Evaluation of radiation dose to the lens in interventional cardiology physicians before and after dose limit regulation changes.

In response to the International Commission on Radiological Protection, which lowered the lens equivalent dose limit, Japan lowered the lens dose limit from 150 mSv y-1to 100 mSv/5 years and 50 mSv y-1, with this new rule taking effect on 1 April 2021. DOSIRIS®is a dosimeter that can accurately measure lens dose. Herein, we investigated lens dose in interventional cardiology physicians 1 year before and after the reduction of the lens dose limit using a neck dosimeter and lens dosimeter measurements. With an increase in the number of cases, both personal dose equivalent at 0.07 mm depth [Hp(0.07), neck dosimeter] and personal dose equivalent at 3 mm depth [Hp(3), lens dosimeter] increased for most of the physicians. The Hp(3) of the lens considering the shielding effect of the Pb glasses using lens dosimeter exceeded 20 mSv y-1for two of the 14 physicians. Protection from radiation dose will become even more important in the future, as these two physicians may experience radiation dose exceeding 100 mSv/5 years. The average dose per procedure increased, but not significantly. There was a strong correlation between the neck dosimeter and lens dosimeter scores, although there was no significant change before and after the lens dose limit was lowered. This correlation was particularly strong for physicians who primarily treated patients. As such, it is possible to infer accurate lens doses from neck doses in physicians who primarily perform diagnostics. However, it is desirable to use a dosimeter that can directly measure Hp(3) because of the high lens dose.

Comparing the Safety and Feasibility of Endovascular Therapy via Transradial and Transfemoral Approaches in Patients with Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Nationwide Registry.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of performing endovascular therapy (EVT) for aortoiliac artery disease using transradial approach (TRA) as compared to transfemoral approach (TFA). METHODS: We analyzed 9671 cases with symptomatic lower extremity artery disease due to aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) treated using EVT from a Japanese Nationwide EVT Registry between January and December 2021. We compared the baseline characteristics, procedural information, and 30-day outcomes of patients who received EVT only via TRA (n=863 [16.9%]) and those only via TFA (n=4255 [83.1%]) by using propensity score (PS) matching, after excluding those who required regular dialysis, those who underwent hybrid surgeries, and those who received EVT through 2 or more approach sites. RESULTS: After matching, the final study population consisted of 862 matched patients with similar baseline characteristics in each group. Technical success rate was comparable between the 2 groups (99.3% vs. 99.3%, p>0.99). No significant differences were observed with respect to the composite of all-cause death within 48 hours after EVT and post-procedural complications within 30 days, including severe bleeding that required transfusion, revascularization procedures, urgent surgeries, cerebral infarction, and major limb amputation (0.2% vs. 0.7%, p=0.29). Transradial approach was associated with shorter operation time (85 vs. 90 minutes, p=0.016), but longer fluoroscopy time (26 vs. 20 minutes, p<0.001) and higher contrast agent volume (80 vs. 75 mL, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: After PS matching, TRA showed the comparable rates of successful EVT and 30-day complications in patients with AIOD compared to TFA. Transradial approach was found to be safe and be a viable alternative of TFA for the treatment of AIOD. CLINICAL IMPACT: The efficacy of transradial approach (TRA) is established in percutaneous coronary intervention; however, its safety and feasibility are unclear in endovascular therapy (EVT). We analyzed 9,671 cases with symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease treated using EVT from a Nationwide Registry to compare the 30-day outcomes of those who received EVT only via TRA (n = 863 [16.9%]and those only via TFA (n=4,255 [83.1%]) by using propensity score matching. Technical success rate (99.3% vs. 99.3%, p > 0.99) and 30-day complications (0.2% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.29) were comparable between the two groups. EVT via TRA could be performed safely.

Edoxaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonist for Atrial Fibrillation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Japanese Patients　- A Subanalysis of the ENVISAGE-TAVI AF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Japanese patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are often female and have a small body size, potentially impacting bleeding risk with antithrombotic therapy. Outcomes of direct oral anticoagulant use in these patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) need to be clarified.Methods and Results: This prespecified analysis included Japanese patients from ENVISAGE-TAVI AF, a prospective, randomized, open-label, adjudicator-masked trial that compared treatment with edoxaban and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with AF after TAVR. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were net adverse clinical events (NACE; composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, systemic embolic event, valve thrombosis, and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis [ISTH]-defined major bleeding) and ISTH-defined major bleeding, respectively. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and on-treatment analyses were performed. Overall, 159 Japanese patients were enrolled (edoxaban group: 82, VKA group: 77) and followed for on average 483 days. Mean patient age was 83.8 years; 52.2% were female. In the ITT analysis, NACE rates were 10.9%/year with edoxaban and 12.5%/year with VKA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.90); major bleeding occurred in 8.9%/year and 7.3%/year, respectively (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.45-3.05). In edoxaban- and VKA-treated patients, rates of ischemic stroke were 1.8%/year and 1.0%/year, respectively; fatal bleeding rates were 0.9%/year and 2.0 %/year. On-treatment results were similar to ITT. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with AF after successful TAVR, edoxaban and VKA treatment have similar safety and efficacy profiles.

Late kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Information on early to late-phase kidney damage in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is scarce. We aimed to identify the predictive factors for late kidney injury (LKI) at 1-year and patient prognosis beyond 1-year after TAVR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1,705 patients' data from the Japanese TAVR multicenter registry. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and LKI, defined as an increase of at least 0.3 mg/dL in creatinine level, a relative 50% decrease in kidney function from baseline to 48 hours and 1-year, were evaluated. The patients were categorized into the 4 groups as AKI-/LKI- (n = 1.362), AKI+/LKI- (n = 95), AKI-/LKI+ (n = 199), and AKI+/LKI+ (n = 46). RESULTS: The cumulative 3-year mortality rates were significantly increased across the four groups (12.5%, 15.8%, 24.6%, 25.8%, P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, periprocedural AKI, and heart failure-related re-admission within 1-year were significantly associated with LKI. The Cox regression analysis revealed that AKI-/LKI+ and AKI+/LKI+ were independent predictors of increased late mortality beyond 1-year after TAVR (P = .001 and P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: LKI was influenced by adverse cardio-renal events and was associated with increased risks of late mortality beyond 1-year after TAVR.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Identifying high-risk diabetic population from the OCEAN-TAVI registry.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the vulnerable diabetic cohort in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUNDS: Considerable controversy remains about whether specific cohort exists in which presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) carries adverse risk of mortality after TAVR. METHODS: Of the 2588 patients who were enrolled in the OCEAN-TAVI registry, 2526 patients with glycohemoglobin data were analyzed. The individuals were divided into DM and non-DM groups according to previous medical history of DM or using diabetic medicine, and increased HbA1c values (≥6.5%) at baseline. The primary endpoint of this study was 2-year all-cause mortality after TAVR. RESULTS: The follow up rate of clinical outcome at 1-year was 2514/2526 (99.5%) and median follow-up period was 22.5 months. DM group had 699 (27.7%) patients, in which 153 (21.9%) was diagnosed by increased HbA1c levels without previous medical history of DM. Kaplan-Meier curve of 2-year all-cause mortality presented significant difference between patients with and without DM (p = 0.029). In addition, patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > 100 mg/dl and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% had great risk of mortality after TAVR (LDL-C: hazard ratio [HR] 1.82, p < 0.001; LVEF: HR 2.61, p = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of DM was significantly associated with poor outcome after TAVR and adverse effect of DM was remarkable in patients with relatively higher LDL-C levels and reduced LVEF under 40%. These subtypes may need intensive control of cardiovascular risk factors, including DM, before and after TAVR.

Clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in nonagenarians from the optimized catheter valvular intervention-TAVI registry.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate 30-day and 2-year clinical outcomes, and predictors of 2-year mortality in nonagenarians undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: TAVI has been applied to nonagenarians. However, sufficient clinical data in nonagenarians who could benefit from TAVI are limited. METHODS: We evaluated the data from the optimized catheter valvular intervention-TAVI registry. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients' age ≥90 years and age <90 years. Predictive factors of 2-year mortality were assessed by multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: From October 2013 to May 2017, a total of 375 nonagenarians (age ≥90 years) and 2,213 younger patients (age <90 years) were included. Although nonagenarians had a higher surgical risk score, 30-day clinical outcomes were similar between two groups. There were no significant differences in 2-year mortality (22.0% vs. 17.3%; p = .11) and stroke (5.5% vs. 3.9%; p = .31); however, 2-year heart failure readmission was higher in nonagenarians (13.3% vs. 9.0%; p = .03). After adjusting covariates, age ≥90 years was not independent predictor for 2-year outcomes. In nonagenarians, female sex (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.26-0.74; p = .002), chronic kidney disease grade ≥4 (HR = 2.14; 95% CI = 1.21-3.64; p = .01), and Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4 (HR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.02-3.42; p = .04) were independently associated with 2-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes of TAVI in selected nonagenarians were favorable. Severe renal dysfunction and frailty may be important factors to predict mid-term mortality after TAVI in nonagenarians.

Midterm outcomes after the rescue THV-in-THV procedure: Insights from the multicenter prospective OCEAN-TAVI registry.

OBJECTIVES: To confirm whether the rescue transcatheter heart valve in the transcatheter heart valve (THV-in-THV) procedure is effective and feasible, we aimed to assess the midterm outcomes following rescue THV-in-THV procedures. The trends in the usage of the rescue THV-in-THV procedure at the time of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have also been explored. BACKGROUND: Midterm outcomes of the rescue THV-in-THV procedure have been poorly defined, though it is popular as an effective method to bail-out some complications in TAVI. METHODS: We reviewed data from the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular iNtervention-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (OCEAN-TAVI) registry and compared the outcomes of TAVI with rescue THV-in-THV and TAVI without rescue THV-in-THV. We also examined the annual rates of rescue THV-in-THV procedures in all the TAVI procedures between 2013 and 2017. RESULTS: Among 2,588 patients who underwent TAVI, 26 patients have required rescue THV-in-THV for valve malposition (n = 23) or severe transvalvular regurgitation because of stuck THV leaflets (n = 3). Three cases needed an open conversion, and two died in the hospital. The rates of new permanent pacemaker implantation, acute kidney injury, and stroke were higher in the THV-in-THV group. A two-year cumulative survival and echocardiographic outcomes succeeding rescue THV-in-THV procedure were comparable to non-THV-in-THV cases. The rate of rescue THV-in-THV procedure lessened from 2.6% in 2013 to 0.6% in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: The rescue THV-in-THV procedure is an effective and feasible option for THV malpositioning and stuck valve. It has given a comparable survival and a stable valve function over midterm observation periods.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with Evolut R versus Sapien 3 in Japanese patients with a small aortic annulus: The OCEAN-TAVI registry.

OBJECTIVES: To compare safety, efficacy, and hemodynamics of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THVs) in patients with a small aortic annulus. BACKGROUND: Few studies have directly compared TAVR outcomes using third-generation THVs, focusing on patients with small aortic annuli. METHODS: In a multicenter TAVR registry, we analyzed data from 576 patients with a small annulus and who underwent transfemoral TAVR using third-generation THVs. Propensity score matching was used to adjust baseline clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The device success rate in the overall cohort was 92.0% (Evolut R: 92.1% vs. Sapien 3:92.0%, p = 0.96). One year after TAVR, patients treated with Evolut R maintained a lower mean pressure gradient (mPG) and a higher indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) in the matched cohort {mPG: 9.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 6.0-11.9] vs. 12.0 [IQR: 9.9-16.3] mmHg, p < .001; iEOA: 1.20 [IQR: 1.01-1.46] vs. 1.08 [IQR: 0.90-1.28] cm2 /m2 , p < .001}. However, no significant differences were reported in the incidence of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch and aortic regurgitation at 1 year. Furthermore, both groups showed comparable outcomes with no differences in terms of all-cause mortality (log-lank test, p = .81). CONCLUSIONS: TAVR for patients with a small annulus using third-generation THVs was associated with high device success. Evolut R seems to be superior to Sapien 3 in hemodynamic performance for patients with a small annulus and body surface area up to 1 year after TAVR. Nevertheless, all-cause mortality at 1 year was similar between both groups.

Clinical risk model for predicting 1-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Estimating 1-year life expectancy is an essential factor when evaluating appropriate indicators for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: It is clinically useful in developing a reliable risk model for predicting 1-year mortality after TAVR. METHODS: We evaluated 2,588 patients who underwent TAVR using data from the Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN) Japanese multicenter registry from October 2013 to May 2017. The 1-year clinical follow-up was achieved by 99.5% of the entire population (n = 2,575). Patients were randomly divided into two cohorts: the derivation cohort (n = 1,931, 75% of the study population) and the validation cohort (n = 644). Considerable clinical variables including individual patient's comorbidities and frailty markers were used for predicting 1-year mortality following TAVR. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, a multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that sex, body mass index, Clinical Frailty Scale, atrial fibrillation, peripheral artery disease, prior cardiac surgery, serum albumin, renal function as estimated glomerular filtration rate, and presence of pulmonary disease were independent predictors of 1-year mortality after TAVR. Using these variables, a risk prediction model was constructed to estimate the 1-year risk of mortality after TAVR. In the validation cohort, the risk prediction model revealed high discrimination ability and acceptable calibration with area under the curve of 0.763 (95% confidence interval, 0.728-0.795, p < .001) in the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis and a Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 statistic of 5.96 (p = .65). CONCLUSIONS: This risk prediction model for 1-year mortality may be a reliable tool for risk stratification and identification of adequate candidates in patients undergoing TAVR.

Effect of Sex on Mortality and Left Ventricular Remodeling After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

BACKGROUND: The effect of sex on mortality is controversial; furthermore, sex differences in left ventricular (LV) remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain unknown.Methods and Results:This study included 2,588 patients (1,793 [69.3%] female) enrolled in the Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN)-TAVI Japanese multicenter registry between October 2013 and May 2017. We retrospectively analyzed the effect of sex on mortality, and evaluated changes in the LV mass index (LVMI) after TAVI. Female sex was significantly associated with lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (log-rank P<0.001 for both). Multivariate analysis showed that female sex was independently associated with lower cumulative long-term mortality (hazard ratio 0.615; 95% confidence interval 0.512-0.738; P<0.001). Regression in the LVMI was observed in both sexes, and there was no significant difference in the percentage LVMI regression from baseline to 1 year after TAVI between women and men. Women had a survival advantage compared with men among patients with LVMI regression at 1 year, but not among patients with no LVMI regression. CONCLUSIONS: We found that female sex is associated with better survival outcomes after TAVI in a large Japanese registry. Although LVMI regression was observed in women and men after TAVI, post-procedural LV mass regression may be related to the sex differences in mortality.

Short-term dual anti-platelet therapy decreases long-term cardiovascular mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

No data are available on extended dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) duration which may influence long-term prognosis (later than 1 year) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Therefore, this study is aimed to evaluate whether discontinuing DAPT within 1 year had an impact on adverse events after TAVR. Using data from the OCEAN-TAVI registry, we assessed 1008 patients who survived the first year after TAVR with DAPT since discharge. Patients were divided into 'DAPT group' (n = 462), comprising patients who took DAPT at both discharge and 1 year, and 'stop-DAPT group' (n = 546), comprising patients who took DAPT at discharge and single anti-platelet therapy (SAPT) at 1 year. We compared the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) death, major and minor bleeding, and ischemic stroke later than 1 year after TAVR between the two groups. A total of 28 CV deaths were observed later than 1 year after TAVR. The stop-DAPT group had a significantly lower incidence of CV death than the DAPT group (1.8% vs. 4.9%, log-rank P = 0.029). Stop DAPT was associated with lower CV death later than 1 year of TAVR in Cox regression analysis (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.99), and in analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting method using propensity score (adjusted HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20-0.98). Our study demonstrated that switching from DAPT to SAPT within 1 year of TAVR was significantly associated with a lower CV death later than 1 year after TAVR.

Comparison of long-term mortality in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement with or without anti-atherosclerotic therapy.

Atherosclerosis is a risk factor for both aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease. This study aimed to investigate whether anti-atherosclerotic therapy (AT), defined as the simultaneous use of antiplatelet agents, statins, and renin aldosterone system inhibitors, had long-term clinical benefits for patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Between October 2013 and May 2017, 2518 patients (31% men; median age, 85 years) who underwent TAVR in 14 Japanese centers were divided into two groups: patients who were prescribed anti-atherosclerotic therapy (AT, n = 567) and patients who were not (no AT, n = 1951). The median follow-up period for this cohort was 693 days (interquartile range, 389-870 days). Compared to no AT group, AT group was associated with significantly lower 2-year all-cause mortality (11.7% vs. 16.5%; log-rank p = 0.002) and 2-year cardiovascular mortality rates (3.5% vs. 6.0%; log-rank p = 0.017). In a propensity-matched cohort (n = 495 each; median follow-up, 710 days [IQR, 394 - 896 days]), patients in AT group had a lower prevalence of 2-year cardiovascular mortality (3.8% vs. 6.2%, log-rank p = 0.024) than that in the no AT group. In the multivariate stepwise regression analysis, AT was a significant predictor of cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.80; p = 0.007). AT may improve survival in post-TAVR patients. Future studies are necessary to identify an optimal treatment regimen to improve long-term outcomes after TAVR.

Risk assessment in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with post-procedural left ventricular systolic dysfunction remains high. We investigated clinical variables associating with worse clinical outcomes following TAVR in patients with systolic dysfunction. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 2588 patients with severe aortic stenosis who received TAVR and were enrolled in the optimized transcatheter valvular intervention (OCEAN-TAVI) multicenter registry (UMIN000020423). The association between the clinical variables following TAVR and 2-year cardiovascular mortality was investigated among those with post-TAVR left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%. RESULTS: A total of 298 patients (median 85 years old, 131 men) were included. The presence of moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation following TAVR was independently associated with 2-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 3.41, 95% confidence interval 1.15-10.1), and significantly discriminated 2-year cardiovascular mortality (30% vs. 12%, p = 0.001). No patients with any improvement in tricuspid regurgitation had cardiovascular death. CONCLUSION: Following TAVR, the existence of significant tricuspid regurgitation was associated with cardiovascular mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Creatinine Score Can Predict Persistent Renal Dysfunction Following Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is often accompanied by renal dysfunction, which portends a poor prognosis. Trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an accepted therapy for patients with severe AS, whereas the prediction of persistent renal dysfunction following TAVR remains challenging. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the pre-procedural score to assess the reversibility of renal dysfunction following TAVR. A total of 2,588 patients with severe AS who received TAVR and were enrolled in the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN-TAVI) multicenter registry (UMIN000020423) were retrospectively investigated and those with serum creatinine (Cre) data at baseline and one year following TAVR were included. The Cre score was calculated using the formula: 0.2 × (age [years]) + 3.6 × (baseline serum Cre [mg/dL]). This score was evaluated to assess the risk of persistent renal dysfunction defined as serum Cre level > 1.5 mg/dL at one year following TAVR. Of the 1705 patients (84.3 ± 5.0 years old) included, 246 (14%) had persistent renal dysfunction following TAVR. The Cre score predicted the incidence of persistent renal dysfunction with an adjusted incidence rate ratio of 1.48 (95% confidence interval 1.42-1.56) with a cutoff of 21.4 (43% versus 5%, P < 0.001). The Cre score also predicted 4-year survival following TAVR (70% versus 52%, P < 0.001) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.75 (95% confidence interval 1.29-2.37). In conclusion, the Cre score identified those with a high risk of one-year persistent renal dysfunction following TAVR. The implication of Cre score-guided therapeutic strategy is the next concern.

Prognostic impact and periprocedural complications of chronic steroid therapy in patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Propensity-matched analysis from the Japanese OCEAN registry.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of chronic steroid use on periprocedural complications and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: Chronic steroid use increases the risk of periprocedural complications and mortality during surgery. METHODS: We investigated 1,313 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who underwent transfemoral (TF)-TAVR using data from a Japanese multicenter registry. The baseline characteristics, periprocedural complications including vascular complications (VCs), access route related VCs, and clinical outcomes were compared between patients in the steroid group and nonsteroid group. RESULTS: Major VCs and access route VCs occurred more in the steroid group than in the nonsteroid group (13.4 vs. 5.8%, p = .019; 20.9% vs. 9.8%, p = .004). Especially in the surgical cut-down group, the rate of access route VCs was differed between the two groups (28.0% vs. 7.5%, p = .003). The 30-day mortality rates were similar between the two groups (0% vs. 1.4%, p = .39). In the propensity score-matched model, the higher incidence of major VCs in the steroid group was maintained, although early mortality was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although chronic steroid therapy is not associated with increased early mortality, chronic steroid use may affect periprocedural VCs and access route VCs mainly due to surgical cut-down in patients following TF-TAVR.

Update on the clinical impact of mild aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the Japanese multicenter OCEAN-TAVI registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the clinical impact of mild postprocedural aortic regurgitation (post-AR) to that of none-trivial post-AR after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to identify the vulnerability factors to mild post-AR. BACKGROUND: Moderate-severe post-AR, associated with increased mortality, is an important issue. However, the clinical impact of mild post-AR remains controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data from 1,572 consecutive patients (1,026 of none-trivial post-AR and 546 of mild post-AR) obtained from the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular Intervention (OCEAN-TAVI) Japanese multicenter registry. We evaluated the 1-year cumulative cardiovascular death and re-hospitalization rates for heart failure (HF) after TAVI according to the degree of post-AR. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no significant difference between "none-trivial post-AR" and "mild post-AR" in terms of cardiovascular death, but a significant difference was noted in the cumulative incidence of re-hospitalization for HF between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.02-2.41, p = .04). In the stratified analysis, only in patients with not more than 50% of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and none-trivial pre-procedural aortic regurgitation (pre-AR), mild post-AR resulted in a higher incidence of re-hospitalization for HF. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the clinical impact of mild post-AR compared to none-trivial post-AR tended to be augmented in the presence of reduced LVEF, concentric LVH, and none-trivial pre-AR. Pre-procedure echocardiographic findings including LVEF, left ventricular geometry, and pre-AR may help to judge the necessity of postdilatation in case of mild post-AR just after the bioprosthesis deployment.

Erratum to "Slender Sheath/Guiding Catheter Combination vs. Sheathless Guiding Catheter for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Two Devices".

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2020/8216831.].

Slender Sheath/Guiding Catheter Combination vs. Sheathless Guiding Catheter for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Two Devices.

A Glidesheath slender (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) and a sheathless Eaucath guiding catheter (Asahi Intecc, Nagoya, Japan) are two major slender devices utilized in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to investigate the differences in access-site complications between these devices in PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A total of 1108 consecutive patients who underwent transradial PCI for ACS were enrolled. Transradial PCI was performed using either a 7-Fr Glidesheath slender/7-Fr guiding catheter combination (Glidesheath group) or a 7.5-Fr sheathless guiding catheter (Sheathless group); 1 : 1 propensity score matching was performed, and 728 patients (364 in each group) were included in the propensity-matched population. In the matched patients, univariate analysis revealed that the Glidesheath group had less radial artery occlusion (RAO) at 30 days (Glidesheath: 1.4% vs. Sheathless: 4.1%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.12-0.91, p=0.039), whereas no significant between-group differences were observed in severe radial spasm (Glidesheath: 1.4% vs. Sheathless: 1.9%, OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.23-2.22, p=0.58) or access-site major bleeding (Glidesheath: 1.4% vs. Sheathless: 1.6%, OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.26-2.71, p=1.00). Multivariate analysis revealed that the choice for Glidesheath was significantly associated with less RAO (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.11-0.93, p=0.036). In conclusion, 7-Fr Glidesheath slender/7-Fr guiding catheter combination is obviously more advantageous than 7.5-Fr sheathless guiding catheters for decreased risk of RAO. The potential low risk of RAO in our findings supports the adoption of the 7-Fr Glidesheath slender sheath/7-Fr guiding catheter combination in transradial PCI for ACS.

Association between valvuloarterial impedance after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 2-year mortality in elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: the OCEAN-TAVI registry.

Pre-procedural valvuloarterial impedance (Zva) is considered as a useful predictor of mortality in patients diagnosed as having severe aortic stenosis (AS) who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, the prognostic significance of post-procedural Zva remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of Zva after TAVI. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and echocardiographic data of 1004 consecutive elderly patients (median 84 years old, 27.5% men) who underwent TAVI for severe symptomatic AS. Zva was calculated after TAVI, and patients were divided into three groups based on tertile values: the high [> 3.33 (n = 335)], intermediate [2.49-3.33 (n = 334)], and low Zva groups [< 2.49 (n = 335)]. The estimated 2-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities using Kaplan-Meier analysis were 16.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.8-20.4] and 5.9% (95% CI 3.2-8.6), respectively. There were no significant intergroup differences in each endpoint (long-rank p = 0.518 for all-cause mortality, p = 0.757 for cardiovascular mortality). Multivariable Cox regression analyzes with adjustments of patient characteristics and medications showed that the post-procedural Zva was not associated with the 2-year all-cause mortality [intermediate Zva group versus (vs.) low Zva group: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.34, 95% CI 0.75-2.40, p = 0.316; high Zva group vs. low Zva group: aHR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.64-2.16, p = 0.613] and cardiovascular mortality (intermediate Zva group vs. low Zva group: aHR = 1.50, 95% CI 0.56-4.06, p = 0.421; high Zva group vs. low Zva group: aHR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.43-3.65, p = 0.682). Our results suggest that post-procedural Zva was not associated with 2-year all-cause or cardiovascular mortalities in patients with severe symptomatic AS who underwent TAVI.