RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Osteomyelitis in children may produce severe sequelae. However, the frequency and distribution of such complications by type of osteomyelitis (chronic or acute) is not well described. METHODS: We searched the HealthFacts® database (containing medical information on 68 million individual patients in the United States) with 238 International Classification of Diseases (ICD) version 10 codes for acute osteomyelitis and chronic osteomyelitis appearing in 2015. Outcomes were recorded for each subject, including development of limb length discrepancies, pathologic fractures, mortality, and need for multiple surgeries or prolonged orthopedic care (one to two years following diagnosis). Gender, age and season of diagnosis were also assessed. Chi-square tests were used to compare differences between categorical variables, and t-tests between continuous variables. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty-nine subjects were included (57.4% male). Children with chronic osteomyelitis were older than those with acute osteomyelitis (median 9.5 years vs 12.0, respectively, p = .0004). Diagnoses were more common in winter (p = .0003). Four subjects died while hospitalized during the study period (two with acute osteomyelitis, two with chronic osteomyelitis). Limb length discrepancies were rare and similarly distributed between infection types (≤ 1.3% of subjects, p = .83). Subjects with chronic osteomyeltis were more likely to require long-term orthopedic follow-up (14.0% vs. 4.8% for acute osteomyelitis, p < .0001), suffer from pathologic fractures (1.5% vs < 1.0%, p = .003) and to require multiple surgeries (46.0% vs. 29.3%, p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Though infrequent, serious outcomes from osteomyelitis are more common with chronic osteomyelitis than acute osteomyelitis.
Assuntos
Fraturas Espontâneas , Osteomielite , Humanos , Criança , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Feminino , Fraturas Espontâneas/cirurgia , Osteomielite/complicações , Osteomielite/diagnóstico , Osteomielite/terapia , Doença Aguda , Progressão da Doença , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Dog bites occur frequently in the United States, yet there are no clear guidelines for prescribing antibiotic prophylaxis in healthy children after a dog bite. The aim of our study was to assess antibiotic prophylaxis and subsequent rates of infection after dog bites in children. We hypothesized a negative association between prophylactic prescription of any antimicrobial and return visit within 14 days for infection. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed the frequency of antibiotic prophylaxis prescribed after dog bite injuries in patients 0 to 18 years old and subsequent return visits for infection using 2016 to 2017 medical and pharmacy claims derived from the IBM MarketScan Research Databases. We used the International Classification of Diseases-10 code W54 for dog bites then used keyword searches to find diagnoses (including infection), wound descriptions, and medications. RESULTS: Over the 2-year period, 22,911 patients were seen for dog bites that were not coded as infected. The majority, 13,043 (56.9%), were prescribed an antibiotic at the initial visit and 9868 (43.1%) were not. Of those prescribed antibiotics, 98 (0.75%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.90) returned with an infection, compared with 59 (0.60%; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75) of those not prescribed antibiotics. Receiving an antibiotic prescription at the initial visit was associated with a reduced rate of return for wound infection only among children whose wounds were repaired or closed. Children not receiving a prescription whose wounds were repaired were more than twice as likely to return with an infection in the subsequent 14 days as children whose wounds were not repaired (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.0). CONCLUSIONS: Most children are prescribed antibiotics at an initial emergency department visit after a dog bite. However, very few return for infection independent of antimicrobial prophylaxis, which suggests antibiotics are overprescribed in this setting.
Assuntos
Mordeduras e Picadas , Animais , Criança , Humanos , Cães , Estudos Retrospectivos , Mordeduras e Picadas/epidemiologia , Mordeduras e Picadas/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Serviço Hospitalar de EmergênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To identify the vascular risk factors associated with the occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients. METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective cohort study using the nationwide electronic medical records (EMR) database. Patients with the diagnosis of MS were extracted from inpatient and outpatient EMR using the international classification of diseases, ninth/tenth revisions, clinical modification codes. We excluded patients younger than 18 years, and those where gender was not specified. Patients were further stratified based on their demographics, risk factors, medications, and comorbidities. Tobacco, diabetes, hypertension, and alcohol were the predicting variables; antiplatelet medication, and anticoagulant agents were the primary exposures for the development of ICH. A validated diagnosis code algorithm defined the diagnosis of ICH. Multivariable logistic regression models were utilized to assess the risk of ICH in MS patients. RESULTS: Of the total 57,099 MS patients (women: 75%, nâ¯=â¯41,517), 107 (.19%) sustained an ICH. Age (ORâ¯=â¯2.74, CIâ¯=â¯1.13-6.62), use of anticoagulants (ORâ¯=â¯2.15, 95% CIâ¯=â¯1.30-3.56, Pâ¯=â¯.0028), and history of tobacco exposure (ORâ¯=â¯2.44, CIâ¯=â¯1.37-4.36, Pâ¯=â¯.0025) were associated with increased risk of ICH. Use of antiplatelet and disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) showed a protective trend against ICH. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco exposure and anticoagulant use were strongly associated with increased risk of ICH in patients with MS. There might be a protective effect that antiplatelet and DMDs have in the pathophysiology of this disease. Further prospective investigations are warranted to establish these associations.
Assuntos
Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiologia , Esclerose Múltipla/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Comorbidade , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Prognóstico , Fatores de Proteção , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Data on all outpatient opioid prescriptions (N = 71,647) to youth below age 21 (N = 42,020) from 2005 to 2016 were extracted from electronic medical records within a university hospital system in New Mexico (NM) as were demographic details and markers of morbidity/mortality. Relative risk was calculated for markers of morbidity/mortality based on sociodemographic characteristics. The sample was primarily male (55.0%), Hispanic/Latinx (50.1%), English-speaking (88.9%), and publicly insured (50.1%). Mean age was 13.54 (SD = 6.50). From 2005 to 2016, overall frequency of opioid prescriptions increased by 86.6% (from 2470 to 4610) with the largest increase (206.2%) observed from 2005 to 2008 (2470-7562). Patients who were older, white, and non-Hispanic were more likely to receive multiple opioid prescriptions. Large relative increases in morbidity and mortality were documented, although base rates remained low. The percentage of individuals within the sample who experienced an overdose increased steadily from 0 in 2005 to 1.09% in 2016. Incidence of mortality increased from 0.12% of the sample to 1.39% in 2016. The proportion of individuals who received a medication for the treatment of opioid dependence increased from 0.06% in 2005 to 0.44% in 2016. Significantly increased risk of adverse outcomes was observed in patients receiving multiple opioid prescriptions, and in patients who were older, of minority race, received their first prescription in an outpatient clinic, and publicly insured or uninsured. Results add to the growing literature concerning opioid prescription rates over time. They also provide important information on potential additive risks of adverse outcomes when pediatric patients receive multiple opioid prescriptions.