Impact of Blood Sampling Methods on Blood Loss and Transfusion After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: An Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess the impact of the closed-loop sampling method on blood loss and the need for blood transfusion in pediatric patients following cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: A single tertiary center. PARTICIPANTS: All pediatric patients younger than 4 years old who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) after cardiac surgery were enrolled. The study included 100 pediatric patients in the conservative (postimplementation) group and 43 pediatric patients in the nonconservative group (preimplementation). INTERVENTIONS: Observational. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the volume of blood loss during the PICU follow-up period. The secondary outcomes were the requirement for blood transfusion in each group, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay, and mortality. MAIN RESULTS: In the conservative (postimplementation) group, blood loss during the follow-up period was 0.67 (0.33-1.16) mL/kg/d, while it was 0.95 (0.50-2.30) mL/kg/d in the nonconservative (preimplementation) group, demonstrating a significant reduction in blood loss in the conservative group (p = 0.012). The groups showed no significant differences in terms of the required blood transfusion volume postoperatively during the first 24 hours, first 48 hours, or after 48 hours (p = 0.061, 0.536, 0.442, respectively). The frequency of blood transfusion was comparable between the groups during the first 24 hours, first 48 hours, or after 48 hours postoperatively (p = 0.277, 0.639, 0.075, respectively). In addition, the groups did not show significant differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The closed-loop sampling method can be efficient in decreasing blood loss during postoperative PICU follow-up for pediatric patients after cardiac surgeries. However, its application did not reduce the frequency or the volume of blood transfusion in these patients.

Evaluation of the virtual learning environment by school students and their parents in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic after school closure.

BACKGROUND: Very few previous studies have involved school students or their parents in the evaluation of virtual learning environment (VLE). Thus, this survey was performed to evaluate the satisfaction of both school students and their parents with the VLE in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was distributed online for VLE evaluation. The questionnaire was based on previous studies and expert opinions from validated instruments for assessing distance education, integrative and literature reviews of VLE environment. A median value >3 indicated participant satisfaction in each of the 5 domains of the questionnaire as well as overall VLE satisfaction. The used questionnaire was checked after its implementation by all possible statistical means and it was found to be of acceptable validity and reliability. RESULTS: Six hundred and ninety-three participants including 571 Saudi citizens and 122 non-Saudi residents participated in this survey. The number of school students who agreed or strongly agreed were significantly lower than the number of students who disagreed or strongly disagreed with preferring the VLE over traditional education (p<0.001). The participants evaluated the VLE experience as unsatisfactory with a median value ≤3 for 4 out of 5 questionnaire domains with an overall satisfaction value of 2.8. Among the 117 participants who gave further written opinions/comments, 42(35.9%) participants supported the VLE as an alternative to traditional classrooms, if equipment and internet are made available and for the safety of their children. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of few available adequate population-based studies for exploring the VLE satisfaction of both Saudi citizens and non-Saudi residents school students and their parents. This study showed the participants' unsatisfactory VLE experience. The VLE is accepted as an alternative to traditional classrooms to keep up with learning and to maintain the safety of children and it can be a supplementary learning method but many measures are still needed to develop the VLE.

The Outcome of Pediatric Esophageal Strictures Managed with Endoscopic Balloon Dilation in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Esophageal strictures can affect nutrition of infants and children impairing their weight gain. To our knowledge, this is the first article evaluating and comparing between the two methods of dilation in terms of outcome and one of few, if any, to assess both weight and height to evaluate the nutritional outcomes following dilation. To determine the safety, efficacy, and long-term effects of endoscopic dilation in managing pediatric esophageal strictures by assessing the clinical and nutritional outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study of 137 patients with esophageal strictures who underwent either endoscopic balloon dilatation or Savary dilatation, or both. Outcome parameters measured include the number of dilatations, nutritional status, and if symptoms had been relieved. Results: The most frequent cause of esophageal strictures was post-tracheoesophageal fistula repair (n = 51, 37.2%), and the majority were lower third strictures (n = 47, 34.3%). However, 8 cases (5.8%) had failed the dilation procedure. Savary dilatation had the highest number of complications. Overall, success rate was 79.6%. Higher success rate was for cases dilated by endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) (n = 47, 90.4%). There was a statistically significant correlation between the success rate and the method of dilatation (P = .042). Statistically significant increment of weight was recorded for lower strictures (P = .001). Conclusion: EBD was associated with the highest success rate. Endoscopic dilatations are safe and efficient in managing pediatric esophageal strictures with improvement in both clinical and nutritional outcomes.

Risk factors and predictors of uncontrolled hyperglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Jeddah, western Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about levels of glycemic control and risk factors for uncontrolled hyperglycemia in Saudi children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The aim of the present study was to identify levels of glycemic control, risk factors and predictors of uncontrolled hyperglycemia (HG) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in children with T1DM. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on Saudi children and adolescents with confirmed T1DM who were followed at the Pediatric Endocrinology Clinic of the Maternity and Children Hospital, Jeddah, from 2000 to 2014. Data collection included all possible factors that may be associated with uncontrolled T1DM. Patients were classified according to American Diabetes Association guidelines for target HbA1c levels per age group. Comparisons were made between well-controlled (WC) patients, HG patients, and DKA patients. Calculation of odds ratios and logistic regression allowed for estimation of the role of each risk factor in uncontrolled T1DM. RESULTS: Only 31.2 % of children and adolescents with T1DM were well controlled. Better glycemic control was associated with age < 6 years, urban residence, and T1DM duration <5 years. Glycemic control was not affected by gender, insulin therapy, or comorbidities. The most significant independent predictors of hyperglycemia and DKA were poor compliance with a healthy lifestyle (adjusted hazards ratio [AHR] 28.94; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 8.37-100.04) and an excess intake of sweets (AHR 3.31; 95 % CI 1.54-7.11). CONCLUSION: The most significant independent predictor for poor glycemic control (particularly DKA rather than hyperglycemia) in Saudi children and adolescents was poor compliance with a healthy lifestyle with an excessive intake of sweets.

Is rotavirus still a major cause for diarrheal illness in hospitalized pediatric patients after rotavirus vaccine introduction in the Saudi national immunization program?

Previous studies in Jeddah, western Saudi Arabia, showed rotavirus (RV) prevalence around 40% in pediatric inpatients with gastroenteritis (GE) with a maximum level during cooler months. Currently, there are no data on impact of rotavirus vaccine (RVV) on RV-GE in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess impact of RVV on incidence and severity of RV-GE in hospitalized pediatric patients; 3 years after introduction of RVV in Saudi immunization program (SIP) in January, 2013.This cross-sectional observational study included GE cases under 5 years of age admitted to 2 tertiary hospitals, in Jeddah, from October to December, 2015. All included GE-cases had RV antigen detection in stool by immunochromatographic assay, complete data collection including RVV status and severity assessment (Vesikari score) in initial admission.During study period, a total of 359 GE cases in children under 5 years of age were hospitalized with 14 (3.9%) RV-GE confirmed cases. Mean age of RV-GE patients was 13.10 ±â€Š5.70 months. All RV cases had severe GE and 1 case received RVV. Among other 345 GE cases, 35.7% did not receive RVV and 46.1% had severe GE. Severe GE (Vesikari score > 11) was more significantly identified among RV-GE cases than in other all-cause GE (P < .001). During same period of this study in 2012, 369 RV-GE out of 1193 total GE cases (31%) were hospitalized at 2 hospitals, so, number of hospitalized pediatric patients for all-cause and RV-GE in children under 5 years of age decreased significantly in 2015 RV season (compared to 2015 RV season, odds ratio for RV-GE in 2012: 11.04, 95% CI: 6.38-19.09).Logistic regression analysis of variables of this cross-sectional, hospital-based study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 3 years after introduction of RVV in SIP, showed that among the studied variables, RVV was associated with remarkable reduction of hazard of all-cause and RV-GE in vaccinated and even in unvaccinated children under 5 years of age possibly by RVV herd effect. However, RV was still associated with severe GE-related hospitalizations in unvaccinated children against RV who were younger than 2 years and particularly in the 1st year of life, indicating need for more optimum rate of RVV coverage. Hopefully, further improvement in RVV coverage rate may make RV-GE a disease of the past in Saudi children.