Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 6(2): 2325967117752105, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29435468

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although restricted hip range of motion (ROM) is associated with an increased risk for injuries in baseball players, the evolution of hip ROM over the season remains undefined. HYPOTHESIS: Hip ROM profiles would be symmetric between hips and positions (pitchers vs position players) but would decrease from preseason to postseason. Additionally, it was hypothesized that this decrease in motion would correlate with workload. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Bilateral hip ROM was assessed in 96 professional baseball players (54 pitchers, 42 position players) preseason and postseason. ROM comparisons were made between lead and trailing hips, pitchers and position players, and preseason and postseason measures. The change from preseason to postseason was correlated with player demographics and measures of workload for pitchers and position players. RESULTS: Preseason hip ROM was symmetric between hips; however, pitchers demonstrated increased preseason lead hip internal rotation (IR) (P = .018) and bilateral hip total ROM (TROM) (P < .020) compared with position players. From preseason to postseason, position players lost 7° of external rotation (ER) (P ≤ .005 ). In pitchers, the loss of IR correlated with increased pitches (P = .016) and innings (P = .037), while the loss of ER (P = .005 ) and TROM (P = .014) correlated with increasing mean fastball velocity. Workload for position players did not correlate with motion loss. CONCLUSION: Symmetric hip ROM profiles should be anticipated in baseball players; however, pitchers may have increased preseason IR and TROM and postseason ER and TROM relative to position players. Although loss of motion correlated with workload in pitchers, this was not the case for position players. Hip motion should be monitored over the course of the season. This is particularly true for pitchers who lose IR as workload increases, which may place them at a greater risk for injuries.

2.
Am J Sports Med ; 46(8): 1997-2003, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29768041

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although batters are frequently hit by pitch (HBP) in baseball, the effect of HBP injuries remains undefined in the literature. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of HBP injuries in terms of time out of play, injury patterns resulting in the greatest time out of play, and the value of protective gear such as helmets and elbow pads. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Based on the Major League Baseball (MLB) Health and Injury Tracking System, all injuries to batters HBP during the 2011-2015 MLB and Minor League Baseball (MiLB) seasons were identified and analyzed. Video analysis was performed on all HBP events from the 2015 MLB season. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis was utilized to determine the predictive capacity of multiple variables (velocity, pitch type, location, etc) on injury status and severity. RESULTS: A total of 2920 HBP injuries resulted in 24,624 days missed (DM) over the 5 seasons. MLB HBP injuries occurred at a rate of 1 per 2554 plate appearances (1 per 9780 pitches thrown). Mean DM per injury were 8.4 (11.7 for MLB vs 8.0 for MiLB, P < .001). Surgery was required for 3.1% of MLB injuries and 1.2% of MiLB injuries ( P = .005). The most common body regions injured were the hand/fingers (n = 638, 21.8%), head/face (n = 497, 17.0%), and elbow (n = 440, 15.7%), and there were 146 (5.0%) concussions. Injury rates and mean DM correlated with velocity in a near linear fashion. Players hit in the head/face (odds ratio, 28.7) or distal upper extremity (odds ratio, 6.4) were more likely to be injured than players HBP in other locations. Players with an unprotected elbow missed 1.7 more days (95% CI, -4.1 to 7.6) than those with an elbow protector ( P = .554) when injured after being HBP. CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although HBP injuries occur infrequently in the course of normal play, they collectively represent a significant source of time out of play. The most common body regions injured include the hands/fingers and head/face, and batters hit in these locations are significantly more likely to be injured. After contusions, concussions were the most common injury diagnosis.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Braço/epidemiologia , Traumatismos em Atletas/epidemiologia , Beisebol/lesões , Traumatismos do Braço/prevenção & controle , Traumatismos em Atletas/prevenção & controle , Concussão Encefálica/etiologia , Contusões , Dispositivos de Proteção da Cabeça , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Lesões no Cotovelo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA