Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Clin Pract ; 74(9): e13562, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32478939

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Current UK and international guidelines advocate the need for multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion of selected patients undergoing either percutaneous or surgical cardiac procedures to decide the optimal treatment strategy. To date, it is unknown if using videoconference facilities is cost-effective. Therefore, we performed a cost analysis of using a high-speed internet video conferencing system compared with conventional face-to-face MDT meetings. METHODS: Costs of running a conventional MDT meeting vs a video conferencing MDT were modelled and compared over a 2-year period. Participants were also surveyed on the overall effectiveness of conducting remote MDTs. RESULTS: The set-up and maintenance cost of the video conferencing system over 2 years was £30 400. The staff costs of running the face-to-face MDT were £95 970 and the video conferencing MDT was £23 992.50. The total travel costs of the conventional face-to-face MDTs were £10 555.34. In total, the cost of the conventional face-to-face MDT was £106 525.34 and the video conferencing MDT was £54 392.50 representing a cost saving of 48.9%. Participants rated the effectiveness of conducing a remote MDT and the ease of technology use as very good. CONCLUSIONS: Video conferencing systems provide a highly cost-effective method of facilitating MDT meetings between cardiologists and cardiac surgeons at remote centres.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Comunicação por Videoconferência/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA