Comparison of Free-Breathing 3D Phase-Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI With Dynamic 19 F Ventilation MRI in Patients With Obstructive Lung Disease and Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Non-contrast-enhanced 1 H magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with full lung coverage shows promise for assessment of regional lung ventilation but a comparison with direct ventilation measurement using 19 F MRI is lacking. PURPOSE: To compare ventilation parameters calculated using 3D phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI with 19 F MRI. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Fifteen patients with asthma, 14 patients with chronic obstructive lung disease, and 13 healthy volunteers. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3D gradient-echo pulse sequence with golden-angle increment and stack-of-stars encoding at 1.5 T. ASSESSMENT: All participants underwent 3D PREFUL MRI and 19 F MRI. For 3D PREFUL, static regional ventilation (RVent) and dynamic flow-volume cross-correlation metric (FVL-CM) were calculated. For both parameters, ventilation defect percentage (VDP) values and ventilation defect (VD) maps (including a combination of both parameters [VDPCombined ]) were determined. For 19 F MRI, images from eight consecutive breaths under volume-controlled inhalation of perfluoropropane were acquired. Time-to-fill (TTF) and wash-in (WI) parameters were extracted. For all 19 F parameters, a VD map was generated and the corresponding VDP values were calculated. STATISTICAL TESTS: For all parameters, the relationship between the two techniques was assessed using a Spearman correlation (r). Differences between VDP values were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. For regional comparison of VD maps, spatial overlap and Sørensen-Dice coefficients were computed. RESULTS: 3D PREFUL VDP values were significantly correlated to VDP measures by 19 F (r range: 0.59-0.70). For VDPRVent , no significant bias was observed with VDP of the third and fourth breath (bias range = -6.8:7.7%, P range = 0.25:0.30). For VDPFVL-CM , no significant bias was found with VDP values of fourth-eighth breaths (bias range = -2.0:12.5%, P range = 0.12:0.75). The overall spatial overlap of all VD maps increased with each breath, ranging from 61% to 81%, stabilizing at the fourth breath. DATA CONCLUSION: 3D PREFUL MRI parameters showed moderate to strong correlation with 19 F MRI. Depending on the 3D PREFUL VD map, the best regional agreement was found to 19 F VD maps of third-fifth breath. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Long-term multicenter comparison shows equivalent efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in severe asthma therapy.

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies (biologics) drastically changed severe asthma therapy. Mepolizumab (anti-interleukin (IL) 5), benralizumab (anti-IL5 receptor alpha), and dupilumab (anti-IL4/13) are the most used biologics in this context. While all biologics are efficient individually, the choice of biologic is complicated by insufficient data on their comparative long-term treatment efficacy. Here, we compare the real-life efficacy of these biologics in asthma therapy over 12 months. METHODS: 280 severe asthma patients treated with mepolizumab (129/280, 46%), benralizumab (83/280, 30%) or dupilumab (68/280, 24%) for one year were analyzed retrospectively. Data were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of therapy. Endpoints were changes pulmonary function (PF), exacerbation rate, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and dose, asthma control test (ACT) score and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels as well as responder status measured by the recently published "Biologic Asthma Response Score" (BARS). RESULTS: All biologics led to significant improvements in PF, ACT and OCS dose. Only Mepolizumab and Benralizumab significantly decreased the exacerbation rate, while only Mepolizumab and Dupilumab significantly decreased FeNO. Responder rates measured by BARS were high across all groups: roughly half of all patients achieved full response and most of the remainder achieved at least partial responder status. Overall, outcomes were similar between groups after both 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: All biologics showed great efficacy in individual parameters and high responder rates measured by BARS without a clinically relevant advantage for any antibody. Response was usually achieved after 6 months and retained at 12 months, emphasizing the utility of early response assessment.

Adverse Effects Under Th2 Biologics (Dupilumab and Tezepelumab) in a Patient with Severe Asthma and Atopic Dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: This is the first report of a patient with severe asthma and atopic dermatitis that developed local perioral skin infection which onset coincided with the patient's treatment with dupilumab (candida albicans) and later with tezepelumab (microscopic detection of yeast). CASE PRESENTATION: Besides moderate headache, macular exanthema was found after administration of tezepelumab, which was subsequently accompanied by a worsening of symptoms upon reexposure to the treatment. Both sensations needed multidisciplinary treatment and both antibody therapies were stopped.

Impact of short-term pausing of oral corticosteroids on blood eosinophil count in patients with severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: The peripheral blood eosinophil count (BEC) is a well-established and easily accessible biomarker for asthma patients and crucial for the therapeutic decision regarding monoclonal antibody (mAB) therapy. Oral corticosteroid therapy frequently hinders the correct evaluation of BEC in patients with severe asthma, but a discontinuation of such therapy frequently comes along with severe side effects. Therefore, we examined the effect of a short 24-hour pause of OCS treatment on BEC in patients with severe asthma and followed-up whether patients with a then increased eosinophil count benefited from mAB-therapy, as expected. METHODS: In this multicentre study we retrospectively included 24 patients with severe asthma and OCS therapy and determined their BEC count. Ten patients, where BEC count was obtained in the morning before taking medication (a de-facto 24-hour OCS pause), were assigned to group 1. Fourteen patients, where BEC was obtained after OCS tapering were assigned to group 2. Those who then received mAB treatment were followed up for treatment response (OCS dose, annual acute exacerbations, increase in forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] and asthma control test [ACT]) after ≥3 months. RESULTS: We included 24 patients with a median age of 60.5 [IQR: 17.3] years. Regarding all baseline characteristics except FEV1 (l), both groups did not differ significantly.Among all 24 patients, after pausing OCS therapy for 2 [5.5] days the BEC increased significantly from 125.0/µl [125] to 300/µl [232.5] (p<0.001). In both individual groups BEC increased significantly as well (150 [123] to 325 [305], p=0.005 and 70 [150] to 280 [255], p<0.001), with no significant difference for increase (BEC +170/µl [205.0] vs. +195 [222.5], p=0.886). Of all 24 patients, 13 (54.2%) reached eosinophil levels ≥300/µl, while 12 of them had not exceeded this threshold before.Subsequently, 20 patients (83.3%) received mAB-therapy with 55.5% demonstrating a good treatment response within 6 [1.5] months. The response rate in patients with BEC count ≥300/µl was even higher (75.0%). There was no difference in the treatment response rate between group 1 and 2 (p=0.092). CONCLUSION: After just a short 24-hour pause of OCS therapy it was possible to demask a relevant eosinophilia in asthma patients, without risking severe side effects. In this manner, we enabled the possibility of achieving successful targeted mAB-therapy, according to the patient's individual asthma phenotype.

[Criteria for evaluation of response to biologics in severe asthma - the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS)]. / Kriterien zur Evaluation des Ansprechens auf Biologika bei schwerem Asthma ­ der Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS).

BACKGROUND: The introduction of monoclonal antibodies (biologics) has revolutionized the therapy of severe asthma. Even though there is a response in the majority of patients, the degree of response varies. To date criteria for assessment of response to biologics are not consistently defined. AIM: To define criteria for evaluation of response to biologics that are precise, simple and suitable for daily use in order to guide decision-making regarding continuation, switching or stopping of biological therapy. METHODS: 8 physicians with large experience in this indication, supported by a data-scientist, developed a consensus on criteria to evaluate response to biologics in patients with severe asthma. RESULT: We developed a combined score based on current literature, own experience and practicability. It uses the main criteria exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy and asthma control (asthma control test, ACT). We defined thresholds for "good response", "response" and "insufficient response" rated with a score of "2", "1" and "0" respectively: annual exacerbations ("0 or reduction ≥ 75 %", reduction 50-74 %", "reductio  < 50 %"), daily OCS dose ("stopping or reduction ≥ 75 %", "reduction 50-74 %", "reduction < 50 %"), asthma control (ACT increase ≥ 6 or ≥ 3 with result ≥ 20", "ACT increase 3-5 with result < 20", "ACT increase < 3"). Additional individual criteria like lung function and comorbidities may be important for evaluation of response. We propose 3, 6 and 12 months timepoint for assessment of tolerability and response. Using the combined score, we developed a scheme to guide the decision whether switching the biologic should be considered. CONCLUSION: The Biologic Asthma Response Score (BARS) serves as objective and simple tool to evaluate response to biologic therapy using the three main criteria exacerbations, OCS use and asthma control. A validation of the score was initiated.

Criteria for evaluation of response to biologics in severe asthma - the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS).

BACKGROUND: The introduction of monoclonal antibodies (biologics) has revolutionized the therapy of severe asthma. Even though there is a response in the majority of patients, the degree of response varies. To date criteria for assessment of response to biologics are not consistently defined. AIM: To define criteria for evaluation of response to biologics that are precise, simple and suitable for daily use in order to guide decision-making regarding continuation, switching or stopping of biological therapy. METHODS: 8 physicians with large experience in this indication, supported by a data-scientist, developed a consensus on criteria to evaluate response to biologics in patients with severe asthma. RESULT: We developed a combined score based on current literature, own experience and practicability. It uses the main criteria exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy and asthma control (asthma control test, ACT). We defined thresholds for "good response", "response" and "insufficient response" rated with a score of "2", "1" and "0" respectively: annual exacerbations ("0 or reduction ≥ 75 %", "reduction 50-74 %", "reductio < 50 %"), daily OCS dose ("stopping or reduction ≥ 75 %", "reduction 50-74 %", "reduction < 50 %"), asthma control ("ACT increase ≥ 6 or ≥ 3 with result ≥ 20", "ACT increase 3-5 with result < 20", "ACT increase < 3"). Additional individual criteria like lung function and comorbidities may be important for evaluation of response. We propose 3, 6 and 12 months timepoint for assessment of tolerability and response. Using the combined score, we developed a scheme to guide the decision whether switching the biologic should be considered. CONCLUSION: The Biologic Asthma Response Score (BARS) serves as objective and simple tool to evaluate response to biologic therapy using the three main criteria exacerbations, OCS use and asthma control. A validation of the score was initiated.

3D phase-resolved functional lung ventilation MR imaging in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic pulmonary disease.

PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of 3D phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic pulmonary disease, to compare 3D to 2D PREFUL, and to investigate the required temporal resolution to obtain stable 3D PREFUL measurement. METHODS: Sixteen participants underwent MRI using 2D and 3D PREFUL. Retrospectively, the spatial resolution of 3D PREFUL (4 × 4 × 4 mm3 ) was decreased to match the spatial resolution of 2D PREFUL (4 × 4 × 15 mm3 ), abbreviated as 3Dlowres . In addition to regional ventilation (RVent), flow-volume loops were computed and rated by a cross-correlation (CC). Ventilation defect percentage (VDP) maps were obtained. RVent, CC, VDPRVent , and VDPCC were compared for systematic differences between 2D, 3Dlowres , and 3D PREFUL. Dividing the 3D PREFUL data into 4- (≈ 20 phases), 8- (≈ 40 phases), and 12-min (≈ 60 phases) acquisition pieces, the ventilation parameter maps, including the heterogeneity of ventilation time to peak, were tested regarding the required temporal resolution. RESULTS: RVent, CC, VDPRVent , and VDPCC  presented significant correlations between 2D and 3D PREFUL (r = 0.64-0.94). CC and VDPCC  of 2D and 3Dlowres  PREFUL were significantly different (P < .0113). Comparing 3Dlowres  and 3D PREFUL, all parameters were found to be statistically different (P < .0045). CONCLUSION: 3D PREFUL MRI depicts the whole lung volume and breathing cycle with superior image resolution and with likely more precision compared to 2D PREFUL. Furthermore, 3D PREFUL is more sensitive to detect regions of hypoventilation and ventilation heterogeneity compared to 3Dlowres  PREFUL, which is important for early detection and improved monitoring of patients with chronic lung disease.

Infection transmission among lung transplant couples.

The risk of transmission of infections in partnerships between 2 transplant recipients is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate transmission in such couples. In this single-center study, lung transplant (LTx) couples were identified among outpatients between 1988 and 2016. Infection rates per year and survival were compared to matched LTx-recipients not living in a transplant partnership. Twelve transplant couples were analyzed with cumulative 65 years of relationship. Overall infections were similar between LTx-couples and matched LTx-patients. No significant differences were noted in bacterial infections (.12 vs .27 per year), community-acquired viral (CARV) infections (.26 vs .22 per year), rejection treatments (.22 vs .12 per year), or hospitalizations (.26 vs .46 per year) in transplant couples and matched controls, respectively. There was no transmission of any microbial colonization from 1 partner to the other. Five cases of simultaneously detected CARV infections occurred (metapneumovirus [3], H1N1 [1], and respiratory syncytial virus [RSV; 1]). Three couples exhibited cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in both partners at the same time with confirmed seronegativity before transplantation. In this case series of 12 lung transplant couples, the partnerships between 2 transplant recipients have no greater risk of bacterial infection and colonization transmission in comparison with recipients not living in a transplant relationship. However, transplant couples should be informed about the risk for transmission of viral infections, which could impact the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).

Anti-IL-5 therapy in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma - clinical efficacy and possible criteria for treatment response.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-5 (IL-5) antibodies represent a promising therapeutic option for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. To date, no official treatment response criteria exist. In this study, simple criteria for treatment response applicable to all asthma patients were used to evaluate clinical efficacy and predictors for treatment response in a real-life setting. METHODS: Data from 42 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab for at least six months were analysed. Simple criteria to assess treatment response in clinical practice were used: increase of FEV1 ≥ 12% or ≥ 200 ml, reduction of blood eosinophils (< 150/µl or < 80% from baseline) and improvement of subjective condition (patient-judged subjective improvement or worsening following therapy). Patients were considered treatment responders if two criteria were fulfilled. RESULTS: Thirty-two out of 42 patients (76% [61-87%]) were classified as responders. Within the groups (responder vs non-responder), treatment with mepolizumab led to significant increase in FEV1 (+ 600 ml vs -100 ml, p = 0.003), oxygenation (+ 8 mmHg vs -3 mmHg, p = 0.001), quality of life (visual analogue scale; + 28% vs - 5%, p = 0.004) and Asthma Control Test (+ 8 vs + 1 points, p = 0.002). In the responder group a significant decrease in the exacerbation rate over 12 months (1.45 vs 0.45, p = 0.002) was observed. Baseline characteristics (sex, BMI, smoking history, allergies, baseline level of eosinophils) did not predict treatment response. CONCLUSION: Using improvement of lung function, decrease of eosinophils and improvement of subjective condition as response criteria, 76% of treated patients could be classified as treatment responders, demonstrating the efficacy of anti-IL-5 therapy in clinical practice.

Removal of methadone by extended dialysis using a high cut-off dialyzer: implications for the treatment of overdose and for pain management in patients undergoing light chain removal.

The synthetic opioid methadone hydrochloride has a low molecular weight of 346 D, a high volume of distribution (4 - 7 L/kg), and is lipophilic. It is used as an analgesic and for the maintenance treatment of opiate dependence. In drug addicts, methadone is frequently involved in mixed intoxications that can lead to death. Here we present the case of a drug addict in whom a high cut-off dialysis membrane together with extended dialysis was used in the setting of suspected overdose and acute kidney injury. Although the observed dialyzer plasma clearance (31.5 mL/min) and reduction ratio (38%) were higher than previously reported for standard hemodialysis, the total amount of methadone in the spent dialysate after 1 extended dialysis session was quite low. Hence, even extended dialysis with a high cut-off membrane does not seem to offer a clinically relevant benefit in the setting of overdose for enhanced methadone removal. On the other hand, in patients undergoing high cut-off dialysis for the removal of light chains, methadone could still be used as an analgesic without an additional dose after high cut-off hemodialysis.

["Crack lung" - atypical bilateral pneumonia]. / "Crack lung" ­ atypische bilaterale Pneumonie.

Inhalation of crack and freebase results in alveolar hemorrhage. In severe courses of the disease, progressive respiratory insufficiency may lead to respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Computed tomography of the thorax reveals bilateral consolidation and ground-glass pattern leaving a subpleural gap. This case report of a 48-year-old male patient highlights the importance of a thorough medical history while ruling out infectious causes.

Real-World Data on Tezepelumab in Patients With Severe Asthma in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Tezepelumab is a novel biologic blocking thymic stromal lymphopoetin, approved for severe asthma irrespective of biomarker levels or phenotype. OBJECTIVE: To characterize a real-world tezepelumab patient cohort and the efficacy among various asthma phenotypes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study on patients with severe asthma initiating tezepelumab. Clinical response was evaluated at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: We included 129 patients with an average age of 52.5 ± 13.1 years, 59.7% were female. The majority (86.0%) had increased type 2 (T2) biomarkers, 68.2% an allergic and 31.8% an eosinophilic phenotype. 23.3% of patients were biologic-naive. 22 (18.2%) patients discontinued tezepelumab therapy owing to suspected side effects or insufficient efficacy. At 6 months' follow-up, median reduction in annualized exacerbation rate was-1 [25th percentile; 75% percentile {-2.9; 0.0}], the reduction of oral corticosteroid dose among patients with long-term oral corticosteroid therapy was -5 mg [-10; 0] and the Asthma Control Test (ACT) improved by 2 [0; 5] points. A treatment response according to Biologic Asthma Response Score of 80.8% was demonstrated. There were no significant differences in treatment response between T2-high versus T2-low, early- versus adult-onset and eosinophilic versus non-eosinophilic asthma. Prior treatment with other biologics was associated with inferior treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-life cohort, including a large proportion of patients with history of previous biologic use and encompassing various subgroups, the majority responded to tezepelumab. Our data further suggest a steroid-sparing effect of tezepelumab.

As-needed low-dose inhaled corticosteroid/formoterol therapy in patients with severe asthma included in the German Asthma Net cohort.

After the GINA update in 2019, the proportion of SMART therapy increased with evidence for better disease control in SMART patients compared to SABA alone https://bit.ly/3SSPX1C.

Burden and trends of hospitalisations associated with pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections in Germany, 2005-2011.

BACKGROUND: Representative population-based data on the epidemiology of pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial (PNTM) infections in Europe are limited. However, these data are needed in order to optimise patient care and to facilitate the allocation of healthcare resources. The aim of the present study was to investigate the current burden and the trends of PNTM infection-associated hospitalisations in Germany. METHODS: International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) discharge diagnosis codes were extracted from the official nationwide diagnosis-related groups (DRG) hospital statistics in order to identify PNTM infection-associated hospitalisations (ICD-10 code A31.0) between 2005 and 2011. Poisson log-linear regression analysis was used to assess the significance of trends. RESULTS: Overall, 5,959 records with PNTM infection as any hospital discharge diagnosis were extracted from more than 125 million hospitalisations. The average annual age-adjusted rate was 0.91 hospitalisations per 100,000 population. Hospitalisation rates increased during the study period for both males and females, with the highest rate of 3.0 hospitalisations per 100,000 population among elderly men, but the most pronounced average increase of 6.4%/year among females, particularly those of young and middle age, and hospitalisations associated with cystic fibrosis. Overall, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was the most frequent PNTM infection-associated condition in 28.9% of hospitalisations and also showed a significant average annual increase of 4.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PNTM infection-associated hospitalisations is steadily increasing in Germany. COPD is currently the most important associated condition. Our population-based study provides evidence of a changing epidemiology of PNTM infections and highlights emerging clinical implications.

Influence of anti-interleukin (IL)-5/anti-IL-5 receptor-α treatment on work productivity in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

This retrospective study shows that treatment with anti-eosinophilic antibodies in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma is associated with an increase in work productivity and a decrease in missed days at work https://bit.ly/3IIPppR.

The impact of anti-eosinophilic therapy on exercise capacity and inspiratory muscle strength in patients with severe asthma.

Introduction: Exercise limitation is frequently described among asthmatic patients and could be related to different mechanisms of the pulmonary, cardiovascular and muscular systems. Despite this, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) does not have an established role in the management of severe asthma. The aim of our study was to investigate the role of CPET and inspiratory pressure measurement in exercise capacity and muscle strength in severe asthmatic patients treated with anti-IL-5 therapy. Methods: A monocentric observational study was conducted at Hanover Medical School, Germany, from April 2018 to June 2019. Patients affected by severe asthma treated with either mepolizumab or benralizumab were included. All patients underwent CPET before the initiation of antibody therapy and after 3 months, and follow-up visits were scheduled at 3, 6 and 12 months with plethysmography, inspiratory pressure measurement and blood gas analysis. Results: 14 patients were enrolled: 10 (71.4%) females, median age 52 years (IQR 47-61). Seven patients were treated with benralizumab, seven with mepolizumab. Oxygen uptake (V'O2 peak) did not change significantly after 3 months of antibody treatment, while the mean value of the breathing reserve exhaustion reduced significantly from 78% to 60% (p=0.004). Whereas at baseline seven patients depleted the breathing reserve and two of them experienced oxygen desaturation during exercise, at 3 months no one presented any desaturation or breathing reserve exhaustion. The inspiratory pressure remained unchanged before and after the antibody therapy. Conclusion: CPET could show hints of alveolar recruitment and ventilatory efficiency in severe asthma patients treated with antibody therapy.