Uncertainties beyond preparedness: COVID-19 vaccination in Senegal.

Vaccination is one of the most recognised strategies in public health for preventing the spread of epidemics, and the availability of a vaccine is often expected by health actors to be a 'game-changer'. However, the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) vaccine in Senegal was not the magic bullet that the international community expected. A very low vaccination coverage rate (less than 10% by April 2023) was observed in this country, once considered a model in West Africa for its epidemic response. Beyond the population's alleged hesitancy to be vaccinated, was a lack of preparedness to blame? Previous analyses show that outbreak preparation limited to standard interventions is not sufficient in the face of the social, cultural, and political configurations of each epidemic context and that uncertainty limits response capacity. This paper examines the social life of the COVID-19 vaccine to identify the forms and contextual dimensions of uncertainty related to immunisation in Senegal. The authors explore how vaccination was implemented and compare experiences with the preparedness process, to offer insight on uncertainties. Using Stirling's theoretical model that defines various expressions of incertitude, the authors identify four nexuses at various stages of the social life of COVID-19 vaccine in Senegal: (1) material uncertainty related to vaccine availability, (2) ambiguity of the population about the purpose of vaccination and the risks of the disease, (3) uncertainty related to side effects, and (4) uncertainty about vaccination strategies shared by scientific and health authorities. These uncertainties were only partly considered in the preparedness process, for they are related to systemic structural dimensions and reflect the impact of global/regional powers on the local level. The findings of this research are relevant not only to support better communication around vaccines in Senegal but also more generally to the prevention of emerging epidemics shaped by human behaviours.

[Neglected patients, unexpected effects. Ebola virus disease suspected case experience.] / Patients négligés, effets imprévus. L'expérience des cas suspects de maladie à virus Ebola.

INTRODUCTION: In an epidemic context, the identification of suspected cases, among alert or contact cases, leads to caring for persons for whom only a minority will be confirmed cases, with a laboratory diagnosis positive for Ebola. How are suspected cases treated that are not subsequently confirmed and how do they feel about this experience ? What are the medical or social consequences ? METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in two countries with a high Ebola risk epidemic situation in 2015-2016 (Senegal, Côte d'Ivoire). Based on interviews with suspected cases and caregivers, 12 referral itineraries were identified for 20 people. RESULTS: Narratives are dominated by the perception of failures at several levels: insufficient means and service preparation; lack of care for patients' vital needs and lack of treatment for their diseases; lack of listening, explanation and consideration for their families; patients' suffering from being isolated and facing violence; unexpected secondary social effects. These findings can be explained partly by caregivers' focus on Ebola diagnosis more than patients, fear of contagion, and by the insufficient preparation of isolation spaces at the time of the survey. CONCLUSION: The results show the possible pitfalls of surveillance systems which increase the number of persons identified as suspected cases, if care services are not sufficiently prepared. Recommendations based on these results should be considered particularly to define operational procedures and trainings for health professionals.

[Preparing for epidemics. A strategy for strengthening social science skills in Africa]. / Se préparer face aux épidémies Une stratégie de renforcement des compétences en sciences sociales en Afrique.

The Covid pandemic was a reminder of the need to be prepared for epidemics and pandemics and to take into account their socio-political dimensions by developing socioanthropological and interdisciplinary approaches. In the post-crisis era, the challenge is one of operationality. How can these dimensions be made more visible? How can we develop analyses that can help to humanize institutional responses, make inequalities visible to limit them during the crisis, reveal structural determinants of transmission, and define interventions that are scientifically sound, ethically just and respectful of diversity?Three strategies are relevant to meet these challenges: (1) more social scientists in Frenchspeaking Africa must get expertise on epidemics to investigate associated issues before, during and after epidemic crisis; (2) public health professionals, health and social workers must get informed about social, historical, economic and political aspects of epidemics that shape risk, care and control; (3) collaborations between researchers and those involved in responding to epidemics on the basis of shared knowledge must develop.This article presents a capacity-building initiative developed in French-speaking West Africa by the Anthropology of Emerging Epidemics Network (RAAE), in conjunction with other networks (Sonar-Global) and institutions (CRCF, IRD). It describes and analyzes a program that combines a working method, a scientific content and teaching tools. This program benefited from previous training experiences and gathered expertise from about 25 social scientists, mainly medical anthropologists, who have worked on various epidemics and pandemics such as AIDS, Ebola, plague, Covid and dengue in West Africa and beyond. The process to develop the course was based on workshops followed by redaction periods, then testings for content and tools during training sessions.The course focuses on two audiences: social science researchers (with a Master degree level and above) and social and health workers (public health, community health, NGOs, social workers). For the former, the course aims at reinforcing theoretical and methodological skills through the presentation of issues, key concepts, selected theoretical developments, themes and bibliographical references. For the latter, the course is based on modules about operational issues that can be taken separately, to better adapt the content of trainings to local teams' needs. For both, a glossary includes 100 definitions of public health, medical and social science vocabulary, relevant to epidemics. The content in terms of skills to be acquired (knowledge, know-how) is presented briefly in the article. Both the scientific content and learning methods and tools are presented in a manual (Desclaux et al., Anthropologie appliquée aux épidémies émergentes, 2022 [5]) as well as on Sonar-Global (English) and RAEE (French) websites (www.sonar-global.eu, www.raee.fr).The knowledge to be imparted is organized into 13 modules: introduction; the framework for responding to epidemics; emergence and One Health; antimicrobial resistance; infectious risk (inequalities, stigmatization and prevention); knowledge (circulation and interpretation); health services (places of risk and care); public health measures (lockdown and distancing); experiences (suffering of the sick and mobilization); death (meaning and rituals); vaccination (innovation, equity and hesitation); epidemic cycles (preparation, response and recovery); challenges, methods, ethics and governance; and conclusion.The first training courses held in Senegal and Burkina Faso for university researchers and young scholars from Africa and France were positively evaluated by the participants. They report that they have acquired knowledge in epidemic social science, but also in public health, which has given them the necessary basis for communicating and developing collaborations (in research and intervention) with social and health actors. The model could be duplicated with adaptation for new training sessions organized by other institutions, for which a manual is available.

Treatment success or failure in children and adolescents born with HIV in rural Senegal: An anthropological perspective.

Due to the efficacy of antiretrovirals (ARVs), mortality and morbidity related to the AIDS epidemic has declined considerably in recent decades. Nevertheless in Africa, the persistence of new infections and the concerning development of ARV drug resistance reflect the challenges in preventing and treating HIV infection. These problems are especially affecting children and adolescents living with HIV (CALHIV). In 1998, Senegal was the first West African country to implement a government program for access to ARV drugs. However, care for CALHIV remains challenging. A national survey conducted in 2015 showed that 64% of CALHIV (0-19 years) in follow-up in sites outside of Dakar were in treatment failure. The article presents the results of an anthropological study that aims to examine the modalities of medical and social care for CALHIV, identify the various structural and social determinants of treatment failure or success, and ascertain their respective influence. The ethnographic survey was conducted between July 2020 and November 2021 in 11 of the 14 regions of Senegal and in 15 health facilities (11 health centers and 4 regional hospitals). The interviews and observations were conducted with 65 children and adolescents, 63 parents or guardians, and 47 health workers providing their care. The results show that situations of treatment failure or success are the result of favorable or unfavorable configurations that bring into play various actors-children, parents, health care professionals-and their interactions with and in varying sociocultural and structural contexts. This research underscores the contribution of anthropology to the analysis and understanding of care systems. From a public health perspective, our analyses argue for a differentiated approach to strengthening the skills of health facility staff, taking into account the specificity of each site.

[Perceptions and use of Universal Health Coverage (Plan Sésame) among the elderly in Dakar (Senegal), impacts on health expenditure related to diabetes and hypertension]. / Perceptions et utilisation de la Couverture Maladie Universelle (Plan Sésame) par les personnes âgées à Dakar (Sénégal), impacts sur les dépenses de santé liées au diabète et à l'hypertension.

Introduction/rationale: In 2006, the Senegalese government set up a health coverage programme for people aged 60 and over - the Plan Sésame - to provide free medical care in all the country's public health facilities. This scheme has been integrated into the Universal Health Coverage (CMU) promoted from 2013. The objective of the study was to describe and analyse the knowledge and representations of professionals and users about health coverage and the Plan Sésame, the use of the scheme by the elderly, to evaluate the amount of medical expenses incurred during a routine medical consultation for the monitoring of their illness (hypertension and diabetes), and to calculate the out-of-pocket expenses related to the consultation. Material and methods: Study conducted between July 2020 and October 2021 in two public health facilities in Dakar. Mixed approach: 1/ qualitative study by semi-directive interviews, informal interviews, observations and field diary with 35 people selected according to a reasoned choice procedure with the aim of diversifying gender, age, social status, therapeutic itineraries for 23 people (including 12 women, ages between 60 and 85 years), and professional activities for 12 health actors; 2/ quantitative cross-sectional study by questionnaire of 225 people (including 141 women) aged 60 and over; we calculated the total cost of the consultation and associated prescriptions (complementary examinations and medicines) as well as the remaining medical expenses (out-of-pocket) and the cost of transporting patients. This is a descriptive exploratory study of a non-representative sample of the elderly population in Senegal. Results: The health professionals interviewed supported the principle of health coverage, but most of them had limited and sometimes imprecise knowledge of the existing schemes and the methods of access or the services covered. Their point of view about the consequences of the Plan Sésame on their practice reveals some contradictions: some complain about the increase in workload, the criticism is extended to all the free schemes which would have a negative impact on daily practice because of the increase in the number of consultations which would be linked to abuse by patients.The interviews highlight the heterogeneity of the knowledge of elderly people about the health coverage intended for them, even though the Plan Sésame has been in place for over ten years. The interviews clearly show that the use of the health coverage system by the elderly depends closely on the information they have and their ability to use it, both for women and men. There is a close link between the level of social integration of people and their use of health coverage: the most socially integrated people are those who know how to use CMU services best. The use of health coverage by the elderly appears to vary according to the individual.Although Plan Sésame is defined as part of a national strategy, its implementation varies according to the health structures and the periods; in the two study sites, the range of services covered by Plan Sésame is very limited, so the coverage provided by Plan Sésame is only partial: between 30 and 50% of the medical costs; the remaining cost of a consultation for elderly patients with hypertension and/or diabetes varies between 24,000 and 28,000 CFA francs.These amounts must be put into perspective with the resources available to people. Statistical studies published in 2021 report that in Senegal the average daily expenditure is 1,390 CFA francs/person/day; and that almost 38% of the population lives on 913 CFA francs/person/ day, which is the poverty line calculated in 2019. Thus, the average out-of-pocket expenses for a follow-up consultation for hypertension, diabetes or a combination of the two diseases represent 15 to 30 days of daily expenditure. While the vast majority of elderly people in Senegal do not have a retirement pension, health expenses are therefore borne by their relatives. Within households, medical expenditure for the elderly competes with basic needs, particularly food, which usually take up more than half of household resources. This indispensable family support places the elderly in a situation of total dependence. Conclusions: In 2021, Plan Sésame does not yet allow for completely free care for the elderly. However, its application, even partial, has resulted in a real reduction in health care costs for the elderly. Its use remains limited due to inconsistent application by most health structures. Its impact is insufficient in view of the amounts that users have to pay in a context of social and economic vulnerability. These observations reinforce the need to work on reducing the price of medical services and strengthening the UHC, in order to improve the equity and performance of the system, and to make it fully functional in all health structures.

Sexuality of adolescent girls born with HIV in Senegal: an anthropological analysis.

Objectives: In Senegal, the dominant social norm upholds virginity before marriage and edifies abstinence for adolescents as a cardinal moral value. Currently, sex outside of marriage remains socially condemned. The onset of sex for adolescent girls born with HIV in Senegal brings up several challenges. In Dakar, initiatives, especially through digital applications, are being developed to support these young people. These programs are much rarer in rural settings. A study conducted in 2021 explored how adolescent girls born with HIV who live outside of Dakar experience sexuality, what socio-health constraints they face, and what support they receive from the healthcare system. Method: An anthropological study titled 'Treatment Failure among Children and Adolescents Living with HIV in Senegal, Outside Dakar' (ETEA-VIH, ANRS 12421) was conducted in 2021 in 14 regional hospitals and health centers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 87 HIV-positive children and adolescents, 95 parents/guardians, and 47 health care workers. Adolescent girls' onset of sexuality was specifically analyzed for 40 adolescent girls age 12-19 years old. Results: Generally, parents feign oblivion about their children's sexual lives. Mothers dread a pregnancy out of marriage because they are responsible for overseeing sex education and would be 'blamed' for the transgression. The occurrence of an unintended pregnancy can lead to exclusion from the family and a risk of transmitting HIV to the child due to the lack of medical and social support. HIV remains a stigmatizing disease that families keep secret. The risk of disclosure is a major concern. Despite sexual and reproductive health (SRH) programs, most healthcare workers are reluctant to discuss sexuality or to offer contraception to adolescent girls. Information spaces have been set up in some regional hospitals by associations trained in SRH. They are rarer in health centers. Accessibility to digital applications and discussion forums is limited due to the lack of smartphones and Internet access. Conclusion: In rural settings, HIV-positive adolescent girls are confronted with the silence that surrounds sexuality and HIV. An individualized approach and confidential access to contraception should be prioritized to support them with assistance from PLHIV associations.

Vaccine anxieties, vaccine preparedness: Perspectives from Africa in a Covid-19 era.

Global debates about vaccines as a key element of pandemic response and future preparedness in the era of Covid-19 currently focus on questions of supply, with attention to global injustice in vaccine distribution and African countries as rightful beneficiaries of international de-regulation and financing initiatives such as COVAX. At the same time, vaccine demand and uptake are seen to be threatened by hesitancy, often attributed to an increasingly globalised anti-vaxx movement and its propagation of misinformation and conspiracy, now reaching African populations through a social media 'infodemic'. Underplayed in these debates are the socio-political contexts through which vaccine technologies enter and are interpreted within African settings, and the crucial intersections between supply and demand. We explore these through a 'vaccine anxieties' framework attending to both desires for and worries about vaccines, as shaped by bodily, societal and wider political understandings and experiences. This provides an analytical lens to organise and interpret ethnographic and narrative accounts in local and national settings in Uganda and Sierra Leone, and their (dis)connections with global debates and geopolitics. In considering the socially-embedded reasons why people want or do not want Covid-19 vaccines, and how this intersects with the dynamics of vaccine supply, access and distribution in rapidly-unfolding epidemic situations, we bring new, expanded insights into debates about vaccine confidence and vaccine preparedness.

Negotiating Intersecting Precarities: COVID-19, Pandemic Preparedness and Response in Africa.

This article shares findings on COVID-19 in Africa across 2020 to examine concepts and practices of epidemic preparedness and response. Amidst uncertainties about the trajectory of COVID-19, the stages of emergency response emerge in practice as interconnected. We illustrate how complex dynamics manifest as diverse actors interpret and modify approaches according to contexts and experiences. We suggest that the concept of "intersecting precarities" best captures the temporalities at stake; that these precarities include the effects of epidemic control measures; and that people do not just accept but actively negotiate these intersections as they seek to sustain their lives and livelihoods.

Does universal health coverage reduce out-of-pocket expenditures for medical consultations for people living with HIV in Senegal? An exploratory cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: In Senegal, a national health coverage system named Couverture Medicale Universelle (CMU) has been under development since 2013; its impact on out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses for people living with HIV (PLHIV) remains unknown. Our objective was to assess the impact of the national health coverage system on health expenses for PLHIV by measuring the OOP amount for a routine consultation for various categories of PLHIV, in Dakar and different regions in Senegal, viewed from the patients' perspective. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional survey in 2018 and 2019 using a face-to-face questionnaire with PLHIV: 344 adults followed up at Fann Regional Centre for research and training in clinical treatment in Dakar; 60 adult men who have sex with men (MSM) in 2 hospitals in Dakar and 7 facilities in the regions; and 130 children and adolescents (0-19 years) in 16 care facilities in the southern regions. We have calculated the total price of the consultation and associated prescriptions along with the patient's OOP medical and transportation contributions. The average amounts were compared using the Student's t-test. RESULTS: All patients are on antiretroviral treatment with a median duration of 6 years, 5 years and 3 years for adults, MSM and children/adolescents, respectively. The percentage of people who have health coverage is 26%, 18% and 44% for adults, MSM and children. In practice, these systems are rarely used. The OOP amount (health expenses+transportation costs) for a routine consultation is €11 for adults and children, and €32.5 for MSM. CONCLUSION: The number of PLHIV with coverage is low, and the system's effectiveness remains limited. Currently, this system has proved ineffective in implementing free healthcare, recommended by WHO since 2005.

Accepted monitoring or endured quarantine? Ebola contacts' perceptions in Senegal.

During the 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola epidemic, transmission chains were controlled through contact tracing, i.e., identification and follow-up of people exposed to Ebola cases. WHO recommendations for daily check-ups of physical symptoms with social distancing for 21 days were unevenly applied and sometimes interpreted as quarantine. Criticisms arose regarding the use of coercion and questioned contact tracing on ethical grounds. This article aims to analyze contact cases' perceptions and acceptance of contact monitoring at the field level. In Senegal, an imported case of Ebola virus disease in September 2014 resulted in placing 74 contact cases in home containment with daily visits by volunteers. An ethnographic study based on in-depth interviews with all stakeholders performed in September-October 2014 showed four main perceptions of monitoring: a biosecurity preventive measure, suspension of professional activity, stigma attached to Ebola, and a social obligation. Contacts demonstrated diverse attitudes. Initially, most contacts agreed to comply because they feared being infected. They adhered to the national Ebola response measures and appreciated the empathy shown by volunteers. Later, acceptance was improved by the provision of moral, economic, and social support, and by the final lack of any new contamination. But it was limited by the socio-economic impact on fulfilling basic needs, the fear of being infected, how contacts' family members interpreted monitoring, conflation of contacts as Ebola cases, and challenging the rationale for containment. Acceptance was also related to individual aspects, such as the professional status of women and health workers who had been exposed, and contextual aspects, such as the media's role in the social production of stigma. Ethnographic results show that, even when contacts adhere rather than comply to containment through coercion, contact monitoring raises several ethical issues. These insights should contribute to the ethics debate about individual rights versus crisis public health measures.

[HIV disclosure in polygamous settings in Senegal]. / Partager l'information sur son statut sérologique VIH dans un contexte de polygamie au Sénégal.

In Senegal, where HIV prevalence is less than 1% and stigma remains important, 40% of marriages are polygamic. The purpose of this article is to describe and analyze the motivations, benefits and constraints related to HIV disclosure, and to explore specific situations related to polygamy. Data were collected through qualitative research based on in-depth repeated interviews on the experience of antiretroviral therapy and its social effects, conducted over a period of 10 years with people on antiretroviral treatment and their caregivers. Health professionals encourage people to disclose their HIV status, especially in certain circumstances such as preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Nevertheless they are aware of the social risks for some patients, particularly women. Some health workers insist on disclosure, while others do not interfere with women who do not disclose to their partner, while highlighting their ethical dilemma. Interviews trace the changing attitudes of caregivers regarding disclosure. The majority of married women begin by sharing their HIV status with their mother, waiting for her to confirm that the contamination is not due to immoral behavior and to participate in implementing a strategy to maintain secrecy. In polygamous households, women try to disclose to their partner, keeping the secret beyond the couple. Some women fear disclosure by their husbands to co-spouses, whose attitudes can be very diverse: some stories relate collective rejection from the household; sometimes disclosure is made in a progressive way following the hierarchy of positions of each person in the household; another person reported the solidarity shown by her co-spouses who kept her HIV status a secret outside the household. The article shows the diversity of situations and their dynamics regarding both disclosure practices and their social effects.