Stability of Prognostic Estimation Using the CAPRA Score Incorporating Imaging-based vs Physical Exam-based Staging.

PURPOSE: Although official T-staging criteria for prostate cancer are based on digital rectal examination findings, providers increasingly rely on transrectal US and MRI to define pragmatic clinical stage to guide management. We assessed the impact of incorporating imaging findings into T-staging on performance of a well-validated prognostic instrument. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2019 with stage ≤cT3a on both digital rectal examination and imaging (transrectal US/MRI) were included. The University of California, San Francisco CAPRA (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment) score was computed 2 ways: (1) incorporating digital rectal examination-based T stage and (2) incorporating imaging-based T stage. We assessed for risk changes across the 2 methods and associations of CAPRA (by both methods) with biochemical recurrence, using unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Model discrimination and net benefit were assessed with time-dependent area under the curve and decision curve analysis, respectively. RESULTS: Of 2,222 men included, 377 (17%) increased in CAPRA score with imaging-based staging (P < .01). Digital rectal examination-based (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.48-1.61) and imaging-based (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.46-1.58) CAPRA scores were comparably accurate for predicting recurrence with similar discrimination and decision curve analyses. On multivariable Cox regression, positive digital rectal examination at diagnosis (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.09-1.53) and imaging-based clinical T3/4 disease (HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.43-2.07) were independently associated with biochemical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The CAPRA score remains accurate whether determined using imaging-based staging or digital rectal examination-based staging, with relatively minor discrepancies and similar associations with biochemical recurrence. Staging information from either modality can be used in the CAPRA score calculation and still reliably predict risk of biochemical recurrence.

Improving multiparametric MR-transrectal ultrasound guided fusion prostate biopsies with hyperpolarized 13 C pyruvate metabolic imaging: A technical development study.

PURPOSE: To develop techniques and establish a workflow using hyperpolarized carbon-13 (13 C) MRI and the pyruvate-to-lactate conversion rate (kPL ) biomarker to guide MR-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsies. METHODS: The integrated multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) exam consisted of a 1-min hyperpolarized 13 C-pyruvate EPI acquisition added to a conventional prostate mpMRI exam. Maps of kPL values were calculated, uploaded to a picture archiving and communication system and targeting platform, and displayed as color overlays on T2 -weighted anatomic images. Abdominal radiologists identified 13 C research biopsy targets based on the general recommendation of focal lesions with kPL >0.02(s-1 ), and created a targeting report for each study. Urologists conducted transrectal ultrasound-guided MR fusion biopsies, including the standard 1 H-mpMRI targets as well as 12-14 core systematic biopsies informed by the research 13 C-kPL targets. All biopsy results were included in the final pathology report and calculated toward clinical risk. RESULTS: This study demonstrated the safety and technical feasibility of integrating hyperpolarized 13 C metabolic targeting into routine 1 H-mpMRI and transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy workflows, evaluated via 5 men (median age 71 years, prostate-specific antigen 8.4 ng/mL, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score 2) on active surveillance undergoing integrated scan and subsequent biopsies. No adverse event was reported. Median turnaround time was less than 3 days from scan to 13 C-kPL targeting, and scan-to-biopsy time was 2 weeks. Median number of 13 C targets was 1 (range: 1-2) per patient, measuring 1.0 cm (range: 0.6-1.9) in diameter, with a median kPL of 0.0319 s-1 (range: 0.0198-0.0410). CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept work demonstrated the safety and feasibility of integrating hyperpolarized 13 C MR biomarkers to the standard mpMRI workflow to guide MR-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsies.

The Natural History of Untreated Biopsy Grade Group Progression and Delayed Definitive Treatment for Men on Active Surveillance for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: For men with clinically localized prostate cancer outcomes of continuing active surveillance (AS) after biopsy progression are not well understood. We aim to determine the impact of continuing AS and delayed definitive treatment after biopsy progression on oncologic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants in our prospective AS cohort (1990-2018) diagnosed with grade group (GG) 1, localized prostate cancer, with prostate specific antigen <20 who were subsequently upgraded to ≥GG2, and underwent further surveillance (biopsy/imaging/prostate specific antigen) were identified. Patients were stratified by post-progression followup into 3 groups: continue AS untreated, pursue early radical prostatectomy (RP) ≤6 months, or undergo late RP within 6 months to 5 years of progression. Patients receiving other treatments were excluded. We compared characteristics between groups and examined the associations of early vs late RP with risk of adverse pathology (AP) at RP and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after RP. RESULTS: Of 531 patients with biopsy progression and further surveillance 214 (40%) remained untreated, 192 (36%) pursued early RP and 125 (24%) underwent late RP. Among patients who underwent early vs late RP, there was no difference in GG (p=0.15) or AP (55% vs 53%, p=0.74) rate at RP, or 3-year RFS (80% vs 87%, log-rank p=0.64) after RP. In multivariable models, only Cancer of Prostate Risk Assessment post-surgical score was associated with risk of RFS (HR=1.42 per point, 95% CI 1.24-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients continuing AS after biopsy progression, 60% underwent surgery within 5 years. Delayed surgery after progression was not associated with higher risk of AP or RFS. This suggests select patients may be able to safely delay treatment after progression.

Clinical Utility of 4Kscore®, ExosomeDx™ and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Early Detection of High Grade Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate 4Kscore® and ExosomeDx™ with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of high grade prostate cancer and number of biopsies avoided. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients had 1 liquid biomarker test with or without multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. High grade prostate cancer was defined as Gleason grade group 2 or greater. The overall number of avoided biopsies (with Gleason grade 1 or less), and number of missed Gleason grade 2 or greater cancer among the biopsied patients, were determined. RESULTS: Of the 783 patients in the overall cohort 419 (53.5%) underwent biopsy. 4Kscore and ExosomeDx scores higher than the manufacturers' cut point were associated with PI-RADS™ scores 3 to 5 and Gleason grade 2 or greater prostate cancer. Limiting biopsy to the men with liquid biomarker scores above the manufacturers' cut point would have resulted avoiding 29.5% to 39.9% unnecessary biopsies overall, while missing 4.0% to 4.8% Gleason grade 2 or greater prostate cancer in the biopsy group. Screening algorithms with up-front liquid biomarker testing followed by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging if the biomarker is above the manufacturers' cut point, then followed by biopsy if the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is positive or if 4Kscore 20 or greater or ExosomeDx 19 or greater would have missed 4.8% to 5.6% of Gleason grade 2 or greater prostate cancer in the biopsy group while avoiding 39.4% to 43.0% biopsies and 29.5% to 39.9% multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging overall. Similar algorithms with up-front multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by liquid biomarker testing for negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging would have missed 2.4% of Gleason grade 2 or greater prostate cancer in the biopsy group but only avoided 17.2% 19.3% biopsies overall. CONCLUSIONS: Screening algorithms with up-front liquid biomarker testing followed by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy at certain biomarker thresholds could reduce unnecessary biopsies, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and overdetection of Gleason grade 1 prostate cancer.

Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Few validated clinical tools currently exist to standardize the frequency of biopsies for men on active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. We determined predictors of biopsy reclassification at specific time points after enrollment on active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified men with clinically low risk prostate cancer prospectively enrolled on active surveillance at the University of California, San Francisco between 2000 and 2016. Biopsy reclassification was defined as Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater on subsequent biopsy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify factors associated with risk of biopsy reclassification at first surveillance biopsy and 1 to 3, 3 to 5 and 5 to 10 years after enrollment, adjusting for clinicodemographic factors, PI-RADS® (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) score and genomic testing. RESULTS: A total of 1,031 men were included in the study. On multivariable analysis biopsy reclassification was associated with prostate specific antigen density 0.15 or greater (HR 3.37, 95% CI 1.83-6.21), percentage biopsy cores positive (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.54) and high genomic score (HR 2.81, 95% CI 1.21-6.52) at first surveillance biopsy and also at 1 to 3 years, after adjustment. Prostate specific antigen density 0.15 or greater (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.56-3.56) and prostate specific antigen kinetics (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.43-3.34) were associated with reclassification at 3 to 5 years. A PI-RADS 4-5 score was not associated with biopsy reclassification at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: High genomic score, prostate specific antigen kinetics and prostate specific antigen density 0.15 or greater were associated with reclassification within 3 years of commencing active surveillance, and prostate specific antigen kinetics and prostate specific antigen density 0.15 or greater remained associated with reclassification at 5 years after diagnosis.

MRI-Based Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Predicts Gleason Score Upgrade in an Active Surveillance Cohort.

OBJECTIVE. Elevated prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) based on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) measurements has been shown to be strongly associated with clinically significant disease and to predict progression on active surveillance (AS) for men with disease that is at a low stage or grade. We hypothesized that elevated MRI PSAD is similarly associated with increased risk of progression on subsequent biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective study, men with Gleason score of 3+3 on diagnostic TRUS-guided biopsy who were managed with AS, had undergone MRI, and had at least one additional biopsy were included. MRI PSAD was calculated using prostate volume on MRI and prostate-specific antigen level temporally closest to the MRI. Multivariable logistics regression models were used to evaluate the association between MRI PSAD and predictors of upgrade on serial biopsy. RESULTS. A total of 166 patients were identified, of whom 74 (44.6%) were upgraded to a Gleason score of 7 or higher on subsequent biopsy. Lesions with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores of 4 and 5 more commonly had MRI PSAD of 0.15 ng/mL2 or higher (51.93% vs 22.22%, p = 0.01) than lesions with PI-RADS scores of 1-3. Median MRI PSAD was significantly higher in the upgraded group compared with the group that was not upgraded (0.15 ng/mL2 vs 0.11 ng/mL2, p = 0.01). MRI PSAD was significantly associated with increased odds of upgrading on subsequent biopsy (log transformation; odds ratio, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.2-2.8]; p = 0.01) after adjusting for age and length of follow-up. CONCLUSION. MRI PSAD was significantly associated with Gleason score upgrading on subsequent biopsy for men initially diagnosed with Gleason 3+3 disease. Although this result is intuitive, to our knowledge it has not been previously shown. As MRI utilization increases, MRI PSAD can aid in risk stratification for men managed with AS.

NMR quantification of lactate production and efflux and glutamate fractional enrichment in living human prostate biopsies cultured with [1,6-13 C2 ]glucose.

PURPOSE: Image-guided prostate biopsies are routinely acquired in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of prostate cancer, yielding useful tissue for identifying metabolic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. We developed an optimized biopsy tissue culture protocol in combination with [1,6-13 C2 ]glucose labeling and quantitative high-resolution NMR to measure glycolysis and tricarboxcylic acid (TCA) cycle activity in freshly acquired living human prostate biopsies. METHODS: We acquired 34 MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsies in vials on ice from 22 previously untreated patients. Within 15 min, biopsies were transferred to rotary tissue culture in 37°C prostate medium containing [1,6-13 C2 ]glucose. Following 24 h of culture, tissue lactate and glutamate pool sizes and fractional enrichments were quantified using quantitative 1 H high resolution magic angle spinning Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) spectroscopy at 1°C with and without 13 C decoupling. Lactate effluxed from the biopsy tissue was quantified in the culture medium using quantitative solution-state high-resolution NMR. RESULTS: Lactate concentration in low-grade cancer (1.15 ± 0.78 nmol/mg) and benign (0.74 ± 0.15 nmol/mg) biopsies agreed with prior published measurements of snap-frozen biopsies. There was substantial fractional enrichment of [3-13 C]lactate (≈70%) and [4-13 C]glutamate (≈24%) in both low-grade cancer and benign biopsies. Although a significant difference in tissue [3-13 C]lactate fractional enrichment was not observed, lactate efflux was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in low-grade cancer biopsies (0.55 ± 0.14 nmol/min/mg) versus benign biopsies (0.31 ± 0.04 nmol/min/mg). CONCLUSION: A protocol was developed for quantification of lactate production-efflux and TCA cycle activity in single living human prostate biopsies, allowing metabolic labeling on a wide spectrum of human tissues (e.g., metastatic, post-non-surgical therapy) from patients not receiving surgery.

Genomic Prostate Score, PI-RADS™ version 2 and Progression in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.

PURPOSE: The OncotypeDx® GPS (Genomic Prostate Score®) is a 17-gene RNA expression assay intended to help guide treatment decisions in men diagnosed with prostate cancer. The PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) version 2 was developed to standardize the risk stratification of lesions identified on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging. We sought to determine whether these tests are associated with an increased risk of biopsy upgrading in men on active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients on active surveillance at the University of California-San Francisco who had low/intermediate risk prostate cancer (prostate specific antigen 20 ng/ml or less and clinical stage T1/T2) and Gleason score 6 disease who underwent multiple biopsies and had a GPS available and/or had undergone multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging with an available PI-RADS version 2 score. The primary study outcome was biopsy upgrading, defined as an increase in the Gleason score from 3 + 3 to 3 + 4 or greater, which was analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Of the men 140 had only GPS test findings, 169 had only a PI-RADS version 2 score and 131 had both data. Each 5-unit increase in the GPS was associated with an increased risk of biopsy upgrading (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.19-1.39, p <0.01). PI-RADS scores of 5 vs 1-2 (HR 4.38, 95% CI 2.36-8.16, p <0.01) and 4 vs 1-2 (HR 2.62, 95% CI 1.45-4.76, p <0.01) were also associated with an increased risk of a biopsy upgrade. On subanalysis of patients with GPS and PI-RADS version 2 scores the GPS was associated with biopsy upgrading, adding value to the clinical covariates (partial likelihood ratio p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A higher GPS or a PI-RADS version 2 score of 4 or 5 was associated with an increased risk of biopsy upgrading.

Evaluating the Safety of Active Surveillance: Outcomes of Deferred Radical Prostatectomy after an Initial Period of Surveillance.

PURPOSE: As enrollment in active surveillance expands, it is increasingly important to assess the potential risks of deferred treatment. We evaluated the risk of prostate specific antigen recurrence in a large cohort of men who underwent radical prostatectomy after initial active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included men who underwent radical prostatectomy after a period of active surveillance. At diagnosis the men had GG (Gleason Grade Group) 1 or 2, clinical T2 or less and low or intermediate risk disease. They were stratified by a composite variable of GG and the volume of high grade cores at diagnosis. Pathological characteristics and recurrence after radical prostatectomy were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 1,916 men enrolled in active surveillance between 1994 and 2017, 448 (23.4%) underwent deferred radical prostatectomy. Median time to radical prostatectomy was 27 months (IQR 15.5-46.5). At diagnosis 388 men (86.6%) had GG1 disease, 31 (6.9%) had GG2 disease with 1 high grade core and 29 (6.5%) had GG2 disease with 2 or more high grade cores. GG2 with 2 or more high grade cores at diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of recurrence compared to GG1 disease (HR 3.29, 95% CI 1.49-7.26, p <0.01). GG2 disease with 1 high grade core did not significantly differ from GG1. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the careful use of active surveillance in men with GG2 and 1 high grade core at diagnosis. Men with 2 or more high grade (GG2 or greater) cores at diagnosis may benefit from immediate treatment.

A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Adverse Pathology in Men on Active Surveillance.

PURPOSE: The GPS (Oncotype Dx® Genomic Prostate Score) test is a RNA expression assay which can be performed on prostate biopsies. We sought to determine whether the GPS was associated with an increased risk of adverse pathology findings in men enrolled on active surveillance who later underwent radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients on active surveillance at University of California-San Francisco who had Gleason score 3 + 3 or low volume (33% or fewer positive cores) Gleason score 3 + 4 prostate cancer, GPS testing at diagnostic or confirmatory biopsy, clinical stage T1/T2, prostate specific antigen less than 20 and a clinical CAPRA (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment) score less than 6. The primary outcome was adverse pathology, defined as Gleason score 4 + 3 or greater, stage pT3a or greater, or pN1. The secondary outcome was biochemical recurrence, defined as 2 consecutive prostate specific antigen measurements greater than 0.05 ng/ml following radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Of the 215 men 179 (83%) were at low risk and 36 (17%) were at intermediate risk by CAPRA scoring. The median GPS was 26.4 (IQR 18.8-34.6). On multivariate analysis a higher GPS was associated with an increased risk of adverse pathology at delayed radical prostatectomy (HR/5 units 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.26, p <0.01). A higher GPS was also associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence (HR/5 units 1.10, 95% CI 1.00-1.21, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who undergo radical prostatectomy after a period on active surveillance, as in those who undergo immediate prostatectomy, a higher GPS is associated with an increased risk of adverse pathology. The GPS is also associated with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in such patients.

A Mobile Health Intervention for Prostate Biopsy Patients Reduces Appointment Cancellations: Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate patient education and preparation for office-based procedures often leads to delayed care, poor patient satisfaction, and increased costs to the health care system. We developed and deployed a mobile health (mHealth) reminder and education program for patients scheduled for transrectal prostate biopsy. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the impact of an mHealth reminder and education program on appointment cancellation rates, communication frequency, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: We developed a text message (SMS, short message service)-based program with seven reminders containing links to Web-based content and surveys sent over an 18-day period (14 days before through 3 days after prostate biopsy). Messages contained educational content, reminders, and readiness questionnaires. Demographic information, appointment cancellations or change data, and patient/provider communication events were collected for 6 months before and after launching the intervention. Patient satisfaction was evaluated in the postintervention cohort. RESULTS: The preintervention (n=473) and postintervention (n=359) cohorts were composed of men of similar median age and racial/ethnic distribution living a similar distance from clinic. The postintervention cohort had significantly fewer canceled or rescheduled appointments (33.8% vs 21.2%, P<.001) and fewer same-day cancellations (3.8% vs 0.5%, P<.001). There was a significant increase in preprocedural telephone calls (0.6 vs 0.8 calls per patient, P=.02) in the postintervention cohort, but not a detectable change in postprocedural calls. The mean satisfaction with the program was 4.5 out of 5 (SD 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: An mHealth periprocedural outreach program significantly lowered appointment cancellation and rescheduling and was associated with high patient satisfaction scores with a slight increase in preprocedural telephone calls. This led to fewer underused procedure appointments and high patient satisfaction.

Detection of clinically signifi cant prostate cancer with PIRADS v2 scores, PSA density, and ADC values in regions with and without mpMRI visible lesions.

PURPOSE: To determine if PSAD, PSADtz, and ADC values improve the accuracy of PI-RADS v2 and identify men whose concurrent systematic biopsy detects clinically significant cancer on areas without mpMRI visible lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single reference-center, cross-sectional, retrospective study of consecutive men with suspected or known low to intermediate-risk prostate cancer who underwent 3T mpMRI and TRUS-MRI fusion biopsy from 07/15/2014 to 02/17/2018. Cluster-corrected logistic regression analyses were utilized to predict clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥3+4) at targeted mpMRI lesions and on systematic biopsy. RESULTS: 538 men (median age=66 years, median PSA=7.0ng/mL) with 780mpMRI lesions were included. Clinically significant disease was diagnosed in 371 men. PI-RADS v2 scores of 3, 4, and 5 were clinically significant cancer in 8.0% (16/201), 22.8% (90/395), and 59.2% (109/184). ADC values, PSAD, and PI-RADS v2 scores were independent predictors of clinically significant cancer in targeted lesions (OR 2.25-8.78; P values <0.05; AUROC 0.84, 95% CI 0.81-0.87). Increases in PSAD were also associated with upgrade on systematic biopsy (OR 2.39-2.48; P values <0.05; AUROC 0.69, 95% CI 0.64-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: ADC values and PSAD improve characterization of PI-RADS v2 score 4 or 5 lesions. Upgraded on systematic biopsy is slightly more likely with PSAD ≥0.15 and multiple small PI-RADS v2 score 3 or 4 lesions.

Impact of Lesion Visibility on Transrectal Ultrasound on the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 3 + 4 or Greater) with Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the impact of lesion visibility with transrectal ultrasound on the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer with transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) compliant, institutional review board approved, retrospective study was performed in 178 men who were 64.7 years old with prostate specific antigen 8.9 ng/ml. They underwent transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy from January 2013 to September 2016. Visible lesions on magnetic resonance imaging were assigned a PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System), version 2 score of 3 or greater. Transrectal ultrasound was positive when a hypoechoic lesion was identified. We used a 3-level, mixed effects logistic regression model to determine how transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging concordance predicted the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer. The diagnostic performance of the 2 methods was estimated using ROC curves. RESULTS: A total of 1,331 sextants were targeted by transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion or systematic biopsies, of which 1,037 were negative, 183 were Gleason score 3 + 3 and 111 were Gleason score 3 + 4 or greater. Clinically significant prostate cancer was diagnosed by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging alone at 20.5% and 19.7% of these locations, respectively. Men with positive imaging had higher odds of clinically significant prostate cancer than men without visible lesions regardless of modality (transrectal ultrasound OR 14.75, 95% CI 5.22-41.69, magnetic resonance imaging OR 12.27, 95% CI 6.39-23.58 and the 2 modalities OR 28.68, 95% CI 14.45-56.89, all p <0.001). The ROC AUC to detect clinically significant prostate cancer using the 2 methods (0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.89) was statistically greater than that of transrectal ultrasound alone (0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.85, p = 0.001) and magnetic resonance imaging alone (0.83, 95% CI 0.79-0.87, p = 0.04). The sensitivity and specificity of transrectal ultrasound were 42.3% and 91.6%, and the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging were 62.2% and 84.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion visibility on magnetic resonance imaging or transrectal ultrasound denotes a similar probability of clinically significant prostate cancer. This probability is greater when each examination is positive.

Serial Anatomical Prostate Ultrasound during Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance.

PURPOSE: The growth potential of low grade prostate cancer is unknown and yet it is potentially impactful for the practice of active surveillance. We evaluated the incidence, growth dynamics and clinical significance of changes in prostate lesions on serial transrectal ultrasound among a large cohort of men with prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included men with prostate cancer treated with active surveillance at UCSF (University of California-San Francisco) from 2000 to 2014 who underwent a minimum of 2 transrectal ultrasound studies. Study inclusion criteria were prostate specific antigen 20 ng/ml or less, clinical stage T2 or less and biopsy Gleason grade 3 + 4 or less. Progression end points included an increase in imaging stage, a 50% or greater increase in volume and an increase in the number of sites (sextants) with apparent lesions. The relationship between transrectal ultrasound progression and biopsy Gleason upgrade was assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: The 875 identified patients underwent a median of 5 transrectal ultrasound studies (IQR 3-8). Median followup was 49 months (IQR 27-81). Of the patients 345 (39%) progressed on serial transrectal ultrasound, including 51 by size, 265 by the number of lesion sites and 279 by stage. Median time to progression was 14 months. Transrectal ultrasound progression was independently associated with biopsy upgrade (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.5, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Local progression on transrectal ultrasound was associated with Gleason upgrade at biopsy. These results suggest that stable imaging findings on transrectal ultrasound may allow for increased intervals between biopsies among men on active surveillance. A prospective study is required to evaluate the usefulness of such a practice.

Extended followup and risk factors for disease reclassification in a large active surveillance cohort for localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Active surveillance to manage prostate cancer provides an alternative to immediate treatment in men with low risk prostate cancer. We report updated outcomes from a long-standing active surveillance cohort and factors associated with reclassification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on all men enrolled in the active surveillance cohort at our institution with at least 6 months of followup between 1990 and 2013. Surveillance consisted of quarterly prostate specific antigen testing, repeat imaging with transrectal ultrasound at provider discretion and periodic repeat prostate biopsies. Factors associated with repeat biopsy reclassification and local treatment were determined by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. We also analyzed the association of prostate specific antigen density and outcomes stratified by prostate size. RESULTS: A total of 810 men who consented to participate in the research cohort were followed on active surveillance for a median of 60 months. Of these men 556 (69%) met strict criteria for active surveillance. Five-year overall survival was 98%, treatment-free survival was 60% and biopsy reclassification-free survival was 40%. There were no prostate cancer related deaths. On multivariate analysis prostate specific antigen density was positively associated with the risk of biopsy reclassification and treatment while the number of biopsies and time between biopsies were inversely associated with the 2 outcomes (each p <0.01). When stratified by prostate volume, prostate specific antigen density remained significantly associated with biopsy reclassification for all strata but prostate specific antigen density was only significantly associated with treatment in men with a smaller prostate. CONCLUSIONS: Significant prostate cancer related morbidity and mortality remained rare at intermediate followup. Prostate specific antigen density was independently associated with biopsy reclassification and treatment while on active surveillance.

Patterns of Local Failure following Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Little is known about patterns of local failure following radiation therapy for prostate cancer. We aimed to characterize post-radiation biopsy findings, including the treatment effect and the zonal distribution of recurrent disease after radiation therapy, in men experiencing biochemical recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients who received post-radiation biopsy in the setting of biochemical recurrence following primary radiation for localized disease. Histological post-radiation biopsy results were categorized by the absence of tumor, demonstration of radiation treatment effect, failure (recurrent cancer) or a combination of treatment effect and failure. We described patterns of histological failure and compared them to the diagnostic biopsy findings. RESULTS: A total of 284 men underwent mapped post-radiation biopsy for biochemical recurrence. Mean age at initial diagnosis was 63 years and median prostate specific antigen was 8.2 ng/ml. Of the men 33%, 32% and 35% were classified at low, intermediate and high risk based on clinical CAPRA (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment) categories. Median time to post-radiation biopsy was 61 months after treatment. Findings were negative in 4% of cases while we noted a treatment effect in 31%, failure in 45% and a combination in 20%. Failure rates were similar across sextants. Of 140 patients with mapped pretreatment and posttreatment biopsies 4% demonstrated cancer in a new location previously identified as negative. Gleason upgrading occurred in 43% of cases with 85% upgraded to 4 + 3 or higher. CONCLUSIONS: Men with rising prostate specific antigen after radiotherapy for prostate cancer most often experience recurrence in dominant tumor sites. Whether failure is due to inadequate targeting, dosing or intrinsic radiation resistance remains unknown to our knowledge. Further study is warranted.

Physical activity and prostate gene expression in men with low-risk prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Vigorous physical activity after diagnosis of localized prostate cancer may reduce the risk of disease progression and prostate cancer-specific mortality. The molecular mechanisms by which physical activity may exert protective effects in the prostate remain unknown. METHODS: We examined the associations between self-reported physical activity and gene expression patterns in morphologically normal prostate tissue of 71 men with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance. Differential gene expression, gene set, and pathway analyses were conducted comparing dichotomous groups defined by type, intensity, and amount of physical activity reported. RESULTS: Cell cycling and DNA repair pathways were up-regulated in men who participated in ≥ 3 h/week vigorous activity compared with men who did not. In addition, canonical pathways involved in cell signaling and metabolism, the cellular effects of sildenafil (Viagra), and the Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress response were modulated in men who reported ≥ 3 h/week of vigorous activity. Differential expression analysis at the individual gene level revealed modest differences between men who performed vigorous activity for ≥ 3 h/week and those who did not. There were no differences in prostate gene expression in comparisons with exercise groupings that did not consider both duration and intensity of activity. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate gene expression and pathway analyses revealed sets of transcripts that may be modulated in normal prostate tissue by participating in ≥ 3 h/week of vigorous activity after diagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer. These findings suggest potential biological mechanisms by which vigorous activity may reduce risk of prostate cancer progression and warrant further study and validation.

Long-term follow-up of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in men following prostate brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate variation in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in men following prostate brachytherapy. METHODS: From January 2004 to November 2009, 524 consecutive patients underwent prostate brachytherapy either alone or in combination with external beam radiation therapy for T1c-T3b prostate cancer. The IPSS was assessed preimplant and at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after treatment. Clinical and treatment-related factors were assessed for correlations with the IPSS increase. RESULTS: The mean preimplant IPSS was 7.4, with the greatest mean score of 16.0 at 1 month. At 6 months, the mean total IPSS had decreased to 11.5, but it was still statistically significantly greater than that at baseline (<0.001). At 12 months, the IPSS was decreased to 8.6, slightly greater than baseline (p = 0.001). The IPSS of 45.4 % (69/152) patients gradually returned to preimplant levels and that of 71.1 % (108/152) patients returned to within 3 points of the baseline at 24 months. At 24, 36, and 48 months after seed implantation, the IPSS was 8.6, 7.7, and 8.2, respectively, and none of these values differed statistically significantly from baseline (p > 0.05). Sixteen patients (3.1 %) showed AUR, and 11 patients required catheterization. On univariate and multivariate analyses, the IPSS increase was best predicted by lower preimplant IPSS. CONCLUSION: In our series, IPSS after prostate brachytherapy peaked at 1 month and gradually returned to approximately baseline at 24 months. The IPSS increase was best predicted by lower preimplant IPSS.

The Impact of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy on Recurrence Outcomes After Initial Active Surveillance: Results from a Large Institutional Cohort.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) involves regular monitoring for disease progression. The aim is to avoid unnecessary treatment while ensuring appropriate and timely treatment for those whose disease progresses. AS has emerged as the standard of care for low-grade (Gleason grade 1, GG 1) PCa. Opponents are concerned that initial undersampling and delay of definitive management for patients with GG 2 disease may lead to adverse outcomes. We sought to determine whether the timing for definitive management of GG 2 PCa, either upfront or after initial AS, affects recurrence outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: Participants were diagnosed with cT1-2N0/xM0/x, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <20 ng/ml, and GG 1-2 PCa between 2000 and 2020 and underwent immediate RP for GG 2 or AS followed by delayed RP on upgrading to GG 2. The outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS) after surgery, with recurrence defined as either biochemical failure (2 PSA measurements ≥0.2 ng/ml) or a second treatment. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to calculate associations between the timing for definitive RP and the risk of recurrence, adjusted for age at diagnosis, percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPC), PSA density, PSA before RP, year of diagnosis, surgical margins, genomic risk score, and prostate MRI findings. KEY FINDINGS: Of the 1259 men who met the inclusion criteria, 979 underwent immediate RP after diagnosis of GG 2, 190 underwent RP within 12 mo of upgrading to GG 2 on AS, and 90 men underwent RP >12 mo after upgrading to GG 2. The 5-yr RFS rates were 81% for the immediate RP group, 80% for the delayed RP ≤12 mo, and 70% for the delayed RP >12 mo group (univariate log-rank p = 0.03). Cox multivariable regression demonstrated no difference in RFS outcomes between immediate RP for GG 2 disease and delayed RP after upgrading on AS. PPC (hazard ratio [HR] per 10% increment 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.15; p = 0.01) and PSA before RP (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09; p < 0.01) were significantly associated with the risk of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: PPC and PSA before RP, but not the timing of definitive surgery after upgrade to GG 2, were associated with the risk of PCa recurrence after RP on multivariable analysis. These findings support the safety of AS and delayed definitive therapy for a subset of patients with GG 2 disease. PATIENT SUMMARY: In a large group of 1259 patients with low-grade prostate cancer, we found that delaying surgical treatment after an initial period of active surveillance resulted in no differences in prostate cancer recurrence. Our results support the safety of active surveillance for low-grade prostate cancer.