RESUMO
AIM: Care for people with spina bifida can be improved. This may be done by evaluating mortality rates and causes of death. METHODS: Between 1973 and 2021, 1735 people with spina bifida appeared in registers of the Swedish population. Survival rates and causes of death were calculated according to age and decade. RESULTS: Over almost 50 years, the prevalence of spina bifida decreased from 5.2 to 1.2 per 10 000 births. Mortality fell sharply during the first year of life, with survival rising from 75% to 94%. For children aged 2-18 years and adults, mortality rates were low and differences between decades were minimal. Causes of childhood deaths were congenital abnormalities, hydrocephalus and infections, the latter two also in adults. Adult causes also included self-inflicted injuries and substance abuse, with suicidal or unclear intent, both more common than in the general population. Bladder malignancies were also more frequent, although after reconstructive bladder surgery, mortality rates were similar. CONCLUSION: Survival in the first year of life increased in children with spina bifida, whereas there was no difference in survival rates between adults born between 1973 and 1999. For adults, proactive prevention methods regarding self-inflicted injury, substance abuse and bladder cancer are warranted.
Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Sistema de Registros , Disrafismo Espinal , Humanos , Disrafismo Espinal/epidemiologia , Disrafismo Espinal/mortalidade , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Suécia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Lactente , Fatores de Risco , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Recém-Nascido , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Countless papers have been published regarding the management and clinical outcome of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), still no active treatment has been proven superior to another, regarding preserving renal function. When considering comparable treatment alternatives, qualitative research is needed to understand the parents' perspectives and preferences. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the parents' experiences of infant high-grade VUR (hVUR) regarding continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP), surgical intervention (SI), urinary tract infection (UTI) and renal damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed four randomized, semi-structured focus groups (FG) with 19 parents to 15 children (aged 1,5-6 years). All children had been diagnosed with hVUR at <8 months of age and treated with CAP (all groups) and SI (two groups). Discussions were recorded, transcribed and analysed to content. The sample size for the FGs was based on category saturation, which was confirmed through comparison analysis in multiple FGs. RESULTS: The FGs generated 2,897 parent-reported experiences, of which this study reports on 1,123, sorted into the abovementioned four themes and underlying categories. Negative experiences regarding CAP, such as stress regarding the daily intake and worries about long-term use and side effects, were abundant, whereas positive experiences were few. The experiences regarding SI were negatively affected by inadequate information and postoperative difficulties and positively by empathy, accurate information and adequate preparations. The increased risk of UTIs were described as a constant emotional stress causing restricted social activities, frequent visits to the hospital and challenges regarding urine-sampling. There was a common awareness of renal damage, but few experiences reflected any actual worry. DISCUSSION: The daily struggle with medications and monitoring for symptoms, concerns of future antibiotic resistance and a parental preference of SI have been documented in previous studies. FG methodology effectively collects data from several participants during the same occasion, the goal being to generate discussions that enable researchers to see the world from the participants' perspective. Since the management of infants with hVUR is still under debate, qualitative research can remind of valuable patient and parent perspectives. CONCLUSION: This study shows that CAP and the risk of UTI have non-negligible, everyday impact on family life, while renal damage seems of secondary importance. The concerns of surgical treatment are related to an isolated occasion, which can be optimized with proper care and improved preoperative preparations. Awareness of parents' experiences and preferences is helpful when managing children with hVUR.
RESUMO
Spina bifida includes a spectrum of different neural tube defects. Myelomeningocele is the most serious type and is associated with a risk of paralysis and sensory dysfunction below the affected level, bladder/bowel dysfunction, brain dysmorphology, and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to describe the establishment of linguistic, content and face validity of the Swedish version of a Quality-of-Life Assessment for children (QUALAS-C, n = 10 items), teenagers (QUALAS-T, n = 10 items) and adults with spina bifida (QUALAS-A, n = 15 items) based on the original US English versions. The process included close collaboration with the original instrument developer and complied with international standards on patient-reported outcome measurements. The procedure includes forward translation, expert and patient/parent review and reconciliation, back translation, back translation review and cognitive debriefing interviews with 16 people with spina bifida aged 8 to 33, providing them with the possibility of evaluating the clarity, adequacy, and comprehensiveness of QUALAS-C, QUALAS-T and QUALAS-A, respectively. The interviews lasted a median of 15 min (range 8-16) for QUALAS-C, 10 min (range 9-15) for QUALAS-T and 24 min (range 9-38) for QUALAS-A. Four main issues/topics needed attention and discussion after both the forward and back translation. Following the back translation review, all issues were resolved. The patient feedback revealed recognition of the HRQoL issues included in QUALAS, and also difficulties in understanding some questions. After the patients' evaluation, four items were reworded for clarity. No study participant reported a wish to add to or remove questions from QUALAS. Hence, the Swedish versions of QUALAS became conceptually equivalent to the original US English versions and achieved linguistic, content and face validity. While empowering the voices of people with spina bifida, these results also enable their HRQoL to be properly assessed in research and clinical care in Sweden and in international studies.