Molecular and clinical correlates of HER3 expression highlights its potential role as a therapeutic target in melanoma.

Overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor family member HER3 (erbB3) has been implicated in several types of cancer and recently drugs targeting HER3 have shown promising clinical activity. In melanoma, HER3 overexpression has been linked to both metastasis formation and resistance to drug therapy in cell culture models. Here, we sought to characterise the expression of HER3 in 187 melanoma biopsies (149 cutaneous, 38 mucosal) using immunohistochemistry, as well as to analyse the association between HER3 expression and molecular, clinical and pathological variables. A subset of the cutaneous melanoma specimens was taken prior to treatment with immune checkpoint blockade therapy (pre-ICB) (n=79). HER3 expression (≥1+) was observed in 136 of 187 samples (∼73%). HER3 expression was found to be markedly lower in the mucosal melanomas, with 17 of the 38 tumours (∼45%) demonstrating no HER3 expression. In cutaneous melanomas, there was a negative association between HER3 expression and mutational load, a positive association with NRAS mutational status, and a trend of negative association with PD-L1 expression. In the pre-ICB cohort, an association was found between high HER3 expression (≥2+) and overall survival after anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy. Overall, our results indicate that HER3 is a promising therapeutic avenue in cutaneous melanoma worthy of further clinical evaluation.

Causes, consequences and clinical significance of aneuploidy across melanoma subtypes.

Aneuploidy, the state of the cell in which the number of whole chromosomes or chromosome arms becomes imbalanced, has been recognized as playing a pivotal role in tumor evolution for over 100 years. In melanoma, the extent of aneuploidy, as well as the chromosomal regions that are affected differ across subtypes, indicative of distinct drivers of disease. Multiple studies have suggested a role for aneuploidy in diagnosis and prognosis of melanomas, as well as in the context of immunotherapy response. A number of key constituents of the cell cycle have been implicated in aneuploidy acquisition in melanoma, including several driver mutations. Here, we review the state of the art on aneuploidy in different melanoma subtypes, discuss the potential drivers, mechanisms underlying aneuploidy acquisition as well as its value in patient diagnosis, prognosis and response to immunotherapy treatment.

Diagnostic utility of PRAME, p53 and 5-hmC immunostaining for distinguishing melanomas from naevi, neurofibromas, scars and other histological mimics.

High expression of PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) and p53 (a proposed marker of desmoplastic melanoma) and low expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) have each been reported in melanoma. However, their combined diagnostic utility for distinguishing melanomas, including uncommon variants, from histological mimics is unknown. This study sought to determine the utility of PRAME, p53 and 5-hmC immunostains for diagnosing melanocytic tumours. A total of 333 cutaneous melanocytic tumours (melanoma n=280, naevi n=53), 20 cutaneous neurofibromas, and 15 scars were evaluated using multiplex immunofluorescence (n=313) or single-plex chromogenic immunohistochemical staining (n=55). Immunostaining for PRAME and 5-hmC were each scored using a previously described semiquantitative scale 0 (absent) to 4+ (diffuse). p53 was scored using a previously described immunoreactive score (range 0-300). PRAME expression was significantly higher in melanomas than in naevi (p<0.0001), with the lowest PRAME expression found in low-grade desmoplastic melanomas compared to the other melanoma subtypes. In non-desmoplastic melanomas, 38% showed 4+ staining (>75% positive tumour cells) and 70% showed 3+ or 4+(>50% positive tumour cells). Conversely, 96% of naevi showed 0, 1+ or 2+ expression. 5-hmC expression was significantly lower in melanomas than in naevi (p<0.0001). However, acral melanomas were not significantly associated with loss of 5-hmC expression (p=0.84). Compared with using PRAME in isolation, combining PRAME and 5-hmC scores increased sensitivity (64%-84%) for detecting melanoma. With respect to desmoplastic melanoma compared to scar or neurofibroma, strong PRAME or p53 staining were almost exclusively found in high-grade desmoplastic melanomas; low-grade desmoplastic melanomas, neurofibromas and scars were negative. 5-hmC was not useful in distinguishing desmoplastic melanomas from neurofibromas or scars. Our data support the use of PRAME as a highly specific ancillary investigation in the diagnosis of melanoma, however PRAME should be considered 'positive' if there is 3+ or 4+ staining (rather than the widely recommended 4+ threshold). 5-hmC, PRAME and p53 appear to have a limited role in the diagnosis of low-grade desmoplastic melanomas.