Innovation in resuscitation: A novel clinical decision display system for advanced cardiac life support.

INTRODUCTION: The Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) Clinical Decision Display System (CDDS) is a novel application designed to optimize team organization and facilitate decision-making during ACLS resuscitations. We hypothesized that resuscitation teams would more consistently adhere to ACLS guideline time intervals in simulated resuscitation scenarios with the CDDS compared to without. METHODS: We conducted a simulation-based, non-blinded, randomized, crossover-design study with resuscitation teams comprised of Emergency Medicine physicians, registered nurses, critical care technicians, and paramedics. Each team performed 4 ACLS scenarios in randomized sequences, half with the CDDS and half without. We analyzed the resuscitations and recorded the times of interventions that have defined intervals by ACLS: rhythm checks, epinephrine administration, and shock delivery. In addition, we surveyed each resuscitation team regarding their experience using the CDDS. RESULTS: On average, teams performed rhythm checks 4.9 s closer to ACLS guidelines with the CDDS (p = 0.0358). Teams were also more consistent; on average, teams reduced the variation of time between consecutive doses of epinephrine by 45% (p = 0.0001) and defibrillation by 47% (p < 0.0001). Ninety-eight percent of participants indicated they would use the CDDS if available in real cardiac arrests. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the CDDS improves the accuracy and precision of timed ACLS interventions in a simulated setting. Resuscitation teams were strongly in favor of utilizing the CDDS in clinical practice. Further investigations of the introduction of the platform into real time clinical environments will be needed to assess true efficacy and patient outcomes.

Comparative accuracy of supine-only and combined supine-prone myocardial perfusion imaging in men.

BACKGROUND: Combined supine-prone myocardial perfusion imaging (CSP MPI) has been shown to reduce attenuation artifact in comparison to supine-only (SU) MPI in mixed-gender populations with varying risk for coronary artery disease (CAD), often where patients served as their own controls. However, there is limited direct comparison of these imaging strategies in men. METHODS: 934 male patients underwent CSP or SU MPI. Diagnostic certainty of interpretation was compared. Within the cohort, 116 were referred for left heart catheterization (LHC) to assess for CAD. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared with additional analysis based on body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: 597 patients completed the SU protocol and 337 patients completed the CSP protocol. Equivocal studies were seen more frequently in the SU group (13%) than in the CSP group (4%, P < .001). At catheterization, the specificity for CSP MPI of 70% was higher than 40% for SU MPI (P = .032). The CSP AUC (0.80 ± 0.06) was significantly larger than SU AUC (0.57 ± 0.05, P = .004). CSP specificity was significantly higher in obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: CSP MPI increases diagnostic certainty and improves test accuracy for CAD detection in men with CAD risk factors, especially obese patients, compared to SU MPI.