Validity and Reliability of the 6-Minute Step Test in Healthy Individuals: A Cross-sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the 6-minute step test's (6MST) reliability and validity and to establish reference performance values of this test. DESIGN: Prospective observational cross-sectional study. SETTING: Spirometry and Respiratory Physiotherapy Laboratory, Federal University of São Carlos (institutional). PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-one individuals [42 men and 49 women, mean age = 39 years (SD, 17 years)] without any diagnosed diseases and with normal exercise capacity [6-minute walk test (6MWT) >75% of the predicted normal]. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Participants underwent two 6MST on 1 day and two 6MWT on another day in randomized order. Furthermore, age, gender, height, weight, lower limbs length, abdominal circumference, percentage of body fat, and fat-free mass were obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test-retest reliability was assessed by comparing the findings of the two 6MST using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot. Validity was assessed by comparing outcomes of the 6MST to outcomes of 6MWT using the Pearson correlation coefficient. A multiple regression analysis was conducted using the stepwise method to develop an equation to predict reference values. RESULTS: The performance (mean steps ± SD) in the first and second test was 149 ± 34 and 149 ± 36 steps, respectively, which was correlated to distance (in meters) in 6MWT (r = 0.72; P < 0.05). Six-minute step test performance was reliable (ICC = 0.9; 95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.93). The equation to predict reference values for the first 6MST was significant (P < 0.001 and R = 0.48): Performance(steps) = 174 to 1.05 × Age(years) to women and Performance(steps) = 209 to 1.05 × Age(years) to men. CONCLUSIONS: Six-minute step test is a reliable and valid test. Moreover, the number of steps may be predicted by demographic and anthropometric variables with moderate strength of prediction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Six-minute step test is an exercise test that is easy to be conducted, more tolerable than a graded exercise test, requires fewer equipments and space, and permits better monitoring of the participants. The assessment of the reliability, validity, and reference values will provide a better interpretability for clinicians to use it, especially in primary care.

Validity of the six-minute step test of free cadence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the concurrent validity of the six-minute step test (6MST) in assessing exercise capacity of COPD patients using the six-minute walk test (6MWT) as a gold-standard. The predictive validity of the 6MST was assessed to determine a cut-off point for identification of low exercise capacity. METHOD: thirty-two COPD patients (50-87 years old) with mild to very severe obstruction performed the 6MST and 6MWT twice. RESULTS: Concurrent validity: a strong positive correlation (Pearson) between the number of ascents on the first (T1), second (T2) and the best of both (T1 or T2) tests during the 6MWT was observed. Although a moderate negative correlation with BODE index and FEV1 was found, it was considered insufficient to test the validity, therefore ROC curves were not applied. The predictive validity (ROC) of the 6MST to identify low physical capacity (compared with the 6MWT) using the performance of T1 or T2, or solely T1 was considered accurate, and the area under the curve was 0.8 (IC95% 0.62-0.98) and 0.85 (IC95% 0.70-0.99), respectively. To classify patients, the cut-off points of 86 and 78 steps were chosen, with both values showing 90% of sensitivity and specificity of 64% and 68% for T1 or T2, or solely T1, respectively. CONCLUSION: The number of steps on the 6MST was valid to verify exercise capacity in COPD patients and the cut-off point of 78 steps was able to identify patients with poor exercise tolerance. Values under this cut-off point are considered to identify patients with a poorer prognosis.

Validity of the six-minute step test of free cadence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease / Validade do teste de degrau de seis minutos de cadência livre em pacientes com doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica

Objectives: to evaluate the concurrent validity of the six-minute step test (6MST) in assessing exercise capacity of COPD patients using the six-minute walk test (6MWT) as a gold-standard. The predictive validity of the 6MST was assessed to determine a cut-off point for identification of low exercise capacity. Method: thirty-two COPD patients (50-87 years old) with mild to very severe obstruction performed the 6MST and 6MWT twice. Results: Concurrent validity: a strong positive correlation (Pearson) between the number of ascents on the first (T1), second (T2) and the best of both (T1 or T2) tests during the 6MWT was observed. Although a moderate negative correlation with BODE index and FEV1 was found, it was considered insufficient to test the validity, therefore ROC curves were not applied. The predictive validity (ROC) of the 6MST to identify low physical capacity (compared with the 6MWT) using the performance of T1 or T2, or solely T1 was considered accurate, and the area under the curve was 0.8 (IC95% 0.62-0.98) and 0.85 (IC95% 0.70-0.99), respectively. To classify patients, the cut-off points of 86 and 78 steps were chosen, with both values showing 90% of sensitivity and specificity of 64% and 68% for T1 or T2, or solely T1, respectively. Conclusion: The number of steps on the 6MST was valid to verify exercise capacity in COPD patients and the cut-off point of 78 steps was able to identify patients with poor exercise tolerance. Values under this cut-off point are considered to identify patients with a poorer prognosis. .

Objetivos: Avaliar a validade concorrente do desempenho no teste de degrau de seis minutos (TD6) em analisar a capacidade física da DPOC, relacionando-o com o teste de caminhada de seis minutos (TC6), bem como verificar a presença de validade de critério preditiva do TD6, determinando um valor de corte para identificar baixa capacidade física. Método: Trinta e dois pacientes com DPOC estágios leve-muito grave, de ambos os sexos, entre 50-87 anos, realizaram dois TD6 e dois TC6. Resultados: Validade concorrente: observou-se correlação forte positiva (Pearson) entre o número de subidas do primeiro (T1), segundo (T2) e do melhor dos dois (T1 ou T2) TD6 com a distância percorrida no TC6. Embora constatamos correlações negativas entre os desempenhos no TD6 com o índice BODE e VEF1, essas não foram suficientes para caracterizar validade, não sendo traçadas as curvas ROC. A validade preditiva (curvas ROC) do TD6 para identificar baixa capacidade física (comparação com o TC6), utilizando o desempenho do T1 ou T2 ou somente do T1, foi considerada acurada para alguns propósitos, sendo a área abaixo da curva de 0,8 (IC95% 0,62-0,98) e 0,85 (IC95% 0,70-0,99), respectivamente. Para classificar os pacientes, escolhemos o ponto de corte de 86 e 78 degraus, apresentando sensibilidade de 90% e 90% e especificidade de 64% e 68%, para T1 ou T2 e somente T1, respectivamente. Conclusão: O desempenho no TD6 apresentou-se válido para verificar capacidade física na DPOC e identificou pacientes com baixa capacidade física, utilizando como ponto de corte 78 degraus, em que valores abaixo disso representaram pior prognóstico. .