Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 32(12): 3711-3717, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28739308

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is globally endemic and is a leading cause of surgical site infection (SSI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of SSI in MRSA carriers undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty, who had confirmed eradication and to compare it with incidence of SSI in non-MRSA carriers. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 6613 patients who underwent elective total hip arthroplasty (THA; n = 3347) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA; n = 3266) at our institution. A cohort of patients who were preoperatively colonized with MRSA was identified. We compared the infection rates with non-MRSA carriers. RESULTS: We had a colonization rate of 1.3% (83 patients). A total of 79 patients had confirmed eradication of carrier status before surgical intervention. Of these, 38 were THAs and 41 were TKAs. Five of 79 patients (6.32%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.35%-14.79%) had "deep SSI" within 1 year of surgery. There were 2 MRSA infections in THAs (relative risk 4.46; 95% CI: 1.12-17.82). There were 2 MRSA and 1 methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections in TKAs (relative risk 5.61; 95% CI: 1.81-17.38). A significant statistical difference in infection rates from MRSA negative control group was noted, which had a deep sepsis rate of 1.17% in THAs and 1.3% in TKAs over the same period. CONCLUSION: In spite of a selective treatment program for carriers and confirmed eradication, there is still a significantly increased risk of SSI in MRSA-colonized patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasties.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Desinfetantes/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
2.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 16: 154-156, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33717951

RESUMO

The choice of anaesthetic in shoulder surgery is an evolving field of research which has important implications for patient outcomes. We have performed a prospective study to assess the usability of an interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) with sedation as the primary anaesthetic and analgesic for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Our study assessed the requirements of analgesia peri-operatively and post operatively and found that patients had no requirement (n = 30) and minimal requirements with a low pain score (visual analogue score; mean 2.4, range 2-5) respectively. We also found that patients spent a short amount of time in recovery (31 min mean, range 21-48 min) and were able to be discharged on the same day. Our findings suggest that ISBPB with sedation is a viable option in arthroscopic shoulder surgery for a variety of procedures with positive effects for patient outcomes and mobility.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA