Individual and Systems-Based Risk Factors for Diabetic Vitrectomy in an Urban Safety-Net Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To identify individual and systems-focused risk factors for pars plana vitrectomy among patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in a diverse, urban, safety-net hospital setting. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective, observational, case-control study at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center between 2017 and 2022. SUBJECTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients with PDR over a 5-year span (2017-2022), consisting of 111 cases who underwent vitrectomy for vision-threatening complications (tractional retinal detachment, nonclearing vitreous hemorrhage, and neovascular glaucoma) and 111 controls with PDR with no history of vitrectomy or vision-threatening complications. Controls were matched 1:1 through incidence density sampling. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed from time of entry into hospital system to vitrectomy date (or date-matched clinic visit for controls). Individual-focused exposures included age, gender, ethnicity, language, homelessness, incarceration, smoking status, area deprivation index, insurance status, baseline retinopathy stage, baseline visual acuity, baseline hemoglobin A1c, panretinal photocoagulation status, and cumulative anti-VEGF treatments. System-focused exposures included external department involvement, referral route, time within hospital and ophthalmology systems, interval between screening and ophthalmology appointment, interval between conversion to proliferative disease and panretinal photocoagulation or first treatment, and loss-to-follow-up in intervals of active proliferative disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios (ORs) for each exposure on vision-threatening diabetic complications requiring vitrectomy. RESULTS: The absence of panretinal photocoagulation was the primary significant individual-focused risk factor for vitrectomy in the multivariable analysis (OR, 4.78; P = 0.011). Systems-focused risk factors included longer interval between PDR diagnosis and initial treatment (weeks; OR, 1.06; P = 0.024) and greater cumulative duration of loss-to-follow-up during intervals of active PDR (months; OR, 1.10; P = 0.002). Greater duration in the ophthalmology system was the primary systems-focused protective factor against vitrectomy (years; OR, 0.75; P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Largely modifiable variables modulate risk of complications requiring diabetic vitrectomy. Each additional month of loss-to-follow-up for patients with active proliferative disease increased odds of vitrectomy by 10%. Optimizing modifiable factors to promote earlier treatment and maintain critical follow-up in proliferative disease may reduce vision-threatening complications requiring vitrectomy in a safety-net hospital setting. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Clinical and Visual Field Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery Combined with Cataract Surgery.

Purpose: To determine the change in Humphrey visual field and clinical parameters after minimally invasive glaucoma surgery combined with cataract surgery. Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing minimally invasive glaucoma surgery combined with cataract surgery in a multicenter retrospective case series between 2013 and 2021 with reliable preoperative and 12 to 18 month postoperative visual field measurements were included. Devices included iStent, XEN, and Hydrus. Clinical parameters were compared with a generalized linear model with generalized estimating equations between preoperative and postoperative visits including best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, number of glaucoma medications and visual fields. Visual field metrics included mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), visual field index (VFI), and Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) score of total deviation probability and pattern deviation probability. Results: Forty-four eyes from 39 patients were included. During the follow up period, visual acuity improved from 0.23±0.17 to 0.10±0.14 logMAR (mean ± standard deviation, p<0.001), number of glaucoma medications was reduced from 2.68±1.06 to 1.46±1.32 (p<0.001), and intraocular pressure decreased from 17.08±4.23 mmHg to 14.92±3.13 mmHg (p=0.003). Differences across devices were negligible. The only significant difference was a greater reduction in number of glaucoma medications in the XEN group (p<0.001). There were no significant changes in the global parameters of VFI, MD, PSD, or CIGTS. Conclusion: Overall, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery combined with cataract surgery appears to be effective at stabilizing visual field function, reducing intraocular pressure, reducing number of glaucoma medications, and improving visual acuity over a 12 to 18 month follow-up period across MIGS devices.