Midterm Outcomes of Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Setting of Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation.

INTRODUCTION: Although randomized trial data exist for 2-y outcomes comparing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus CABG with concomitant mitral valve repair (CABG + MVr) for the treatment of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR), longer term outcomes are unclear. This study evaluated the longitudinal outcomes of isolated CABG for moderate IMR. METHODS: Patients with moderate IMR undergoing isolated CABG from January 2010 to February 2018 at a single institution were included. Outcomes included longitudinal freedom from heart failure readmission, survival, rates of persistent mitral regurgitation (MR), and freedom from mitral valve reinterventions. A subanalysis was conducted comparing CABG versus CABG + MVr. Multivariable Cox regression was used for risk adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 528 patients with moderate IMR underwent isolated CABG. Postoperatively, 26% of patients had at least moderate MR at 1-mo follow-up, although at 5 y progression to severe MR was rare (2.2%) as were mitral valve reinterventions (0.2%). Survival at 30 d (95.8%), 1 y (89.6%), and 5 y (76.6%) was acceptable. Furthermore, the freedom from readmission for heart failure was also acceptable at 30 d (92.6%), 1 y (79.9%), and 5 y (65.0%) postoperatively. In a subanalysis comparing CABG versus CABG + MVr, unadjusted and risk-adjusted survival, freedom from heart failure readmissions, mitral valve reinterventions, and degrees of MR were comparable between the groups at all intervals (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with moderate IMR can undergo isolated CABG with acceptable rates of heart failure readmissions, survival, progression to severe MR, and the need for subsequent mitral interventions. These data support the use of isolated CABG in patients with moderate IMR.

Fate of the Kidneys in Patients with Post-Operative Renal Failure After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the clinical and renal-related outcomes in patients with acute renal failure (ARF) following cardiac surgery. METHODS: Index adult cardiac operations at a single institution from 2010-2018 were reviewed. Patients requiring dialysis pre-operatively were excluded. ARF was stratified as either creatinine rise (≥3-times baseline or ≥4.0 mg/dL) or post-operative dialysis. Outcomes included mortality, rates of progression to dialysis, and renal recovery. Multivariable Cox regression was used for risk-adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 10,037 patients, including 6,275 (62.5%) isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 2,243 (22.3%) isolated valve, and 1,519 (15.1%) CABG plus valve cases, were included. Post-operative ARF occurred in 346 (3.5%) patients, with 230 (66.5%) requiring dialysis. Survival was significantly reduced in patients with ARF at 30-days (97.9 versus 70.8%, P <0.001), 1-year (94.9 versus 48.0%, P <0.001), and 5-years (86.2 versus 38.2%, P <0.001) with more profound reductions in those requiring dialysis, findings which persisted after risk-adjustment. Progression to subsequent dialysis in the creatinine rise group was rare (n = 1). The median time to dialysis initiation in the dialysis group was 5 days (IQR 2-12 days) with a median time of dialysis dependence of 72 days (IQR 38-1229 days). Of those patients requiring postoperative dialysis, 30.9% demonstrated renal recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative ARF and in particular the need for dialysis are associated with substantial reductions in survival that persist during longitudinal follow-up. This occurs despite the finding that patients experiencing creatinine rise only rarely progress to dialysis, and that nearly one-third of patients requiring post-operative dialysis recover renal function.

A mortality risk score for septuagenarians undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: With septuagenarians undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) more frequently, we aimed to develop a risk score for 1-year mortality in this population. METHODS: Septuagenarian OHT recipients were identified from the UNOS registry between 1987 and 2018. The primary outcome was 1-year post-OHT mortality. Patients were randomly divided into derivation and validation cohorts. Associated covariates were entered into a multivariable logistic regression model. A risk score was created using the magnitudes of the odds ratios from the derivation cohort, and its 1-year post-OHT mortality prediction capacity was tested in the validation cohort. RESULTS: A total of 1156 septuagenarians were included, and they were randomly divided into derivation (66.7%, n = 771) and validation (33.3%, n = 385) cohorts. An 11-point risk score incorporating 4 variables was created, which included mechanical ventilation, serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, and donor age. The predicted 1-year mortality ranged from 4.2% (0 points) to 48.1% (11-points) (p < .001). After cross-validation, the c-index was 0.67 with a Brier score of 0.10. Risk scores above 3 points portended a survival disadvantage at 1-year follow-up (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This 11-point risk score for septuagenarians is predictive of mortality within 1-year of OHT and has potential utilization in improving recipient evaluation and selection of elderly patients.

Geographic disparities in heart transplantation persist under the new allocation policy.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on geographic disparities in United States orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to measure geographic disparity in OHT rates between pre-policy and post-policy change eras. We performed multilevel Poisson regression to measure region-level OHT rates. We derived an allocation priority-adjusted median incidence rate ratio (MIRR) for each policy era, a measure of median change in OHT rates between regions. RESULTS: 5958.78 waitlist person-years were analyzed, comprising 6596 OHT procedures (3890 pre-policy and 2706 post-policy). Median region-level OHT rate was .94 transplants/person-years before and 1.51 transplants/person-years after the policy change (P < .001). The unadjusted OHT MIRR across regions was 1.29 (95% CI 1.00-1.50) pre-policy change and 1.17 (95% CI 1.00-1.43) post-policy change, suggesting that the region-related variance in OHT rates decreased under the new allocation. After adjustment for allocation priority risk factors, the MIRR pre-policy change was 1.13 (95% CI 1.01-1.32) and post-policy change was 1.15 (95% CI 1.00-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: Geography accounts for ∼10% of the disparity among United States OHT rates. Despite broader heart sharing, the updated allocation policy did not substantially alter the existing geographic disparities among OHT recipients.

A mortality risk score for heart transplants after contemporary ventricular assist device bridging.

BACKGROUND: We sought to derive a risk score for 1-year mortality following orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) in patients bridged with a contemporary centrifugal left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS: Adult patients (≥18 years) in the United Network for Organ Sharing database undergoing OHT between 2010 and 2019 who were bridged with a HeartWare or HeartMate III device were included. Derivation and validation cohorts were randomly assigned with a 2:1 ratio. Threshold analysis and multivariable logistic regression were utilized to obtain adjusted odds ratios for 1-year post-OHT mortality. A risk score was generated using these adjusted odds ratios in the derivation cohort and the predictive performance of the composite index was evaluated in the validation set. RESULTS: A total of 3434 patients were identified. In the derivation cohort, the mean age was 53.5 ± 12.1 years and 1758 (76.8%) were male; 1789 (78.1%) were bridged with a HeartWare device. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that recipient age ≥50 years, bilirubin level ≥2.4 mg/dl, ischemic time ≥4 h, and preoperative hemodialysis predicted 1-year post-transplant mortality. Stratification into risk groups in the validation cohort revealed significant differences in postoperative renal failure, stroke, and short-term mortality. One-year post-transplant mortality was 5%, 6.7%, and 14.8% in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk categories, respectively (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients bridged to OHT with newer generation centrifugal LVADs, older age, increasing bilirubin, longer ischemic time, and pre-OHT dialysis independently predicted post-transplant mortality. The composite risk score based on these factors may assist in patient selection and prognostication in those supported with contemporary LVADs.

Changes in multiorgan heart transplants following the 2018 allocation policy change.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of the heart allocation policy change in 2018 on the characteristics and outcomes of multiorgan transplants involving heart allografts. METHODS: Adults undergoing multiorgan heart transplantation from 2010 to 2020 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry. Transplants were stratified into occurring before versus after the October 2018 heart allocation change. The primary outcome was 1-year survival following transplantation. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the risk-adjusted effect of the allocation policy change on outcomes between cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 1832 patients underwent multiorgan heart transplantation during the study period with 245 (13.37%) undergoing heart-lung transplantation, 244 (13.32%) undergoing heart-liver transplantation, and 1343 (73.31%) undergoing heart-kidney transplantation. There was a higher utilization of temporary MCSDs as well as longer ischemic times for all three types of transplantation following the policy change. Heart-lung and heart-liver recipients had a similar 1-year survival before and after the policy change (each p > .05). Renal failure requiring dialysis (29.5% vs. 39.4%, p = .001) as well as 1-year survival (88% vs. 82%; log-rank p = .01) were worse in the heart-kidney cohort after the organ allocation system modification. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates similar trends in multiorgan transplants as has been observed in isolated heart transplants following the allocation change, including more frequent utilization of temporary mechanical support and longer ischemic times. Although outcomes have remained comparable in the new allocation era with heart-lung and heart-liver transplants, heart-kidney recipients have a worse 1-year survival following the change.

Impact of center donor acceptance patterns on utilization of extended-criteria donors and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the impact of transplanting center donor acceptance patterns on usage of extended-criteria donors (ECDs) and posttransplant outcomes following orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was queried to identify heart donor offers and adult, isolated OHT recipients in the United States from January 1, 2013 to October 17, 2018. Centers were stratified into three equal-size terciles based on donor heart acceptance rates (<13.7%, 13.7%-20.2%, >20.2%). Overall survival was compared between recipients of ECDs (≥40 years, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <60%, distance ≥500 miles, hepatitis B virus [HBV], hepatitis C virus [HCV], or human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], or ≥50 refusals) and recipients of traditional-criteria donors, and among transplanting terciles. RESULTS: A total of 85,505 donor heart offers were made to 133 centers with 15,264 (17.9%) accepted for OHT. High-acceptance programs (>20.2%) more frequently accepted donors with LVEF <60%, HIV, HCV, and/or HBV, ≥50 offers, or distance >500 miles from the transplanting center (each p < .001). Posttransplant survival was comparable across all three terciles (p = .11). One- and five-year survival were also similar across terciles when examining recipients of all five ECD factors. Acceptance tier and increasing acceptance rate were not found to have any impact on mortality in multivariable modeling. Of ECD factors, only age ≥40 years was found to have increased hazards for mortality (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.46; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Of recipients of ECD hearts, outcomes are similar across center-acceptance terciles. Educating less aggressive programs to increase donor acceptance and ECD utilization may yield higher national rates of OHT without major impact on outcomes.

Concomitant tricuspid valve surgery is beneficial at the time of left-sided valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the impact of secondary functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and concomitant tricuspid valve repair (TVr) at the time of left-sided valve operations. METHODS: Adults undergoing left-sided valve operations between 2010 and 2019 at a multihospital academic institution were included. Patients were stratified into three groups: less-than-moderate TR without TVr (Group 1), moderate-or-greater TR without TVr (Group 2), and moderate-or-greater TR with TVr (Group 3). Primary outcomes included survival and hospital readmissions. Secondary outcomes included major postoperative morbidities. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated risk-adjusted mortality and readmission. RESULTS: About 3444 patients were included in the analysis and were stratified into Group 1 (n = 2612, 75.8%), Group 2 (n = 563, 16.3%), and Group 3 (n = 269, 7.8%). Patients with moderate or greater TR (Groups 2 and 3) had higher rates of mortality, hospital readmissions and major postoperative complications including reoperations, renal failure requiring dialysis, blood transfusions, and prolonged ventilation (all, p < .05). When assessed individually, the Group 3 had substantially higher rates of renal failure requiring dialysis, prolonged ventilation, and reoperations, although the Group 2 had higher rates of 30-day mortality (all, p < .05). These findings persisted in risk-adjusted analysis with the highest hazards for mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-2.2) and readmission (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.5) appreciated in the Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of 3444 patients, those with moderate-to-severe TR who did not undergo a TVr at the time of their left-sided valve operation had substantially higher risks of mortality and hospital readmissions compared with those who did undergo TV surgery.

Gastrointestinal complications after cardiac surgery: Incidence, predictors, and impact on outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence, predictors, and long-term impact of gastrointestinal (GI) complications following adult cardiac surgery. METHODS: Index Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) adult cardiac operations performed between January 2010 and February 2018 at a single institution were included. Patients were stratified by the occurrence of postoperative GI complications. Outcomes included early and late survival as well as other associated major postoperative complications. A subanalysis of propensity score-matched patients was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 10,285 patients were included, and the overall rate of GI complications was 2.4% (n = 246). Predictors of GI complications included dialysis dependency, intra-aortic balloon pump, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and longer aortic cross-clamp times. Thirty-day (2.6% vs. 24.8%), 1- (6.3% vs. 41.9%), and 3-year (11.1% vs. 48.4%) mortality were substantially higher in patients who experienced GI complications (all p < .001). GI complication was associated with a threefold increased hazard for mortality (hazard ratio = 3.1, 95% confidence interval = 2.6-3.7) after risk adjustment, and there was an association between the occurrence of GI complications and increased rates of renal failure (39.4% vs. 2.5%), new dialysis dependency (31.3% vs. 1.5%), multisystem organ failure (21.5% vs .1.0%), and deep sternal wound infections (2.6% vs. 0.2%; all p < .001). These results persisted in propensity-matched analysis. CONCLUSION: GI complications are infrequent but have a profound impact on early and late survival, and often occur in association with other major complications. Risk factor modification, heightened awareness, and early detection and management of GI complications appear warranted.

The predictive value of preimplant pulmonary function testing in LVAD patients.

BACKGROUND: The predictive value of preoperative pulmonary function testing (PFT) in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients remains unknown. This study evaluates the relationship between abnormal PFTs and postimplant outcomes in LVAD patients. METHODS: LVAD implants from January 2004 to December 2018 at a single institution were included. Patients were stratified based on the presence of abnormal preoperative PFTs, and the primary outcome was respiratory adverse events (AE). Secondary outcomes included 1-year overall postimplant survival, and complications including bleeding, renal failure, thromboembolism, and device malfunction. RESULTS: The total of 333 patients underwent LVAD implant, 46.5% (n = 155) with normal PFTs and 53.5% (n = 178) with abnormal PFTs. Patients with abnormal PFTs were noted to have higher rates of respiratory AEs (25.9% vs. 15.1%, p = .049). In multivariable analysis, the impact of PFTs was most significant when forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced expiratory volume (FEV1/FVC) ratio was less than 0.5 (hazard ratio [HR] 16.32, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-156.78). The rates of other AEs including bleeding, renal failure, right heart failure, and device malfunction were similar. One-year overall postimplant survival was comparable between the groups (56.8% vs. 68.8%, p = .3183), though patients in the lowest strata of FEV1 (<60% predicted) and FEV1/FVC (<0.5) had elevated risk-adjusted hazards for mortality (HR 2.63, 95% CI, 1.51-4.60 and HR 18.92, 95% CI, 2.10-170.40, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of abnormal preoperative PFTs is not prohibitory for LVAD implantation although it can be used for risk stratification for respiratory AEs and mortality, particularly in patients with severely reduced metrics. The importance of careful patient selection should be underscored in this higher risk patient subset.

Wound complications and 30-day readmissions after single and bilateral internal mammary grafting: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database.

BACKGROUND: This study compares the postoperative outcomes, 30-day readmission rates, and incidence of sternal wound infection-related readmissions between patients receiving bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) and single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafting during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. METHODS: We utilized the weighted 2013-2014 National Readmission Database claims to identify all US adult patients who underwent CABG utilizing SIMA (n = 279,891) or BIMA (n = 11,651). Thirty-day overall and wound-related readmissions, in-hospital outcomes, costs, lengths of stay (LOS) at readmissions were compared between the two groups. Predictors of 30-day readmission were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: After propensity matching (n = 10,339 pairs), there were no significant differences between the two groups during the index hospitalization, except for higher total hospital costs in the BIMA group (p = .02). The incidence of wound infections was also comparable between BIMA and SIMA (1.1% vs. 1.2%; p = .50). At 30-days, the overall readmission rate was elevated in SIMA patients (9.5% vs. 8.8%; p < .01), primarily impacted by cardiovascular causes. While the proportion of 30-day readmissions due to infections was significantly higher among BIMA versus SIMA patients (20.4% vs. 15.9%; p < .01), wound infections during the index hospitalization did not predict all-cause 30-day readmission among BIMA patients (p = .24) in the risk-adjusted analysis. Among the readmitted patients, LOS (6.4 vs. 6.2 days), costs ($14,440 vs. $16,461), and in-hospital mortality (2.4% vs. 1.7%) were comparable between the two groups (all p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: BIMA grafting is not an independent predictor of all-cause 30-day readmissions. Cardiovascular causes remain the primary driver of 30-day readmissions among SIMA and BIMA patients after CABG.

Twenty-year survival following orthotopic heart transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated 20-year survival after adult orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing Registry database was queried to study adult OHT recipients between 1987 and 1998 with over 20-year posttransplant follow-up. The primary and secondary outcomes were 20-year survival and cause of death after OHT, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify significant independent predictors of long-term survival, and long-term survival was compared among cohorts stratified by number of predictors using Kaplan Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: 20,658 patients undergoing OHT were included, with a median follow-up of 9.0 (IQR, 3.2-15.4) years. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 10-, 15-, and 20-year survival were 50.2%, 30.1%, and 17.2%, respectively. Median survival was 10.1 (IQR, 3.9-16.9) years. Increasing recipient age (>65 years), increasing donor age (>40 years), increasing recipient body mass index (>30), black race, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and longer cold ischemic time (>4 h) were adversely associated with a 20-year survival. Of these 6 negative predictors, presence of 0 risk factors had the greatest 10-year (59.7%) and 20-year survival (26.2%), with decreasing survival with additional negative predictors. The most common cause of death in 20-year survivors was renal, liver, and/or multisystem organ failure whereas graft failure more greatly impacted earlier mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies six negative preoperative predictors of 20-year survival with 20-year survival rates exceeding 25% in the absence of these factors. These data highlight the potential for very long-term survival after OHT in patients with end-stage heart failure and may be useful for patient selection and prognostication.

Direct bridging to cardiac transplantation with the surgically implanted Impella 5.0 device.

This study evaluated outcomes of direct bridging to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) with the Impella 5.0 device. Adult recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry bridged to OHT with the Impella 5.0 device between 2010 to 2018 were included. Outcomes included waitlist and post-transplant survival. A total of 236 patients were wait-listed with Impella 5.0 support, and 24% (n = 57) underwent bridge to OHT. Early and late post-transplant survival was excellent at 96.5% at 30 day, 93.8% at 90-day, and 90.3% at 1-year follow-up. Post-transplant complications were infrequent, but the most common were renal failure requiring dialysis (8.8%, n = 5), cerebrovascular accidents (1.8%, n = 1), and pacemaker implant (1.8%, n = 1). The rate of waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration was 20.0% (n = 47); however, the majority of patients were bridged to OHT (24%, n = 57) or durable continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (37.0%, n = 87). The median time supported on the device, while waitlisted was 13 days (Interquartile range [IQR] 7, 20 days). The Impella 5.0 device can be used as a direct bridge to OHT with excellent survival and minimal post-transplant morbidity. Overall, these data support the utilization of Impella 5.0 as a bridge to OHT in select patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.

The importance of repeat testing in detecting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a coronary artery bypass grafting patient.

While elective cardiac surgeries have been postponed to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission and to reduce resource utilization, patients with urgent indications necessitating surgery may still be at risk of contracting the disease throughout their postoperative recovery. We present a case of an 81-year-old female who underwent urgent coronary artery bypass grafting and was readmitted following discharge to a nursing facility with a cluster of COVID-19 cases. Despite symptomatology and imaging concerning for COVID-19, two initial reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests were negative but a third test was positive. This case emphasizes the risks of discharge location in the COVID-19 era as well as the importance of clinical suspicion, early isolation practices for those presumed positive, and repeat testing, given the marginal sensitivity of available COVID-19 RT-PCR.

Preoperative prealbumin does not impact outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: This single-center, the retrospective study evaluates the impact of preoperative serum prealbumin levels on outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. METHODS: Adults undergoing LVAD implantation, with a recorded preoperative prealbumin level, between 2004 to 2018 were included. Primary outcomes included rates of 1-year survival and secondary outcomes included rates of postimplant adverse events. Threshold regression and restricted cubic splines were utilized to identify a cut-point to dichotomize prealbumin level. Prealbumin was also evaluated as a continuous variable. Multivariable logistic regression was used for risk-adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients were included. Patients were dichotomized according to an optimal prealbumin threshold of 15 mg/dL: 47.4% (n = 158) had levels below and 52.6% (n = 175) had levels above this threshold, respectively. The rates of postimplant adverse events, including bleeding, infection, stroke, renal failure, and right heart failure, were similar between the groups (all P > .05). Furthermore, the rates of cardiac transplantation and device explantation were also similar (all P > .05). Unadjusted survival was comparable between the groups at 30-days, 90-days, and 1-year following LVAD implantation (all P > .05). In addition, lower prealbumin did not impact risk-adjusted 1-year mortality when modeled either as a categorical (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.48-2.12; P = .82) or continuous variable (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 0.73-2.34; P = .96). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that lower prealbumin levels were not predictive of increased post-LVAD morbidity or mortality. Although an established marker of nutritional and inflammatory status, the role of prealbumin in patient selection or prognostication appears limited in LVAD patients.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery lacks a longitudinal survival advantage in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the longitudinal impacts of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: Adults with LVEF ≤ 30% undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting between 2011 and 2020 were included. Patients were stratified based on the utilization of cardiopulmonary bypass into OPCAB or on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) groups. Primary outcomes included survival and hospital readmissions. Secondary outcomes evaluated postoperative morbidities. Multivariable regression evaluated risk-adjusted mortality and readmission. Propensity score matching was utilized to reduce bias. RESULTS: A total of 660 low LVEF patients were included, of which 28.5% (n = 188) were OPCAB and 71.5% (n = 472) were ONCAB. The rates of complete revascularization were similar between the groups (80.3% vs 82.0%; P = .67). Early survival between the unmatched groups was similar at 1-year follow-up (86.2% vs 87.9%; P = .53); however, at 5 years OPCABs had significantly worse survival compared with ONCABs (71.5% vs 64.2%; P = .02). These findings persisted in the matched cohort where survival at 1 year was comparable (86.8% vs 85.7%; P = .80), but 5-year survival was better for ONCABs (64.1% vs 69.9%; P = .03). The rates of readmission were similar between the unmatched and matched groups at all time intervals, including readmissions for cardiac-related and heart failure-related events (all, P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary patients with reduced LVEF, survival after OPCAB was similar at 1 year but lower at 5-year follow-up compared with ONCAB, despite similar rates of complete revascularization. These findings suggest that there may be other factors influencing longitudinal mortality in the low LVEF cohort, beyond the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.

The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor exposure on coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of preoperative angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) exposure on outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Isolated CABGs from January 2010 to January 2018 at a single institution were included. Primary stratification was based on exposure to an ACEi within 48-hours of CABG. Propensity-matching with a 1:1 ratio was performed to generate cohorts with comparable baseline characteristics. Primary outcomes included operative mortality and morbidity rates as well as prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Secondary outcomes included hospital readmission. RESULTS: Five-thousand two hundred seventy propensity-matched patients underwent isolated CABG. Baseline characteristics were comparable between those exposed and unexposed to ACEi, with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality of 2.4% in each group (P = .98). Rates of postoperative renal failure (5.0% vs 8.2%; P = .002), new-onset dialysis (1.2% vs 2.2%; P = .004), and prolonged ventilation (7.0% vs 13.4%; P < .0001) were higher in patients without ACEi exposure. The rates of prolonged ICU stay were similar (25.8% vs 27.7%; P = .127). ACEi exposed patients had lower unadjusted (1.7% vs 2.8%; P = .009) and risk-adjusted hazards for mortality at 30-days (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.40, 0.88; P = .01). Overall readmission rates were similar. Similar findings persisted when limiting the analysis to CABGs performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. CONCLUSIONS: This study of 5270 propensity-matched patients suggests that ACEi can safely be continued until the time of CABG without an adverse impact on clinical outcomes, and in fact, may confer an early survival advantage and reduced postoperative renal failure rates.

Left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with a history of malignancy.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the impact of a history of malignancy on outcomes of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. METHODS: Adult patients with a preimplant history of malignancy who underwent LVAD implantation between 2006 and 2018 were included. The primary outcome was post-LVAD survival. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients underwent LVAD implant during the study period, including 37 (14.8%) patients with a history of malignancy. Of these 37 patients, five (13.5%) had active malignancy at the time of LVAD implantation, and seven had more than one type of cancer. The median disease-free duration before LVAD was 3.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.0-7.75 years). The most common types of malignancy included urologic (n = 20; 45.5%), skin (n = 7, 15.9%), and leukemia or lymphoma (n = 6; 13.6%). Median follow-up was 244 (IQR, 126-571) days and 313 (IQR 127-738) days for those with and without a history of malignancy, respectively (P = .49). Unadjusted post-LVAD survival was reduced in those with a malignancy history (2-year survival 53.4% vs 66.9%; P = .01), a finding that persisted after risk-adjustment (hazard ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.14; P = .01). Only one (2.7%) patient died post-LVAD from their cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Although a history of malignancy is associated with reduced survival after LVAD implantation, more than half of the patients are alive at 2 years. This combined with the fact that most do not die from causes directly related to their cancer suggest that LVAD implantation is reasonable to perform in carefully selected patients with a history of malignancy.

Temporary left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: To create equitable access to donor organs for the highest mortality patients, the cardiac transplant allocation system now prioritizes patients with surgically implanted temporary left ventricular assist devices (T-LVADs). The outcomes following a direct bridge from a T-LVAD to orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) are not well delineated. AIM: This study investigates the T-LVAD waitlist outcomes and compares the posttransplant outcomes in patients bridged to OHT with surgically implanted T-LVADs to patients bridged with durable continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs). METHODS: Adults recorded in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry bridged to OHT with a durable CF-LVAD and T-LVADs, with or without temporary right ventricular assist devices (T-RVADs), between 2010 and 2018 were included. Propensity matching and multivariable Cox regression were utilized to compare outcomes. RESULTS: Of 504 patients waitlisted with T-LVADs, the majority were transplanted (50%), bridged to CF-LVAD (17%), or recovered (9%). A total of 9047 recipients were bridged to OHT during the study period with 8875 CF-LVADs and 172 T-LVADs. Early survival in propensity-matched T-LVAD ± T-RVAD patients was similar to CF-LVAD ± T-RVAD patients but reduced at a 1-year follow-up. This difference in survival at 1-year follow-up was attributable to significantly reduced survival in patients with combined T-LVAD + T-RVAD support when compared with CF-LVAD, isolated T-LVAD and combined CF-LVAD + T-RVAD support (80% vs 90% vs 90% vs 91%; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that most patients waitlisted with a T-LVAD are successfully bridged to durable therapy or recover, and those bridged to OHT have acceptable posttransplant outcomes, particularly when T-RVADs are not required.

Nationwide variability in the use of induction immunosuppression for adult heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Institutional factors have been shown to impact outcomes following orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). This study evaluated center variability in the utilization of induction therapy for OHT and its implications on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Adult OHT patients between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. Transplant centers were stratified based on their rates of induction therapy utilization. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were created with drug-treated rejection within 1 year as primary endpoint and individual centers as a random parameter. Risk-adjusted Cox regression was used to evaluate patient-level mortality outcomes. RESULTS: In 17,524 OHTs performed at 100 centers, induction therapy was utilized in 48.6% (n = 8411) with substantial variability between centers (interquartile range, 21.4%-79.1%). There were 36, 30, and 34 centers in the low (<29%), intermediate (29%-66%), and high (>67%) induction utilization terciles groups, respectively. Induction therapy did not account for the observed variability in the treated rejection rate at 1 year among centers after adjusting for donor and recipient factors (p = .20). No differences were observed in postoperative outcomes among induction utilization centers groups (all, p > .05). Furthermore, there was a weak correlation between the percentage of induction therapy utilization at the center-level and recipients found to have moderate (r = .03) or high (r = .04) baseline risks for acute rejection at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates that there is substantial variability in the use of induction therapy among OHT centers. In addition, there was a minimal correlation with baseline recipient risk or 1-year rejection rates, suggesting a need for better-standardized practices for induction therapy use in OHT.