Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 205(1): 49.e1-7, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21620358

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between neonatal respiratory morbidity and the interval between antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) administration and birth. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study among women who had received ACS and delivered at <34 weeks of gestation. We categorized these women in 4 groups: ACS-to-delivery interval of 0-7, 8-14, 15-21, and 22-28 days. Multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the association between the ACS-to-delivery interval and neonatal respiratory morbidity. RESULTS: We included 254 neonates. Eighty-two neonates (32%) were intubated. In comparison with neonates with an ACS-to-delivery interval of 0-7 days, the risk for intubation was increased in all other groups (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-5.4; OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.8-18; and OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 0.71-32, not statistically significant, respectively). CONCLUSION: The effect of ACS decreases when the ACS-to-delivery interval exceeds 7 days. The first administration of ACS should be considered carefully.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Nascimento Prematuro/fisiopatologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 28(9): 683-8, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21698551

RESUMO

The optimal time interval between administration of antenatal corticosteroids and delivery is 1 to 7 days. This study evaluates the timing of the first course of antenatal corticosteroids in clinical practice. We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive women who had received antenatal corticosteroids and/or delivered between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Time between administration of corticosteroids and delivery was compared between women with different causes of anticipated preterm deliveries: symptomatic preterm labor with intact membranes; preterm premature rupture of the membranes; (pre)eclampsia; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count; intrauterine growth restriction; vaginal blood loss; and suspected fetal distress. We included 439 women of whom 348 (79%) completed the course of corticosteroids. In women with a complete course, 143 (41%) delivered within 7 days. The median interval between the course and delivery was 11 days and varied between 41 days in women with vaginal blood loss, 25 days in women with spontaneous preterm labor with intact membranes, and 8 days in women with preeclampsia ( P < 0.001). In women with spontaneous preterm labor with intact membranes and in women with vaginal blood loss, we can benefit substantially from a more accurate discrimination of women who need corticosteroids immediately and women who do not.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido/prevenção & controle , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Feminino , Sofrimento Fetal/tratamento farmacológico , Retardo do Crescimento Fetal/tratamento farmacológico , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome HELLP/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/tratamento farmacológico , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 49(2): 142-4, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19441163

RESUMO

AIMS: To compose a normogram regarding cardiac output during pregnancy measured with ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM), a non-expensive simple continuous wave Doppler device and to investigate if this machine could be useful for haemodynamic monitoring during pregnancy. METHODS: Cardiac output was measured in 172 pregnant women with a gestational age < 21 weeks (n = 59), 21-32 weeks (n = 48), and > 32 weeks' gestation (n = 48). Interobserver differences were determined by measuring 24 patients and comparing results between three different observers. RESULTS: A good signal could be obtained in 155 (90.2%) pregnant women. Haemodynamic profiles were in line with data published in the literature. In 9.8 % of cases it was difficult to get a good result. Interobserver variations between the research officer (CK) and two clinicians were good (r = 0.9359 and r = 0.9609). CONCLUSION: USCOM appears to be a reliable and fast method to measure cardiac output compared with existing highly complex ultrasounds machines used in cardiology. It is easy to learn, cheap and quite reproducible between different observers. Further research is required to define its place in the management of hypertensive complications during pregnancy.


Assuntos
Débito Cardíaco , Ecocardiografia Doppler de Pulso/instrumentação , Gravidez/fisiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Nomogramas , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA