-based rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease.

Here we examined changes in muscle coordination associated with improved motor performance after partnered, dance-based rehabilitation in individuals with mild to moderate idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Using motor module (a.k.a. muscle synergy) analysis, we identified changes in the modular control of overground walking and standing reactive balance that accompanied clinically meaningful improvements in behavioral measures of balance, gait, and disease symptoms after 3 wk of daily Adapted Tango classes. In contrast to previous studies that revealed a positive association between motor module number and motor performance, none of the six participants in this pilot study increased motor module number despite improvements in behavioral measures of balance and gait performance. Instead, motor modules were more consistently recruited and distinctly organized immediately after rehabilitation, suggesting more reliable motor output. Furthermore, the pool of motor modules shared between walking and reactive balance increased after rehabilitation, suggesting greater generalizability of motor module function across tasks. Our work is the first to show that motor module distinctness, consistency, and generalizability are more sensitive to improvements in gait and balance function after short-term rehabilitation than motor module number. Moreover, as similar differences in motor module distinctness, consistency, and generalizability have been demonstrated previously in healthy young adults with and without long-term motor training, our work suggests commonalities in the structure of muscle coordination associated with differences in motor performance across the spectrum from motor impairment to expertise.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate changes in neuromuscular control of gait and balance in individuals with Parkinson's disease after short-term, dance-based rehabilitation. Our work is the first to show that motor module distinctness, consistency, and generalizability across gait and balance are more sensitive than motor module number to improvements in motor performance following short-term rehabilitation. Our results indicate commonalities in muscle coordination improvements associated with motor skill reacquisition due to rehabilitation and motor skill acquisition in healthy individuals.

Small forces that differ with prior motor experience can communicate movement goals during human-human physical interaction.

BACKGROUND: Physical interactions between two people are ubiquitous in our daily lives, and an integral part of many forms of rehabilitation. However, few studies have investigated forces arising from physical interactions between humans during a cooperative motor task, particularly during overground movements. As such, the direction and magnitude of interaction forces between two human partners, how those forces are used to communicate movement goals, and whether they change with motor experience remains unknown. A better understanding of how cooperative physical interactions are achieved in healthy individuals of different skill levels is a first step toward understanding principles of physical interactions that could be applied to robotic devices for motor assistance and rehabilitation. METHODS: Interaction forces between expert and novice partner dancers were recorded while performing a forward-backward partnered stepping task with assigned "leader" and "follower" roles. Their position was recorded using motion capture. The magnitude and direction of the interaction forces were analyzed and compared across groups (i.e. expert-expert, expert-novice, and novice-novice) and across movement phases (i.e. forward, backward, change of direction). RESULTS: All dyads were able to perform the partnered stepping task with some level of proficiency. Relatively small interaction forces (10-30N) were observed across all dyads, but were significantly larger among expert-expert dyads. Interaction forces were also found to be significantly different across movement phases. However, interaction force magnitude did not change as whole-body synchronization between partners improved across trials. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively small interaction forces may communicate movement goals (i.e. "what to do and when to do it") between human partners during cooperative physical interactions. Moreover, these small interactions forces vary with prior motor experience, and may act primarily as guiding cues that convey information about movement goals rather than providing physical assistance. This suggests that robots may be able to provide meaningful physical interactions for rehabilitation using relatively small force levels.

Long-term training modifies the modular structure and organization of walking balance control.

How does long-term training affect the neural control of movements? Here we tested the hypothesis that long-term training leading to skilled motor performance alters muscle coordination during challenging, as well as nominal everyday motor behaviors. Using motor module (a.k.a., muscle synergy) analyses, we identified differences in muscle coordination patterns between professionally trained ballet dancers (experts) and untrained novices that accompanied differences in walking balance proficiency assessed using a challenging beam-walking test. During beam walking, we found that experts recruited more motor modules than novices, suggesting an increase in motor repertoire size. Motor modules in experts had less muscle coactivity and were more consistent than in novices, reflecting greater efficiency in muscle output. Moreover, the pool of motor modules shared between beam and overground walking was larger in experts compared with novices, suggesting greater generalization of motor module function across multiple behaviors. These differences in motor output between experts and novices could not be explained by differences in kinematics, suggesting that they likely reflect differences in the neural control of movement following years of training rather than biomechanical constraints imposed by the activity or musculoskeletal structure and function. Our results suggest that to learn challenging new behaviors, we may take advantage of existing motor modules used for related behaviors and sculpt them to meet the demands of a new behavior.

Perspectives on human-human sensorimotor interactions for the design of rehabilitation robots.

Physical interactions between patients and therapists during rehabilitation have served as motivation for the design of rehabilitation robots, yet we lack a fundamental understanding of the principles governing such human-human interactions (HHI). Here we review the literature and pose important open questions regarding sensorimotor interaction during HHI that could facilitate the design of human-robot interactions (HRI) and haptic interfaces for rehabilitation. Based on the goals of physical rehabilitation, three subcategories of sensorimotor interaction are identified: sensorimotor collaboration, sensorimotor assistance, and sensorimotor education. Prior research has focused primarily on sensorimotor collaboration and is generally limited to relatively constrained visuomotor tasks. Moreover, the mechanisms by which performance improvements are achieved during sensorimotor cooperation with haptic interaction remains unknown. We propose that the effects of role assignment, motor redundancy, and skill level in sensorimotor cooperation should be explicitly studied. Additionally, the importance of haptic interactions may be better revealed in tasks that do not require visual feedback. Finally, cooperative motor tasks that allow for motor improvement during solo performance to be examined may be particularly relevant for rehabilitation robotics. Identifying principles that guide human-human sensorimotor interactions may lead to the development of robots that can physically interact with humans in more intuitive and biologically inspired ways, thereby enhancing rehabilitation outcomes.

Falls perceived as significant by lower limb prosthesis users are generally associated with fall consequences rather than circumstances.

PURPOSE: To determine if falls perceived as significant by lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users were associated with fall circumstances and/or consequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The circumstances and consequences of LLP users' most significant fall in the past 12-months were collected using the Lower Limb Prosthesis User Fall Event Survey. Participants rated fall significance from 0 (not significant) to 10 (extremely significant), which was then dichotomized into "low" and "high". Binary logistic regression was used to assess associations between fall significance and fall circumstances and consequences. RESULTS: Ninety-eight participants were included in the analysis. Five fall consequences were associated with greater significance: major injury (OR = 26.7, 95% CI: 1.6-459.6, p = 0.024), need to seek medical treatment (OR = 19.0, 95% CI: 1.1-329.8, p = 0.043), or allied-health treatment (OR = 18.2, 95% CI: 2.3-142.4, p = 0.006), decreased balance confidence (OR = 10.9, 95% CI: 2.4-49.3, p = 0.002), and increased fear of falling (OR = 7.5, 95% CI: 2.4-23.8, p = 0.001), compared to two fall circumstances: impact to the arm (OR = 5.0, 95% CI: 2.0-12.1, p = 0.001), and impact to the face, head, or neck (OR = 9.7, 95% CI: 1.2-77.4, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Significant falls were generally more associated with fall consequence than fall circumstances.

Falls remain common, injurious, costly, and socially isolating events for lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users.Falls perceived as most significant by LLP users were associated with injury, reduced balance confidence, and increased fear-of-falling.Studying falls perceived by LLP users as significant may help reduce falls that matter most to LLP users.

The number of falls recalled in the past year and balance confidence predict the frequency of injurious falls by unilateral lower limb prosthesis users.

INTRODUCTION: Several personal characteristics have been associated with an increased risk of injurious falls by lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users. To date, however, none have been used to effectively predict the occurrence of injurious falls. OBJECTIVE: To develop a model that could predict the number of injurious falls over the next 6 months and identify fall-related circumstances that may increase the odds of a fall being injurious in unilateral LLP users. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of a prospective observational study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty unilateral LLP users with a transtibial or transfemoral amputation. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants' characteristics were recorded at baseline. Falls and their circumstances and consequences were collected prospectively over 6 months via monthly telephone calls. Multivariate negative binomial regression was used to predict the number of injurious falls over the next 6 months in LLP users. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were derived to determine the risk of an injurious fall. Bivariate logistic regression was used to identify the associations between injurious falls and fall-related circumstances. Odds ratios (ORs) were derived to characterize the odds that a fall would be injurious. RESULTS: The final multivariate model, which included the number of falls recalled in the past year (IRR = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.71, p = .045) and balance confidence (p = .120), predicted the number of injurious falls in the next 6 months (χ2 (2) = 8.15, p = .017). Two fall-related circumstances were found to increase the odds that a fall would be injurious, fatigue due to activity (OR = 13.5, 95% CI: 3.50-52.3, p  = .001), and tiredness from a lack of sleep (OR = 5.36, 95% CI: 1.22-23.6, p = .026). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the number of falls recalled in the past year and balance confidence scores predict the number of injurious falls an LLP user will experience in the next 6 months.

Age, Cognitive Task, and Arm Position Differently Affect Muscle Synergy Recruitment but have Similar Effects on Walking Balance.

Age modifies walking balance and neuromuscular control. Cognitive and postural constraints can increase walking balance difficulty and magnify age-related differences. However, how such challenges affect neuromuscular control remains unknown. We determined the effects of age, cognitive task, and arm position on neuromuscular control of walking balance. Young (YA) and older adults (OA) walked on a 6-cm wide beam with and without arm crossing and a cognitive task. Walking balance was quantified by the distance walked on the beam. We also computed step speed, margin of stability, and cognitive errors. Neuromuscular control was determined through muscle synergies extracted from 13 right leg and trunk muscles. We analyzed neuromuscular complexity by the number of synergies and the variance accounted for by the first synergy, coactivity by the number of significantly active muscles in each synergy, and efficiency by the sum of the activation of each significantly active muscle in each synergy. OA vs. YA walked a 14% shorter distance, made 12 times more cognitive errors, and showed less complex and efficient neuromuscular control. Cognitive task reduced walking balance mainly in OA. Decreases in step speed and margin of stability, along with increased muscle synergy coactivity and reduced efficiency were observed in both age groups. Arm-crossing also reduced walking balance mostly in OA, but step speed decreased mainly in YA, in whom the margin of stability increased. Arm-crossing reduced the complexity of synergies. Age, cognitive task, and arm position affect differently muscle synergy recruitment but have similar effects on walking balance.

Normalization alters the interpretation of hip strength in established unilateral lower limb prosthesis users.

BACKGROUND: Valid comparisons of muscle strength between individuals or legs that differ in size requires normalization, often by simple anthropometric variables. Few studies of muscle strength in lower-limb prosthesis users have normalized strength data by any anthropometric variable, potentially confounding our understanding of strength deficits in lower-limb prosthesis users. The objective of this pilot study was to determine the need for as well as effectiveness and impact of normalizing hip strength in lower-limb prosthesis users. METHODS: Peak isometric hip extension and abduction torques were collected from 28 lower-limb prosthesis users. Allometric scaling was used to determine if hip torque values were significantly associated with, and therefore needed to be adjusted for, body mass, thigh length, or body mass x thigh length, and whether normalization was effective in reducing any associations. Between limb differences in peak hip torque, and correlations with balance ability, were inspected pre- and post-normalization. FINDINGS: Hip torques were consistently and significantly associated with body-mass x thigh length. Associations between peak hip torque and body-mass x thigh length were reduced by normalization. After normalization by body-mass x thigh length, between limb differences in hip extension torque, as well as the correlation between hip abduction torque and balance ability, changed from non-significant to significant. INTERPRETATION: In the absence of normalization, hip strength (i.e., peak torque) in lower-limb prosthesis users remains dependent on basic anthropometric variables, masking relationships between hip strength and balance ability, as well as between limb differences.

Performance-based balance tests, combined with the number of falls recalled in the past year, predicts the incidence of future falls in established unilateral transtibial prosthesis users.

BACKGROUND: Falls are common and consequential events for lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users. Currently, there are no models based on prospective falls data that clinicians can use to predict the incidence of future falls in LLP users. Assessing who is at risk for falls, and thus most likely to need and benefit from intervention, remains a challenge. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether select performance-based balance tests predict future falls in established, unilateral transtibial prosthesis users (TTPU). DESIGN: Multisite prospective observational study. SETTING: Research laboratory and prosthetics clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five established, unilateral TTPU. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of falls reported over a prospective 6-month period. Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) and Four-Square Step Test (FSST) times, as well as Narrowing Beam Walking Test scores were recorded at baseline, along with the number of falls recalled over the past 12 months and additional potential fall-risk factors. RESULTS: The final negative binomial regression model, which included TUG (P = .044) and FSST (P = .159) times, as well as the number of recalled falls (P = .009), was significantly better than a null model at predicting the number of falls over the next 6 months (X2 [3] = 11.6, P = .009) and fit the observed fall count data (X2 [41] = 36.12, P = .20). The final model provided a significant improvement in fit to the prospective fall count data over a model with fall recall alone X2 (1) = 4.342, P < .05. CONCLUSION: No combination of performance-based balance tests alone predicted the incidence of future falls in our sample of established, unilateral TTPU. Rather, a combination of the number of falls recalled over the past 12 months, along with TUG and FSST times, but not NBWT scores, was required to predict the number of "all-cause" falls over the next 6 months. The resulting predictive model may serve as a suitable method for clinicians to predict the incidence of falls in established, unilateral TTPU.

Recalled Number of Falls in the Past Year-Combined With Perceived Mobility-Predicts the Incidence of Future Falls in Unilateral Lower Limb Prosthesis Users.

OBJECTIVE: Falls are a frequent and costly concern for lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users. At present, there are no models that clinicians can use to predict the incidence of future falls in LLP users. Assessing who is at risk for falls, therefore, remains a challenge. The purpose of this study was to test whether easily accessible clinical attributes and measurements predict the incidence of future falls in LLP users. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, a secondary analysis of data from 60 LLP users was conducted. LLP users reported the number of falls that they recalled over the past year before prospectively reporting falls over a 6-month observation period via monthly telephone calls. Additional candidate predictor variables were recorded at baseline. Negative binomial regression was used to develop a model intended to predict the incidence of future falls. RESULTS: The final model, which included the number of recalled falls (incidence rate ratio = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.28) and Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility T-scores (incidence rate ratio = 0.949; 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.01), was significantly better than a null model at predicting the number of falls over the next 6 months (χ22 = 9.76) and fit the observed prospective fall count data (χ256 = 54.78). CONCLUSION: The number of recalled falls and Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility T-scores predicted the incidence of falls over the next 6 months in established, unilateral LLP users. The success and simplicity of the final model suggests that it may serve as a screening tool for clinicians to use for assessing risk of falls. Additional research to validate the proposed model in an independent sample of LLP users is needed. IMPACT: Owing to its simplicity, the final model may serve as a suitable screening measure for clinicians to ascertain an initial evaluation of fall risk in established unilateral LLP users. Analyzing falls data as counts rather than as a categorical variable may be an important methodological consideration for falls prevention research.

A survey for characterizing details of fall events experienced by lower limb prosthesis users.

Despite their importance to fall prevention research, little is known about the details of real-world fall events experienced by lower limb prosthesis users. This gap can be attributed to the lack of a structured, population-specific fall survey to document these adverse health events. The objective of this project was to develop a survey capable of characterizing the circumstances and consequences of fall events in lower limb prosthesis users. Best practices in survey development, including focus groups and cognitive interviews with diverse samples of lower limb prosthesis users, were used to solicit input and feedback from target respondents, so survey content would be meaningful, clear, and applicable to lower limb prosthesis users. Focus group data were used to develop fall event definitions and construct a conceptual fall framework that guided the creation of potential survey questions and response options. Survey questions focused on the activity, surroundings, situation, mechanics, and consequences of fall events. Cognitive interviews revealed that with minor revisions, survey definitions, questions, and response options were clear, comprehensive, and applicable to the experiences of lower limb prosthesis users. Administration of the fall survey to a national sample of 235 lower limb prosthesis users in a cross-sectional preliminary validation study, found survey questions to function as intended. Revisions to the survey were made at each stage of development based on analysis of participant feedback and data. The structured, 37-question lower limb prosthesis user fall event survey developed in this study offers clinicians and researchers the means to document, monitor, and compare fall details that are meaningful and relevant to lower limb prosthesis users in a standardized and consistent manner. Data that can be collected with the developed survey are essential to establishing specific goals for fall prevention initiatives in lower limb prosthesis users.

Fall-related events in people who are lower limb prosthesis users: the lived experience.

PURPOSE: To explore lived experiences, and identify common themes as well as vocabulary associated with fall-related events in lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five focus groups of LLP users from across the United States were conducted remotely via video or tele-conferencing. Focus group transcripts were coded and analyzed using methods adapted from a grounded theory approach to identify themes. RESULTS: Focus group participants (n = 25) described experiences associated with fall-related events that resulted in the identification of six themes: (1) memories of fall-related events are shaped by time and context, (2) location and ground conditions influence whether falls occur, (3) some activities come with more risk, (4) fall-related situations are multi-faceted, and often involve the prosthesis, (5) how LLP users land, but not the way they go down, tends to vary, and (6) not all falls affect LLP users, but some near-falls do. CONCLUSION: Consideration for where LLP users fall, what they are doing when they fall, how they fall, what occurs as a result of a fall, and how well memory of a fall persists may enhance recording and reporting of falls, contribute to development of improved fall risk assessment tools, and inspire the design and function of prosthetic componentry for patient safety.Implications for rehabilitationFalls are a common problem in lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users that can lead to adverse health outcomes.Concerns over near falls, not just falls, may merit greater attention from rehabilitation professionals.Elements of the lived experience that appear unique to LLP users include the role of prosthetic fit, function, and comfort in losing and/or recovering balance; as well as the tendency of LLP users to modify rather than stop or avoid activities associated with falls.

Beam width and arm position but not cognitive task affect walking balance in older adults.

Detection of changes in dynamic balance could help identify older adults at fall risk. Walking on a narrow beam with its width, cognitive load, and arm position manipulated could be an alternative to current tests. Therefore, we examined additive and interactive effects of beam width, cognitive task (CT), and arm position on dynamic balance during beam walking in older adults. Twenty older adults (69 ± 4y) walked on 6, 8, and 10-cm wide beams (2-cm high, 4-m-long), with and without CT, with three arm positions (free, crossed, akimbo). We determined cognitive errors, distance walked, step speed, root mean square (RMS) of center of mass (COM) displacement and trunk acceleration in the frontal plane. Beam width decrease progressively reduced distance walked and increased trunk acceleration RMS. Step speed decreased on the narrowest beam and with CT. Arm crossing decreased distance walked and step speed. COM displacement RMS and cognitive errors were not affected by any manipulation. In conclusion, distance walked indicated that beam width and arm position, but less so CT, affected dynamic balance, implying that beam walking has the potential to become a test of fall risk. Stability measurements suggested effective trunk adjustments to control COM position and keep dynamic balance during the task.

Direction of attentional focus in prosthetic training: Current practice and potential for improving motor learning in individuals with lower limb loss.

OBJECTIVE: Adopting an external focus of attention has been shown to benefit motor performance and learning. However, the potential of optimizing attentional focus for improving prosthetic motor skills in lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users has not been examined. In this study, we investigated the frequency and direction of attentional focus embedded in the verbal instructions in a clinical prosthetic training setting. METHODS: Twenty-one adult LLP users (8 female, 13 male; 85% at K3 level; mean age = 50.5) were recruited from prosthetic clinics in the Southern Nevada region. Verbal interactions between LLP users and their prosthetists (mean experience = 10 years, range = 4-21 years) during prosthetic training were recorded. Recordings were analyzed to categorize the direction of attentional focus embedded in the instructional and feedback statements as internal, external, mixed, or unfocused. We also explored whether LLP users' age, time since amputation, and perceived mobility were associated with the proportion of attentional focus statements they received. RESULTS: We recorded a total of 20 training sessions, yielding 904 statements of instruction from 338 minutes of training. Overall, one verbal interaction occurred every 22.1 seconds. Among the statements, 64% were internal, 9% external, 3% mixed, and 25% unfocused. Regression analysis revealed that female, older, and higher functioning LLP users were significantly more likely to receive internally-focused instructions (p = 0.006, 0.035, and 0.024, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that verbal instructions and feedback are frequently provided to LLP users during prosthetic training. Most verbal interactions are focused internally on the LLP users' body movements and not externally on the movement effects. IMPACT STATEMENT: While more research is needed to explore how motor learning principles may be applied to improve LLP user outcomes, clinicians should consider adopting the best available scientific evidence during treatment. Overreliance on internally-focused instructions as observed in the current study may hinder prosthetic skill learning.