The Relationship between Adult Height and Blood Pressure.

BACKGROUND: Identification and modification of cardiovascular risk factors is paramount to reducing cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but its association with height remains largely underrecognized. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this manuscript is to review the evidence examining the association between blood pressure and human stature and to summarize the plausible pathophysiological mechanisms behind such an association. METHODS: A systematic review of adult human height and its association with hypertension and coronary artery disease was undertaken. The literature evidence is summarized and tabulated, and an overview of the pathophysiological basis for this association is presented. RESULTS: Shorter arterial lengths found in shorter individuals may predispose to hypertension in a complex hemodynamic interplay, which is explained predominantly by summated arterial wave reflections and an elevated augmentation index. Our systemic review suggests that an inverse relationship between adult height and blood pressure exists. However, differences in the studied populations and heterogeneity in the methods applied across the various studies limit the generalizability of these findings and their clinical application. CONCLUSION: Physiological studies and epidemiological data suggest a potential inverse association between adult height and blood pressure. Further research is required to define the relationship more clearly between adult height and blood pressure and to assess whether antihypertensive therapeutic approaches and goals should be modified according to patients' heights.

A Modern History RAAS Inhibition and Beta Blockade for Heart Failure to Underscore the Non-equivalency of ACEIs and ARBs.

Beta blockers and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-inhibitors (RAAS-i) including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been a mainstay of guideline-based medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) for decades. However, initial evidence supporting each of the aforenoted class of drug for heart failure indications was largely found independently of the other two classes with the exception of the addition of BBs to ACEIs. In the initial ACEI trials for HFrEF, few participants were on BBs as BBs were seen as contraindicated in HFrEF at the time. The seminal BB in HFrEF trials had high prevalence of ACEIs use as ACEIs for HF were standard of care by then, but ARBs as a class were still in their infancy. We closely examine the evidence for combinations of BB and ACEIs versus ARBs in HFrEF. In doing so, we demonstrate the lack of evidence for consideration of ARBs to be interchangeable with ACEIs when used in combination with BB and provide evidence that calls in to question the validity of assuming benefits from each drug class are independently cumulative, widening the gap between ACEIs and ARBs when used with BBs. Modern guidelines should emphasize this lack of evidence for the combination use of ARB and BB in HFrEF, except for candesartan. Even as practice moves towards the widespread uptake of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (which contain the ARB valsartan) in heart failure, the distinction has important implications for the ongoing role of combination therapy with BB, which thus far has been assumed, but not proven.

Occurrence and toxicity of disinfection byproducts in European drinking waters in relation with the HIWATE epidemiology study.

The HIWATE (Health Impacts of long-term exposure to disinfection byproducts in drinking WATEr) project was a systematic analysis that combined the epidemiology on adverse pregnancy outcomes and other health effects with long-term exposure to low levels of drinking water disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in the European Union. The present study focused on the relationship of the occurrence and concentration of DBPs with in vitro mammalian cell toxicity. Eleven drinking water samples were collected from five European countries. Each sampling location corresponded with an epidemiological study for the HIWATE program. Over 90 DBPs were identified; the range in the number of DBPs and their levels reflected the diverse collection sites, different disinfection processes, and the different characteristics of the source waters. For each sampling site, chronic mammalian cell cytotoxicity correlated highly with the numbers of DBPs identified and the levels of DBP chemical classes. Although there was a clear difference in the genotoxic responses among the drinking waters, these data did not correlate as well with the chemical analyses. Thus, the agents responsible for the genomic DNA damage observed in the HIWATE samples may be due to unresolved associations of combinations of identified DBPs, unknown emerging DBPs that were not identified, or other toxic water contaminants. This study represents the first to integrate quantitative in vitro toxicological data with analytical chemistry and human epidemiologic outcomes for drinking water DBPs.

Case report of a coronary artery-right ventricular fistula following repeat endomyocardial biopsies in a heart transplant patient.

BACKGROUND: Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the gold standard for cellular rejection surveillance in heart transplant recipients. Coronary artery fistula formation is a rare late and potentially catastrophic complication of repeated endomyocardial biopsies, without contemporary evidence on incidence or management. CASE SUMMARY: A 47-year-old male was found to have a fistula between his right ventricle and his left anterior descending artery on an angiogram that was performed as a part of regular screening of coronary allograft vasculopathy. Given the low shunt fraction, asymptomatic nature, and lack of guidelines on definitive management, the patient is undergoing conservative management with regular surveillance. DISCUSSION: Coronary artery fistulas were once thought to be rare complications of repeated EMB, but the true prevalence is likely to be higher than previously believed. Ideal treatment and monitoring is unknown given the relative rarity of the condition.

Meta-analysis Comparing Multivessel Versus Culprit Coronary Arterial Revascularization for Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.

We present a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing efficacy and safety outcomes between single procedure multivessel revascularization (MVR) and culprit vessel only revascularization in patients presenting with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). NSTE-ACS is the most common form of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and multivessel disease is common. There is no consensus on the most efficacious single procedure revascularization strategy for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention not meeting coronary artery bypass grafting criteria. Studies in PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically reviewed, and 15 studies met criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Baseline characteristics between the groups were similar. A random effects model was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity of studies was assessed using Cochrane's Q and Higgins I2 tests. For short-term outcomes, patients who underwent MVR had higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.29; p = 0.03); and stroke (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.01 to 3.72; p = 0.05), but lower rates of urgent or emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.43; p <0.00001). In the long-term, MVR patients had less frequent major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.93; p = 0.009), all-cause death (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.97; p = 0.03), and repeat revascularization, (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.90; p = 0.01). MVR following NSTE-ACS was associated with higher short-term risk, but long-term benefit. In conclusion, these results support the use of single procedure multivessel revascularization for NSTE-ACS patients who are suitable candidates at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention.

Disparities Regarding Inadequate Automated External Defibrillator Training and Potential Barriers to Successful Cardiac Resuscitation in Public School Systems.

Installation of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in public schools has been shown to improve outcomes for children with sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). However, the adequacy of faculty AED training and potential barriers to successful cardiac resuscitation remain unknown. A questionnaire was mailed to all public schools in the state of Illinois (n = 3796). The survey focused on the demographic variables of each school as well as the confidence of the responder regarding effectiveness of AED training. 2,192 surveys were included in this study (58% response rate). Independent variables for perceived inadequate AED training were schools that were predominantly black (odds ratio [OR] 3.93; 3.01 to 5.13) or Hispanic (OR 2.75; 2.11 to 3.58), elementary schools (OR 2.05; 1.69 to 2.50), schools with <250 students (OR 1.69; 1.19 to 2.40) and <25 faculty (OR 1.54; 1.10 to 2.15). Eighty-eight percent of responders cited at least one barrier to successful AED utilization. Location in a town setting (OR 9.34; 4.73 to 18.44) or rural setting (OR 3.18; 2.47 to 4.10) as well as upper socioeconomic status (OR 3.85; 2.04 to 7.29) were found to be predictors of schools with no barriers to AED utilization.