RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Feedback facilitates learning by guiding and modifying behaviors through an action-outcome contingency. As the majority of existing studies have focused on the immediate presentation of feedback, the impact of delayed feedback on learning is understudied. Prior work demonstrated that learning from immediate and delayed feedback employed distinct brain regions in healthy individuals, and compared to healthy individuals, individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are impaired in learning from immediate feedback. The goal of the current investigation was to assess the effects of delayed vs immediate feedback on learning in individuals with TBI and examine brain networks associated with delayed and immediate feedback processing. SETTING: Nonprofit research organization. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI. DESIGN: Participants completed a paired-associate word learning task while undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. During the task, feedback was presented either immediately, after a delay, or not at all (control condition). MAIN MEASURES: Learning performance accuracy, confidence ratings, post-task questionnaire, and blood oxygen level-dependent signal. RESULTS: Behavioral data showed that delayed feedback resulted in better learning performance than immediate feedback and no feedback. In addition, participants reported higher confidence in their performance during delayed feedback trials. During delayed vs immediate feedback processing, greater activation was observed in the superior parietal and angular gyrus. Activation in these areas has been previously associated with successful retrieval and greater memory confidence. CONCLUSION: The observed results might be explained by delayed feedback processing circumventing the striatal dopaminergic regions responsible for learning from immediate feedback that are impaired in TBI. In addition, delayed feedback evokes less of an affective reaction than immediate feedback, which likely benefited memory performance. Indeed, compared to delayed feedback, positive or negative immediate feedback was more likely to be rated as rewarding or punishing, respectively. The findings have significant implications for TBI rehabilitation and suggest that delaying feedback during rehabilitation might recruit brain regions that lead to better functional outcomes.
RESUMO
The modified Story Memory Technique (mSMT) is a memory rehabilitation program that combines training in visualization and context formation to improve learning and memory. Previous studies have shown improvement in learning and memory in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) after undergoing the mSMT, including changes in brain activity related to working memory and word encoding. The current study examined changes in brain activity in 16 individuals diagnosed with MS (n treatmentâ¯=â¯6; n placebo controlâ¯=â¯10) when they were presented with to-be-remembered information within a meaningful context (i.e. a paragraph) from before to after mSMT treatment. We expected treatment-related changes in brain activation in the language network (LAN), default mode network (DMN), and executive control network (ECN). Consistent with this prediction, fMRI results revealed reduced brain activation in the LAN, DMN and ECN after completing the mSMT treatment in the context of paragraph learning. While no significant behavioral changes were observed, a marginally significant improvement with a large effect size was noted between baseline and follow-up performance on the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test in persons who completed treatment. Results are discussed in terms of the impact of imagery training on patterns of cerebral activation when learning words presented within a context.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Mapeamento Encefálico , Humanos , Aprendizagem , Imageamento por Ressonância MagnéticaRESUMO
While cognitive fatigue is experienced by up to 80% of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI), little is known about its neural underpinnings. We previously hypothesized that presentation of rewarding outcomes leads to cognitive fatigue reduction and activation of the striatum, a brain region shown to be associated with cognitive fatigue in clinical populations and processing of rewarding outcomes. We have demonstrated this in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Here, we tested this hypothesis in individuals with TBI. Twenty-one individuals with TBI and 24 healthy participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants performed a task during which they were presented with 1) the Outcome condition where they were exposed to monetary rewards, and 2) the No Outcome condition that served as the control condition and was not associated with monetary rewards. In accordance with our hypothesis, results showed that attainment of rewarding outcomes leads to cognitive fatigue reduction in individuals with TBI, as well as activation of the striatum. Specifically, we observed a significant group by condition interaction on fatigue scores driven by the TBI group reporting lower levels of fatigue after the Outcome condition. fMRI data revealed a significant main-effect of condition in regions previously implicated in outcome processing, while a significant group by condition interaction was observed in the left ventral striatum as revealed by a priori region of interest analysis. Results suggest that a salient motivator can significantly reduce fatigue and that outcome presentation leads to increased activation of the ventral striatum in TBI. These findings can inform the development of future non-pharmacological cognitive fatigue treatment methods and contribute to the growing body of evidence showing the association between cognitive fatigue and the striatum.