RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pediatric emergency departments (ED) are where many families receive post-concussion medical care and thus an important context for helping parents build skills to support their child after discharge. OBJECTIVE: Develop a strategy for increasing parent provision of emotional and instrumental support to their child after discharge and conduct a pilot test of this strategy's acceptability. METHODS: In a large pediatric ED in the United States, we partnered with parents (n = 15) and clinicians (n = 15) to understand needs and constraints related to discharge education and to operationalize a strategy to feasibly address these needs. This produced a brief daily text message intervention for parents for 10 days post-discharge. We used a sequential cohort design to assess the acceptability this intervention and its efficacy in changing parenting practices in the 2-weeks post-discharge (n = 98 parents). RESULTS: Parents who received the messaging intervention rated it as highly acceptable and had meaningfully higher scores for emotionally supportive communication with their child in the two weeks post-discharge than parents in the control condition (Cohen's d = 0.65, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: This brief messaging intervention is a promising strategy for enhancing discharge education post-concussion that warrants further evaluation.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Alta do Paciente , Criança , Humanos , Assistência ao Convalescente , Pais/psicologia , Serviço Hospitalar de EmergênciaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to describe firearm storage practices in homes of patients evaluated for mental health (MH) complaints at a tertiary care children's hospital and to describe storage practice changes after treatment. METHODS: We surveyed families of children with MH complaints presenting to the emergency department or psychiatry unit who stored firearms in their homes between February 12, 2016, and January 14, 2017. Patients and families received standard care, including routine counseling on limiting access to methods of suicide. Participants completed surveys at baseline, 7, and 30 days after discharge. The primary outcome was triple safe firearm storage-storage of firearms unloaded, locked, and with ammunition stored and locked separately. RESULTS: Ninety-one household members of MH patients who stated they had firearms were enrolled at baseline. Seventy-seven (85%) completed at least 1 follow-up survey, and 63 (69%) completed both. At baseline, 21% (19/91) of participants reported engaging in triple safe firearm storage, 26% had an unlocked firearm, 23% had a loaded firearm, and 65% stored ammunition either unlocked or with their firearm. Triple safe storage rates increased to 31% at both 7 days and 30 days. Ten (17%) of 59 (P < 0.01) participants who did not report triple safe storage at baseline and completed a follow-up survey changed to reporting triple safe storage on follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of firearm-storing family members of children with MH complaints do not follow triple safe storage practices. Storage practices modestly improved after an emergent MH visit, but over two thirds of participants reported unsecured or partially secured firearms 7 and 30 days later.
Assuntos
Armas de Fogo , Suicídio , Criança , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Saúde Mental , SegurançaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Transurethral bladder catheterization (TUBC) is a painful, frequently performed procedure for collecting sterile urine. We sought to determine if administration of intraurethral lidocaine before TUBC using a blunt tipped syringe decreases procedural pain in young children in the pediatric emergency department. METHODS: Randomized clinical trial of children 0 to 36 months old requiring TUBC for collection of urine in a pediatric emergency department was performed. Patients received intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly or usual care (no analgesia). Randomization was stratified by sex. Intraurethral lidocaine jelly was administered via Uro-Jet, 5 minutes before TUBC. Baseline child state, lidocaine application, TUBC, and child state 1 minute post-TUBC were videotaped. Neither providers nor parents were blinded to study arm. Videos were scored by a trained, independent, blinded reviewer using the Faces, Legs, Arms, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) and Modified Behavioral Pain Score scales. Pain scores were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Our primary outcome was difference in FLACC scores between groups. RESULTS: Eighty children were enrolled in the study, and 73 had analyzable data. No differences were detected in pain by mean FLACC score between intervention (8; 95% confidence interval, 7-9) and control (9; 95% confidence interval, 8-10) groups. There were no differences between groups in mean FLACC score when stratified by age or sex or in mean Modified Behavioral Pain Score. CONCLUSIONS: Intraurethral lidocaine for TUBC for urine collection using a blunt tipped applicator did not improve procedural pain scores. Pain scores were high across groups. Further study should be performed to improve analgesia for this highly painful procedure.
Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Cateterismo Urinário/efeitos adversos , Analgesia/métodos , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Medição da Dor/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Uretra/efeitos dos fármacos , Cateterismo Urinário/instrumentação , Cateterismo Urinário/métodos , Gravação de VideoteipeRESUMO
A prototype of a self-contained, automated, disposable device for chemically amplified protein-based detection of influenza virus from nasal swab specimens was developed and evaluated in a clinical setting. The device required only simple specimen manipulation without any dedicated instrumentation or specialized training by the operator for interpretation. The device was based on a sandwich immunoassay for influenza virus nucleoprotein; it used an enzyme-labeled antibody and a chromogenic substrate to provide an amplified visible signal, in a two-dimensional paper network format. All reagents were stored within the device. Device performance was assessed at Seattle Children's Hospital; clinical staff collected nasal swab samples from 25 patients and then operated test devices on site to detect influenza A and B in those specimens. The total test time from device initiation to result was approximately 35 min. Device performance for influenza A detection was â¼70% accurate using in-house qRT-PCR influenza A as a gold-standard comparison. The ratio of valid to total completed device runs yielded a success rate of 92%, and the negative predictive value for both the influenza A and B assay was 81%. The ability to diagnose respiratory infections rapidly and close to the patient was well received by hospital staff, inspiring further optimization of device function.
Assuntos
Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Proteínas Virais/análise , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/instrumentação , Humanos , Imunoensaio/instrumentação , Vírus da Influenza A/isolamento & purificação , Vírus da Influenza B/isolamento & purificação , Nucleoproteínas/análise , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine if electronic medical record (EMR) changes and implementation of a study on firearm storage practices changed identification of firearm exposure in children presenting to a pediatric emergency department (PED) with mental health complaints. We also sought to determine the accuracy of information collected on firearm storage practices. METHODS: Retrospective study of EMR documentation of firearm exposure in PED patients with mental health complaints from January 20, 2015 until November 20, 2017. EMR changes occurred on January 20, 2016 and the firearms study began on February 13, 2016. The primary outcome was documentation of firearm exposure. Secondary outcomes were documentation of unsafe firearm storage practices. We also examined differences between clinical and research documentation of unsafe firearm storage practices post-intervention. We compared groups using descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests. We used statistical process control to examine the relationship between interventions and changes in outcomes. RESULTS: 5582 encounters were examined. Identification of firearm exposure increased from 11 to 17% postintervention. Identification of unsafe storage practices increased from 1.9% to 4.4% across all encounters. Special cause variation in both metrics occurred concurrently with the interventions. Postintervention, unsafe firearms storage practices in firearm owning families were under-identified (39% identified as not triple-safe in clinical data vs 75% in research data). CONCLUSIONS: EMR changes and implementation of a firearms study improved identification of firearm exposure and unsafe storage practices in families of PED patients being evaluated for mental health complaints. However, unsafe storage practices continued to be under-identified in firearm-owning families.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Armas de Fogo , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Adolescente , Transtornos Mentais/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic raised unprecedented challenges to vaccinating children. This multi-center study aimed to compare on-time vaccination of children before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify key factors associated with on-time vaccination. METHODS: This study was conducted among children aged 0-6 years enrolled in the New Vaccine Surveillance Network at seven geographically diverse U.S. academic medical centers. Children with acute respiratory illness or acute gastroenteritis were enrolled from emergency department and inpatient settings; healthy control subjects were enrolled from primary care practices. Vaccination data were collected and verified from patient medical records, immunization information systems, and/or provider documentation. On-time vaccination according to Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations was compared between pre-pandemic (December 2018-February 2020) and pandemic (March 2020-August 2021) periods using bivariate and multivariable analyses, adjusting for key demographic, clinical, and study characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 24,713 children were included in the analytic sample (non-Hispanic 73.4 %; White 51.0 %; publicly insured 69.0 %). On-time vaccination declined between the pre-pandemic (67.3 %) and pandemic (65.4 %) periods (Adjusted Odds Ratio 0.89, 95 % CI 0.84-0.95). The largest declines were observed among children who were < 12 months, male, Black, publicly insured, or whose mothers had a high school-equivalent education or less. The pandemic impact also varied by vaccine type and study site. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-center study revealed a relatively modest overall reduction in on-time vaccination, which may reflect multilevel efforts to address pandemic-associated challenges. However, some patient subgroups and sites experienced greater reductions in on-time vaccination, highlighting the importance of tailoring interventions to increase equitable vaccine delivery, access, and acceptance across populations and communities.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous investigations into clinical signs and symptoms associated with influenza types and subtypes have not definitively established differences in the clinical presentation or severity of influenza disease. METHODS: The study population included children 0 through 17 years old enrolled at 8 New Vaccine Surveillance Network sites between 2015 and 2020 who tested positive for influenza virus by molecular testing. Demographic and clinical data were collected for study participants via parent/guardian interview and medical chart review. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics by influenza subtype. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess effects of age, sex, influenza subtype, and history of asthma on severity, including hospital admission, need for supplemental oxygen, and length of stay. RESULTS: Retractions, cyanosis, and need for supplemental oxygen were more frequently observed among patients with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. Headaches and sore throat were more commonly reported among patients with influenza B. Children with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and children with asthma had significantly increased odds of hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.39, 95% CI: 1.14-1.69 and AOR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.72-2.67, respectively). During admission, children with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 had significantly increased use of supplemental oxygen compared to children with A(H3N2) (AOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44-0.82) or B (AOR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Among children presenting to the emergency department and admitted to the hospital, influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 caused more severe disease compared to influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B. Asthma also contributed to severe influenza disease regardless of subtype.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of hospitalization in US infants. Accurate estimates of severe RSV disease inform policy decisions for RSV prevention. METHODS: We conducted prospective surveillance for children <5 years old with acute respiratory illness from 2016 to 2020 at 7 pediatric hospitals. We interviewed parents, reviewed medical records, and tested midturbinate nasal ± throat swabs by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for RSV and other respiratory viruses. We describe characteristics of children hospitalized with RSV, risk factors for ICU admission, and estimate RSV-associated hospitalization rates. RESULTS: Among 13 524 acute respiratory illness inpatients <5 years old, 4243 (31.4%) were RSV-positive; 2751 (64.8%) of RSV-positive children had no underlying condition or history of prematurity. The average annual RSV-associated hospitalization rate was 4.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-4.1) per 1000 children <5 years, was highest among children 0 to 2 months old (23.8 [95% CI: 22.5-25.2] per 1000) and decreased with increasing age. Higher RSV-associated hospitalization rates were found in premature versus term children (rate ratio = 1.95 [95% CI: 1.76-2.11]). Risk factors for ICU admission among RSV-positive inpatients included: age 0 to 2 and 3 to 5 months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.97 [95% CI: 1.54-2.52] and aOR = 1.56 [95% CI: 1.18-2.06], respectively, compared with 24-59 months), prematurity (aOR = 1.32 [95% CI: 1.08-1.60]) and comorbid conditions (aOR = 1.35 [95% CI: 1.10-1.66]). CONCLUSIONS: Younger infants and premature children experienced the highest rates of RSV-associated hospitalization and had increased risk of ICU admission. RSV prevention products are needed to reduce RSV-associated morbidity in young infants.
Assuntos
Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial , Vírus Sinciciais Respiratórios , Criança , Lactente , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/epidemiologia , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/terapia , Hospitalização , Hospitais PediátricosRESUMO
Abstract Assessing parent readiness to support their child's post-concussion management requires valid and reliable measures. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop and conduct preliminary tests of reliability and validity of survey measures of parent concussion management knowledge and self-efficacy. Additionally, we tested the hypothesis that among parents of youth who had sustained a concussion, higher scores on measures of knowledge and self-efficacy would predict greater likelihood of engaging in recommended concussion management behaviors during their child's recovery. Measure development occurred with reference to parenting behaviors included in the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) Management Guidelines. A multi-stage mixed- methods approach was employed, including expert review, cognitive interviews with parents, quantitative item reduction, and tests of reliability and validity. All participants were English-speaking parents of school-aged children in the United States. A stepwise measure development process was followed, with different participant groups across steps (including opt-in web-based survey panels and in-person recruitment from the population of parents of pediatric patients seen in a large pediatric emergency department). In total, 774 parents participated in study activities. The final knowledge index had 10 items, and the final self-efficacy scale had 13 items across four subscales (emotional support, rehabilitation support, monitoring, and external engagement). Internal consistency reliability was 0.63 for the knowledge index and 0.79-0.91 for self-efficacy sub-scales, and validation tests were in the hypothesized directions. In a test of predictive validity, we observed that among parents of youth patients with recent concussion, higher self-efficacy scores at the time of discharge from the pediatric emergency department were positively correlated (r = 0.12) with greater likelihood of engaging in recommended support behaviors at 2-week follow-up. There was no association between concussion management knowledge at discharge and parenting behaviors at follow-up. Parents have the potential to play an important role in concussion management. The measures of knowledge and self-efficacy developed in this study can help identify parent needs and evaluate interventions aiming to support parenting post-concussion.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Adolescente , Humanos , Criança , Concussão Encefálica/terapia , Autoeficácia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Pais/psicologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Background: This study sought to determine the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) protein immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in healthcare and hospital workers (HCHWs), and changes in IgG N antibody levels over time. Methods: Longitudinal study of HCHWs at a freestanding, urban paediatric tertiary care hospital. Asymptomatic HCHWs aged ≥18 years working in clinical areas were eligible to enrol. Participants completed four surveys and blood draws over 12 months. Specimens were tested for IgG N at four timepoints and IgG S at 12 months. Results: In total, 531 HCHWs enrolled in this study; of these, 481 (91%), 429 (81%) and 383 (72%) completed follow-up blood draws at 2, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Five of 531 (1%), 5/481 (1%), 6/429 (1%) and 5/383 (1.3%) participants were seropositive for IgG N at baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months, respectively. All (374/374; 100%) participants who received one or two doses of either mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were seropositive for IgG S. One of nine unvaccinated participants was seropositive for IgG S. Conclusions: In this paediatric hospital, IgG N and IgG S were detected in 1.9% and 97.9% of HCHWs, respectively. This study demonstrated low transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among HCHWs with appropriate infection prevention measures.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In this study we aimed to assess the impact of an electronic health assessment with individualized feedback for risk behaviors in adolescents seeking care in a pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: We conducted a randomized control trial using a tablet-based screening program with a study population of adolescents in a busy pediatric ED. The intervention group received the screening program with individualized feedback. The control group received the screening program without feedback. All participants received one-day and three-month follow-up surveys to assess behaviors and attitudes toward health behaviors. RESULTS: A total of 296 subjects were enrolled and randomized. There was no difference in changes in risky behaviors between the control and experimental groups. A higher proportion of participants in the intervention groups reported that the screener changed the way they thought about their health at one-day follow-up (27.0%, 36/133) compared to the control group (15.5%, 20/129, P = .02). CONCLUSION: This study successfully tested a multivariable electronic health screener in a real-world setting of a busy pediatric ED. The tool did not significantly change risky health behaviors in the adolescent population screened. However, our finding that the intervention changed adolescents' perceptions of their health opens a door to the continued development of electronic interventions to screen for and target risk behaviors in adolescents in the ED setting.
Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente , Assunção de Riscos , Criança , Adolescente , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , EletrônicaRESUMO
Multiple factors may be associated with immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Factors potentially related to magnitude and durability of response include age, time, and vaccine reactogenicity. This study analyzed SARS-CoV-2 IgG spike antibody responses following the second dose of vaccine in healthcare workers (HCWs). Data were collected from participants enrolled in a longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 serology study over a 12-month period. Participants completed a survey documenting symptoms post-vaccination. Serum specimens were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies using the Abbott Architect AdvisdeDx SARS-CoV-2 IgGII assay. Antibody levels were compared against time from second vaccine dose, and symptoms following vaccination. Altogether, 335 women (86.6%) and 52 men (13.4%) participated. Median age was 37 years (IQR 30-43). Overall median antibody level was 2150.80 [1246.12, 3556.98] AU/mL (IQR). Age was not associated with antibody concentration (p-value = 0.10). Higher antibody responses (2253 AU/mL vs. 1506 AU/mL; p = 0.008) were found in HCWs with one or more symptoms after the second dose of the vaccine (n = 311). Antibody responses persisted throughout the study period post-vaccination; statistically significant decreases in antibody responses were observed over time (p < 0.001). Higher antibody response was associated with reactogenicity post-vaccine. Age and sex were not associated with higher antibody responses.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine if providing firearm storage devices with training during clinical care improves safe storage practices in household members of children who present to a pediatric hospital with an emergent mental health complaint. METHODS: Prospective, pre-post study. Enrollment occurred in the emergency department or the inpatient psychiatric unit. Participants in the observation phase received usual care. Participants in the intervention phase were randomized to be offered a firearm storage device at either no or low ($5) cost and trained in its use. We surveyed participants at enrollment, 7, & 30 days post visit. Our primary outcome was triple-safe storage (TSS) - storing firearms unloaded, locked, and with ammunition stored and locked separately. RESULTS: About 256 participants enrolled. In the observation phase TSS increased from 21% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14%-30%) at baseline to 31% (95% CI 21%-42%) at 7 and 31% (95% CI 21%-43%) at 30 days. In the intervention phase, TSS increased from 32% (95% CI 25%-39%) at baseline to 56% (95% CI 48%-64%) at 7 and 56% (95% CI 47%-64%) at 30 days. Among those not practicing TSS at baseline, 7-day TSS was higher in the intervention (38%) versus the observation phase (14%, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Distribution and training in the use of firearm storage devices increased TSS in the study population, improves pediatric safety and should be part of the routine care of these high-risk patients.
Assuntos
Armas de Fogo , Criança , Humanos , Saúde Mental , Estudos Prospectivos , Equipamentos de Proteção , SegurançaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Asymptomatic transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in health care settings is not well understood. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in health care and hospital workers (HCHWs) and assess how antibody levels change over time. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of employed HCHWs at a freestanding, urban pediatric tertiary care hospital. Employed HCHWs ≥18 years old who were asymptomatic and worked in clinical hospital locations were eligible to participate. Participants completed blood draws and surveys at baseline (between May 4, 2020, and June 2, 2020) and 2 months later (between July 6, 2020, and August 7, 2020). Surveys collected demographic information, SARS-CoV-2 exposures, and previous COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 530 participants enrolled in and completed baseline study activities. The median age was 37 years (range 19-67 years); 86% identified as female, and 80% identified as white. Two months later, 481 (91%) HCHWs completed another survey and blood draw. Four of 5 (0.9%) seropositive subjects at baseline remained seropositive at 2 months, although 3 had decreasing IgG indices. Five (1.0%) seropositive individuals, including 4 who were previously seropositive and 1 newly seropositive, were detected 2 months later. History of positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing results (P < .001) and history of COVID-19 exposure (P < .001) were associated with presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 1% of HCHWs in an urban pediatric hospital in a city with moderate SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. Participants with a known previous COVID-19 diagnosis showed a decline or loss of IgG antibodies over 2 months. These results have implications for identifying those with previous exposure and for ongoing public health recommendations for ensuring workplace safety.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/virologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Previous reports of coronavirus disease 2019 among children in the United States have been based on health jurisdiction reporting. We performed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing on children enrolled in active, prospective, multicenter surveillance during January-March 2020. Among 3187 children, only 4 (0.1%) SARS-CoV-2-positive cases were identified March 20-31 despite evidence of rising community circulation.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Adolescente , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Parents frequently decline the influenza vaccine for their child during hospitalization. In this study, we aimed to assess the role of vaccine hesitancy in these declinations. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey study was conducted among English-speaking parents of influenza vaccine-eligible children who were hospitalized between October 2014 and April 2015. Between July 2015 and September 2015, parents were recruited via mail to complete the validated Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) survey (modified for influenza vaccination). PACV scores (0-100 scale) were dichotomized into scores of ≥50 (hesitant) and <50 (nonhesitant). The primary outcome was parental declination of the influenza vaccine for their child during hospitalization. A secondary outcome was the declination reason documented during hospitalization. The main independent variable was parental vaccine hesitancy status, determined by the PACV score. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between vaccine hesitancy and influenza vaccine declination, adjusting for sociodemographic, visit, and clinical characteristics. The relationship between vaccine hesitancy and declination reason was also explored. RESULTS: Of 199 parents (18% response rate), 24% were vaccine hesitant and 53% declined the influenza vaccine for their child during hospitalization. Vaccine hesitancy (versus nonhesitancy) was associated with declining influenza vaccination (adjusted odds ratio: 6.4; 95% confidence interval: 2.5-16.5). The declination reason differed by vaccine hesitancy status, with a higher proportion of parents who were hesitant versus nonhesitant reporting "vaccine concern" or "vaccine unnecessary." CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine hesitancy was prevalent in this limited sample of parents of hospitalized children and associated with influenza vaccine declination. Additional investigation in a large, diverse, prospectively recruited cohort is warranted given the potential sampling bias present in this study.
Assuntos
Criança Hospitalizada/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Pais , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pais/educação , Pais/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Infants born prematurely or with underlying conditions are at increased risk of severe rotavirus disease and associated complications. Given the theoretical risk of nosocomial transmission of vaccine-type rotavirus, rotavirus vaccination is recommended for infants at or after discharge from neonatal care settings. Because the first dose should be administered by 104 days of age, some infants may be age-ineligible for vaccination if delayed until discharge. METHODS: This prospective cohort included infants admitted to an urban academic medical center between birth and 104 days who received care in intensive care settings. Pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine (RV5) was used, per routine clinical care. Stool specimens were collected weekly (February 2013-April 2014) and analyzed for rotavirus strains using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Demographic and vaccine data were collected. RV5 safety was not assessed. RESULTS: Of 385 study infants, 127 were age-eligible for routine vaccinations during hospitalization. At discharge, 32.7% were up-to-date for rotavirus vaccination, compared with 82.7% for other vaccinations. Of rotavirus-unvaccinated infants, 42.6% were discharged at age >104 days and thus vaccination-ineligible. Of 1192 stool specimens collected, rotavirus was detected in 13 (1.1%): 1 wild-type strain from an unvaccinated infant; 12 vaccine-type strains from 9 RV5-vaccinated infants. No vaccine-type rotavirus cases were observed among unvaccinated infants (incidence rate: 0.0 [95% confidence interval: 0.0-1.5] cases per 1000 patient days at risk). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that delaying rotavirus vaccination until discharge from the hospital could lead to missed vaccination opportunities and may be unnecessary in institutions using RV5 with comparable infection control standards.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Rotavirus/imunologia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Estudos de Coortes , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Masculino , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Rotavirus/isolamento & purificação , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos , Vacinação/normas , Vacinação/tendênciasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rhinovirus is the most common cause of viral respiratory tract infections in children. Virologic predictors of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), such as viral load and the presence of another respiratory virus (coinfection), are not well characterized in pediatric outpatients. METHODS: Mid-nasal turbinate samples were collected from children presenting for care to the Seattle Children's Hospital emergency department (ED) or urgent care with a symptomatic respiratory infection between December 2011 and May 2013. A subset of samples was tested for rhinovirus viral load by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Clinical data were collected by chart reviews. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between viral load and coinfection and the risk for LRTI. RESULTS: Rhinovirus was the most frequent respiratory virus detected in children younger than 3 years. Of 445 patients with rhinovirus infection, 262 (58.9%) had LRTIs, 231 (51.9%) required hospital admission and 52 (22.5%) were hospitalized for 3 days or longer. Children with no comorbidities accounted for 142 (54%) of 262 rhinovirus LRTIs. Higher viral load was significantly associated with LRTI among illness episodes with rhinovirus alone (OR, 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-3.58). Coinfection increased the risk of LRTI (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.01-3.32). CONCLUSIONS: Rhinovirus was the most common pathogen detected among symptomatic young children in a pediatric ED who had respiratory viral testing performed, with the majority requiring hospitalization. Higher rhinovirus viral load and coinfection increased disease severity. Virologic data may assist clinical decision making for children with rhinovirus infections in the pediatric ED.
Assuntos
Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Infecções por Picornaviridae/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Rhinovirus/isolamento & purificação , Pré-Escolar , Coinfecção/virologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Hospitalização , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Carga ViralRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Consistent professional interpretation improves communication with patients who have limited English proficiency. Remote modalities (telephone and video) have the potential for wide dissemination. OBJECTIVE: To test the effect of telephone vs. video interpretation on communication during pediatric emergency care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized trial of telephone vs. video interpretation at a free-standing, university-affiliated pediatric emergency department (ED). A convenience sample of 290 Spanish-speaking parents of pediatric ED patients with limited English proficiency were approached from February 24 through August 16, 2014, of whom 249 (85.9%) enrolled; of these, 208 (83.5%) completed the follow-up survey (91 parents in the telephone arm and 117 in the video arm). Groups did not differ significantly by consent or survey completion rate, ED factors (eg, ED crowding), child factors (eg, triage level, medical complexity), or parent factors (eg, birth country, income). Investigators were blinded to the interpretation modality during outcome ascertainment. Intention-to-treat data were analyzed August 25 to October 20, 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Telephone or video interpretation for the ED visit, randomized by day. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Parents were surveyed 1 to 7 days after the ED visit to assess communication and interpretation quality, frequency of lapses in interpreter use, and ability to name the child's diagnosis. Two blinded reviewers compared parent-reported and medical record-abstracted diagnoses and classified parent-reported diagnoses as correct, incorrect, or vague. RESULTS: Among 208 parents who completed the survey, those in the video arm were more likely to name the child's diagnosis correctly than those in the telephone arm (85 of 114 [74.6%] vs. 52 of 87 [59.8%]; P = .03) and less likely to report frequent lapses in interpreter use (2 of 117 [1.7%] vs. 7 of 91 [7.7%]; P = .04). No differences were found between the video and telephone arms in parent-reported quality of communication (101 of 116 [87.1%] vs. 74 of 89 [83.1%]; P = .43) or interpretation (58 of 116 [50.0%] vs. 42 of 89 [47.2%]; P = .69). Video interpretation was more costly (per-patient mean [SD] cost, $61 [$36] vs. $31 [$20]; P < .001). Parent-reported adherence to the assigned modality was higher for the video arm (106 of 114 [93.0%] vs .68 of 86 [79.1%]; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Families with limited English proficiency who received video interpretation were more likely to correctly name the child's diagnosis and had fewer lapses in interpreter use. Use of video interpretation shows promise for improving communication and patient care in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01986179.
Assuntos
Barreiras de Comunicação , Telefone , Tradução , Comunicação por Videoconferência , Criança , Comunicação , Compreensão , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hispânico ou Latino , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Idioma , Masculino , Pais , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare emergency department care experiences of Spanish-speaking, limited-English-proficient (SSLEP) and English-proficient (EP) parents and to assess how SSLEP care experiences vary by parent-perceived interpretation accuracy. METHODS: The National Research Corporation Picker Institute's Family Experience Survey (FES) was administered from November 26, 2010, to July 17, 2011, to 478 EP and 152 SSLEP parents. Problem scores for 3 FES dimensions were calculated: information/education, partnership with clinicians, and access/coordination of care. Adjusted associations between language proficiency (SSLEP vs EP) and dimension problem scores were examined by multivariate Poisson regression. Unadjusted Poisson regression analysis was used to examine the association between perceived interpretation accuracy and FES problem scores for SSLEP parents who received interpretation. RESULTS: SSLEP parents had a higher risk of reporting problems with access/coordination of care compared to EP parents (risk ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.2, 2.1). There were no differences in reported care experiences related to information/education or partnership with clinicians. Among SSLEP parents who received professional interpretation, those reporting poor accuracy had a higher risk of also reporting problems with information/education (risk ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.2, 3.6). CONCLUSIONS: In a pediatric emergency department with around-the-clock access to professional interpretation, SSLEP parents report poorer experiences than EP parents with access/coordination of care, including perceived wait times. Their experiences with provision of information/education and partnership with clinicians approximate those of EP parents. However, SSLEP parents who perceive poor interpretation accuracy report more problems understanding information provided about their child's illness and care.