Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 103
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer ; 129(6): 890-900, 2023 03 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36544387

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant capecitabine is considered a standard of care for resected cholangiocarcinoma per the BILCAP trial. The role of adjuvant radiation therapy in that trial was not addressed. This study was designed to examine the outcomes of adjuvant radiation in patients who received chemotherapy for resected cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, the authors identified high-risk patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with either positive nodes (N+) or margins (R1) who received adjuvant chemotherapy between 2006 and 2014. Overall survival (OS) was determined with the Kaplan-Meier method. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate analysis (MVA) were performed to identify prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: The authors identified 1478 patients after PSM who were included in the analysis. There was no difference in OS between patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy and patients receiving multiagent chemotherapy (p = .69). There was a significant OS benefit associated with radiation therapy. The median OS and the 5-year OS rate for radiated patients versus nonradiated patients were 34 months and 33% versus 27 months and 24% (p < .001) for the whole group, 30 months and 29% versus 24 months and 19% (p = .007) for the N+ subgroup, and 25 months and 23% versus 20 months and 12% (p = .03) for the R1 subgroup. MVA demonstrated that age, N stage, T stage, R1, and grade were associated with increased mortality, whereas adjuvant radiation was associated with decreased mortality (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study showing that adjuvant radiation therapy after chemotherapy resulted in a significant OS benefit for patients with resected high-risk extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Trials are needed to address the role of radiation therapy in this population.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Humanos , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Colangiocarcinoma/radioterapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Ductos Biliares Intra-Hepáticos/patologia , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/radioterapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 34(9): 1547-1555, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37210030

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization as first-line treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients who had never received chemotherapy, liver embolization, and radiation therapy. The tumors were solitary in 16 patients, multiple in 8 patients, unilobar in 14 patients, and bilobar in 10 patients. Patients underwent transarterial radioembolization with 90Y-labeled glass microspheres. The primary end point was hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), tumor response, and toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (age, 72.3 years ± 9.3; 12 women) were included in the study. The median delivered radiation dose was 135.5 Gy (interquartile range, 77.6 Gy). The median HPFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.0 months). Analysis failed to identify any prognostic factor associated with HPFS. Imaging response at 3 months showed 56% disease control, and the best radiographic response was 71% disease control. The median OS from the radioembolization treatment was 19.4 months (95% CI, 5.0-33.7). Patients with solitary ICC had significantly longer median OS than patients with multifocal ICC: 25.9 months (95% CI, 20.8-31.0 months) versus 10.7 months (95% CI, 8.0-13.4 months) (P = .02). Patients with progression on the 3-month imaging follow-up had significantly shorter median OS than patients who had stable disease at 3 months: 10.7 months (95% CI, 0.7-20.7 months) versus 37.3 months (95% CI, 16.5-58.1 months) (P = .003). Two (8%) Grade 3 toxicities were reported. CONCLUSIONS: First-line treatment of ICC with radioembolization showed promising OS and minimal toxicity, especially in patients with solitary tumor. Radioembolization may be considered as a first-line treatment option for unresectable ICC.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Embolização Terapêutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos Prospectivos , Ductos Biliares Intra-Hepáticos , Microesferas , Estudos de Viabilidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Colangiocarcinoma/radioterapia , Radioisótopos de Ítrio , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia
3.
Surg Endosc ; 37(11): 8720-8727, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37530987

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ischemia is known to be a major contributor for anastomotic leaks and indocyanine green (ICYG) fluorescence angiography has been utilized to assess perfusion. Experienced esophageal surgeons have clinically assessed the gastric conduit with acceptable outcomes for years. We sought to examine the impact of ICYG in a surgeon's decision-making during esophagectomy. METHODS: We queried a prospectively maintained database to identify patients who underwent robotic esophagectomy. Time to initial perfusion, time to maximum perfusion, and residual ischemia were measured and used as a guide to resection of residual stomach. During esophagectomy the surgeon identified the anticipated line of ischemic demarcation (LOD) prior to ICYG injection. The distance between the surgeon's LOD and ICYG LOD was measured. RESULTS: We identified 312 patients who underwent robotic esophagectomy, 251 without ICYG and 61 with ICGY. There were no differences in age, sex, race, body mass index, histology, stage, or neoadjuvant therapy use between groups. The incidence of anastomotic leak did not differ between groups (non-ICYG, 5.2% vs. ICYG, 6.6%), p = 0.67. The initial perfusion time was ≥ 10 s and max perfusion was > 25 s in all the patients in the ICYG that developed anastomotic leaks. All patients were noted to have at least 1 cm of residual gastric ischemia. Fifteen patients underwent independent surgeon evaluation of the ischemic LOD prior to ICYG. Differential distances were noted in 12 (80%) patients with a mean distance between surgical line of demarcation and ICYG LOD of 0.77 cm. CONCLUSION: While the implementation of ICYG during esophagectomy demonstrates no significant improvements in anastomotic leak rates compared to historical controls, surgeon's decision-making is impacted in 80% of cases resulting in additional resection of the gastric conduit. Elevated times to initial perfusion and maximum perfusion were associated with increased gastric ischemia and anastomotic leaks.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/prevenção & controle , Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Verde de Indocianina , Esofagectomia/métodos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Estômago/cirurgia , Angiofluoresceinografia/métodos , Perfusão , Isquemia/etiologia , Isquemia/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia
4.
Surg Endosc ; 37(10): 7530-7537, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37433916

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is associated with significant mortality worldwide. Radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy is considered the only curative option. Traditionally, these operations are associated with significant morbidity. Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and more recently robotic gastrectomy (RG) techniques have been developed to potentially decrease the perioperative morbidity. We sought to compare oncologic outcomes with laparoscopic and robotic techniques for gastrectomy. METHODS: Utilizing the National Cancer Database we identified patients who underwent gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Patients were stratified by open, robotic or laparoscopic surgical technique. Open gastrectomy patients were excluded. RESULTS: We identified 1,301 patients who underwent RG and 4,892 LG with median ages of 65 (20-90) and 66 (18-90) respectively, p = 0.02. The mean number of positive lymph nodes were higher in the LG 2.2 ± 4.4 vs RG 1.9 ± 3.8, p = 0.01. The R0 resections were higher in the RG at 94.5% vs 91.9% in LG, p = 0.001. Conversions to open were 7.1% in the RG and 16% in the LG group, p < 0.001. The median length of hospitalization was 8 (6-11) in both groups. There was no difference in the 30-day readmission (p = 0.65), 30-day mortality (p = 0.85) and 90-day mortality (p = 0.34) between groups. The median and overall 5-year survival was 71.3 mo and 56% in the RG and 66.1 mo and 52% in the LG, p = 0.03. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores, location of gastric cancer, histology grade, pathologic T-stage, pathologic N-stage, surgical margins, and facility volume were all predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic and laparoscopic techniques are both acceptable approaches to gastrectomy. However, conversions to open are higher and R0 resections rates are lower in the laparoscopic group. Additionally, a survival benefit is demonstrated in those undergoing robotic gastrectomy.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Laparoscopia/métodos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia
5.
HPB (Oxford) ; 25(9): 1110-1120, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37286392

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The influence of chemotherapy type and vascular margin status after sequential chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on BRPC patients treated with chemotherapy and 5-fraction SBRT from 2009 to 2021. Surgical outcomes and SBRT-related toxicity were reported. Clinical outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier with log rank comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT to a median dose of 40 Gy prescribed to the tumor-vessel interface and median dose of 32.4 Gyto 95% of the gross tumor volume. One hundred and sixty-nine patients (56%) were resected and benefited from improved median OS (41.1 vs 15.5 months, P < 0.001). Close/positive vascular margins were not associated with worse OS or FFLRF. Type of neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not influence OS for resected patients, but FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved median OS in unresected patients (18.2 vs 13.1 months, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: For BRPC, the effect of a positive or close vascular margin may be mitigated by neoadjuvant therapy. Shorter duration neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as the optimal biological effective dose of radiotherapy should be prospectively explored.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Radiocirurgia , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Pâncreas/patologia
6.
Pancreatology ; 22(3): 396-400, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35304103

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation is often recommended for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We sought to examine the impact of these therapies on R1 resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Utilizing the National Cancer Database we identified patients who underwent pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma. Patients were stratified by resection status and adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: We identified 28,440 patients who underwent pancreatic resection. Patients with tumor size >2 cm were more likely to undergo R1 resections, p < 0.001. Adjuvant therapy improved survival in all patients with median and 5-year survival: adjuvant chemotherapy (21.7 months, 17.45%), chemoradiation (23.3 months, 20.9%) vs no adjuvant therapy (19.5 months, 19.1%), p < 0.001. In the R1 resection cohort survival was also improved with adjuvant therapy with chemoradiation demonstrating the most significant improvement: adjuvant chemotherapy (15.9 months, 6.5%), chemoradiation (18.7 months, 11.2%) vs no adjuvant therapy (12.5 months, 8.7%), p < 0.001. Chemoradiation but not adjuvant chemotherapy improved survival in the R1 node negative, p < 0.004, and node positive, p < 0.001. Adjuvant chemotherapy benefited survival in R1 node positive patients, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pancreatic cancer who undergo R1 resection have significant improvement in survival when treated with adjuvant chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, benefits were greater in those receiving adjuvant chemoradiation.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Humanos , Margens de Excisão , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
7.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 65(2): 139-62, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25582527

RESUMO

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE The management of squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal has evolved from surgery as first-line treatment to curative chemoradiation, with surgery reserved for salvage. Significant progress has been made in understanding how to most effectively deliver chemotherapy and reduce toxicity through advancements in radiation delivery. The purpose of this article is to review the multimodality approach to the diagnosis and management of anal cancer based on a review of the published data and in light of available guidelines.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias do Ânus/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia , Padrão de Cuidado , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Ânus/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Ânus/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Ânus/prevenção & controle , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/prevenção & controle , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Guias como Assunto , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Humanos , Incidência , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Terapia de Salvação , Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Surg Endosc ; 34(2): 814-820, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31183790

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has demonstrated superior outcomes compared to open approaches. The myriad of techniques has precluded the recommendation of a standard approach. The addition of robotics to esophageal resection has potential benefits. We sought to examine the outcomes with MIE to include robotics. METHODS: Utilizing a prospective esophagectomy database, we identified patients who underwent (MIE) Ivor Lewis via thoracoscopic/laparoscopic (TL), transhiatal (TH), or robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis (RAIL). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and complications were analyzed via ANOVA, χ2, and Fisher exact where appropriate. RESULTS: We identified 302 patients who underwent MIE: TL 95 (31.5%), TH 63 (20.8%), and RAIL 144 (47.7%) with a mean age of 65 ± 9.6. The length of operation was longer in the RAIL: TL (299 ± 87), TH (231 ± 65), RAIL (409 ± 104 min), p < 0.001. However, the EBL was lower in the patients undergoing transthoracic approaches (RAIL + TL): TL (189 ± 188 ml), TH (242 ± 380 ml), RAIL (155 ± 107 ml), p = 0.03. Conversion to open was also lower in these patients: TL 7 (7.4%), TH 8 (12.7%), RAIL 0, p < 0.001. The R0 resection rate and lymph node (LN) harvest also favored the RAIL cohort: TL 86 (93.5%), TH 60 (96.8%), and RAIL 144 (100%), p = 0.01; LN: TL 14 ± 7, TH 9 ± 6, and RAIL 20 ± 9, p < 0.001. The overall morbidity was lower in MIE patients that underwent a transthoracic approach vs. transhiatal: TL 29 (30.5%), TH 39 (61.9%), RAIL 34 (23.6%), p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing MIE via thoracoscopic/laparoscopic and robotic transthoracic approaches demonstrated lower EBL, morbidity, and conversion to open compared to the transhiatal approach. Additionally the oncologic outcomes measured by R0 resections and LN harvest also favored the patients who underwent a transthoracic approach.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Robótica , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Feminino , Florida , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Estudos Prospectivos
9.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 29(8): 1101-1108, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30042074

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial yttrium-90 glass microsphere radioembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 85 consecutive patients (41 men and 44 women; age, 73.4 ± 9.3 years) was performed. Survival data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression models, and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 21.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.6-28.4); median OS from radioembolization was 12.0 months (95% CI: 8.0-15.2). Seven episodes of severe toxicity occurred. At 3 months, 6.2% of patients had partial response, 64.2% had stable disease, and 29.6% had progressive disease. Median OS from radioembolization was significantly longer in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 0 and 1 than patients with an ECOG score of 2 (18.5 vs 5.5 months, P = .0012), and median OS from radioembolization was significantly longer in patients with well-differentiated histology than patients with poorly differentiated histology (18.6 vs 9.7 months, P = .012). Patients with solitary tumors had significantly longer median OS from radioembolization than patients with multifocal disease (25 vs. 6.1 months, P = .006). The absence of extrahepatic metastasis was associated with significantly increased median OS (15.2 vs. 6.8 months, P = .003). Increased time from diagnosis to radioembolization was a negative predictor of OS. The morphology of the tumor (mass-forming or infiltrative, hyper- or hypo-enhancing) had no effect on survival. Post-treatment increased cancer antigen 19-9 level, increased international normalized ratio, decreased albumin, increased bilirubin, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and increased Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score were significant predictors of decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the therapeutic role of radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable ICC with good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/radioterapia , Colangiocarcinoma/radioterapia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/administração & dosagem , Radioisótopos de Ítrio/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aspartato Aminotransferases/sangue , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/sangue , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/mortalidade , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/patologia , Bilirrubina/sangue , Antígeno CA-19-9/sangue , Colangiocarcinoma/sangue , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidade , Colangiocarcinoma/patologia , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Embolização Terapêutica/mortalidade , Feminino , Vidro , Humanos , Coeficiente Internacional Normatizado , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Microesferas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Albumina Sérica Humana/metabolismo , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Radioisótopos de Ítrio/efeitos adversos
10.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 19(5): 435-443, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29962026

RESUMO

This work demonstrates the efficacy of voxel-based 90 Y microsphere dosimetry utilizing post-therapy SPECT/CT imaging and applies it to the prediction of treatment response for the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A 90 Y microsphere dosimetry navigator (RapidSphere) within a commercial platform (Velocity, Varian Medical Systems) was demonstrated for three microsphere cases that were imaged using optimized bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT. For each case, the 90 Y SPECT/CT was registered to follow-up diagnostic MR/CT using deformable image registration. The voxel-based dose distribution was computed using the local deposition method with known injected activity. The system allowed the visualization of the isodose distributions on any of the registered image datasets and the calculation of dose-volume histograms (DVHs). The dosimetric analysis illustrated high local doses that are characteristic of blood-flow directed brachytherapy. In the first case, the HCC mass demonstrated a complete response to treatment indicated by a necrotic region in follow-up MR imaging. This result was dosimetrically predicted since the gross tumor volume (GTV) was well covered by the prescription isodose volume (V150 Gy = 85%). The second case illustrated a partial response to treatment which was characterized by incomplete necrosis of an HCC mass and a remaining area of solid enhancement in follow-up MR imaging. This result was predicted by dosimetric analysis because the GTV demonstrated incomplete coverage by the prescription isodose volume (V470 Gy = 18%). The third case demonstrated extrahepatic activity. The dosimetry indicated that the prescription (125 Gy) isodose region extended outside of the liver into the duodenum (178 Gy maximum dose). This was predictive of toxicity as the patient later developed a duodenal ulcer. The ability to predict outcomes and complications using deformable image registration, calculated isodose distributions, and DVHs, points to the clinical utility of patient-specific dose calculations for 90 Y radioembolization treatment planning.


Assuntos
Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único , Canadá , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Radioisótopos de Ítrio
11.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 19(6): 159-165, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30288936

RESUMO

The purpose of this work was to compare dose distributions between two radiosurgery modalities, single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and GammaKnife Perfexion (GK), in the treatment of a large number (≥7) of brain metastases. Twelve patients with 103 brain metastases were analyzed. The median number of targets per patient was 8 (range: 7-14). GK plans were compared to noncoplanar VMAT plans using both 6-MV flattening filter-free (FFF) and 10-MV FFF modes. Parameters analyzed included radiation therapy oncology group conformity index (CI), 12, 6, and 3 Gy isodose volumes (V12 Gy, V6 Gy, V3 Gy), mean and maximum hippocampal dose, and maximum skin dose. There were statistically significant differences in CI (2.5 ± 1.6 vs 1.6 ± 0.8 and 1.7 ± 0.9, P < 0.001, P < 0.001), V12 Gy (2.8 ± 6.1 cc vs 3.0 ± 5.2 cc and 3.1 ± 5.4 cc, P = 0.003, P < 0.001), and V3 Gy (323.0 ± 294.8 cc vs, 880.1 ± 369.1 cc and 937.9 ±  vs 361.9 cc, P = 0.005, P = 0.001) between GK versus both 6-MV FFF and 10-MV FFF. No significant differences existed for maximum hippocampal or skin doses. In conclusion, highly optimized VMAT produced improved conformity at the expense of a higher V12 Gy and V3 Gy volume when compared with highly optimized GK.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Radiocirurgia/instrumentação , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/normas , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Prognóstico , Radiometria/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos
12.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 28(2): 254-259, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27955832

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of transarterial hepatic radioembolization treatment of patients with liver-dominant metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2010 to December 2014, 18 patients with liver-dominant metastatic RCC were treated with yttrium-90 glass microsphere radioembolization. Retrospective review of medical records and imaging studies was performed to evaluate toxicities, treatment response, and overall survival. The median follow-up period from radioembolization treatment was 17.8 months (range, 3-54.4 months). RESULTS: Median overall survival from RCC diagnosis was 64 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-144.1 months), from diagnosis of liver metastasis was 29 months (95% CI, 7.2-50.8 months), and from radioembolization treatment was 22.8 months (95% CI, 13.2-32.3 months). After treatment, 10 patients reported grade 1 clinical toxicities, and 8 patients had grade 1 or 2 biochemical toxicities. The best radiographic responses of 17 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging showed complete response in 16 patients and partial response in 1 patient evaluated by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria. The last available imaging of these 17 patients demonstrated complete response in 14 patients, partial response in 1 patient, and progression of disease in 2 patients. Images of a patient who underwent noncontrast CT showed stable disease as best response and stable disease on the last available imaging evaluated by RECIST. CONCLUSIONS: Radioembolization is safe and effective and led to improved hepatic disease control and overall survival in patients with liver-dominant metastatic RCC.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Renais/terapia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/administração & dosagem , Radioisótopos de Ítrio/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Embolização Terapêutica/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Radioisótopos de Ítrio/efeitos adversos
13.
Acta Oncol ; 56(3): 391-397, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27885876

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy response correlates with survival in multiple gastrointestinal malignancies. To potentially augment neoadjuvant response for pancreas adenocarcinoma, we intensified treatment with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) following multi-agent chemotherapy. Using this regimen, we analyzed whether the College of American Pathology (CAP) tumor regression grade (TRG) at pancreatectomy correlated with established response biomarkers and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer patients treated according to our institutional clinical pathway who underwent surgical resection with reported TRG (n = 81, median follow-up after surgery 24.2 months). Patients had baseline CA19-9, computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound, and FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT then underwent multi-agent chemotherapy (79% with three cycles of gemcitabine, docetaxel and capecitabine) followed by 5-fraction SBRT. They then underwent restaging CT, PET/CT and CA19-9. Overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Univariate ordinal logistic regression correlated TRG with baseline, restaging and change in CA19-9 and the PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). RESULTS: Restaging level and decrease in CA19-9 correlated with improved TRG (p = .02 for both) as did restaging SUVmax (p < .01), yet there was no TRG correlation with decrease in SUVmax (p = .10) or CT response (p = .30). The TRG groups had similar OS and PFS except the TRG 0 (complete response) group. Compared to partial response levels (TRG 1-3, median OS 33.9 months, median PFS 13.0 months), the six (7%) patients with TRG 0 had no deaths (p = .05) and only one progression (p = .03). A group of 10 (12%) TRG 1 patients with only residual isolated tumor cells had similar outcomes to the other TRG 1-3 patients. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative PET-CT and CA19-9 response correlate with histopathologic tumor regression. Patients with complete pathologic response have superior outcomes, suggesting a rationale for intensification and personalization of neoadjuvant therapy in BRPC and LAPC.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Quimioterapia de Indução , Pancreatectomia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Radiocirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Gradação de Tumores , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Dis Esophagus ; 30(1): 1-7, 2017 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27149640

RESUMO

The impact of body weight on outcomes after robotic-assisted esophageal surgery for cancer has not been studied. We examined the short-term operative outcomes in patients according to their body mass index following robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at a high-volume tertiary-care referral cancer center and evaluated the safety of robotic surgery in patients with an elevated body mass index. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy between April 2010 and June 2013 for pathologically confirmed distal esophageal cancer was conducted. Patient demographics, clinicopathologic data, and operative outcomes were collected. We stratified body mass index at admission for surgery according to World Health Organization criteria; normal range is defined as a body mass index range of 18.5-24.9 kg/m2. Overweight is defined as a body mass index range of 25.0-29.9 kg/m2 and obesity is defined as a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 and above. Statistics were calculated using Pearson's Chi-square and Pearson's correlation coefficient tests with a P-value of 0.05 or less for significance. One hundred and twenty-nine patients (103 men, 26 women) with median age of 67 (30-84) years were included. The majority of patients, 76% (N = 98) received neoadjuvant therapy. When stratified by body mass index, 28 (22%) were normal weight, 56 (43%) were overweight, and 45 (35%) were obese. All patients had R0 resection. Median operating room time was 407 (239-694) minutes. When stratified by body mass index, medians of operating room time across the normal weight, overweight and obese groups were 387 (254-660) minutes, 395 (310-645) minutes and 445 (239-694), respectively. Median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 150 (25-600) cc. When stratified by body mass index, medians of EBL across the normal weight, overweight and obese groups were 100 (50-500) cc, 150 (25-600) cc and 150 (25-600), respectively. Obesity significantly correlated with longer operating room time (P = 0.05) but without significant increased EBL (P = 0.348). Among the three body mass index groups there was no difference in postoperative complications including thrombotic events (pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis) (P = 0.266), pneumonia (P = 0.189), anastomotic leak (P = 0.090), wound infection (P = 0.390), any cardiac events (P = 0.793) or 30 days mortality (P = 0.414). Our data study demonstrates that patients with esophageal cancer and an elevated body mass index undergoing robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy have increased operative times but no significantly increased EBL during the procedure. Other potential morbidities did not differ with the robotic approach.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Índice de Massa Corporal , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Feminino , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Duração da Cirurgia , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Readmissão do Paciente , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Carga Tumoral , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia
15.
Lancet Oncol ; 17(6): 801-810, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27160474

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: 35% of patients with pancreatic cancer have unresectable locally advanced disease at diagnosis. Several studies have examined systemic chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin and fluorouracil plus irinotecan and oxaliplatin) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment in this patient population. METHODS: We systematically searched Embase, MEDLINE (OvidSP), Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed Publisher, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from July 1, 1994, to July 2, 2015, for studies of treatment-naive patients of any age who received FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Our primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival; rates of grade 3 or 4 adverse events; and the proportion of patients who underwent radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, surgical resection after FOLFIRINOX, and R0 resection. We evaluated survival outcomes with the Kaplan-Meier method with patient-level data. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events, and the proportion of patients who underwent subsequent radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy or resection, were pooled in a random-effects model. FINDINGS: We included 13 studies comprising 689 patients, of whom 355 (52%) patients had locally advanced pancreatic cancer. 11 studies, comprising 315 patients with locally advanced disease, reported survival outcomes and were eligible for patient-level meta-analysis. Median overall survival from the start of FOLFIRINOX ranged from 10·0 months (95% CI 4·0-16·0) to 32·7 months (23·1-42·3) across studies with a pooled patient-level median overall survival of 24·2 months (95% CI 21·7-26·8). Median progression-free survival ranged from 3·0 months (95% CI not calculable) to 20·4 months (6·5-34·3) across studies with a patient-level median progression-free survival of 15·0 months (95% 13·8-16·2). In ten studies comprising 490 patients, 296 grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported (60·4 events per 100 patients). No deaths were attributed to FOLFIRINOX toxicity. The proportion of patients who underwent radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy ranged from 31% to 100% across studies. In eight studies, 154 (57%) of 271 patients received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy after FOLFIRINOX. The pooled proportion of patients who received any radiotherapy treatment was 63·5% (95% CI 43·3-81·6, I(2) 90%). The proportion of patients who underwent surgical resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer ranged from 0% to 43%. The proportion of patients who had R0 resection of those who underwent resection ranged from 50% to 100% across studies. In 12 studies, 91 (28%) of 325 patients underwent resection after FOLFIRINOX. The pooled proportion of patients who had resection was 25·9% (95% CI 20·2-31·9, I(2) 24%). R0 resection was reported in 60 (74%) of 81 patients. The pooled proportion of patients who had R0 resection was 78·4% (95% CI 60·2-92·2, I(2) 64%). INTERPRETATION: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX had a median overall survival of 24·2 months-longer than that reported with gemcitabine (6-13 months). Future research should assess these promising results in a randomised controlled trial, and should establish which patients might benefit from radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy or resection after FOLFIRINOX. FUNDING: None.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Irinotecano , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Prognóstico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Gencitabina
16.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(4): 1371-9, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26661409

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Without prospective data establishing a consensus multimodality approach to borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, institutional treatment regimens vary. This study investigated the outcomes of the clinical pathway at the author's institution, which consists of neoadjuvant gemcitabine, docetaxel, capecitabine, and stereotactic radiotherapy followed by surgery. METHODS: The study reviewed all cases that met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) diagnostic criteria for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 1 January 2006, to 31 December 2013. Pancreatectomy rates, margin status, pathologic response, disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively examined. Standard statistical methods and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Of 121 patients who met criteria, 101 entered the clinical pathway, and 94 (93.1 %) completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Of the 101 patients, 55 (54.5 %) underwent pancreatectomy, with 53 patients (96.4 %) having microscopically negative margins (R0) and 2 patients (3.6 %) having microscopically positive margins (R1). Vascular resection was required for 22 patients (40 %), with rates of 95.5 % for R0 (n = 21) and 4.5 % for R1 (n = 1). A pathologic response to treatment was demonstrated by 45 patients (81.8 %) and a complete response by 10 patients (14.5 %). Pancreatectomy resulted in a median DFS of 23 months (95 % conflidence interval [CI] 14.5-31.5), a median DSS of 43 months (95 % CI, 25.7-60.3), and a median OS of 33 months (95 % CI, 25.0-41.0) versus a median DSS and OS of 14 months (95 % CI, 10.9-17.1) for patients without pancreatectomy (DSS: P = 3.5 × 10(-13); OS: P = 4.7 × 10(-10)). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated high rates for neoajduvant therapy completion (93.1 %) and pancreatectomy (54.5 %). After pancreatectomy, DSS was significantly improved (43 months), with a pathologic response demonstrated by 81.8 % and a complete response by 14.5 % of the patients. The results support further study of this borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma clinical pathway.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Clínicos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Pancreatectomia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Radiocirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Capecitabina/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Docetaxel , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Gencitabina
17.
J Surg Oncol ; 112(6): 597-602, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26394724

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of residual nodal disease in otherwise complete pathologic responders (ypT0N+) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) for esophageal cancer is unknown. METHODS: ypT0N+ responders were identified from a single institution database of esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy and were compared to patients without locoregional disease (ypT0N0) and to non-complete responders (ypT+). RESULTS: Out of 487 patients, 196 ypT0N0 and 14 ypT0N+ patients were identified. Pre-treatment stage was similar between ypT0N0 and ypT0N+ patients: 66% versus 73% of patients had uT3 disease (P = 0.50) and 76% versus 55% had nodal involvement (P = 0.49), respectively. Locoregional recurrence (43%) was more common in ypT0N+ patients. Median overall survival (OS) was worse in ypT0N+ patients (14.8 months) compared to ypT0N0 patients (92.2 months) and ypT+ patients (38.0 months, P < 0.001). Median OS of ypT0N+ patients was similar to ypT+ stage II (29.6 months, P = 0.84) and stage III (27.5 months, P = 0.95) disease. No difference in median OS existed in patients with residual nodal disease (n = 163) based on local response (14.8 months in ypT0N+ and 22.5 months in ypT+N+ patients, P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Residual nodal disease in esophageal cancer patients with complete response in the primary tumor following nCRT portends a poor prognosis and behaves similar to pathologic stage II/III disease.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Quimiorradioterapia/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasia Residual/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
18.
Acta Oncol ; 54(7): 979-85, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25734581

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Limited data are available to guide neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We updated our institutional outcomes with a neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) approach. An IRB-approved analysis was performed of all BRPC and LAPC patients treated with our departmental treatment protocol. After staging, medically fit patients underwent chemotherapy for 2-3 months, with regimen at the discretion of the treating medical oncologist. Patients then received SBRT delivered in five consecutive daily fractions with median total radiation doses of 30 Gy to tumor and 40 Gy dose painted to tumor-vessel interfaces. This was followed by restaging imaging for possible resection. Overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), and locoregional control (LRC) rates were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. RESULTS: We identified 159 patients, 110 BRPC and 49 LAPC, with 14.0 months median overall follow-up. The resection and margin negative (R0) rate for BRPC patients who completed neoadjuvant therapy was 51% and 96%, respectively. Estimated median OS was 19.2 months for BRPC patients and 15.0 months for LAPC patients (p = 0.402). Median OS was 34.2 months for surgically resected patients versus 14.0 months for unresected patients (p < 0.001). Five of 21 (24%) LAPC patients receiving FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy underwent R0 resection. In LAPC, FOLFIRINOX recipients underwent R0 resection more often than other chemotherapy recipients (5 of 21 vs. 0 of 28, p = 0.011). There was a trend for improved survival in those resected LAPC patients (p = 0.09). For those not undergoing resection, one year LRC was 78%. Any grade ≥ 3 potentially radiation-related toxicity rate was 7%. CONCLUSIONS: These data underscore the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of neoadjuvant SBRT and chemotherapy for BRPC and LAPC.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Quimiorradioterapia , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução/métodos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Radiocirurgia/métodos
19.
Surg Endosc ; 29(11): 3273-81, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25631110

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether preoperative biliary drainage was predictive of recurrence and survival among patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic cancer who were treated with upfront surgery between 2000 and 2012 were identified and stratified by preoperative percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram-guided drainage (PTBD), placement of endoscopic stents (ERCP), or no biliary drainage (NBD). The primary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: We identified 193 patients with resectable pancreatic head cancer (33 PTBD; 96 ERCP; and 64 NBD). Key differences between the three groups were more patients who underwent >1 preoperative biliary procedures (p = 0.004) in the PTBD cohort. PTBD patients had a significant increase in hepatic recurrence rate compared with patients who did not undergo PTBD (44.8 vs. 23.3 %, p = 0.02). PTBD patients also had worse overall survival. Median and 5-year survival for PTBD, ERCP, and NBD patients were 17.5 months and 3 %, 22.4 months and 24 %, and 28.9 months and 32 %, respectively (p = 0.002). MVA revealed that percutaneous drainage was an independent predictor of worse overall survival [HR 1.76, 95 % CI (1.05-2.99), p = 0.03]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who receive PTBD have more advanced disease, higher hepatic recurrence, and worse survival.


Assuntos
Drenagem , Pancreatectomia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colangiografia , Drenagem/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Cancer ; 120(8): 1171-7, 2014 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24390779

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) and lymph node dissection (LND) on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The 2004 to 2008 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was analyzed to identify patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgery and received chemotherapy and to evaluate the correlation between overall survival (OS), PORT, and LND. RESULTS: In total, 2966 patients were identified who underwent pancreatic resection (1842 PORT, 1124 no PORT). Median survival, 1-year OS, and 3-year OS were 21 months, 77%, and 28%, respectively, with PORT versus 20 months, 70%, and 25%, respectively, without PORT (P = .02). Subset analysis revealed that the benefit of PORT was limited to lymph node-positive (N1) patients. Median survival, 1-year OS, and 3-year OS for patients with N1 disease were 19 months, 73%, and 25%, respectively, for those who received PORT versus 18 months, 67%, and 20%, respectively, for those who did not receive PORT (P < .01). An increasing lymph node count was associated with increased survival on multivariate analysis in all patients and in patients with N1 disease (both P < .001). Significant cutoff points for OS based on LND in patients with N1 disease were identified for those who had ≥8, ≥10, ≥12, ≥15, and ≥20 lymph nodes resected. Multivariate analysis for OS revealed that increasing age, T3 and T4 tumors, N1 stage, and moderately and poorly differentiated grade were prognostic for increased mortality, while female gender, PORT, and LND were prognostic for decreased mortality. In patients with N1 disease, other than patient age, all of these factors remained significant. In patients with N0 disease, only T1 and T2 tumor classification and having a tumor that was less than high grade were associated with survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: This SEER analysis demonstrated an associated survival benefit of PORT and LND in patients with N1, surgically resected pancreatic cancer who received chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Programa de SEER
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA