Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between the hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor, boceprevir, and the oral contraceptive ethinyl estradiol/norethindrone.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine drug interactions between boceprevir, a hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease inhibitor, and a combined oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norethindrone (NE). METHODS: A single-center, open-label study was conducted in 20 healthy female volunteers. In three consecutive 28-day treatment periods, subjects received EE/NE (0.035 mg/1 mg; 21 days on, 7 days off). During period 3, subjects also received boceprevir (800 mg three times daily) for 28 days. RESULTS: Coadministration of boceprevir with EE/NE did not affect NE AUC0-24 but slightly reduced NE C max. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for NE AUC0-24 and C max with EE/NE alone and EE/NE plus boceprevir were 0.96 (90% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-1.06) and 0.83 (90% CI, 0.76-0.90). Coadministration of boceprevir with EE/NE reduced EE AUC0-24 and C max by 26 and 21%, with GMRs of 0.74 (90% CI, 0.68-0.80) and 0.79 (90% CI, 0.75-0.84). Boceprevir had no effect on mid-cycle luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), or sex hormone-binding globulin levels, and progesterone concentrations remained <1 ng/ml during the luteal phase. Adverse events reported in this study were consistent with the well-established safety profile of boceprevir. CONCLUSION: Serum progesterone, LH, and FSH levels indicate that ovulation was suppressed during coadministration of boceprevir with EE/NE. Coadministration of boceprevir with combined oral contraceptives containing EE and ≥1 mg of NE is therefore unlikely to alter contraceptive effectiveness. The ovulation suppression activity of oral contraceptives containing lower doses of NE, and of other forms of hormonal contraception during coadministration with boceprevir, has not been established.

Lack of effect of aprepitant or its prodrug fosaprepitant on QTc intervals in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: A single 115-mg dose of fosaprepitant, the IV prodrug of the NK(1) receptor antagonist aprepitant, is bioequivalent to a 125-mg dose of oral aprepitant. Thus far, fosaprepitant/aprepitant has not shown a meaningful effect on QTc intervals; in this study, we sought to confirm these findings. METHODS: This double-blind, active-controlled, randomized, three-treatment, three-period, crossover study in healthy young subjects evaluated the effect of a 200-mg dose of fosaprepitant on QTc prolongation. In each period, subjects received 400 mg moxifloxacin per os, 200 mg fosaprepitant IV, or placebo in randomized sequence. The effect of fosaprepitant on QTc interval was assessed by 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs). The baseline value for QTc interval for each subject during each period was defined as the average of five replicate baseline QTc intervals extracted from predose ECGs. ECGs were performed at predose, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 min; and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 h postinfusion. Values for individual QTc change from baseline were evaluated in a repeated-measures mixed model appropriate for a crossover design. A two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the true difference in QTc interval change from baseline at each timepoint was calculated for fosaprepitant versus placebo and for moxifloxacin versus placebo. RESULTS: After fosaprepitant 200-mg administration, the mean (95% CI) QTc interval change from baseline at T(max) was -1.45 (-4.67 to 1.77) ms, and the placebo-corrected mean (90% CI) QTc interval change from baseline was -1.37 (-4.78 to 2.05) ms. Neither was statistically significant at alpha = 0.05. After 400 mg moxifloxacin administration, the mean (95% CI) QTc interval change from baseline at 2 h was 9.71 (6.49-12.93) ms, and the placebo-corrected mean (90% CI) QTc interval change from baseline at moxifloxacin T(max) was 10.50 (7.09-13.92) ms. Both were statistically significant at alpha = 0.05. The maximum aprepitant concentration after fosaprepitant 200 mg administration was 6300 ng/mL (approximately twofold, fourfold, and ninefold higher than that observed historically with fosaprepitant 115 mg [3095 ng/mL], aprepitant 125 mg [1600 ng/mL], and aprepitant 40 mg [675 ng/mL]). CONCLUSIONS: In subjects receiving fosaprepitant 200 mg, no clinically meaningful increases in QTc were seen at any timepoint, whereas after moxifloxacin 400 mg, increases were observed at the approximate T(max) of moxifloxacin and additional timepoints. The lack of QTc increase at this high dose of fosaprepitant and resulting aprepitant plasma exposures support the expectation that clinical doses of fosaprepitant or aprepitant will not be associated with significant QTc prolongation.

Evaluation of potential inductive effects of aprepitant on cytochrome P450 3A4 and 2C9 activity.

The NK(1) receptor antagonist aprepitant (EMEND(R)), developed for use in combination with a 5HT(3) receptor antagonist and a corticosteroid to prevent highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), has been shown to have a moderate inhibitory effect as well as a possible inductive effect on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Aprepitant has been noted to produce modest decreases in plasma S(-)-warfarin concentrations, suggesting potential induction of CYP2C9. Because metabolism of some chemotherapeutic agents may involve CYP3A4, the potential inductive effect of the CINV dosing regimen of aprepitant on this metabolic pathway was evaluated using intravenous midazolam, a sensitive probe substrate of CYP3A4. The time course of induction of CYP2C9 by aprepitant was also evaluated using oral tolbutamide, a probe substrate of CYP2C9. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center study, 24 healthy subjects were randomized (12 subjects per group) to receive either an aprepitant 3-day regimen (aprepitant 125 mg p.o. on day 1 and aprepitant 80 mg p.o. on days 2 and 3) or matching placebo. All subjects also received probe drugs (midazolam 2 mg i.v. and tolbutamide 500 mg p.o.) once prior to aprepitant dosing (baseline) and again on days 4, 8, and 15. The ratio (aprepitant/placebo) of the geometric mean area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) fold-change from baseline for midazolam was 1.25 on day 4 (p < 0.01), 0.81 on day 8 (p < 0.01), and 0.96 on day 15 (p = 0.646). The ratio (aprepitant/placebo) of the geometric mean AUC fold-change from baseline for tolbutamide was 0.77 on day 4 (p < 0.01), 0.72 on day 8 (p < 0.001), and 0.85 on day 15 (p = 0.05). Assessed using intravenous midazolam as a probe, aprepitant 125/80 mg p.o. administered over days 1 to 3 produced clinically insignificant weak inhibition (day 4) and induction (day 8) of CYP3A4 activity and no effect on CYP3A4 activity on day 15. Assessed using oral tolbutamide as a probe, the aprepitant regimen also produced modest induction of CYP2C9 activity on days 4 and 8, which resolved nearly to baseline by day 15. Thus, the aprepitant regimen for CINV results in modest, transient induction of CYPs 3A4 and 2C9 in the 2 weeks following administration.

A Single-Dose Bioequivalence and Food Effect Study With Aprepitant and Fosaprepitant Dimeglumine in Healthy Young Adult Subjects.

Fosaprepitant dimeglumine, a lyophilized prodrug, is rapidly converted to aprepitant, a substance P/neurokinin 1 (NK1 ) receptor antagonist. Intravenous (IV) fosaprepitant and oral aprepitant are used in combination with other antiemetics to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This randomized, phase 1 study was designed to assess the aprepitant area under the curve (AUC0-∞ ) equivalence of a single, oral 165-mg or 185-mg dose of aprepitant to a single 150-mg fosaprepitant IV dose infused over 20 minutes, and to evaluate the effect of food on the bioavailability of the oral 165-mg and 185-mg aprepitant doses. Plasma samples were analyzed for aprepitant, and linear mixed-effects models were applied to natural log-transformed aprepitant AUC data. A 2 one-sided tests procedure was used to evaluate bioequivalence; the adjusted P values for the AUC0-∞ of both oral doses versus the IV dose were < .05, supporting the hypothesis that each single, oral dose of aprepitant is equivalent to the AUC0-∞ of a single IV infusion of fosaprepitant. Food effect results suggest that dose adjustment would not be necessary with a single oral dose of aprepitant. Single-dose administration of oral 165 mg and 185 mg aprepitant and IV 150 mg fosaprepitant was generally well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics of oral dexamethasone and midazolam when administered with single-dose intravenous 150 mg fosaprepitant in healthy adult subjects.

Aprepitant or its prodrug fosaprepitant, in combination with a corticosteroid and a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist, are used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This study evaluated the effect of fosaprepitant 150 mg on CYP3A4 metabolism. Fosaprepitant 150 mg has been submitted to regulatory agencies for consideration of approval as a single-day alternative to the 3-day oral aprepitant antiemetic regimen currently marketed. Part 1 of the study evaluated the drug interaction between fosaprepitant 150 mg and oral dexamethasone (8 mg daily for 3 days). Part 2 of the study evaluated the drug interaction between fosaprepitant 150 mg and oral midazolam (2 mg on days 1 and 4). Thirteen subjects were enrolled in part 1 and 10 in part 2. For dexamethasone, fosaprepitant increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours by approximately 2.0-fold on days 1 and 2 and to a lesser extent (~1.2-fold) on day 3. Similarly, for midazolam, fosaprepitant increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 hours to infinity by approximately 1.8-fold on day 1 but had no effect on midazolam pharmacokinetics on day 4. Fosaprepitant 150 mg is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4. Oral dexamethasone doses on days 1 and 2 should be reduced by approximately 50% when coadministered with intravenous fosaprepitant 150 mg on day 1.