An Exploration of the Impact of Initial Timing of Physical Therapy on Safety and Outcomes After Concussion in Adolescents.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Physical therapy (PT) is a management strategy increasingly recognized to facilitate recovery after concussion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and outcomes of multimodal impairment-based PT at varying time points after injury in youth diagnosed with concussion. METHODS: Data were extracted retrospectively from medical records for patients who received PT for concussion-related impairments. Patient records were categorized into 3 cohorts on the basis of the timing of PT implementation: 0-20 days following injury (early intervention), 21 to 41 days following injury (middle intervention), and 42 or more days following injury (late intervention). The primary outcome measure was Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory score from the beginning to the end of the PT episode of care. Additional outcome measures included number of PT sessions, duration of PT episode of care (days), and occurrence of unplanned visits to a health care provider. RESULTS: A total of 120 patient records (mean age of 14.77 years) were analyzed. Thirty-three, 39, and 48 individuals were categorized into the early, middle, and late intervention cohorts, respectively. There were no significant differences between intervention cohorts with regard to symptom change on the Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory from the beginning to the end of the PT episode of care, unplanned health care visits, number of PT sessions, or duration of PT episode of care. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Early initiation of PT may be safe and tolerable. Future prospective studies are needed to explore the efficacy of PT services administered early following injury to help characterize an optimal care plan for youth following concussion.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A210).

Exertional Tolerance Assessments After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature to identify and summarize strategies for evaluating responses to physical exertion after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) for clinical and research purposes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and EBSCOhost through December 31, 2016. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent reviewers selected studies based on the following criteria: (1) inclusion of participants with mTBI/concussion, (2) use of a measurement of physiological or psychosomatic response to exertion, (3) a repeatable description of the exertion protocol was provided, (4) a sample of at least 10 participants with a mean age between 8 and 65 years, and (5) the article was in English. The search process yielded 2685 articles, of which 14 studies met the eligibility requirements. DATA EXTRACTION: A quality assessment using a checklist was conducted for each study by 2 independent study team members and verified by a third team member. Data were extracted by one team member and verified by a second team member. DATA SYNTHESIS: A qualitative synthesis of the studies revealed that most protocols used a treadmill or cycle ergometer as the exercise modality. Protocol methods varied across studies including differences in initial intensity determination, progression parameters, and exertion duration. Common outcome measures were self-reported symptoms, heart rate, and blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The strongest evidence indicates that exertional assessments can provide important insight about mTBI recovery and should be administered using symptoms as a guide. Additional studies are needed to verify optimal modes and protocols for post-mTBI exertional assessments.