Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 65
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cardiol Young ; 28(6): 816-825, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29690945

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Our primary goal was to decrease time to resolution of postoperative chylothorax as demonstrated by total days of chest tube utilisation through development and implementation of a management protocol. METHODS: A chylothorax management protocol was implemented as a quality improvement project at a tertiary-care paediatric hospital in July, 2015. Retrospective analysis was completed on patients aged 0-17 years diagnosed with chylothorax within 30 days of cardiac surgery in a pre-protocol cohort (February, 2014 to June, 2015, n=20) and a post-protocol cohort (July, 2015 to March, 2016, n=22).Measurements and resultsPatient characteristics were similar before and after protocol implementation. Duration of mechanical ventilation and cardiac ICU and hospital lengths of stay were unchanged between cohorts. Following protocol implementation, total duration of chest tube utilisation decreased from 12 to 7 days (p=0.047) with a decrease in maximum days of chest tube utilisation from 44 to 13 days. Duration of medium-chain triglyceride feeds decreased from 42 days to 31 days (p=0.01). In total, three patients in the post-protocol cohort underwent additional surgical procedures to treat chylothorax with subsequent resolution of chylothorax within 24 hours. There were no chest tube re-insertions or re-admissions related to chylothorax in either the pre- or post-protocol cohorts. Protocol compliance was 81%. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of a chylothorax management protocol is feasible, and in our small cohort of patients implementation led to a significant decrease in the duration of chest tube utilisation, while eliminating practice variability among providers.


Assuntos
Tubos Torácicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Quilotórax/diagnóstico , Quilotórax/terapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Quilotórax/etiologia , Drenagem/métodos , Feminino , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S178-96.e15, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212396

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe study design, patients, centers, treatments, and outcomes of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) practice-based evidence (PBE) study and to evaluate the generalizability of the findings to the U.S. TBI inpatient rehabilitation population. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, observational study. SETTING: Ten inpatient rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=2130) enrolled between October 2008 and September 2011 and admitted for inpatient rehabilitation after an index TBI injury. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Return to acute care during rehabilitation, rehabilitation length of stay, FIM at discharge, residence at discharge, and 9 months postdischarge rehospitalization, FIM, participation, and subjective well-being. RESULTS: The level of admission FIM cognitive score was found to create relatively homogeneous subgroups for the subsequent analysis of best treatment combinations. There were significant differences in patient and injury characteristics, treatments, rehabilitation course, and outcomes by admission FIM cognitive subgroups. TBI-PBE study patients were overall similar to U.S. national TBI inpatient rehabilitation populations. CONCLUSIONS: This TBI-PBE study succeeded in capturing naturally occurring variation in patients and treatments, offering opportunities to study best treatments for specific patient impairments. Subsequent articles in this issue report differences between patients and treatments and associations with outcomes in greater detail.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/reabilitação , Centros de Reabilitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Escolaridade , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Ocupacional , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Projetos de Pesquisa , Distribuição por Sexo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S209-21.e6, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212398

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations of patient and injury characteristics with outcomes at inpatient rehabilitation discharge and 9 months postdischarge for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal observational study. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients (N=2130) enrolled between 2008 and 2011, admitted for inpatient rehabilitation after index TBI, and divided into 5 subgroups based on rehabilitation admission FIM cognitive score. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rehabilitation length of stay, discharge to home, and FIM at discharge and 9 months postdischarge. RESULTS: Severity indices increased explained variation in outcomes beyond that accounted for by patient characteristics. FIM motor scores were generally the most predictable. Higher functioning subgroups had more predictable outcomes then subgroups with lower cognitive function at admission. Age at injury, time from injury to rehabilitation admission, and functional independence at rehabilitation admission were the most consistent predictors across all outcomes and subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from previous studies of the relations among patient and injury characteristics and rehabilitation outcomes were largely replicated. Discharge outcomes were most strongly associated with injury severity characteristics, whereas predictors of functional independence at 9 months postdischarge included both patient and injury characteristics.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/classificação , Lesões Encefálicas/reabilitação , Adulto , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Análise dos Mínimos Quadrados , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Centros de Reabilitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
4.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S235-44, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212400

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe patients' level of effort in occupational, physical, and speech therapy sessions during traumatic brain injury (TBI) inpatient rehabilitation and to evaluate how age, injury severity, cognitive impairment, and time are associated with effort. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Acute TBI rehabilitation programs. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=1946) receiving 138,555 therapy sessions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effort in rehabilitation sessions rated on the Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale, FIM, Comprehensive Severity Index brain injury severity score, posttraumatic amnesia (PTA), and Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS). RESULTS: The Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale effort ratings in individual therapy sessions closely conformed to a normative distribution for all 3 disciplines. Mean Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale ratings for patients' therapy sessions were higher in the discharge week than in the admission week (P<.001). For patients who completed 2, 3, or 4 weeks of rehabilitation, differences in effort ratings (P<.001) were observed between 5 subgroups stratified by admission FIM cognitive scores and over time. In linear mixed-effects modeling, age and Comprehensive Severity Index brain injury severity score at admission, days from injury to rehabilitation admission, days from admission, and daily ratings of PTA and ABS score were predictors of level of effort (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' level of effort can be observed and reliably rated in the TBI inpatient rehabilitation setting using the Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale. Patients who sustain TBI show varying levels of effort in rehabilitation therapy sessions, with effort tending to increase over the stay. PTA and agitated behavior are primary risk factors that substantially reduce patient effort in therapies.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/fisiopatologia , Lesões Encefálicas/reabilitação , Transtornos Cognitivos/reabilitação , Terapia Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Esforço Físico , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Fonoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Atividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Lesões Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/fisiopatologia , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Centros de Reabilitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S245-55, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212401

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of enteral nutrition (EN) with patient preinjury and injury characteristics and outcomes for patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Nine rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=1701) admitted for first full inpatient rehabilitation after TBI. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FIM at rehabilitation discharge, length of stay, weight loss, and various infections. RESULTS: There were many significant differences in preinjury and injury characteristics between patients who received EN and patients who did not. After matching patients with a propensity score of >40% for the likely use of EN, patients receiving EN with either a standard or a high-protein formula (>20% of calories coming from protein) for >25% of their rehabilitation stay had higher FIM motor and cognitive scores at rehabilitation discharge and less weight loss than did patients with similar characteristics not receiving EN. CONCLUSIONS: For patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation after TBI and matched on a propensity score of >40% for the likely use of EN, clinicians should strongly consider, when possible, EN for ≥25% of the rehabilitation stay and especially with a formula that contains at least 20% protein rather than a standard formula.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/reabilitação , Lesões Encefálicas/terapia , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Pacientes Internados , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Análise de Regressão , Centros de Reabilitação , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S282-92.e5, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212404

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe the amount and content of group therapies provided during inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI), and to assess the relations of group therapy with patient, injury, and treatment factors and outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive admissions (N=2130) for initial TBI rehabilitation at 10 inpatient rehabilitation facilities (9 in the United States, 1 in Canada) from October 2008 to September 2011. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of sessions that were group therapy (≥2 patients were treated simultaneously by ≥1 clinician); proportion of patients receiving group therapy; type of activity performed and amount of time spent in group therapy, by discipline; rehabilitation length of stay; discharge location; and FIM cognitive and motor scores at discharge. RESULTS: Of the patients, 79% received at least 1 session of group therapy, with group therapy accounting for 13.7% of all therapy sessions and 15.8% of therapy hours. On average, patients spent 2.9h/wk in group therapy. The greatest proportion of treatment time in group format was in therapeutic recreation (25.6%), followed by speech therapy (16.2%), occupational therapy (10.4%), psychology (8.1%), and physical therapy (7.9%). Group therapy time and type of treatment activities varied among admission FIM cognitive subgroups and treatment sites. Several factors appear to be predictive of receiving group therapy, with the treatment site being a major influence. However, group therapy as a whole offered little explanation of differences in the outcomes studied. CONCLUSIONS: Group therapy is commonly used in TBI rehabilitation, to varying degrees among disciplines, sites, and cognitive impairment subgroups. Various therapeutic activities take place in group therapy, indicating its perceived value in addressing many domains of functioning. Variation in outcomes is not explained well by overall percentage of therapy time delivered in groups.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/reabilitação , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Lesões Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/reabilitação , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Psicoterapia de Grupo/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Recreacional , Centros de Reabilitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fonoterapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S293-303.e1, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212405

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of, causes for, and factors associated with readmission to an acute care hospital (RTAC) during inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with TBI admitted consecutively for inpatient rehabilitation (N=2130). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: RTAC incidence, RTAC causes, rehabilitation length of stay (RLOS), and rehabilitation discharge location. RESULTS: A total of 183 participants (9%) experienced RTAC for a total of 210 episodes. Of 183 participants, 161 patients experienced 1 RTAC episode, 17 had 2, and 5 had 3. The mean time from rehabilitation admission to first RTAC was 22±22 days. The mean duration in acute care during RTAC was 7±8 days. Eighty-four participants (46%) had ≥1 RTAC episodes for medical reasons, 102 (56%) had ≥1 RTAC episodes for surgical reasons, and 6 (3%) participants had RTAC episodes for unknown reasons. Most common surgical RTAC reasons were neurosurgical (65%), pulmonary (9%), infection (5%), and orthopedic (5%); most common medical reasons were infection (26%), neurological (23%), and cardiac (12%). Any RTAC was predicted as more likely for patients with older age, history of coronary artery disease, history of congestive heart failure, acute care diagnosis of depression, craniotomy or craniectomy during acute care, and presence of dysphagia at rehabilitation admission. RTAC was less likely for patients with higher admission FIM motor scores and education less than high school diploma. RTAC occurrence during rehabilitation was significantly associated with longer RLOS and smaller likelihood of discharge home. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 9% of patients with TBI experienced RTAC episodes during inpatient rehabilitation for various medical and surgical reasons. This information may help inform interventions aimed at reducing interruptions in rehabilitation for RTAC. RTACs were associated with longer RLOS and discharge to an institutional setting.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/reabilitação , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Canadá , Estudos de Coortes , Avaliação da Deficiência , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
8.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8 Suppl): S330-9.e4, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212407

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of, causes for, and factors associated with acute rehospitalization during 9 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Multicenter observational cohort. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with TBI (N=1850) admitted for inpatient rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrences of proxy or self-report of postrehabilitation acute care rehospitalization, as well as length of and causes for rehospitalizations. RESULTS: A total of 510 participants (28%) had experienced 775 acute rehospitalizations. All experienced 1 admission (510 participants [66%]), whereas 154 (20%) had 2 admissions, 60 (8%) had 3, 23 (3%) had 4, 27 had between 5 and 11, and 1 had 12. The most common rehospitalization causes were infection (15%), neurological (13%), neurosurgical (11%), injury (7%), psychiatric (7%), and orthopedic (7%). The mean time from rehabilitation discharge to first rehospitalization was 113 days. The mean rehospitalization duration was 6.5 days. Logistic regression analyses revealed that older age, history of seizures before injury or during acute care or rehabilitation, history of brain injuries, and non-brain injury medical severity increased the risk of rehospitalization. Injury etiology of motor vehicle collision and high motor functioning at discharge decreased rehospitalization risk. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 28% of patients with TBI were rehospitalized within 9 months of TBI rehabilitation discharge owing to various medical and surgical reasons. Future research should evaluate whether some of these occurrences may be preventable (such as infections, injuries, and psychiatric disorders) and should evaluate the extent to which persons at risk may benefit from additional screening, surveillance, and treatment protocols.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/reabilitação , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Lesões Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Centros de Reabilitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Convulsões/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia
9.
Wound Repair Regen ; 21(6): 823-32, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24134202

RESUMO

Randomized controlled trials in wound care generalize poorly because they exclude patients with significant comorbid conditions. Research using real-world wound care patients is hindered by lack of validated methods to stratify patients according to severity of underlying illnesses. We developed a comprehensive stratification system for patients with wounds that predicts healing likelihood. Complete medical record data on 50,967 wounds from the United States Wound Registry were assigned a clear outcome (healed, amputated, etc.). Factors known to be associated with healing were evaluated using logistic regression models. Significant variables (p < 0.05) were determined and subsequently tested on a holdout sample of data. A different model predicted healing for each wound type. Some variables predicted significantly in nearly all models: wound size, wound age, number of wounds, evidence of bioburden, tissue type exposed (Wagner grade or stage), being nonambulatory, and requiring hospitalization during the course of care. Variables significant in some models included renal failure, renal transplant, malnutrition, autoimmune disease, and cardiovascular disease. All models validated well when applied to the holdout sample. The "Wound Healing Index" can validly predict likelihood of wound healing among real-world patients and can facilitate comparative effectiveness research to identify patients needing advanced therapeutics.


Assuntos
Cicatrização , Ferimentos e Lesões/patologia , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sistema de Registros , Terminologia como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Ferimentos e Lesões/classificação
10.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 94(4 Suppl): S106-14, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23527767

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency of and reasons for missed therapy sessions during inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), and to assess the influence of demographic, medical, and injury factors on the missing of therapy sessions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Six inpatient rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with SCI (N=1376) consecutively admitted for inpatient rehabilitation at participating sites; 1032 participants were randomly selected for model development, and 344 participants were selected for model cross-validation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total hours of missed therapy; total minutes missed per week; and reason for missed therapy. RESULTS: Patients missed an average of 153 minutes of therapies per week, or a total of 20 hours over their rehabilitation stay. Common reasons for missing physical, occupational, and speech therapy were lack of patient readiness and medical reasons. Therapeutic recreation sessions were commonly missed because of patient refusal. More missed therapy (for any reason) was predicted by having C5-8 tetraplegia, paraplegia, greater morbidity, higher motor and cognitive functional independence, higher percent of sessions limited by fatigue, violent SCI etiology, longer rehabilitation length of stay, and treatment center. Older age, ventilator use, and percent of sessions limited by spasticity were predictive of less therapy time missed. CONCLUSIONS: On average, patients missed about 2.5 hours of therapy weekly. In view of the potential impact on rehabilitation outcomes and given the potential cost of lost resources, missed therapy deserves further study and administrative attention. In addressing this issue, there may be potential for the rehabilitation facility to intervene to reduce such lost time, including addressing equipment/therapist availability, patient readiness, patient engagement, and center-specific approaches.


Assuntos
Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
11.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 94(4 Suppl): S165-74, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23527772

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between inpatient and postdischarge rehabilitation services and function, life satisfaction, and community participation 1 year after spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Prospective, observational. SETTING: Six rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with SCI (N=1376). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART), motor FIM (mFIM), and return to work/school at 1 year post-SCI. RESULTS: Demographic and injury characteristics explained 49% of the variance in mFIM and 9% to 25% of the variance in SWLS and CHART social integration, mobility, and occupation scores. Inpatient rehabilitation services explained an additional 2% of the variance for mFIM and 1% to 3% of the variance for SWLS and CHART scores. More time in inpatient physical therapy (PT) was associated with higher mFIM scores; more time in inpatient therapeutic recreation (TR) and social work and more postdischarge nursing (NSG) were associated with lower mFIM scores. More inpatient PT and TR and more postdischarge PT were associated with higher mobility scores; more inpatient psychology (PSY) was associated with lower mobility scores. More postdischarge TR was associated with higher SWLS; more postdischarge PSY services was associated with lower SWLS. Inpatient TR was positively associated with social integration scores; postdischarge PSY was negatively associated with social integration scores. More postdischarge vocational counseling was associated with higher occupation scores. Differences between centers did not explain additional variability in the outcomes studied. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient and postdischarge rehabilitation services are weakly associated with life satisfaction and societal participation 1 year after SCI. Further study of the type and intensity of postdischarge services, and the association with outcomes, is needed to ascertain the most effective use of therapy services after SCI.


Assuntos
Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fatores Sexuais , Participação Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
12.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 94(4 Suppl): S75-86, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23527775

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the amount of variation in short- and medium-term spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation outcomes explained by various comorbidity measures, over and above patient preinjury characteristics and neurologic and functional status. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study of traumatic SCI patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation and followed up at 1 year postinjury. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation and community follow-up at 6 SCI treatment centers. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=1376) included 1032 patients randomly selected for model development and 344 patients selected for cross-validation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rehabilitation length of stay (LOS), return to acute care during rehabilitation, discharge motor FIM, discharge home, rehospitalization after discharge, 1-year return to work/school and 1-year depression symptomatology, motor FIM, and residence. Comorbidity measures used were case-mix groups tier weights, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and the Comprehensive Severity Index (CSI). RESULTS: Multivariable regression analyses, controlling for patient preinjury and injury characteristics, found that the maximum Comprehensive Severity Index (MCSI) was a significant and stronger predictor of LOS, return to acute care during rehabilitation, and 1-year motor FIM compared with the case-mix groups tier weight or the CCI. The admission CSI was a strong predictor of LOS. For rehospitalization after discharge, only the case-mix groups tier weight was significant. No comorbidity measure was significant beyond patient preinjury and injury characteristics for discharge home, discharge motor FIM, living at home, depression symptomatology, major depressive syndrome, and return to work/school. CONCLUSIONS: Patient preinjury and injury characteristics are sufficient to predict most SCI outcomes. For rehabilitation LOS and return to acute care during rehabilitation, one achieves substantially better explanation when taking clinical comorbidity based on the MCSI into account.


Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Adulto , Comorbidade , Depressão/psicologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Readmissão do Paciente , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/psicologia , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
13.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 94(4 Suppl): S98-105, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23527777

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate frequency of and reasons for readmission to acute care (RTAC) during inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), and to identify factors associated with RTAC. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with SCI (N=1376) consecutively admitted for inpatient rehabilitation; 1032 randomly selected for model development; 344 selected for model cross-validation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: RTAC, RTAC reasons, rehabilitation length of stay (LOS), discharge location and FIM, rehospitalization between discharge and year 1, and 1-year outcomes: FIM, Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. RESULTS: Participants (n=116; 11%) experienced RTAC with a total 143 episodes--96 patients experienced only 1 RTAC, while 14 had 2 RTACs, 5 had 3 RTACs, and 1 had 4 RTACs. The most common RTAC reasons were surgery (36%), infection (22%), noninfectious respiratory (14%), and gastrointestinal (8%). Mean days ± SD from rehabilitation admission to first RTAC was 27 ± 30 days. Seventy-four (7%) patients had at least 1 RTAC for medical reasons and 46 (4%) for surgical reasons. Regression analyses indicated several variables were associated with RTACs: greater admission medical severity, lower admission cognitive FIM, pressure ulcer acquired in acute care, and study site. Medical RTACs were associated with higher body mass index, lower admission cognitive and motor FIM, payer, and study site. Predictors of surgical RTAC were longer time from injury to rehabilitation admission and study site. After controlling for the other variables, the only outcome RTAC influenced was longer rehabilitation LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 11% of SCI patients experience RTAC during the course of rehabilitation for a variety of medical and surgical reasons. RTACs are associated with longer rehabilitation LOS.


Assuntos
Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Adulto , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Regressão Psicológica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
14.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 94(4 Suppl): S145-53, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23527770

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe group therapy utilization in spinal cord injury (SCI) inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Six inpatient rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=1376) receiving initial rehabilitation after traumatic SCI. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time spent in group versus individual therapy for physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), therapeutic recreation (TR), and psychology (PSY) therapies. RESULTS: The majority (98%) of patients participated in at least 1 group therapy session, with 83%, 81%, 80%, and 54% of patients receiving group PT, OT, TR, and PSY, respectively. On average, 24% of treatment sessions and 27% of treatment time was provided in group sessions, with TR providing the greatest percent of its time in groups. Group therapy time and time spent in specific activities varied among patient subgroups with different injury characteristics. Group therapy time also varied widely among centers (range, 1.2-6.6h/wk). Across all injury subgroups, individual and group therapy hours per week were negatively correlated for OT and positively correlated for TR. Patient characteristics, clinician experience, and treatment center predicted 32% of variance in group hours per week. PT and OT strengthening/endurance interventions and TR outings were the most common group activities overall. CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of inpatient SCI rehabilitation consists of individual sessions, most patients participate in group therapy, which contributes significantly to total therapy time. Patterns of group utilization fit with functional expectations and clinical goals. A trade-off between group and individual therapy may occur in some disciplines. Utilization of group therapy varies widely among centers, and further study is needed to identify optimal patterns of group therapy utilization.


Assuntos
Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Ocupacional/métodos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Psicoterapia de Grupo/métodos , Terapia Recreacional/métodos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
15.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 94(4 Suppl): S87-97, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23527776

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of rehospitalization among discharged rehabilitation patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) in the first 12 months postinjury, and to identify factors associated with rehospitalization. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Six geographically dispersed rehabilitation centers in the U.S. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutively enrolled individuals with new traumatic SCI (N=951), who were discharged from participating rehabilitation centers and participated in a 1-year follow-up survey. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of postrehabilitation rehospitalization within 1 year of injury, length of rehospitalization stays, and causes of rehospitalizations. RESULTS: More than one third (36.2%) of participants were rehospitalized at least once in the 12-month follow-up period; 12.5% were rehospitalized at least twice. The average number of rehospitalizations among those rehospitalized at least once was 1.37 times, with an average length of stay (LOS) of 15.5 days across all rehospitalization episodes. The 3 most common health conditions associated with rehospitalization were those related to the genitourinary system (eg, urinary tract infection), respiratory system (eg, pneumonia), and skin and subcutaneous tissue (eg, pressure ulcer). Being a woman (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.034-2.279), having Medicaid as the main payer (95% CI, 1.303-2.936), and more severe case mix were associated with increased odds of rehospitalization. Those who had more intensive physical therapy (95% CI, .960-.981) had lower odds of rehospitalization. Some center-to-center variation in rehospitalization rates remained unexplained after case mix and practice differences were considered. The 6 SCI rehabilitation centers varied nearly 2-fold in rates at which their former SCI patients were rehospitalized--from 27.8% to 50%. Center-to-center variation diminished when patient case mix was considered. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with earlier studies, rehospitalization rates among individuals with SCI in the first postinjury year remain high and vary by level and completeness of injury. Rehospitalization risk was associated with younger age, being a woman, unemployment and retirement, and Medicaid coverage. Those who had more intensive physical therapy had lower odds of rehospitalization. Future studies should examine center-to-center variations in rehospitalization rates and availability of patient education and community resources.


Assuntos
Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Adulto , Avaliação da Deficiência , Documentação , Meio Ambiente , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
16.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 35(6): 503-26, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23318034

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Examine associations of type and quantity of physical therapy (PT) interventions delivered during inpatient spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation and patient characteristics with outcomes at the time of discharge and at 1 year post-injury. METHODS: Physical therapists delivering routine care documented details of PT interventions provided. Regression modeling was used to predict outcomes at discharge and 1 year post-injury for a 75% subset; models were validated with the remaining 25%. Injury subgroups also were examined: motor complete low tetraplegia, motor complete paraplegia, and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) D motor incomplete tetra-/paraplegia. RESULTS: PT treatment variables explain more variation in three functionally homogeneous subgroups than in the total sample. Among patients with motor complete low tetraplegia, higher scores for the transfer component of the discharge motor Functional Independence Measure () are strongly associated with more time spent working on manual wheelchair skills. Being male is the most predictive variable for the motor FIM score at discharge for patients with motor complete paraplegia. Admission ASIA lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and change in LEMS were the factors most predictive for having the primary locomotion mode of "walk" or "both (walk and wheelchair)" on the discharge motor FIM for patients with AIS D injuries. CONCLUSION: Injury classification influences type and quantity of PT interventions during inpatient SCI rehabilitation and is a strong predictor of outcomes at discharge and 1 year post-injury. The impact of PT treatment increases when patient groupings become more homogeneous and outcomes become specific to the groupings. Note: This is the second of nine articles in the SCIRehab series.


Assuntos
Pacientes Internados , Paraplegia/etiologia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Atividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Asiático , Avaliação da Deficiência , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos do Humor/etiologia , Paraplegia/reabilitação , Alta do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Quadriplegia/etiologia , Quadriplegia/reabilitação , Análise de Regressão , Centros de Reabilitação , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 35(6): 527-46, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23318035

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Describe associations of occupational therapy (OT) interventions delivered during inpatient spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation and patient characteristics with outcomes at the time of discharge and 1-year post-injury. METHODS: Occupational therapists at six inpatient rehabilitation centers documented detailed information about treatment provided. Least squares regression modeling was used to predict outcomes at discharge and 1-year injury anniversary for a 75% subset; models were validated with the remaining 25%. Functional outcomes for injury subgroups (motor complete low tetraplegia and motor complete paraplegia) also were examined. RESULTS: OT treatment variables explain a small amount of variation in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) outcomes for the full sample and significantly more in two functionally homogeneous subgroups. For patients with motor complete paraplegia, more time spent in clothing management and hygiene related to toileting was a strong predictor of higher scores on the lower body items of the self-care component of the discharge motor FIM. Among patients with motor complete low tetraplegia, higher scores for the FIM lower body self-care items were associated with more time spent on lower body dressing, manual wheelchair mobility training, and bathing training. Active patient participation during OT treatment sessions also was predictive of FIM and other outcomes. CONCLUSION: OT treatments add to explained variance (in addition to patient characteristics) for multiple outcomes. The impact of OT treatment on functional outcomes is more evident when examining more homogeneous patient groupings and outcomes specific to the groupings. Note: This is the third of nine articles in the SCIRehab series.


Assuntos
Terapia Ocupacional/métodos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/psicologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Atividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Adulto , Avaliação da Deficiência , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos dos Movimentos , Alta do Paciente , Análise de Regressão , Centros de Reabilitação , Autocuidado , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Comportamento Social , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
18.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 34(2): 133-48, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21675353

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Length of stay (LOS) for rehabilitation treatment after spinal cord injury (SCI) has been documented extensively. However, there is almost no published research on the nature, extent, or intensity of the various treatments patients receive during their stay. This study aims at providing such information on a large sample of patients treated by specialty rehabilitation inpatient programs. METHODS: Six hundred patients with traumatic SCI admitted to six rehabilitation centers were enrolled. Time spent on various therapeutic activities was documented by each rehabilitation clinician after each patient encounter. Patients were grouped by neurologic level and completeness of injury. Total time spent by each rehabilitation discipline over a patient's stay and total minutes of treatment per week were calculated. Ordinary least squares stepwise regression models were used to identify patient and injury characteristics associated with time spent in rehabilitation treatment overall and within each discipline. RESULTS: Average LOS was 55 days (standard deviation 37), during which 180 (106) hours of treatment were received, or 24 (5) hours per week. Extensive variation was found in the amount of treatment received, between and within neurologic groups. Total hours of treatment provided throughout a patient's stay were primarily determined by LOS, which in turn was primarily predicted by medical acuity. Variation in minutes per week of treatment delivered by individual disciplines was predicted poorly by patient and injury characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Variations between and within SCI rehabilitation patient groups in LOS, minutes of treatment per week overall, and for each rehabilitation discipline are large. Variation in treatment intensity was not well explained by patient and injury characteristics. In accordance with practice-based evidence methodology, the next step in the SCIRehab study will be to determine which treatment interventions are related with positive outcomes (at 1 year post injury), after controlling for patient and injury differences.


Assuntos
Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/classificação , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/estatística & dados numéricos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Centros de Reabilitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/classificação , Adulto Jovem
19.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 91(11): 1722-30, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21044717

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess black-white differences in functional outcomes, controlling for patient characteristics, use of nontherapy ancillaries (NTAs), and use of physical (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) activities and interventions. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective observational cohort study of poststroke rehabilitation. SETTING: Six U.S. inpatient rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=732) subdivided into case-mix subgroups (CMGs; CMGs 104-107 for moderate strokes [n=397], CMGs 108-114 for severe strokes [n=335]). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Discharge Motor FIM. RESULTS: Taking into account patient characteristics, NTAs, and therapy activities, multivariate regressions explained (R(2)) 54% and 69% of variation in outcomes between patients with moderate and severe stroke, respectively. Black race was associated with lower outcomes than white race in the severe group. However, race was no longer associated with outcomes after including interventions used within PT and OT activities. Including interventions within therapy activities increased R(2) to 64% and 74% for moderate and severe strokes, respectively. Some PT and OT activities were provided more to blacks than whites and vice versa. Greater intensity sometimes was associated with better and sometimes with poorer functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for interventions within activities, no racial differences were found in functional outcomes at discharge despite racial differences in rehabilitation care, possibly because each racial group received a mixture of interventions that were negatively and positively associated with outcome. Clinicians should provide therapies associated with better outcomes with high and similar intensities for black and white patients poststroke.


Assuntos
População Negra , Avaliação da Deficiência , Atividade Motora/fisiologia , Terapia Ocupacional/métodos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etnologia , População Branca , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Centros de Reabilitação , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
20.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 91(11): 1712-21, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21044716

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe racial differences in patient characteristics, nontherapy ancillaries, physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), and functional outcomes at discharge in stroke rehabilitation. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective observational cohort study of poststroke rehabilitation. SETTING: Six U.S. inpatient rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Black and white patients (n=732), subdivided in case-mix subgroups (CMGs): CMGs 104 to 107 for moderate strokes (n=397), and CMGs 108 to 114 for severe strokes (n= 335). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: FIM. RESULTS: Significant black-white differences in multiple patient characteristics and intensity of rehabilitation care were identified. White subjects took longer from stroke onset to rehabilitation admission and were more ambulatory prior to stroke. Black subjects had more diabetes. For patients with moderate stroke, black subjects were younger, were more likely to be women, and had more hypertension and obesity with body mass index greater than or equal to 30. For patients with severe stroke, black subjects were less sick and had higher admission FIM scores. White subjects received more minutes a day of OT, although black subjects had significantly longer median PT and OT session duration. No black-white differences in unadjusted stroke rehabilitation outcomes were found. CONCLUSIONS: Reasons for differences in rehabilitation care between black and white subjects should be investigated to understand clinicians' choice of treatments by race. However, we did not find black-white differences in unadjusted stroke rehabilitation outcomes.


Assuntos
População Negra , Avaliação da Deficiência , Terapia Ocupacional/métodos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etnologia , População Branca , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Centros de Reabilitação , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA