RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Although surgery is the treatment of choice for CTEPH, it is not appropriate for patients with surgically inaccessible distal disease. These patients are traditionally managed supportively, but may benefit from newer, more specific vasoactive therapies. This study examines the acute haemodynamic responses to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and intravenous sildenafil in this patient population. METHODS: Nine patients with de novo distal CTEPH and nine with persistent pulmonary hypertension post-pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) were enrolled. At right heart catheterisation, following baseline haemodynamic measurements, iNO was administered at 20 ppm for 10 min. Following repeat measurements, iNO was discontinued with a subsequent washout period of 10 min. Sildenafil was then administered intravenously at two doses, to achieve plasma levels equivalent to 25 mg and 50 mg orally, with further measurements obtained at the end of each infusion. RESULTS: Significant reductions in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were demonstrated following both iNO (-4.3 mm Hg or -10.3% p=0.001 and -101 dyn/s/cm(5) or -15.6% p<0.001) and sildenafil (-7.4 mm Hg or -16.9% p<0.001 and -188.8 dyn/s/cm(5) or -25.1% p<0.001). Individual mPAP and cardiac output (CO) responses to iNO and sildenafil correlated well, but haemodynamic changes following sildenafil were consistently more marked. There was, however, no difference in effect between the two doses of sildenafil. Although sildenafil caused significant reductions in systemic vascular resistance, the net haemodynamic effect of sildenafil remained pulmonary selective. Subgroup analysis suggested that post-PEA patients were more responsive to both iNO and sildenafil than de novo patients. DISCUSSION: Although all but one patient failed to fulfil the formal haemodynamic response criteria typically used in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), subjects displayed significant acute responses to both iNO and sildenafil suggesting that increased vascular tone forms an important component of distal CTEPH. It is possible that these acute haemodynamic responses may translate to improved clinical outcomes, and thus further long term trials of sildenafil in distal CTEPH are warranted.
Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/administração & dosagem , Hipertensão Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Óxido Nítrico/administração & dosagem , Piperazinas/administração & dosagem , Circulação Pulmonar/efeitos dos fármacos , Sulfonas/administração & dosagem , Tromboembolia/complicações , Vasodilatação/efeitos dos fármacos , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Administração por Inalação , Adulto , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Débito Cardíaco/efeitos dos fármacos , Doença Crônica , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/etiologia , Hipertensão Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Injeções Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Óxido Nítrico/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Purinas/administração & dosagem , Purinas/uso terapêutico , Citrato de Sildenafila , Sulfonas/uso terapêutico , Tromboembolia/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Resistência Vascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mutations in the type II receptor for bone morphogenetic protein (BMPR-II), a receptor member of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily, underlie many cases of familial and sporadic primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH). We postulated that pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) from patients with PPH might demonstrate abnormal growth responses to TGF-beta superfamily members. METHODS AND RESULTS: For studies of (3)H-thymidine incorporation or cell proliferation, PASMCs (passages 4 to 8) were derived from main pulmonary arteries. In control cells, 24-hour incubation with TGF-beta(1) (10 ng/mL) or bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2, -4, and -7 (100 ng/mL) inhibited basal and serum-stimulated (3)H-thymidine incorporation, and TGF-beta(1) and BMPs inhibited the proliferation of serum-stimulated PASMCs. In contrast, TGF-beta(1) stimulated (3)H-thymidine incorporation (200%; P<0.001) and cell proliferation in PASMCs from PPH but not from patients with secondary pulmonary hypertension. In addition, BMPs failed to suppress DNA synthesis and proliferation in PASMCs from PPH patients. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of PASMC mRNA detected transcripts for type I (TGF-betaRI, Alk-1, ActRI, and BMPRIB) and type II (TGF-betaRII, BMPR-II, ActRII, ActRIIB) receptors. Receptor binding and cross-linking studies with (125)I-TGF-beta(1) confirmed that the abnormal responses in PPH cells were not due to differences in TGF-beta receptor binding. Mutation analysis of PASMC DNA failed to detect mutations in TGF-betaRII and Alk-1 but confirmed the presence of a mutation in BMPR-II in 1 of 5 PPH isolates. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that PASMCs from patients with PPH exhibit abnormal growth responses to TGF-beta(1) and BMPs and that altered integration of TGF-beta superfamily growth signals may contribute to the pathogenesis of PPH.