Basic in vitro Characterization of the Vasodilatory Potential of 2-Aminoethyl Nitrate Fixed-Dose Combinations with Cilostazol, Metoprolol and Valsartan.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: 2-aminoethyl nitrate (CLC-1011) is a member of the class of organic nitrates that cause vasodilation by the generation of nitric oxide (•NO). These drugs are mainly used for the treatment of angina pectoris and ischemic heart disease. The aim of this study was to characterize the vasodilatory potency of this organic nitrate alone and in combination with clinically established cardiovascular drugs. METHODS: Vasodilation by CLC-1011 was tested by isometric tension studies, either alone or combined with cilostazol, valsartan, and metoprolol. Induction of oxidative stress in isolated heart mitochondria was measured by enhanced chemiluminescence. Bioactivation of CLC-1011 in aortic tissue was measured by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using an iron-based spin trap for •NO. RESULTS: We observed potent vasodilation by CLC-1011 and additive effects for all three drug combinations. In contrast to nitroglycerin (GTN), CLC-1011 did not stimulate mitochondrial oxidative stress. CLC-1011 was bioactivated to •NO in aortic tissue. CONCLUSION: In summary, the experiments described in this report demonstrate that CLC-1011 does not induce oxidative stress, is a more potent vasodilator than isosorbide-5-mononitrate and dinitrate ISDN, and displays synergistic vasodilation with other cardiovascular drugs. CLC-1011 fixed dose combinations could be used in the management of cardiovascular diseases.

The influence of Erythropoietin on platelet activation, thrombin generation and FVII/active FVII in patients with AMI.

BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin (Epo) has been shown to improve myocardial function in models of experimental myocardial infarction, but has also been associated with a rise in thromboembolic events. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the influence of Epo on platelet activation and coagulation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: The study was designed as a substudy of the randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled REVIVAL-3 (REgeneration of VItal Myocardium in ST-Segment EleVation MyocardiAL Infarction by Erythropoietin) study that investigated the effects of recombinant human Epo in AMI. Serial venous blood samples were collected before and after study medication. Circulating prothrombin fragment F1 + 2, FVII, active FVII, beta thromboglobulin (TG) and P-Selectin were measured before and 60 hours after randomization by immunoassay (n = 94). In a randomly selected subgroup platelet aggregation was measured using whole blood aggregometry (Multiplate Analyzer, n = 45). RESULTS: After 5 days an increase in FVII was observed after Epo as compared to placebo (P = 0.02), yet active FVII and prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 remained unchanged. Moreover, no statistically significant differences in circulating TG or P-selectin were observed between the groups. As an expected response to peri-interventional therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin, platelet aggregation after stimulation with ADP, TRAP, ASPI or collagen decreased 12 hours and 2 days after PCI. However, no difference between the Epo and the placebo group was observed. CONCLUSION: After treatment with Epo in patients with AMI a slight increase in circulating FVII after Epo was not associated with an increase in active FVII, prothrombin fragment F1 + 2, TG or P-selectin. Moreover, platelet aggregation was not altered after treatment with Epo as compared to placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01761435.

In vitro and in vivo characterization of a new organic nitrate hybrid drug covalently bound to pioglitazone.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Organic nitrates represent a group of nitrovasodilators that are clinically used for the treatment of ischemic heart disease. The new compound CLC-3000 is an aminoethyl nitrate (AEN) derivative of pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione antidiabetic agent combining the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist activity of pioglitazone with the NO-donating activity of the nitrate moiety. METHODS: In vitro and in vivo characterization was performed by isometric tension recording, platelet function, bleeding time and detection of oxidative stress. RESULTS: In vitro, CLC-3000 displayed more potent vasodilation than pioglitazone alone or classical nitrates. In vitro, some effects on oxidative stress parameters were observed. Authentic AEN or the AEN-containing linker CLC-1275 displayed antiaggregatory effects. In vivo treatment with CLC-3000 for 7 days did neither induce endothelial dysfunction nor nitrate tolerance nor oxidative stress. Acute or chronic administration of AEN increased the tail vein bleeding time in mice. CONCLUSION: In summary, the results of these studies demonstrate that CLC-3000 contains a vasodilative and antithrombotic activity that is not evident with pioglitazone alone, and that 7 days of exposure in vivo showed no typical signs of nitrate tolerance, endothelial dysfunction or other safety concerns in Wistar rats.

Characterization of new organic nitrate hybrid drugs covalently bound to valsartan and cilostazol.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Organic nitrates represent a group of nitrovasodilators that are clinically used for the treatment of ischemic heart disease. With the present studies we synthesized and characterized new organic nitrate hybrid molecules. Compounds CLC-1265 (valsartan mononitrate) and CLC-1280 (valsartan dinitrate) are derivatives of the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan, with CLC-1265 containing a single organic nitrate linker and CLC-1280 also containing a second, different linker. Compounds CLC-2000 (cilostazol mononitrate) and CLC-2100 (cilostazol dinitrate) are nitrate derivatives of the phosphodiesterase III inhibitor cilostazol. All compounds are designed as hybrid molecules, potentially combining the NO-donating properties of organic nitrates with the AT1-blocking activity of valsartan or the phosphodiesterase-III-inhibiting effect of cilostazol. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The properties of new drugs were assessed by isometric tension recording, inhibition of platelet aggregation and formation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. KEY RESULTS: In this report, all new nitrate compounds are shown, in vitro, to induce vasodilation in the range of other, classical organic nitrates, without inducing oxidative stress or classical nitrate tolerance. In addition, the new hybrid nitrate molecules displayed superior antiaggregatory properties over classical mono- and dinitrates. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results demonstrate that organic nitrates can be successfully linked to existing therapeutic molecules to create a new class of molecular entities with a potential dual mechanism of action via combining the established pharmacological properties of valsartan or cilostazol with the vasodilating properties of organic nitrates. Future experimental studies have to demonstrate whether the combined action of these compounds translates to superior therapeutic effects.

The impact of pulmonary disease on noninvasive measurement of cardiac output by the inert gas rebreathing method.

Cardiac output (CO) is an important parameter for diagnosis and therapy of heart diseases, but it is still difficult to determine. Innocor, a novel noninvasive inert gas rebreathing (IGR) system, has shown promising results. However, the impact of pulmonary diseases on IGR remains unclear. The aim of the study therefore was to assess the accuracy and reliability of IGR in patients with distinct chronic lung disease. A total of 96 patients were enrolled, including 48 consecutive patients with variant lung diseases (group A) and 48 pair-matched pulmonary healthy patients (group B). CO was measured with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and IGR. Lung function testing was done by spirometry [FEV(1)/FVC (forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity), VC (vital capacity)] and determination of the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide divided by alveolar volume (DLCO/VA). In group A we found a mean CO of 4.7 ± 1.3 L/min by IGR and 4.9 ± 1.2 L/min by CMR. Group B showed a mean CO of 4.8 ± 1.4 L/min by IGR and 5.0 ± 1.3 L/min by CMR. Bland-Altman analysis revealed good correspondence between CMR and IGR, with an average deviation of 0.1 ± 1.0 L/min in group A and 0.1 ± 1.0 L/min in group B (p = 0.99). Multiple regression analysis for the pulmonary parameters did not show a statistically significant impact on the mean bias of CO measurements (FEV(1)/FVC: r = 0.01, p = 0.91; VC: r = -0.2, p = 0.13; and DLCO/VA: r = 0.04, p = 0.82). IGR allows a feasible determination of CO even in patients with lung diseases. The accuracy of the IGR method is not influenced by either pulmonary obstructive and restrictive diseases or a reduced DLCO.

Left ventricular geometry predicts cardiovascular outcomes associated with anemia correction in CKD.

Partial correction of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) reduces left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), which is a risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) morbidity, but complete correction of anemia does not improve CV outcomes. Whether LV geometry associates with CV events in patients who are treated to different hemoglobin (Hb) targets is unknown. One of the larger trials to study the effects of complete correction of anemia in stages 3 to 4 CKD was the Cardiovascular Risk Reduction by Early Anemia Treatment with Epoetin Beta (CREATE) trial. Here, we analyzed echocardiographic data from CREATE to determine the prevalence, dynamics, and prognostic implications of abnormal LV geometry in patients who were treated to different Hb targets. The prevalence of LVH at baseline was 47%, with eccentric LVH more frequent than concentric. During the study, LVH prevalence and mean left ventricular mass index did not change significantly, but LV geometry fluctuated considerably within 2 yr in both groups. CV event-free survival was significantly worse in the presence of concentric LVH and eccentric LVH compared with the absence of LVH (P = 0.0009 and P < or = 0.0001, respectively). Treatment to the higher Hb target associated with reduced event-free survival in the subgroup with eccentric LVH at baseline (P = 0.034). In conclusion, LVH is common and associates with poor outcomes among patients with stages 3 to 4 CKD, although both progression and regression of abnormal LV geometry occur. Complete anemia correction may aggravate the adverse prognosis of eccentric LVH.

Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia.

BACKGROUND: Whether correction of anemia in patients with stage 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease improves cardiovascular outcomes is not established. METHODS: We randomly assigned 603 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 15.0 to 35.0 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area and mild-to-moderate anemia (hemoglobin level, 11.0 to 12.5 g per deciliter) to a target hemoglobin value in the normal range (13.0 to 15.0 g per deciliter, group 1) or the subnormal range (10.5 to 11.5 g per deciliter, group 2). Subcutaneous erythropoietin (epoetin beta) was initiated at randomization (group 1) or only after the hemoglobin level fell below 10.5 g per deciliter (group 2). The primary end point was a composite of eight cardiovascular events; secondary end points included left ventricular mass index, quality-of-life scores, and the progression of chronic kidney disease. RESULTS: During the 3-year study, complete correction of anemia did not affect the likelihood of a first cardiovascular event (58 events in group 1 vs. 47 events in group 2; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 1.14; P=0.20). Left ventricular mass index remained stable in both groups. The mean estimated GFR was 24.9 ml per minute in group 1 and 24.2 ml per minute in group 2 at baseline and decreased by 3.6 and 3.1 ml per minute per year, respectively (P=0.40). Dialysis was required in more patients in group 1 than in group 2 (127 vs. 111, P=0.03). General health and physical function improved significantly (P=0.003 and P<0.001, respectively, in group 1, as compared with group 2). There was no significant difference in the combined incidence of adverse events between the two groups, but hypertensive episodes and headaches were more prevalent in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic kidney disease, early complete correction of anemia does not reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00321919 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Hepcidin as a predictor of response to epoetin therapy in anemic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Hepcidin is thought to be the central regulator of iron metabolism. Iron deficiency is associated with low hepcidin concentrations, and anemia in patients with cancer is associated with high concentrations of hepcidin. STUDY OBJECTIVES: Our main objective was to assess the potential role of hepcidin for predicting response to epoetin therapy in anemic cancer patients. We also aimed to identify a cutoff value for hepcidin as a potential predictive marker for response to epoetin therapy. METHODS: Using data from 525 anemic cancer patients enrolled in 5 studies, we assessed serum hepcidin concentrations in 408 of these patients at baseline and analyzed pooled data from the 408 patients. The analysis population was separated into 2 categories using a threshold hepcidin concentration of 13 nmol/L: low hepcidin (< 13 nmol/L) and high hepcidin (> or = 13 nmol/L). RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of responders (defined as hemoglobin increase > or = 10 g/L or > or = 20 g/L from baseline) was observed in the low hepcidin group compared with the high hepcidin group (P = 0.04 for > or = 10 g/L increase and P = 0.009 for > or = 20 g/L from baseline). There was also a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups for hematopoietic response (hemoglobin rise at least once > or = 20 g/L from baseline or at least once > or = 120 g/L) to epoetin therapy (P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this analysis suggest a potential role of hepcidin serum concentrations in predicting the response to epoetin therapy.

Effect of computer-assisted European Best Practice Guideline implementation on adherence and target attainment: ORAMA results.

BACKGROUND: The success of guidelines depends largely on effective implementation and uptake in clinical practice. The Optimal Renal Anemia Management Assessment (ORAMA) study investigated the impact of European Best Practice Guideline (EBPG) prompting on patient outcomes. METHODS: ORAMA was a prospective, international, multicenter, cluster-randomized study. Fifty-three centers in eight European countries enrolled patients with chronic kidney disease stage V receiving chronic dialysis. Patients were either anemic (hemoglobin [Hb] <11 g/dL [110 g/L]) or treated with erythropoiesis stimulating agents and/or iron supplementation. Centers were randomized to two groups, with or without access to a computerized clinical decision support (CDS) system. In a post hoc analysis,patients were further subdivided into adherence or non-adherence of investigators to the EBPG regardless of CDS usage. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with Hb >11 g/ dL (110 g/L), reflecting hematological targets in the revised EPBG. RESULTS: In this population of 599 dialysis patients, hematological targets did not differ in the presence or absence of a CDS system. There was a general shift towards improved patient distribution by Hb categories while the width of the distribution curves remained unchanged. The proportion of patients with Hb >11 g/dL (110 g/L) was higher among adherers (79% and 84% with or without CDS use, respectively) than non-adherers (59% and 57%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ORAMA is the first international study to show that adherence to EBPG improved attainment of anemia indices. The availability of a CDS system did not affect anemia management.

Correction towards normal hemoglobin values in chronic kidney disease: what is the current evidence regarding mortality and morbidity outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Recent studies, in which the cardiovascular risk and mortality associated with high and low hemoglobin target values, respectively, have been investigated, challenged the concept that hemoglobin normalization improves prognosis. METHODS: The results of these studies are reviewed with respect to differences in study populations, study design and methodological limitations to provide guidance for their interpretation and relevance for clinical practice. RESULTS: There are important differences with respect to enrolled populations, design and conduct of the studies. Each study has its specific, inherent methodological limitations. Importantly, there is no statistically significant and consistent pattern of negative results for cardiovascular and mortality outcomes, although in general outcomes are not in favor of hemoglobin normalization. On the other hand, the reported data on quality of life are consistently and significantly better with higher hemoglobin values. CONCLUSIONS: Recent evidence from large outcome studies suggested an increased risk associated with hemoglobin normalization. On the other side, several study-inherent and methodological limitations must be considered before simply extrapolating the negative findings of these studies into clinical practice. However, until new evidence becomes available from ongoing and future clinical studies, an upper Hb limit of 12 g/dl should not be exceeded.

Target level for hemoglobin correction in patients with diabetes and CKD: primary results of the Anemia Correction in Diabetes (ACORD) Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes and anemia are at high risk of cardiovascular disease. The Anemia CORrection in Diabetes (ACORD) Study aimed to investigate the effect of anemia correction on cardiac structure, function, and outcomes in patients with diabetes with anemia and early diabetic nephropathy. METHODS: One hundred seventy-two patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus, mild to moderate anemia, and stage 1 to 3 chronic kidney disease were randomly assigned to attain a target hemoglobin (Hb) level of either 13 to 15 g/dL (130 to 150 g/L; group 1) or 10.5 to 11.5 g/dL (105 to 115 g/L; group 2). The primary end point was change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Secondary end points included echocardiographic variables, renal function, quality of life, and safety. RESULTS: Median Hb level and LVMI were similar in groups 1 and 2 (Hb, 11.9 and 11.7 g/dL [119 and 117 g/L]; LVMI, 113.5 and 112.3 g/m(2), respectively). At study end, Hb levels were 13.5 g/dL (135 g/L) in group 1 and 12.1 g/dL (121 g/L) in group 2 (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in median LVMI at month 15 between study groups (group 1, 112.3 g/m(2); group 2, 116.5 g/m(2)). Multivariate analysis showed a nonsignificant decrease in LVMI (P = 0.15) in group 1 versus group 2. Anemia correction had no effect on the rate of decrease in creatinine clearance, but resulted in significantly improved quality of life in group 1 (P = 0.04). There were no clinically relevant differences in adverse events between study groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with diabetes with mild to moderate anemia and moderate left ventricular hypertrophy, correction to an Hb target level of 13 to 15 g/dL (130 to 150 g/L) does not decrease LVMI. However, normalization of Hb level prevented an additional increase in left ventricular hypertrophy, was safe, and improved quality of life.

The safety of amiodarone in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty persists about the safety and efficacy of amiodarone for the management of heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 3029 patients with chronic heart failure to receive carvedilol or metoprolol and followed patients for a median of 58 months. One hundred fifty-five of 1466 patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II and 209 of 1563 in Class III or IV received amiodarone at baseline. Persistence with amiodarone treatment was high and 66% received amiodarone after 4 years. During follow-up, 38.7% and 58.9% of patients receiving amiodarone in NYHA Classes II and III + IV died versus 26.2% and 43.3% not receiving amiodarone (P < .001). This difference was maintained in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-1.7, P < .001). The difference was explained by an increased risk of death due to circulatory failure (HR 2.4, CI 1.9-3.1, P < .001) in patients receiving amiodarone. Sudden death was not different (HR 1.07, CI 0.8-1.4, P = .7). The increased risk was similar across NYHA classes with HR of 1.60 (CI 1.2-2.1, P < .001) in NYHA Class II versus 1.58 (CI 1.3-1.9, P < .001) in Classes III + IV. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with amiodarone was associated with an increased risk of death from circulatory failure independent of functional class.

Prognostic importance of plasma NT-pro BNP in chronic heart failure in patients treated with a beta-blocker: results from the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET) trial.

BACKGROUND: Plasma levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) are increased in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Beta-blockers (BB) may influence these levels but it is unclear whether changes in NT-pro BNP reflect concomitant changes in prognosis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic importance of NT-pro BNP at baseline and during follow-up, in patients in whom beta-blocker therapy is initiated. METHODS: In COMET, 3029 patients with CHF in NYHA class II-IV and EF<35% were randomised to carvedilol or metoprolol tartrate and were followed for an average of 58 months. Blood samples were collected for the measurement of NT-pro BNP at baseline (n=1559) and during follow-up (n=309). RESULTS: Baseline plasma concentrations of NT-pro BNP above the median (1242 pg/ml) were associated with higher all-cause mortality (RR 2.77; 95% CI 2.33-3.3, p<0.001). Patients who achieved NT-pro BNP levels<400 pg/ml during follow-up had a lower subsequent mortality (RR 0.32; 95% CI 0.15-0.69, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The plasma concentration of NT-pro BNP is a powerful predictor of mortality in patients with CHF. Patients who achieve an NT-pro BNP of <400 pg/ml subsequent to treatment with a beta-blocker have a favourable prognosis.

Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET): randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Beta blockers reduce mortality in patients who have chronic heart failure, systolic dysfunction, and are on background treatment with diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. We aimed to compare the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcome. METHODS: In a multicentre, double-blind, and randomised parallel group trial, we assigned 1511 patients with chronic heart failure to treatment with carvedilol (target dose 25 mg twice daily) and 1518 to metoprolol (metoprolol tartrate, target dose 50 mg twice daily). Patients were required to have chronic heart failure (NYHA II-IV), previous admission for a cardiovascular reason, an ejection fraction of less than 0.35, and to have been treated optimally with diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors unless not tolerated. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or all-cause admission. Analysis was done by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The mean study duration was 58 months (SD 6). The mean ejection fraction was 0.26 (0.07) and the mean age 62 years (11). The all-cause mortality was 34% (512 of 1511) for carvedilol and 40% (600 of 1518) for metoprolol (hazard ratio 0.83 [95% CI 0.74-0.93], p=0.0017). The reduction of all-cause mortality was consistent across predefined subgroups. The composite endpoint of mortality or all-cause admission occurred in 1116 (74%) of 1511 on carvedilol and in 1160 (76%) of 1518 on metoprolol (0.94 [0.86-1.02], p=0.122). Incidence of side-effects and drug withdrawals did not differ by much between the two study groups. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that carvedilol extends survival compared with metoprolol.

Influence of pretreatment systolic blood pressure on the effect of carvedilol in patients with severe chronic heart failure: the Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS) study.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the influence of pretreatment systolic blood pressure (SBP) on the efficacy and safety of carvedilol in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: Although beta-blockers reduce the risk of death in CHF, there is little reported experience with these drugs in patients with a low pretreatment SBP, who may respond poorly to beta-blockade. METHODS: We studied 2,289 patients with severe CHF who participated in the Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS) trial. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, carvedilol improved the clinical status and reduced the risk of death and the combined risk of death or hospitalization for any reason, for a cardiovascular reason, or for worsening heart failure (p < 0.001 for all). The relative magnitude of these benefits did not vary as a function of the pretreatment SBP (all interaction: p > 0.10). However, because patients with the lowest SBP were at highest risk of an event, they experienced the greatest absolute benefit from treatment with carvedilol. The lower the pretreatment SBP, the more likely that patients would report an adverse event, be intolerant of high doses of the study drug, or require permanent withdrawal of treatment (p < 0.001 for all). However, these risks were primarily related to the severity of the underlying illness and not to treatment with carvedilol. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides little support for concerns about using beta-blockers (particularly those with vasodilatory actions) in patients with severe CHF who have a low SBP. Pretreatment blood pressure can identify patients who have the greatest need for risk reduction with carvedilol.

Effects of metoprolol and carvedilol on cause-specific mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure--COMET.

BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers with different receptor bindings reduce mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. We compared the effects of the beta1-blocker metoprolol tartrate and the beta1-, beta2-, and alpha1-blocker carvedilol. METHODS: In a randomized double-blind design, 3029 patients with chronic congestive heart failure requiring diuretic therapy and with left ventricular dysfunction were randomized to treatment with carvedilol (n = 1511) or metoprolol tartrate (n = 1518) and titrated to target doses of 25 mg of carvedilol twice daily or 50 mg of metoprolol tartrate twice daily. The main outcome measures were total mortality and the combination of mortality or hospitalization for any cause. Secondary end points were cardiovascular death, combinations of morbidity and mortality, New York Heart Association class, worsening of heart failure, hospitalizations, and discontinuation of study therapy. RESULTS: A total of 512 and 600 patients in the carvedilol group and metoprolol group, respectively, died (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.93, P = .0017). Cardiovascular death was reduced by carvedilol (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.90, P = .0004). There were fewer sudden deaths and deaths caused by circulatory failure or by stroke in the carvedilol group. There was no difference in all-cause hospitalizations or in worsening heart failure between treatment groups. The incidence of fatal or nonfatal acute myocardial infarction was significantly lower in the carvedilol group (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.97, P = .03). Discontinuations of study therapy were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with metoprolol tartrate, carvedilol reduced cardiovascular mortality, sudden death, death caused by circulatory failure, death caused by stroke, as well as fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarctions.

Exchange of beta-blockers in heart failure patients. Experiences from the poststudy phase of COMET (the Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial).

BACKGROUND: The Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET) reported a significant survival benefit for carvedilol, a beta1-, beta2- and alpha1-blocker, vs. metoprolol tartrate, a beta1-selective blocker, in patients with mild-to-severe chronic heart failure (CHF). Patients on treatment with metoprolol might benefit from switching to carvedilol. AIM: To investigate the safety and tolerability of switching beta-blockers in CHF. METHODS: At the end of COMET, the Steering Committee recommended that study medication was stopped without unblinding, and patients were commenced on open-label beta-blockade at a dose equivalent to half the dose of blinded therapy, with subsequent titration to target or maximum tolerated dose. Patients were followed for 30 days. RESULTS: 1321 out of 1440 patients were transitioned to open-label treatment (76.8% to carvedilol). Serious adverse and CHF-related events were respectively 9.4% and 4.7% in those switching from carvedilol to metoprolol and 3.1% and 1.5% in patients switching from metoprolol to carvedilol. Patients who switched from carvedilol to metoprolol showed the highest mortality or hospitalisation rate (12.3%) in comparison with those who switched from metoprolol to carvedilol (3.1%, p<0.001) or who stayed on the same drug (carvedilol: 2.5%, p<0.001; metoprolol: 4.2%, p=0.04). Reducing the initial dose of the second beta-blocker maximised the safety of this strategy. Event rate was higher in patients with more severe heart failure and in those withdrawing from beta-blockade. CONCLUSION: Our data show that switching beta-blockers is a practical, safe and well-tolerated strategy to optimise treatment of CHF. Patients who switched to carvedilol showed the lowest rate of adverse events. A closer clinical monitoring is recommended during transition in high-risk patients.

Tolerability of carvedilol and ACE-Inhibition in mild heart failure. Results of CARMEN (Carvedilol ACE-Inhibitor Remodelling Mild CHF EvaluatioN).

BACKGROUND: Management guidelines for heart failure recommend ACE-I and beta-blockers. The perception of difficult up-titration might have added to the slow uptake of beta-blockers despite their mortality and morbidity benefits. AIMS: CARMEN offered a possibility to study safety and tolerability of enalapril against carvedilol and their combination. METHODS: Five hundred and seventy-two patients were blindly up-titrated on carvedilol (target 25 mg bid) and/or enalapril (target 10 mg bid), and continued for 18 months. In the combination arm, carvedilol was up-titrated before enalapril. RESULTS: There was no group related difference in adverse events during up-titration. Withdrawal rates were 31, 30 and 30%, and serious adverse events 28, 29 and 34% in the combination, carvedilol and enalapril arms. Mortality was similar in all groups (all-cause N=14, 14 and 14; cardiovascular N=9, 13 and 14). All-cause and cardiovascular hospitalizations occurred in 26, 27 and 32%, and in 12, 16 and 22% in the combination, carvedilol and enalapril arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: The safety profile was similar in all treatment arms. In contrast to common perception, there was no difference in tolerability between the ACE-I and carvedilol. This result is even more remarkable as the high prestudy use of ACE-I (65%) might have introduced a bias by selecting ACE-I tolerant patients, who were only switched from their former ACE-I to enalapril.

Value of N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide as a prognostic marker in patients with CKD: results from the CREATE study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study assessed plasma N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as a prognostic marker of cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3-4 and anaemia treated with epoetin beta to two haemoglobin target ranges. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS & MEASUREMENTS: Of 603 patients enrolled in the Cardiovascular Risk Reduction by Early Anaemia Treatment with Epoetin Beta (CREATE) trial (baseline creatinine clearance 15-35 mL/min; haemoglobin 11.0-12.5 g/dL), 291 were included in this sub-study. Patients received subcutaneous epoetin beta either immediately after randomisation (target 13.0-15.0 g/dL; Group 1), or after their haemoglobin levels had fallen < 10.5 g/dL (target 10.5-11.5 g/dL; Group 2). Chronic heart failure New York Heart Association class III-IV was an exclusion criterion. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00321919) RESULTS: Cardiovascular event rates were higher in patients with baseline NT-proBNP > 400 vs. ≤ 400 pg/mL (39 vs. 13 events; p = 0.0002). Dialysis was initiated in 68 vs. 42 patients with NT-proBNP > 400 vs. ≤ 400 pg/mL (p = 0.0003). Amongst patients with NT-proBNP > 400 pg/mL, there was no significant difference between treatment groups in risk of cardiovascular events (HR = 0.57; p = 0.08) or time to dialysis (HR = 0.65; p = 0.08). The overall interpretation of this substudy is, however, limited by its relatively small sample size which, together with low clinical event rates, result in a lack of statistical power for some analyses and should be viewed as being hypothesis-generating in nature. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic kidney disease patients with mild-to-moderate anaemia, elevated baseline plasma NT-proBNP levels are associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events and an accelerated progression towards end-stage renal disease.

Effectiveness and safety of recombinant human erythropoietin beta in maintaining common haemoglobin targets in routine clinical practice in Europe: the GAIN study.

OBJECTIVE: The Gain effectiveness in Anaemia treatment wIth NeoRecormon (epoetin beta) study (GAIN) evaluated the effectiveness and safety of recombinant human erythropoietin beta in correcting and/or maintaining common haemoglobin (Hb) targets in routine clinical practice in Europe. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: European 18-month observational, prospective clinical practice study across 217 centres from 13 countries. During a 3-month retrospective period, patients received any erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA). For the subsequent 18-month study phase, patients receiving intravenous (IV) epoetin beta or any other ESA were recommended to be switched to subcutaneous (SC) epoetin beta. Presence of anti-erythropoietin antibodies (AEAB) and related outcomes was investigated before and during the study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00551603. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correction and maintenance of Hb levels within recommended target range and mean dose requirement to correct and maintain target Hb levels. RESULTS: A total of 4264 patients on haemodialysis received an ESA for treatment of renal anaemia. During the study period, the number of patients who maintained Hb levels in the recommended target range of 10-12 g/dL increased from 57% to 62%. Administration of SC epoetin beta resulted in a 24% lower mean dose requirement to maintain target Hb levels compared to IV administration (p < 0.001). Considerable differences were observed between countries in the study. No patients developed pure red cell aplasia associated with AEAB during observation. CONCLUSION: This observational study suggests that haemodialysis patients who are receiving any ESA via SC or IV administration for treatment of their renal anaemia can be safely and effectively switched to SC epoetin beta to achieve or maintain the currently recommended Hb targets. SC required a lower dose than IV administration to maintain similar efficacy, thereby potentially lowering the drug costs.