Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Circ J ; 2022 Nov 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36403975

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Whether nerve block improves the quality of conscious sedation (CS) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unclear. This study investigated whether fascia iliaca block (FIB) reduced the remifentanil requirement and relieved pain in CS for TAVI.Methods and Results: This prospective study randomized 72 patients scheduled for elective TAVI under CS into 2 groups, with (FIB) and without (control) FIB (n=36 in each group). The sedation targeted a Bispectral Index <90 with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of -2 to -1. Dexmedetomidine (0.7 µg/kg, i.v.) combined with remifentanil (0.03 µg/kg/min, i.v.) and propofol (0.3 mg/kg/h, i.v.) was used to commence sedation. FIB using 30 mL of 0.185% ropivacaine was implemented 2 min before TAVI. Patient sedation was maintained with dexmedetomidine (0.4 µg/kg/h, i.v.) supplemented with remifentanil (0-0.02 µg/kg/min, i.v.). Remifentanil (20 µg, i.v.) was used as a rescue dose for intraprocedural pain. Compared with the control group, FIB reduced the both the total (median [interquartile range] 83.0 [65.0-98.0] vs. 34.5 [26.0/45.8)] µg; P<0.001) and continuous (25.3 [20.9/31.5] vs. 9.5 [6.8/12.5] ng/kg/min; P<0.001) doses of remifentanil administered. CONCLUSIONS: FIB reduced the remifentanil requirement and relieved pain in patients undergoing TAVI with CS. Therefore, FIB improved the quality of CS in TAVI.

2.
Health Sci Rep ; 6(9): e1586, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37752975

RESUMO

Background and Aims: In cases of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) accompanied by heavily calcified lesions, endovascular treatment becomes necessary at times. To effectively address these challenging calcified lesions, we developed an innovative approach named WINNER (Wingman's bevel tip inner catheter removal) technique. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of a novel method using the WINNER technique. Methods: This was a two-center, prospective observational study. We analyzed the clinical data of patients with LEAD complicated with severely calcified lesions who underwent the WINNER technique between January 2021 and December 2022. We investigated the patients' characteristics, target lesions, and intervention results in terms of crossing device rates and periprocedural complications. Results: A total of 35 patients were treated using the WINNER technique for LEAD complicated by severely calcified lesions. Key patient characteristics were a mean age of 75 ± 9 years, 83% male, 71% hemodialysis, 60% chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and mean lesion length of 147 ± 88 mm. Using the WINNER technique, a device crossing was achieved in 34 patients (97.1%). Wire perforation occurred in one patient, and WINNER catheter rupture occurred in three patients. Conclusions: The WINNER technique is useful for treating severely calcified lesions, and we should consider using this technique to cross devices for lesions with severe calcifications.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA