The prognostic significance of microsatellites in cutaneous melanoma.

Microscopic satellite metastases are an adverse prognostic feature in primary cutaneous melanoma patients. The prognostic significance of microsatellites, including their number, size and distance from the primary melanoma, using the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer definition, has not previously been evaluated. This study sought to determine the prognostic significance of microsatellites in histopathologically reviewed cases. Eighty-seven cases of primary cutaneous melanoma with the presence of microsatellites documented in the original pathology report and all histopathology slides available were reviewed and the findings were correlated with clinical outcome. Matched control cases were selected for all confirmed microsatellites cases. The presence of microsatellites was confirmed in 69 cases. The microsatellite group had significantly worse prognosis, with 21% 5-year disease-free survival compared with 56% in the control group (p < 0.001). The 5-year melanoma-specific survival was 53% in the microsatellites group and 73% in the control group (p = 0.004). Increasing distance (mm) of the microsatellite from the primary melanoma was found to adversely influence disease-free survival (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.13-1.36, p < 0.001), overall survival (HR = 1.26 95%CI: 1.13-1.40, p < 0.001), and melanoma-specific survival (HR = 1.27 95% CI: 1.11-1.45, p < 0.001). Number and size of microsatellites were not significant prognostic factors. The presence of microsatellites was the only factor that proved to be an independent predictor of sentinel node positivity in multivariate analysis (OR 4.64; 95% CI 1.66-12.95; p = 0.003). Microsatellites were significantly associated with more loco-regional recurrences (p < 0.001) but not distant metastases (p = 0.821). Melanomas with microsatellites as defined by the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system are thus aggressive tumors, associated with significantly worse disease-free survival, overall survival and melanoma-specific survival. The presence of microsatellites is also associated with sentinel node-positivity and local and in-transit recurrence. Increasing distance of the microsatellite from the primary tumor is an independent adverse prognostic factor that warrants further evaluation.

Minimum Safe Pathologic Excision Margins for Primary Cutaneous Melanomas (1-2 mm in Thickness): Analysis of 2131 Patients Treated at a Single Center.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the minimum safe pathologic excision margin for primary cutaneous melanomas 1.01-2.00-mm thick (T2) and to identify prognostic factors that influence survival in these patients. BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown previously that "narrow" clinical excision margins (1-2 cm in vivo) are as safe as "wide" excision margins (4-5 cm) for management of primary T2 melanomas. However, pathologic margins are likely to be a better predictor of recurrence than clinical margins. METHODS: Clinicopathologic and follow-up data for 2131 T2 melanoma patients treated at Melanoma Institute Australia between January 1992 and May 2012 were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 2131 patients, those who had a pathologic excision margin of <8 mm (equivalent to 1 cm in vivo) had poorer prognosis in terms of disease-free survival compared with the 8-16-mm group (equivalent to 1-2 cm in vivo; P = 0.044). When comparing 8-mm with 16-mm pathologic margins, no differences were observed in any of the survival outcomes. Only the deep margin proved to be an independent predictor of local and in-transit recurrence-free survival (P = 0.003) in all excision margin categories. Pathologic excision margins <8 mm were associated with worse regional node recurrence-free survival and distant recurrence-free survival compared with margins ≥8 mm (P = 0.049 and P = 0.045; respectively). However, these results failed to translate into a statistically significant difference in melanoma-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that if a peripheral/radial pathologic excision margin for a T2 primary cutaneous melanoma is <8 mm consideration should be given to performing a wider excision.

Emergency physician-performed ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in proximal femoral fractures provide safe and effective pain relief: a prospective observational study in The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of acute pain in the emergency department is not always optimal. Peripheral nerve blocks using "blind" or nerve stimulator techniques have substantial disadvantages. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia may provide quick, safe, and effective pain relief in patients with proximal femoral fractures with severe pain. However, no evidence exists on emergency physician-performed ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia in these patients in Dutch emergency departments. We hypothesized that emergency physicians can be effectively trained to safely perform and implement ultrasound-guided femoral nerve blocks, resulting in effective pain relief in patients with proximal femoral fractures. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, emergency physicians were trained by expert anesthesiologists to perform ultrasound-guided femoral nerve blocks during a single-day course. Femoral nerve blocks were performed on patients with proximal femoral fractures. A system of direct supervision by skilled anesthesiologists and residents was put in place. RESULTS: A total of 64 femoral nerve blocks were performed. After 30 min, blocks were effective in 69% of patients, and after 60 min, in 83.3%. The mean reduction in pain scores after 30 and 60 min was 3.84 and 4.77, respectively (both p <  0.001). Patients reported a mean satisfaction of 8.42 (1 to 10 scale). No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block is an effective, safe, and easy to learn (single-day course) procedure for emergency physicians to implement and perform in the emergency department. Patient satisfaction was high.