Extreme selection in humans against homeotic transformations of cervical vertebrae.

Why do all mammals, except for sloths and manatees, have exactly seven cervical vertebrae? In other vertebrates and other regions, the vertebral number varies considerably. We investigated whether natural selection constrains the number of cervical vertebrae in humans. To this end, we determined the incidence of cervical ribs and other homeotic vertebral changes in radiographs of deceased human fetuses and infants, and analyzed several existing datasets on the incidence in infants and adults. Our data show that homeotic transformations that change the number of cervical vertebrae are extremely common in humans, but are strongly selected against: almost all individuals die before reproduction. Selection is most probably indirect, caused by a strong coupling of such changes with major congenital abnormalities. Changes in the number of thoracic vertebrae appear to be subject to weaker selection, in good correspondence with the weaker evolutionary constraint on these numbers. Our analysis highlights the role of prenatal selection in the conservation of our common body plan.

Simultaneous selection on two fitness-related traits in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Theory about the role of constraints in evolution is abundant, but few empirical data exist to describe the consequences a bias in phenotypic variation has for micro evolution. Responses to natural selection can be severely hampered by a genetic correlation among a suite of traits. Constraints can be studied using antagonistic selection experiments, that is, two-trait selection in opposition to this correlation. The two traits studied here were development time and wing pattern (eyespot size) in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana, both of which have a clear adaptive significance. Rates of response were higher for eyespot size than for development time, but were independent of the concurrent selection (either in the same direction as the correlation or perpendicular to it). Regimes differed in both traits in all directions after 11 generations of selection. The uncoupling lines had higher relative responses than the synergistic lines in development time and equal relative responses in eyespot size. The patterns for eyespot size (reaction norms) were consistent across different rearing temperatures. Differences in lines selected for fast and slow development time were more pronounced at lower temperatures, irrespective of the direction of joint wing pattern selection. Furthermore, correlated responses in pupal weight and growth rate were observed; lines selected for a slower development had higher pupal weights, especially at lower temperatures. The response of the uncoupling lines was not hampered by a lack of selectable genetic variation, and the relative response in the development time was larger than expected based on response in the coupled direction and quantitative genetic predictions. This suggests that the structure of the genetic architecture does not constrain the short-term, independent evolution of both wing pattern and development time.

Butterfly selected lines explore the hormonal basis of interactions between life histories and morphology.

Hormonal mechanisms underlie many life-history traits and their interactions. We studied the role of ecdysteroids with regard to wing pattern and development time of the polyphenic butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Ecdysteroid titers and sensitivity to ecdysone injection were assayed for two-trait selected lines (ventral eyespot size and development time concurrently). These two traits are genetically and phenotypically coupled, having a common endocrinal basis. Two-trait selection had been applied both antagonistically (opposite the correlation) and synergistically (in the same direction as the correlation). Although selected lines had diverged most in eyespot size, the widest differences in timing of ecdysteroid titers were observed between the development time selection regimes; fast selected lines had an earlier hormonal increase after pupation than slow selected lines (even when corrected for differential pupal times). This endocrine peak was also earlier for females than for males. Furthermore, sensitivity to ecdysone injection as measured by a subsequent decrease in pupal time was significantly lower for slow selected lines than for fast or unselected lines. We conclude that the observed response in eyespot size to artificial selection must have been achieved via alteration of, or selection on, other developmental mechanisms, because the dynamics of the alternative, hormonal, pathway were dictated by development time selection. The developmental system is flexible enough to allow evolution in directions opposing the correlation between wing pattern and developmental time, and responses to selection are not constrained by a shared hormonal system.