Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 41
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Oncologist ; 21(10): 1212-1217, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27382030

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib is a standard treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). Data on its activity in the rare variant of metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (mchRCC), are limited. We aimed to analyze the activity of sunitinib in a relatively large and homogenous international cohort of mchRCC patients in terms of outcome and comparison with mccRCC. METHODS: Records from mchRCC patients treated with first-line sunitinib in 10 centers across 4 countries were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses of association between clinicopathologic factors and outcome were performed. Subsequently, mchRCC patients were individually matched to mccRCC patients. We compared the clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between the groups. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2014, 36 patients (median age, 64 years; 47% male) with mchRCC were treated with first-line sunitinib. Seventy-eight percent achieved a clinical benefit (partial response + stable disease). Median PFS and OS were 10 and 26 months, respectively. Factors associated with PFS were the Heng risk (hazard ratio [HR], 3.3; p = .03) and pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >3 (HR, 0.63; p = .02). Factors associated with OS were the Heng risk (HR, 4.1; p = .04), liver metastases (HR, 3.8; p = .03), and pretreatment NLR <3 (HR, 0.55; p = .03). Treatment outcome was not significantly different between mchRCC patients and individually matched mccRCC patients. In mccRCC patients (p value versus mchRCC), 72% achieved a clinical benefit (p = .4) and median PFS and OS were 9 (p = .6) and 25 (p = .7) months, respectively. CONCLUSION: In metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, sunitinib therapy may be associated with similar outcome and toxicities as in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The Heng risk and pretreatment NLR may be associated with PFS and OS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Data on the activity of sunitinib in metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (mchRCC) are limited. This study analyzed the activity of sunitinib in a cohort of mchRCC patients. Of 36 patients with mchRCC who were treated with first-line sunitinib, 78% achieved a clinical benefit. Median PFS and OS were 10 and 26 months, respectively. Treatment outcome was not significantly different between mchRCC patients and individually matched metastatic clear cell RCC patients.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sunitinibe , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Future Oncol ; 11(20): 2831-40, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26118456

RESUMO

AIM: To investigate retrospectively the effects of bone metastases and bisphosphonates in sunitinib-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. PATIENTS & METHODS: Patients in Groups (Gp) 1 and 2, but not Gp3, had bone metastases. Gp2 received bisphosphonates following standard practice. RESULTS: Gp2 had less favorable prognosis than Gp1. Gp3 had fewer metastases and the best prognosis. More serious adverse events occurred in Gp2 versus Gp1. The difference in overall survival between Gp1 and Gp2 was not significant after adjusting for covariates. Significantly shorter overall survival in Gp1 versus Gp3 persisted after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSION: Bone metastases may have a negative prognostic impact in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Bisphosphonates may have delayed early disease progression for prognostically worse sunitinib/bisphosphonate-treated patients.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Sunitinibe , Adulto Jovem
3.
Prostate ; 74(4): 433-40, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24338986

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone, a potent CYP 17 inhibitor, is standard treatment in docetaxel refractory, metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, in countries where abiraterone has not been approved yet, or for patients who cannot afford it, ketoconazole is used as an alternative CYP 17 inhibitor. Although preclinical data suggests that ketoconazole is a less potent inhibitor of CYP 17, there are limited clinical data comparing both agents. We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of abiraterone versus ketoconazole in docetaxel refractory mCRPC. METHODS: Records from mCRPC patients treated with ketoconazole (international multicenter database, n = 162) were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty-six patients treated post docetaxel were individually matched by clinicopathologic factors to patients treated with abiraterone (national multicenter database, n = 140). We compared the PSA response, biochemical and radiological progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between the groups. PFS and OS were determined by Cox regression. RESULTS: The groups were matched by Gleason score, pre-treatment disease extent, ECOG PS, pre-treatment risk category (Keizman, Oncologist 2012). Furthermore, they were balanced regarding other known confounding risk factors. In the groups of abiraterone versus ketoconazole, PSA response was 46% versus 19% (OR 4.3, P = 0.04), median biochemical PFS 7 versus 2 months (HR 1.54, P = 0.02), median radiological PFS 8 versus 2.5 months (HR 1.8, P = 0.043), median OS 19 versus 11 months (HR 0.53, P = 0.79), and treatment interruption d/t severe adverse events 8% (n = 2) versus 31% (n = 8) (0R 0.6, P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: In docetaxel refractory mCRPC, the outcome of abiraterone treatment may be superior to ketoconazole.


Assuntos
Androstadienos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Cetoconazol/uso terapêutico , Orquiectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Acetato de Abiraterona , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Bases de Dados Factuais , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Retratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Oncologist ; 19(1): 51-60, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24309979

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity, smoking, hypertension, and diabetes are risk factors for renal cell carcinoma development. Their presence has been associated with a worse outcome in various cancers. We sought to determine their association with outcome of sunitinib treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: An international multicenter retrospective study of sunitinib-treated mRCC patients was performed. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between outcome and the pretreatment status of smoking, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, and other known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2013, 278 mRCC patients were treated with sunitinib: 59 were active smokers, 67 were obese, 73 were diabetic, and 165 had pretreatment hypertension. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9 months, and overall survival (OS) was 22 months. Factors associated with PFS were smoking status (past and active smokers: hazard ratio [HR]: 1.17, p = .39; never smokers: HR: 2.94, p < .0001), non-clear cell histology (HR: 1.62, p = .011), pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio >3 (HR: 3.51, p < .0001), use of angiotensin system inhibitors (HR: 0.63, p = .01), sunitinib dose reduction or treatment interruption (HR: 0.72, p = .045), and Heng risk (good and intermediate risk: HR: 1.07, p = .77; poor risk: HR: 1.87, p = .046). Factors associated with OS were smoking status (past and active smokers: HR: 1.25, p = .29; never smokers: HR: 2.7, p < .0001), pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio >3 (HR: 2.95, p < .0001), and sunitinib-induced hypertension (HR: 0.57, p = .002). CONCLUSION: Active smoking may negatively affect the PFS and OS of sunitinib-treated mRCC. Clinicians should consider advising patients to quit smoking at initiation of sunitinib treatment for mRCC.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Análise Multivariada , Metástase Neoplásica , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sunitinibe , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
5.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 16(6): 347-51, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25058995

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The VEGFR/PDGFR inhibitor sunitinib was approved in Israel in 2008 for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), based on an international trial. However, the efficacy of sunitinib treatment in Israeli mRCC patients has not been previously reported. OBJECTIVES: To report the outcome and associated factors of sunitinib treatment in a large cohort of Israeli mRCC patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of an unselected cohort of mRCC patients who were treated with sunitinib during the period 2006-2013 in six Israeli hospitals. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between treatment outcome and clinicopathologic factors. RESULTS: We identified 145 patients; the median age was 65 years, 63% were male, 80% had a nephrectomy, and 28% had prior systemic treatment. Seventy-nine percent (n = 115) had clinical benefit (complete response 5%, n = 7; partial response 33%, n = 48; stable disease 41%, n = 60); 21% (n = 30) were refractory to treatment. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months and median overall survival 21 months. Factors associated with clinical benefit were sunitinib-induced hypertension: [odds ratio (OR) 3.6, P = 0.042] and sunitinib dose reduction or treatment interruption (OR 2.4, P = 0.049). Factors associated with PFS were female gender [hazard ratio (HR) 2, P = 0.0041, pre-sunitinib treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio < or = 3 (HR 2.19, P = 0.002), and active smoking (HR 0.19, P < 0.0001). Factors associated with overall survival were active smoking (HR 0.25, P < 0.0001) and sunitinib-induced hypertension (HR 0.48, P = 0.005). To minimize toxicity, the dose was reduced or the treatment interrupted in 39% (n = 57). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of sunitinib treatment for mRCC among Israeli patients is similar to that in international data.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Israel , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Metástase Neoplásica , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sunitinibe , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
6.
Anticancer Drugs ; 24(5): 431-40, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23511427

RESUMO

Skeletal involvement is common in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC): ∼30% of patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) will develop bone metastases. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been pursued as a therapeutic target in the treatment of metastatic clear-cell RCC (m-ccRCC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as sunitinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, and the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, became the therapy of choice for patients with m-ccRCC. Besides the undisputed efficacy of TKI in the treatment of m-ccRCC, the problem of metastatic bone disease still remains. There is evidence that the presence of bone metastases in m-ccRCC patients has a significant and clinically relevant negative impact on survival and potentially on the outcome of VEGF-targeted therapy. Also, a relatively common practice in the treatment of such patients is bone-directed therapy with bisphosphonates (BPs). Recent evidence shows a potentially synergistic effect on efficacy but also the potential for increased toxicity of combining TKIs and BPs. This review article highlights the importance of this subject and aims to facilitate further research and optimize the treatment of this important and common group of RCC patients.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Difosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Difosfonatos/farmacologia , Humanos , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , Indazóis , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Niacinamida/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Tirosina Quinases/antagonistas & inibidores , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Sorafenibe , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Sunitinibe , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Ácido Zoledrônico
7.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 15(2): 75-8, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23516766

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic radiation cystitis (HRC) is a significant clinical problem that occurs after pelvic radiation therapy and is often refractory. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) for HRC. METHODS: Daily 90 minute sessions of HBO at 2 ATM 100% oxygen were given to 32 HRC patients with ASTRO grades 3-4 hematuria. RESULTS: The median age was 72.5 (48-88 years). The median time interval between radiation therapy and HBO was 4 years (1-26 years). The patients received a median of 30 HBO sessions (3-53). Hematuria resolved in 27 patients (84%) and persisted in 5. Cystectomy was required in two, and ileal-conduit and bilateral percutaneous nephrostomies were performed in one and two patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 12 months (5-74 months), the hematuria cleared completely in 16 patients (59%) and mild hematuria requiring no further treatment recurred in 10 others. Another patient with ASTRO grade 4 hematuria needed bladder irrigation and blood transfusions. Complications included eardrum perforation in four patients and transient vertigo and mild hemoptysis in one case each. None of them required HBO discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: HBO controlled bleeding in 84% of the patients. A durable freedom from significant hematuria was achieved in 96% of the patients. HBO seems to be an effective and safe modality in patients with HRC.


Assuntos
Cistite/etiologia , Cistite/terapia , Hematúria/etiologia , Hematúria/terapia , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Lesões por Radiação/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/radioterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias Retais/radioterapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Int J Cancer ; 131(7): E1166-72, 2012 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22407753

RESUMO

Patients with large or nonoperable breast cancers often receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy to facilitate full resection of the tumor and enable conservation of the breast. However, currently available methods for evaluation of response during therapy are limited and the actual effect of the treatment is only recognized at surgery upon completion of chemotherapy. Timely assessment of response could allow individual tailoring of the treatment and save noneffective drugs and unnecessary toxicity. Here, we suggest that tumor derived DNA methylation in the serum may reflect changes in tumor burden and allow early recognition of responders versus nonresponders. In this pilot study, we collected 7 consecutive serum samples from 52 patients with locally advanced breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We selected RASSF1, which was methylated in more than 80% of the tumors, for serum analysis. Using the "methylation sensitive PCR and high resolution melting," we detected RASSF1 methylation in the serum of 21 patients prior to therapy. In four patients who achieved complete pathological response, RASSF1 methylation in the serum became undetectable early during therapy. In contrast, in 17 patients that had partial or minimal pathological response, serum RASSF1 methylation persisted longer or throughout the treatment (complete versus partial response p = 0.02). These findings support further development of this assay for monitoring response during neoadjuvant therapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Metilação de DNA , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , DNA/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas , Resultado do Tratamento , Proteínas Supressoras de Tumor/genética
9.
Oncologist ; 17(12): 1508-14, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22971522

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an inflammation marker, is prognostic in several cancers. We assessed the association between the pretreatment NLR and outcome of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with the CYP17 inhibitor ketoconazole. METHODS: This was an international, retrospective study of 156 mCRPC patients treated with ketoconazole. The independent effect of the pretreatment NLR and factors associated with treatment outcome were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (50%) had a ≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 8 months. Excluded from the analysis were 23 patients without available data on their NLR and those with a recent health event or treatment associated with a blood count change. Sixty-two patients (47%) had a pretreatment NLR >3. Risk factors associated with the PFS outcome were a pretreatment NLR >3 and PSA doubling time (PSADT) <3 months and a prior response to a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist of <24 months or to an antiandrogen of <6 months. The number of risk factors was used to form a predictive nomogram by patient categorization into favorable (zero or one factor), intermediate (two factors), and poor (three or four factors) risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: In mCRPC patients treated with ketoconazole, the pretreatment NLR and PSADT, and prior response to androgen-deprivation therapy, may be associated with the PFS time and used to form a risk stratification predictive nomogram.


Assuntos
Cetoconazol/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Contagem de Linfócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Neutrófilos/citologia , Nomogramas , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Esteroide 17-alfa-Hidroxilase/antagonistas & inibidores , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Chemotherapy ; 58(3): 200-5, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22759787

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate if hypothyroidism developing during sunitib therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is associated with a better outcome. METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with clear cell mRCC were retrospectively analyzed. Thyroid function was assessed prior to therapy, every 6 weeks during the first 6 months and every 2-4 months thereafter. Hypothyroidism was considered present if thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) exceeded the upper normal limit (UNL) with normal triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4). RESULTS: Hypothyroidism occurred in 16 patients (52%) within 3 months (range 0.7-22.9) of treatment initiation. Thyroid replacement corrected TSH below the UNL in 10 patients (63%). The distribution according to Motzer prognostic criteria revealed good prognosis in 16 patients (52%), intermediate in 9 (29%) and poor in 6 (19%). The hypothyroid patients tended to have longer progression-free survival (PFS; median 12.2 vs. 9.4 months; p = 0.234) and longer survival (median 22.4 vs. 13.9 months; p = 0.234) than the euthyroid patients. Clinical benefits were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Hypothyroidism that develops in mRCC patients treated with sunitinib is associated with a trend toward prolonged PFS and survival, with a similar clinical benefit rate.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Hipotireoidismo/induzido quimicamente , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Metástase Neoplásica , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Hipotireoidismo/metabolismo , Indóis/farmacologia , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia , Prognóstico , Pirróis/farmacologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sunitinibe , Glândula Tireoide/efeitos dos fármacos , Tireotropina/análise , Tiroxina/análise , Tri-Iodotironina/análise
11.
Int Braz J Urol ; 38(1): 49-56, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22397786

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin is the accepted treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer patients unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² (days 1, 8) and carboplatin AUC- 4.5 (day 1) were given every 21 days to 23 patients with creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min, cardiac ejection fraction < 45% or active ischemia. Patient characteristics included: median age 73 (56-86) years; primary site: bladder 17 (73%), upper tract 6 (27 %) patients; Bajorin 's prognostic groups: good 6 (26%), intermediate 11 (48%) and poor 6 (26%) patients. Data was retrospectively documented. Patients were followed until they expired. RESULTS: We obtained objective responses in 8 (34.7%) patients, (95% CI, 16.3-57.2%), including one patient with complete response. The median progressionfree survival was 4 (0.2-16.5+) months and the overall survival 8.6 (0.2-45.3+) months. At time of analysis, 4 patients (17%) remained disease free; 3 of them underwent resection of residual disease. Toxicity included: infection in 9 (39%) patients; among them, one died from pneumonia; bleeding ≥ grade 2 in 3 (13%) patients and fatigue grade 3 in 2 (9%) patients. Hematologic toxicity included grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 2 (9%) patients and grade 4 neutropenia in 3 (13%) patients. Five (22%) patients discontinued therapy due to toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin demonstrated clinical activity in patients with advanced urothelial cancer unfit for cisplatin. It was associated with considerable toxicity. Resection of residual disease is feasible in this population.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/mortalidade , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Coração/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Gencitabina
12.
Cancers (Basel) ; 12(9)2020 Aug 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32825620

RESUMO

The function of BRCA1/2 proteins is essential for maintaining genomic integrity in all cell types. However, why women who carry deleterious germline mutations in BRCA face an extremely high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancers specifically has remained an enigma. We propose that breast-specific epigenetic modifications, which regulate tissue differentiation, could team up with BRCA deficiency and affect tissue susceptibility to cancer. In earlier work, we compared genome-wide methylation profiles of various normal epithelial tissues and identified breast-specific methylated gene promoter regions. Here, we focused on deltaNp73, the truncated isoform of p73, which possesses antiapoptotic and pro-oncogenic functions. We showed that the promoter of deltaNp73 is unmethylated in normal human breast epithelium and methylated in various other normal epithelial tissues and cell types. Accordingly, deltaNp73 was markedly induced by DNA damage in human mammary epithelial cells (HMECs) but not in other epithelial cell types. Moreover, the induction of deltaNp73 protected HMECs from DNA damage-induced cell death, and this effect was more substantial in HMECs from BRCA1 mutation carriers. Notably, when BRCA1 was knocked down in MCF10A, a non-malignant breast epithelial cell line, both deltaNp73 induction and its protective effect from cell death were augmented upon DNA damage. Interestingly, deltaNp73 induction also resulted in inhibition of BRCA1 and BRCA2 expression following DNA damage. In conclusion, breast-specific induction of deltaNp73 promotes survival of BRCA1-deficient mammary epithelial cells upon DNA damage. This might result in the accumulation of genomic alterations and allow the outgrowth of breast cancers. These findings indicate deltaNp73 as a potential modifier of breast cancer susceptibility in BRCA1 mutation carriers and may stimulate novel strategies of prevention and treatment for these high-risk women.

13.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 18(1): 69-76.e4, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31767448

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The sequential use of a number of new agents (NAs) have improved the overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer whose disease progresses after docetaxel (DOC) treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the cumulative survival outcomes of different sequencing strategies by evaluating the individual data from published studies of patients treated with a post-DOC treatment sequence of 2 NAs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients' individual data were analyzed to investigate whether different sequencing strategies lead to differences in OS. RESULTS: We analyzed the data of 1099 evaluable patients. Among the patients treated with a second-line new hormone agent (NHA), median OS from the start of third-line treatment was significantly longer in the patients treated with cabazitaxel (CABA) than in those treated with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide. Median cumulative OS (cumOS) from the start of second-line treatment was 21.1 months in the patients who received NHA then NHA, 22.1 months in those who received NHA then CABA, and 21.0 months in those who received CABA then NHA. Among the patients with a second-line progression-free survival of ≥6 months, median cumOS was significantly longer in patients who received CABA-including sequences than in those treated with NHA then NHA sequences (29.5 vs. 24.8 months; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the sequential use of NAs with different mechanisms of action improves cumOS regardless of the order in which they are administered, thus supporting the hypothesis of cross-resistance between the 2 NHAs.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Receptores de Andrógenos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Acetato de Abiraterona/farmacologia , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapêutico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Antagonistas de Receptores de Andrógenos/farmacologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Benzamidas , Docetaxel/farmacologia , Docetaxel/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Calicreínas/sangue , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Gradação de Tumores , Nitrilas , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Feniltioidantoína/análogos & derivados , Feniltioidantoína/farmacologia , Feniltioidantoína/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Próstata/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/sangue , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxoides/farmacologia , Taxoides/uso terapêutico
14.
Eur J Cancer ; 125: 153-163, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31787484

RESUMO

AIM OF THE STUDY: Our goal was to evaluate the impact of progression type (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] only, radiological or clinical) at initiation of first-, second- and third life-extending therapy (LET) on treatment outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, by performing a post-hoc analysis using data from the CATS international registry. METHODS: The 669 consecutive mCRPC patients of the CATS registry were classified according to their type of progression at initiation of each LET: PSA only (PSA-p), radiological (±PSA) (Radio-p); or clinical (±PSA, ±radiological) progression (Clin-p). Overall survival (OS), the primary endpoint, was calculated from initiation of the first-, second- and third-LET to death for each sequence. RESULTS: Median OS was shorter in the Clin-p group compared with the PSA-p group (14-month difference in first line; around 7-month difference in second- and third line). Shorter progression-free survival (PFS) was also observed in Clin-p patients, whatever the treatment is. Clinical progression seemed to be associated with a shorter duration of therapy with androgen receptor-targeted therapy (ART) compared with taxanes. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical progression at initiation of a LET is associated with poor outcomes including shorter PFS and OS as well as clinical and biological features of aggressive disease. Stratifying patients in clinical trials according to disease progression type may prevent selection bias and data heterogeneity. In daily practice, first signs of clinical progression may prompt physicians to consider starting a new LET, independently of PSA levels.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 17(3): e689-e703, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31072748

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Axitinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) versus sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) previously treated with sunitinib in the AXIS trial. We report post hoc analyses evaluating patient subgroups that may benefit more from axitinib in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: AXIS was an open-label randomized phase 3 trial (NCT00678392) in mRCC patients with disease that failed to respond to one prior systemic therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated potential prognostic factors for improved PFS and overall survival (OS) after sunitinib. PFS and OS of axitinib versus sorafenib were assessed within subgroups identified according to these factors. RESULTS: Of 723 patients, 389 received first-line sunitinib; 194 and 195 were randomized to second-line axitinib and sorafenib, respectively. Identified prognostic factors were: nonbulky disease (sum of the longest diameter < 98 mm), favorable/intermediate risk disease (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center or International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria), and no bone or liver metastases. In patients with all of these prognostic factors (n = 86), significantly longer PFS was observed for axitinib versus sorafenib (hazard ratio = 0.476; 95% confidence interval, 0.263-0.863; 2-sided P = .0126). OS (hazard ratio = 0.902; 95% confidence interval, 0.457-1.780; 2-sided P = .7661) was similar between treatments. Across subgroups, PFS was generally longer in patients treated with axitinib versus sorafenib, and OS was generally similar between the two treatments. CONCLUSION: In patients with mRCC, axitinib remains a suitable second-line treatment option across multiple subgroups. A relevant reduction in the risk of a PFS event was observed for axitinib compared to sorafenib in selected subgroups of patients.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Axitinibe/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Sorafenibe/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Axitinibe/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Sorafenibe/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
BJU Int ; 102(11): 1607-9, 2008 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18990177

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 'flare' phenomenon in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) treated with docetaxel, as flare is a known effect of androgen-deprivation therapy in hormone-dependent prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The charts of 56 patients who received docetaxel-based chemotherapy in three different centres from August 1999 to August 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. The biochemical response was characterized according to the Bubley criteria. There was an immediate PSA response (PSA decline >or= 50%) in 23 (41%) patients, PSA stabilization (PSA decline < 50%) in 16 (29%) and PSA progression in nine (16%). There was also a fourth response, i.e. PSA flare, defined as an increase in PSA level with no symptomatic progression, after starting docetaxel-based chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Eight (14%) patients with PSA flare were identified; all had osseous disease and five had additional soft-tissue disease. The PSA flare lasted a median (range) of 21 (21-42) days and it spread over a median of 1 (1-2) cycles. The temporary PSA surge exceeded baseline values by a median (range) of 61.5 (12-404)%. There was a subsequent PSA response in six of the eight patients and PSA stabilized in the remaining two. Patients with flare received a median of 8.5 (5-12) treatment cycles, vs a median of 8 (2-12) in the immediate PSA response group (P = 0.103, Student's t-test). The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria evaluation showed one patient with a partial response and six with stable disease. The median survival of patients with PSA flare was 12.5 months, while that of the immediate PSA responders was 20.1 months (not statistically significant, P = 0.168, log-rank test). CONCLUSION: Of patients with AIPC, 14% had an initial PSA flare after starting docetaxel-based chemotherapy. The occurrence of PSA flare had no effect on treatment duration or outcome. With lack of clinical progression, docetaxel-based chemotherapy should be administered for at least two 3-week cycles before further decisions are made about efficacy.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Androgênios/metabolismo , Docetaxel , Estramustina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxoides/administração & dosagem
17.
18.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 1(6): 467-475, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31158090

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal sequence of life-extending therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes among mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel (DOC), cabazitaxel (CABA), and a novel androgen receptor-targeted agent (ART; abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) according to three different sequences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from 669 consecutive mCRPC patients were retrospectively collected between November 2012 and October 2016. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (decrease ≥50% from baseline) to each therapy. Secondary endpoints included best clinical benefit, time to PSA progression, radiological progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 158 patients received DOC→CABA→ART (group 1), 456 received DOC→ART→CABA (group 2), and 55 received ART→DOC→CABA (group 3). At baseline, PSA progression only and Gleason <8 were more common in group 3. PSA response on DOC was lower in group 3 than in other groups (p=0.02) and PSA response on CABA was higher in the second than in the third line (p=0.001). In Group 3, rPFS on ART (6.6 mo) and DOC (9.2 mo) was also shorter than in the other groups. OS calculated from the first life-extending therapy reached 34.8, 35.8, and 28.9 mo in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p=0.007). Toxicity was comparable between the arms. The main limitations of the trial are its retrospective design and the low number of patients in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective trial, sequencing of DOC, CABA, and one ART, was associated with median OS of up to 35.8 mo. CABA seemed to retain its activity regardless of treatment sequence. DOC activity after ART appeared to be reduced, but the data are insufficient to conclude that cross-resistance occurs. PATIENT SUMMARY: The order of drugs administered to patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer could impact their efficacy, with cabazitaxel appearing to retain its activity whatever the therapeutic sequence.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Acetato de Abiraterona/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Antígeno Prostático Específico/análise , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Eur Urol ; 73(2): 178-211, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28655541

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In advanced prostate cancer (APC), successful drug development as well as advances in imaging and molecular characterisation have resulted in multiple areas where there is lack of evidence or low level of evidence. The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2017 addressed some of these topics. OBJECTIVE: To present the report of APCCC 2017. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Ten important areas of controversy in APC management were identified: high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer; "oligometastatic" prostate cancer; castration-naïve and castration-resistant prostate cancer; the role of imaging in APC; osteoclast-targeted therapy; molecular characterisation of blood and tissue; genetic counselling/testing; side effects of systemic treatment(s); global access to prostate cancer drugs. A panel of 60 international prostate cancer experts developed the program and the consensus questions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 150 predefined questions, which have been developed following a modified Delphi process. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Voting is based on panellist opinion, and thus is not based on a standard literature review or meta-analysis. The outcomes of the voting had varying degrees of support, as reflected in the wording of this article, as well as in the detailed voting results recorded in Supplementary data. CONCLUSIONS: The presented expert voting results can be used for support in areas of management of men with APC where there is no high-level evidence, but individualised treatment decisions should as always be based on all of the data available, including disease extent and location, prior therapies regardless of type, host factors including comorbidities, as well as patient preferences, current and emerging evidence, and logistical and economic constraints. Inclusion of men with APC in clinical trials should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2017 again identified important areas in need of trials specifically designed to address them. PATIENT SUMMARY: The second Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference APCCC 2017 did provide a forum for discussion and debates on current treatment options for men with advanced prostate cancer. The aim of the conference is to bring the expertise of world experts to care givers around the world who see less patients with prostate cancer. The conference concluded with a discussion and voting of the expert panel on predefined consensus questions, targeting areas of primary clinical relevance. The results of these expert opinion votes are embedded in the clinical context of current treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer and provide a practical guide to clinicians to assist in the discussions with men with prostate cancer as part of a shared and multidisciplinary decision-making process.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia
20.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 15(2): 291-299.e1, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27638198

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) models categorize patients with 1 or 2 risk factors as intermediate prognosis (INTMP). This category encompasses 15 and 19 permutations of the MSKCC and IMDC risk factors, respectively. The purpose of the present retrospective analysis of data from INTMP patients in 6 clinical trials was to determine whether this heterogeneity influences the response to sunitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with INTMP metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were identified using the MSKCC and IMDC classifications. The statistical data were analyzed using Cox regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier methods, and Pearson χ2 tests. RESULTS: The patient characteristics and risk factors were similar in the MSKCC (n = 548) and IMDC (n = 517) groups. Overall, 59% had 1 risk factor and 41% had 2 risk factors. The most common was low hemoglobin alone or with an interval of < 1 year since diagnosis. In both groups, patients with 1 risk factor had longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than did those with 2 risk factors (P < .001 for both outcomes). Patients in the IMDC group with 1 risk factor had a greater objective response rate (ORR; P = .023). In both groups, OS was longer for patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0 than for those with ECOG PS 1 or 2 (P < .001). An ECOG PS of 0 was also associated with superior PFS and ORR in the MSKCC group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: INTMP comprises a heterogeneous group of mRCC patients in whom the number of risk factors and ECOG PS might predict the outcome with sunitinib.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sunitinibe , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA