Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 59
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Turk J Med Sci ; 51(3): 912-920, 2021 06 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33237663

RESUMO

Background/aim: The aim of this descriptive article is to share the experience in Ege University, Turkey with favipiravir in the treatment of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Materials and methods: This retrospective descriptive study included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who presented with or developed severe pneumonia. Results: Forty patients who completed a full course (at least 5 days) of favipiravir were included in the study. At baseline, 30 (75%) patients required treatment for respiratory distress. Thirty-three patients (82.5%) were discharged from the hospital with full recovery, 6 patients (15%) died and 1 case (2.5%) was still at the intensive care unit (ICU) when this paper was written. Conclusion: This study provides relevant information for the treatment of COVID-19, suggesting that favipiravir was associated with significant clinical and laboratory improvements in the majority of the patients, is a safe drug with no serious side effects and would merit further investigation.


Assuntos
Amidas/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias , Pirazinas/uso terapêutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Idoso , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Turquia/epidemiologia
2.
Turk J Med Sci ; 2021 Aug 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34344140

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: Effective therapeutic approaches for SARS-CoV-2 pandemic are urgently needed. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) alone or in combination with azithromycin has been used in several countries, without any clear evidence. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of hydroxychloroquine as compared to hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin combination in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated all patients admitted to two university hospitals between 18 March and 20 May 2020 with the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. Out of 496 patients, 370 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were time to recovery, presence of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI), the requirement for oxygen therapy, and/or mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients received hydroxychloroquine and 148 were treated with HCQ and azithromycin combination. The in-hospital mortality rates were similar in the two groups (10.8% vs. 6.8%, respectively, p=0.186). Additionally, the needs for oxygen therapy, invasive mechanic ventilation (IMV) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were not different. The rate of the requirement of non-invasive mechanic ventilation (NIV) was higher in patients receiving HCQ plus azithromycin (10.1% vs. 4.5%, p=0.035). Time to recovery was 3.5 days in HCQ and 5.0 days in HCQ plus azithromycin group (p<0.001). The median length of hospital stay was longer in patients with the combination therapy (7.0 vs. 5.5 days, p<0.001). Amongst all patients, only 3 patients developed electrocardiographic changes needing discontinuation of therapy. LIMITATIONS: Observational design of the study is the main limitation. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that adding azithromycin to HCQ is not associated with any improvement in clinical outcome and mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and supports the current knowledge not to include azithromycin in the initial treatment of COVID-19.

3.
Tuberk Toraks ; 68(3): 305-320, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33295729

RESUMO

Pneumococcal infections are an important cause of mortality and morbidity in Chronic Lung Diseases. However, exacerbations, which make the treatment of diseases very difficult, and corticosteroids used during treatment carry a great risk of pneumococcal infection and adversely affect the treatment. The most rational way to reduce the negative impact of pneumococcal infections on the clinical and economic burden of Chronic Lung Diseases is vaccination of the risky population. Although, vaccination recommendations are well defined, recommended by national and international guidelines and are paid by health authorities, in Turkey, vaccination rates in adults with chronic lung disease is far below the expected. Since physicians are considered to be the most important and reliable resource that can guide their patients in vaccination, applying pneumococcal vaccination routinely in all patients with chronic lung diagnosis and making it a part of daily practice will greatly contribute to reducing the clinical and economic burden of pneumococcal infections in these patients. In this review, the effects of pneumococcal diseases on chronic lung diseases, the risk and clinical burden of pneumococcal diseases in chronic lung diseases are discussed in the light of guidelines and current literature, and the importance of protection from pneumonia in these patients is emphasized. In addition to general information and efficacy data about pneumococcal vaccines available in our country, application methods and access routes to vaccines are also described.


Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/uso terapêutico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/normas , Médicos de Atenção Primária/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Turquia
4.
Turk J Med Sci ; 48(4): 730-736, 2018 Aug 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30119147

RESUMO

Background/aim: The optimal empiric antibiotic regimen for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical cure rate, mortality, and length of stay among patients hospitalized with community- acquired pneumonia in nonintensive care unit (ICU) wards and treated with a ß-lactam, ß-lactam and macrolide combination, or a fluoroquinolone. Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study was performed using standardized web-based database sheets from January 2009 to September 2013 in nine tertiary care hospitals in Turkey. Results: Six hundred and twenty-one consecutive patients were enrolled. A pathogen was identified in 78 (12.6%) patients. The most frequently isolated bacteria were S. pneumoniae (21.8%) and P. aeruginosa (19.2%). The clinical cure rate and length of stay were not different among patients treated with ß-lactam, ß-lactam and macrolide combination, and fluoroquinolone. Forty-seven patients (9.2%) died during the hospitalization period. There was no difference in survival among the three treatment groups. Conclusion: In patients admitted to non-ICU hospital wards for CAP, there was no difference in clinical outcomes between ß-lactam, ß-lactam and macrolide combination, and fluoroquinolone regimens.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Tempo de Internação , Macrolídeos/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/mortalidade , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Departamentos Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/microbiologia , Pneumonia/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Streptococcus pneumoniae/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Resultado do Tratamento , Turquia/epidemiologia
5.
Tuberk Toraks ; 65(4): 271-281, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29631525

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Colistimethate sodium (CMS) is frequently used in the treatment of nosocomial multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections. Nephrotoxicity is the most important side effect. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of colistin on nephrotoxicity and to assess prognosis in patients treated with CMS due to hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with CMS for HAP due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii were included in this cohort study. RESULT: We evaluated 281 patients treated with two different brands of CMS whose administration dose is different: imported (n= 58, low dose/kg) and domestic (n= 223, high dose/kg). Nephrotoxicity developed in 175 patients (62.3%). The median age (73 vs. 66 years, p= 0.004) and mortality rates were higher (66.9% vs. 52.8%, p= 0.022) in patients having nephrotoxicity. The patients receiving high dose/kg had higher nephrotoxicity rate (67.7% vs. 41.4%, p< 0.001). The clinical, bacteriological response and mortality rates of the whole group were 52.0%, 61.0%, 61.6%, respectively. The clinical and bacteriological response rates were similar in the different dose groups. Multivariate analysis showed that nephrotoxicity was associated with domestic brand depending on use of high dose (OR= 3.97), advanced age (ß= 0.29, p= 0.008), male gender (OR= 2.60), hypertension (OR= 2.50), red blood cells transfusion (OR= 2.54), absence of acute kidney injury (OR= 10.19), risk stage of RIFLE (OR= 11.9). CONCLUSIONS: Nephrotoxicity is associated with the use of high dose colistin, age, gender, hypertension, red blood cells replacement and RIFLE stage. The mortality rate is higher in patients developing nephrotoxicity.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Colistina/análogos & derivados , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Renal/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes , Colistina/administração & dosagem , Colistina/efeitos adversos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Prognóstico
7.
Tuberk Toraks ; 64(2): 112-8, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27481077

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) aims to improve the patients's well-being and to reduce mortality, morbidity and the development of exacerbations. This study was thus designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of salmeterol/fluticasone combination with tiotropium in patients with moderate COPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an open, prospective, randomized trial in COPD patients whose FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) levels were between 80% and 50% predicted. A total of 44 patients who met the inclusion and exlusion criteria and who gave written informed consent were included in the study. At the end of the two week wash-out period, the patients were randomized to receive either salmeterol 50 µg/fluticasone 500 µg combination as dry powder inhaler twice daily (SF Group) or tiotropium dry powder inhaler 18 µg once daily (T Group) for one year. These were equally distributed in the two groups (22 patients in each study group). At follow-up, the patients were required to come to the outpatient clinic at the third, sixth, ninth and twelfth months. RESULT: There were no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regards to demographic features and baseline measurements. There were 1.2 ± 1.7 exacerbations in SF Group and 2.1 ± 2.2 exacerbations in T Group (p= 0.070). The time to the first exacerbation was 4.2 ± 4.0 and 4.2 ± 3.3 months, respectively (p= 0.697). The number of severe exacerbations that resulted in admission to the emergency department or hospital was 0.6 ± 1.0 and 1.1 ± 1.4, respectively (p= 0.245). Significant improvements were observed in CAT (CPOD Assessment Test) scores in both groups during the treatment period (p< 0.0001); but there was no difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that in patients with moderate COPD, treatment with combined corticosteroid and long-acting beta-2 agonist provides similar improvements in pulmonary function tests, patient-reported outcomes and exercise capacity as compared a long-acting anticholinergics.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapêutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/uso terapêutico , Inaladores de Pó Seco , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Administração por Inalação , Adulto , Idoso , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Testes de Função Respiratória
8.
Tuberk Toraks ; 64(3): 185-190, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28393724

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pneumonia in cases with preceding hospitalization, hemodialysis, intravenous therapy, wound care, or chemotherapy within the prior 30 days and residence in nursing homes are defined as healthcare associated pneumonia (HCAP). The aim of this study was to compare the demographic and laboratory data, isolated causative agents and prognosis of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and HCAP in a large population in Turkey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 785 cases (average age 65.3 ± 16.4, 530 male) registered to Turkish Thoracic Society Respiratory Infections Study Group CAP database (TURCAP) were examined. The demographic data, clinical history, pneumonia severity scores (PSI), laboratory and radiologic findings of the CAP and HCAP patients were compared. RESULT: Out of 785 cases, 207 (26.4%) were diagnosed with HCAP and 578 (73.6%) with CAP. Among HCAP cases, 140/207 (67.6%) had preceding hospitalization in the last 90 days, 28/207 (13.5%) were on a hemodialysis program during the previous 30 days and 22/207 (10.6%) were staying in nursing homes. Patients with HCAP more frequently had comorbidities (93.2% vs. 81.6%; p= 0.001) and higher PSI scores (103.9 ± 37.2 vs. 94.6 ± 35.4; p= 0.002) compared to patients with CAP. A causative microorganism was isolated in only 12.1% (70/578) of CAP and 14.5% (30/207) of HCAP patients. The length of stay in hospital was higher in HCAP than CAP (8.6 ± 5.5 vs. 7.5 ± 6.1 days, p= 0.03); however the rates of treatment failure, intensive care unit admission and mortality were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to CAP, HCAP patients tend to have more severe disease, despite have no difference in mortality. The current criteria for HCAP do not predict worse clinical outcomes. Further work is required to define local risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Comorbidade , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Turquia/epidemiologia
9.
Tuberk Toraks ; 63(4): 265-77, 2015.
Artigo em Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26963310

RESUMO

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common lung diseases characterized by chronic airway inflammation and airway obstruction. Among patient with COPD and asthma; there is a group of patients with an overlap between clinical, functional characteristics and airway inflammation patterns, named "Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome" (ACOS). ACOS is a syndrome characterized by reversible but persistant airflow limitation (postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 70%) which has some features of both asthma and COPD. ACOS should be suspected in a patient > 40 years, with smoking history, previous asthma diagnosis or history of childhood asthma who has persistant airflow limitation and reversible ariway obstruction (defined by an increase of > %12 of FEV1 pred or increase of FEV1 > 200 mL after inhalation of 400 mcg salbutamol or 1000 mcg terbutaline). The prevalence for ACOS has been reported 11-55% in different case series to date and increases by age and is more frequent in females in different age groups. Patients with ACOS are younger than COPD patients and older than asthma patients. Frequent and severe exacerbations and related hospitalization and emergency room visits are common in ACOS and this causes an impaired quality of life. Current recommendations of guidelines for pharmacologic treatment of ACOS have been composed of a combination with optimal COPD and asthma treatment. Future therapeutic approaches should be based on endotypes. Clinical phenotype and underlying endotype driven clinical studies may be the base of ACOS guidelines.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Albuterol/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Comorbidade , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Síndrome
10.
Tuberk Toraks ; 63(2): 111-31, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26167969

RESUMO

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are airway diseases with acute exacerbations. Natural course of both disease are affected by exacerbations. COPD exacerbations may be caused by infections and other causes; indoor and outdoor pollution, cardiovascular diseases, asthma-COPD overlap syndrome, COPD- obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, pulmonary embolism, gastro-oesophageal reflux, anxiety-depression, pulmonary hypertension. Exposure to triggering factors, viral infections, treatment insufficiency may cause asthma exacerbations. Smoking cessations, prevention of infections, long-acting anticholinergics, long-acting 2 agonists, inhaled corticosteroids, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, mucolytics, prophilactic antibiotics can be effective on the prevention of COPD exacerbations. Asthma exacerbations may be decreased by the avoidance of allergens, viral infections, occupational exposures, airpollution, treatment of comorbid diseases. Effective treatment of asthma is required to prevent asthma exacerbations. Inhaled steroids and combined treatments are the most effective preventive therapy for exacerbations. Patient education and cooperation is an element of the preventive measures for asthma attacks. Compliance to therapy, inhalation techniques, written asthma plans are required. The essential of COPD and asthma exacerbation treatment is bronchodilator therapy. Steroids are also implemented to the therapy, targeting the inflammation. Specific treatments of the cause (infection, airpollution, pulmonary embolism etc.) should be administered.


Assuntos
Asma/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/patologia , Administração por Inalação , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Expectorantes/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico
11.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther ; 27(2): 179-83, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23518215

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Systemic steroids shorten recovery time, improve lung function and hypoxemia in COPD exacerbations. Although several studies have shown that both parenteral and oral steroids are effective and GOLD guideline recommends use of oral steroids at a dose of 30-40 mg/day, very little data exists as to whether any route of admininstration (parenteral vs oral) or any dose is more effective and/or safer. METHODS: This was a randomized, parallel-group study aiming to compare the effectiveness and safety of orally administered lower dose of steroids with parenteral administration of higher doses. Thus, a total of 40 patients were included; one group (Group 1, n = 20) received methylprednisolone (MP) as recommended by the GOLD guideline (PO 32 mg/day for seven days) and the other (Group 2, n = 20) was given IV MP at 1 mg/kg/day for four days and 0.5 mg/kg/day for three days. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with regards to age (69.0 ± 10.5 vs 67.1 ± 8.4 years), duration of COPD (11.8 ± 8.3 vs 9.7 ± 7.7 years), FEV1 (41.3 ± 17.3 vs 34.0 ± 12.0%), PaO2 levels (55.5 ± 9.9 vs 59.1 ± 11.0 mmHg) and dyspnea scores (9.4 ± 1.1 vs 10.0 ± 1.0). Worsening hypercapnic respiratory failure developed in two patients from Group 1 on days 1 and 2, these were intubated and thus excluded from the study. At day 7, both groups showed significant improvements in FEV1 levels (50.8 ± 19.4 and 43.8 ± 21.4%, respectively) (Table 2), PaO2 levels (66.5 ± 12.5 and 65.3 ± 10.6 mmHg, respectively) (Table 3) and dyspnea scores (3,5 ± 2,8 and 4.2 ± 2.8) (Fig. 1). The length of hospital stay was similar for the two groups (11.0 ± 3.9 vs 12.7 ± 6.4). Regarding adverse events, four patients in Group 1 vs 11 patients in group 2 developed hyperglycemia. Besides, three patients in group 2 had worsening of previously controlled hypertension. All events were treated and controlled with administration of proper medications. All patients were followed up for three months. Eight patients in group 1 and 15 patients in group 2 had unplanned visits to their physicians or to the emergency rooms for recurring exacerbations. Four patients in group 1 and five patients in group 2 were readmitted to hospital for recurrence (p = NS). During the follow-up two patients from group 1 died. CONCLUSION: These data show that oral administration of MP at a dose 32 mg/day for seven days significantly improves lung function, symptom scores and oxygenation in patients admitted to the hospital for COPD exacerbation and is as effective as and possibly safer than parenteral admininistration of higher doses.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intravenosa , Administração Oral , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Seguimentos , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Metilprednisolona/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxigênio/metabolismo , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Testes de Função Respiratória , Método Simples-Cego
12.
BMC Pulm Med ; 14: 43, 2014 Mar 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24621109

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The study evaluated the efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FF) extrafine combination versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/S) combination in COPD patients. METHODS: The trial was a 12-week multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double dummy study; 419 patients with moderate/severe COPD were randomised to BDP/FF 200/12 µg or FP/S 500/50 µg twice daily. The primary objective was to demonstrate the equivalence between treatments in terms of Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) score and the superiority of BDP/FF in terms of change from pre-dose in the first 30 minutes in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1). Secondary endpoints included lung function, symptom scores, symptom-free days and use of rescue medication, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, six minute walking test and COPD exacerbations. RESULTS: BDP/FF was equivalent to FP/S in terms of TDI score and superior in terms of FEV1 change from pre-dose (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between treatments in secondary outcome measures, confirming overall comparability in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Moreover, a clinically relevant improvement (>4 units) in SGRQ was detected in the BDP/FF group only. CONCLUSION: BDP/FF extrafine combination provides COPD patients with an equivalent improvement of dyspnoea and a faster bronchodilation in comparison to FP/S. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01245569.


Assuntos
Albuterol/análogos & derivados , Androstadienos/uso terapêutico , Beclometasona/administração & dosagem , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Etanolaminas/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Albuterol/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Combinação Fluticasona-Salmeterol , Fumarato de Formoterol , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
13.
Tuberk Toraks ; 62(1): 51-67, 2014.
Artigo em Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24814078

RESUMO

Severe asthmatics account 10% of the all asthmatic population. Those asthmatics whose disease is inadequately controlled account for up to half of the cost for asthma, because they have more emergency room visits, more hospital admission and greater absenteeism from work. New therapeutic options were tried in those patients whose asthma was uncontrolled with standart high dose inhaled corticosteroid and long acting beta-2 agonsit combination therapy. In this paper taking into account the conditions of our country, current literature was reviewed and treatment options was discussed and graded recommendations are made for daily clinical practice in patients with severe treatment-refractory asthma.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapêutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Asma/fisiopatologia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Prova Pericial , Hospitalização , Humanos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
14.
Tuberk Toraks ; 72(2): 131-136, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869205

RESUMO

Introduction: Clinical observations suggest that Omicron infections may present with different radiographic findings and be more frequently associated with bacterial co-infections, but there is a paucity of published data. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic findings of patients hospitalized with Omicron versus alpha-delta infections. Materials and Methods: Between January 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021 (alpha and delta period) and between January 1, 2022 and July 31, 2022 (Omicron period), respectively 149 and 163 COVID-19 PCR-positive patients who were followed up in the COVID-19 ward and intensive care unit of a tertiary care center were included in the study. Clinical (presence of fever and purulent sputum), laboratory and radiologic findings of the two groups were compared. Sputum culture results and antibiotic use were also evaluated. Result: In the alpha/delta group, ground glass opacities were seen in 75.2% (112) of the patients, consolidation in 2.7% (4), and both findings together in 6.0% (9). In the Omicron group, ground glass was seen in 40.5% (66), consolidation in 5.5% (9), and both ground glass and consolidation together in 8.7% (13) (p< 0.001). Procalcitonin levels were 0.25 µg/L or higher in 29.6% and 43.9% of the patients in the alpha/delta and Omicron groups, respectively. Mean PCT values were 0.36 µg/L and 1.93 µg/L, respectively (p> 0.05). CRP levels were similar in both groups. Mean LDH level in the Omicron group was 278 U/L and was significantly lower than the alpha/delta group (381 U/L) (p< 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring intensive care during hospitalization was higher in the alpha/delta group (36.2% vs 26.4%) (p= 0.06). Conclusions: Lower LDH levels, less need for intensive care and less frequent development of ARDS indicate that Omicron causes milder disease, while a higher rate of consolidation and higher procalcitonin levels suggest a higher frequency of bacterial co-infections.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Coinfecção , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/complicações , Idoso , Escarro/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos
15.
Thorac Res Pract ; 25(2): 75-81, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454203

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: There is a need to increase patient and clinician awareness on the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination in at-risk groups. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of reminders for physicians and patients using the vaccination tracking system created in the hospital information management system (HIMS) on the vaccination rate, and the effect of pneumococcal vaccination on pneumonia-related hospitalization and mortality over a 12-month period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study was undertaken during a 2-year period in 3 tertiary care centers. Patients were followed up for 12 months following vaccination, and hospital admissions and mortality were recorded via HIMS. During the campaign, HIMS transmitted pneumococcal immunization reminder messages in accordance with guideline recommendations to physicians' computers and patients' mobile phones. Educational posters on pneumococcal vaccination were posted in outpatient clinics. Regular seminars on the evidence for pneumococcal vaccination were organized. All patients who were hospitalized during the follow-up period for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, lung cancer, or pneumonia were analyzed in relation to their vaccination history regarding clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 29530 patients were included in the study. During the study period, the annual vaccination rate increased by 74.4% and reached 4.8% in 3 hospitals (P = .001). The rates were 3.9% in patients older than 65 years without comorbidities and 5.2% in those with COPD and asthma (P = .002). In pneumococcal vaccine recipients, pneumonia-related hospital mortality was lower (relative risk (RR) = 0.19, CI 0.09-0.35, P < .001). CONCLUSION: It is possible to raise the rate of pneumococcal vaccination through awareness campaigns. Individuals with COPD and asthma are more willing to receive pneumococcal vaccination. Among patients hospitalized for pneumonia, prior pneumococcal vaccination is associated with lower mortalit.

16.
Balkan Med J ; 41(3): 206-212, 2024 May 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700365

RESUMO

Background: Bronchiectasis is a chronic lung disease characterized by permanent bronchial wall dilatation. Although it has been known as an orphan disease, it has recently gained attention because of registry-based studies and drug research. Aims: We aimed to use a multicenter database to analyze and compare data regarding the etiology, associated comorbidities, microbiological characteristics, and preventive strategies of bronchiectasis in Türkiye to those of other countries. Study Design: A multicenter prospective cohort study. Methods: The multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted between March 2019 and January 2022 using the Turkish Adult Bronchiectasis Database, in which 25 centers in Türkiye participated. Patients aged > 18 years who presented with respiratory symptoms such as cough, sputum, and dyspnea and were diagnosed with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using computed tomography were included in the study. Demographic information, etiologies, comorbidities, pulmonary functions, and microbiological, radiological, and clinical data were collected from the patients. Results: Of the 1,035 study participants, 518 (50%) were females. The mean age of the patients was 56.1 ± 16.1 years. The underlying etiology was detected in 565 (54.6%) patients. While postinfectious origin was the most common cause of bronchiectasis (39.5%), tuberculosis was identified in 11.3% of the patients. An additional comorbidity was detected in 688 (66.5%) patients. The most common comorbidity was cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchiectasis was identified in 19.5% of the patients. The most commonly detected microbiological agent was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (29.4%). Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) were used in 70.1% of the patients, and the frequency of exacerbations in the last year was significantly higher in patients using ICS than in nonusers (p < 0.0001). Age [odds ratio (OR): 1.028; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005-1.051], cachexia (OR: 4.774; 95% CI: 2,054-11,097), high modified medical research council dyspnea scale score (OR: 1,952; 95% CI: 1,459-2,611), presence of chronic renal failure (OR: 4,172; 95% CI: 1,249-13,938) and use of inhaled steroids (OR: 2,587; 95% CI: 1,098-6,098) were significant risk factors for mortality. Mortality rates were higher in patients with COPD than in those with no COPD (21.7-9.1%, p = 0.016). Patients with bronchiectasis and COPD exhibited more frequent exacerbations, exacerbation-related hospitalizations, and hospitalization in the intensive care unit in the previous year than patients without COPD. Conclusion: This is the first multicenter study of bronchiectasis in Türkiye. The study results will provide important data that can guide the development of health policies in Türkiye on issues such as infection control, vaccination, and the unnecessary use of antibiotics and steroids.


Assuntos
Bronquiectasia , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Bronquiectasia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , Turquia/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade
17.
Pulm Ther ; 2024 Mar 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446336

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Despite the proven benefits of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), clinicians limit patient exposure to ICS due to the risk of pneumonia. However, there are multiple factors associated with the risk of pneumonia in patients with COPD. This post hoc analysis of IMPACT trial data aims to set the risks associated with ICS into a context of specific patient-related factors that contribute to the risk of pneumonia. METHODS: The 52-week, double-blind IMPACT trial randomized patients with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 exacerbation in the prior year 2:2:1 to once-daily fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI), FF/VI or UMEC/VI. Annual rate of on-treatment pneumonias in the intent-to-treat population associated with age, body mass index (BMI), percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and blood eosinophil count (BEC) was evaluated. RESULTS: This analysis revealed that the annual rate of pneumonia showed the lowest risk at the age of 50 years. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) between ICS-containing and non-ICS containing treatments diverged in ages > 63 years, suggesting a significantly increased ICS-related risk in older patients. In contrast, the annual rate of pneumonia rose in both groups below BMI of 22.5 kg/m2, but above that, there was no relationship to pneumonia rate and no differential effect between the two groups. The relationship between BEC and pneumonia was flat up to > 300/µL cells with ICS-containing treatment and then rose. In contrast, the rate of pneumonia with non-ICS containing treatment appeared to increase at a lower level of BEC (~ 200/µL). CONCLUSIONS: There was little evidence of a differential effect of older age, lower BMI, lower FEV1 and BEC on the pneumonia rate between ICS-containing and non-ICS containing treatments. This analysis points to the need for a balanced approach to risk versus benefit in the use of ICS-containing treatments in COPD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: IMPACT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02164513.

18.
Pulm Ther ; 10(1): 69-84, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38112909

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this Delphi study was to understand and assess the level of consensus among respiratory experts on the clinical application of GOLD 2023 recommendations in management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: The study comprised two online surveys and a participant meeting with 34 respiratory experts from 16 countries. Responses of 73 questions were recorded using a Likert scale ranging from 0 (disagreement) to 9 (agreement). The consensus threshold was 75%. RESULTS: Survey 1 and survey 2 had 34 and 32 participants, respectively; and 25 attended the participant meeting. Consensus was reached on survey 1: 28/42; survey 2: 18/30 close-ended questions. A consensus was reached on the clinical relevance of most updates in definitions and diagnosis of COPD. Mixed results for the treatment recommendations by GOLD were noted: 74% agreed with the recommendation to initiate treatment with dual bronchodilators for group E patients; 63% agreed for including inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/long-acting ß2 agonist(LABA)/ Long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists (LAMA) as a treatment option for GOLD B patients. Also, consensus lacked on removing ICS + LABA as an initial therapeutic option, in countries with challenges in access to other treatment option;. 88% agreed that they use GOLD recommendations in their daily clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi study demonstrated a high level of consensus regarding key concepts of GOLD 2023 report, with most participants favoring recent updates in definitions, diagnosis, management, and prevention of COPD. More evidence on the etiotype based management and treatment options for group B and E are required which could further strengthen clinical application of the GOLD report.


The goal of this Delphi study was to understand and assess the level of alignment among the respiratory experts on the application of key changes and recommendations proposed by the GOLD 2023 report in their routine clinical practice for the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There were two online surveys in this study, and experts from 16 countries (primarily focused on developing countries) were invited to participate. Using the Delphi method, expert representatives shared their insights with the aim of optimizing patient care. The alignment was assessed in six well-defined themes: 1) Overall view on GOLD/other recommendations; 2) Assessing patients with COPD; 3) Initial pharmacological treatment in patients with COPD; 4) Vaccination for patients with COPD; 5) Follow-up pharmacological treatment in patients with COPD; and 6) Survival evidence in patients with COPD. Participants expressed a high level of agreement regarding key concepts of the GOLD 2023 report, with most of them agreeing with recent updates in definitions, diagnosis, management, and prevention of COPD. The results also highlighted the need to publish GOLD reports in multiple languages and in a shorter, pocket-sized format to increase awareness and adaptation among healthcare providers.

19.
Tuberk Toraks ; 72(1): 25-36, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676592

RESUMO

Introduction: Patients with asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) have a greater disease burden than those with COPD or asthma alone. In this study, it was aimed to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical features of ACO because there are limited national data in Türkiye. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in a cross-sectional design in nine tertiary-care hospitals. The patients followed with a diagnosis of asthma or COPD for at least one year were enrolled in the study. The frequency of ACO and the characteristics of the patients were evaluated in the asthma and COPD groups. Result: The study included 408 subjects (F/M= 205/203, mean age= 56.24 ± 11.85 years). The overall prevalence of ACO in both groups was 20.8% (n= 85). The frequency was higher in the COPD group than in the asthma group (n= 55; 33.3% vs. n= 22; 9.8%), respectively (p= 0.001). Patients with ACO had similarities to patients with COPD in terms of advanced age, sex, smoking, exposure to biomass during childhood, being born in rural areas, and radiologic features. Characteristics such as a history of childhood asthma and allergic rhinitis, presence of chronic sinusitis, NSAID hypersensitivity, atopy, and high eosinophil counts were similar to those of patients with asthma (p<0.001). The annual decline in FEV1 was more prominent in the ACO group (mean= -250 mL) than in the asthma (mean change= -60 mL) and COPD (mean change= -230 mL) groups (p= 0.003). Conclusions: This study showed that ACO was common among patients with asthma and COPD in tertiary care clinics in our country. ACO should be considered in patients with asthma and COPD who exhibit the abovementioned symptoms.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Sobreposição da Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica e Asma , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Idoso , Turquia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Síndrome de Sobreposição da Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica e Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia
20.
Cent Eur J Public Health ; 21(4): 233-6, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24592732

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An important development in the field of adult pneumococcal vaccination since the last Consensus Statement, published by the Expert Panel of Central and Eastern Europe and Israel (the Region) in September 2012, was the licensure of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) for adults aged 50 years and older. DISCUSSION: The Expert Panel has developed this Position Statement as an update to its previous Consensus to address the following topics which are likely to be on the agenda of national scientific societies during the ongoing updates of vaccination recommendations in the Region: the availability of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for adults over 50 years of age, the available clinical evidence on its use in adults, and the future place of conjugate vaccines in adult pneumococcal vaccination. The Expert Panel concluded that there is sufficient epidemiologic immunogenicity and safety evidence to use PCV 13 in adults over 50 years of age. RESULTS: The use of conjugate vaccine induces immunological memory and can overcome some limitations associated with the plain polysaccharide vaccine (PPV). It was also agreed that, if the use of PPV is considered appropriate, PCV13 should be administered first, regardless of prior pneumococcal vaccination status.


Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Israel , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA