Biomechanical response of ultrathin slices of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy tissue to myosin modulator mavacamten.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited myocardial disorder of the heart, but effective treatment options remain limited. Mavacamten, a direct myosin modulator, has been presented as novel pharmacological therapy for HCM. The aim of this study was to analyze the biomechanical response of HCM tissue to Mavacamten using living myocardial slices (LMS). LMS (n = 58) from patients with HCM (n = 10) were cultured under electromechanical stimulation, and Verapamil and Mavacamten were administered on consecutive days to evaluate their effects on cardiac biomechanics. Mavacamten and Verapamil reduced contractile force and dF/dt and increased time-to-relaxation in a similar manner. Yet, the time-to-peak of the cardiac contraction was prolonged after administration of Mavacamten (221.0 ms (208.8 - 236.3) vs. 237.7 (221.0 - 254.7), p = 0.004). In addition, Mavacamten prolonged the functional refractory period (FRP) (330 ms (304 - 351) vs. 355 ms (313 - 370), p = 0.023) and better preserved twitch force with increasing stimulation frequencies, compared to Verapamil. As such, Mavacamten reduced (hyper-)contractility and prolonged contraction duration of HCM LMS, suggesting a reduction in cardiac wall stress. Also, Mavacamten might protect against the development of ventricular tachyarrhythmias due to prolongation of the FRP, and improve toleration of tachycardia due to better preservation of twitch force at tachycardiac stimulation frequencies.

Biatrial arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) may be caused by a primary atrial myopathy. Whether HOCM-related atrial myopathy affects mainly electrophysiological properties of the left atrium (LA) or also the right atrium (RA) has never been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize atrial conduction and explore differences in the prevalence of conduction disorders, potential fractionation, and low-voltage areas (LVAs) between the RA and LA during sinus rhythm (SR) as indicators of potential arrhythmogenic areas. METHODS: Intraoperative epicardial mapping of both atria during SR was performed in 15 HOCM patients (age 50 ± 12 years). Conduction delay (CD) and conductin block (CB), unipolar potential characteristics (voltages, fractionation), and LVA were quantified. RESULTS: Conduction disorders and LVA were found scattered throughout both atria in all patients and did not differ between the RA and LA (CD: 2.9% [1.9%-3.6%] vs 2.6% [2.1%-6.4%], P = .541; CB: 1.7% [0.9%-3.1%] vs 1.5% [0.5%-2.8%], P = .600; LVA: 4.7% [1.6%-7.7%] vs 2.9% [2.1%-7.1%], P = .793). Compared to the RA, unipolar voltages of single potentials (SPs) and fractionated potentials (FPs) were higher in the LA (SP: P75 7.3 mV vs 10.9 mV; FP: P75 2.0 mV vs 3.7 mV). FP contained low-voltage components in only 18% of all LA sites compared to 36% of all RA sites. CONCLUSION: In patients with HOCM, conduction disorders, LVA, and FP are equally present in both atria, supporting the hypothesis of a primary atrial myopathy. Conceptually, the presence of a biatrial substrate and high-voltage FP may contribute to failure of ablative therapy of atrial tachyarrhythmias in this population.