Ames test study designs for nitrosamine mutagenicity testing: qualitative and quantitative analysis of key assay parameters.

The robust control of genotoxic N-nitrosamine (NA) impurities is an important safety consideration for the pharmaceutical industry, especially considering recent drug product withdrawals. NAs belong to the 'cohort of concern' list of genotoxic impurities (ICH M7) because of the mutagenic and carcinogenic potency of this chemical class. In addition, regulatory concerns exist regarding the capacity of the Ames test to predict the carcinogenic potential of NAs because of historically discordant results. The reasons postulated to explain these discordant data generally point to aspects of Ames test study design. These include vehicle solvent choice, liver S9 species, bacterial strain, compound concentration, and use of pre-incubation versus plate incorporation methods. Many of these concerns have their roots in historical data generated prior to the harmonization of Ames test guidelines. Therefore, we investigated various Ames test assay parameters and used qualitative analysis and quantitative benchmark dose modelling to identify which combinations provided the most sensitive conditions in terms of mutagenic potency. Two alkyl-nitrosamines, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) were studied. NDMA and NDEA mutagenicity was readily detected in the Ames test and key assay parameters were identified that contributed to assay sensitivity rankings. The pre-incubation method (30-min incubation), appropriate vehicle (water or methanol), and hamster-induced liver S9, alongside Salmonella typhimurium strains TA100 and TA1535 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA(pKM101) provide the most sensitive combination of assay parameters in terms of NDMA and NDEA mutagenic potency in the Ames test. Using these parameters and further quantitative benchmark dose modelling, we show that N-nitrosomethylethylamine (NMEA) is positive in Ames test and therefore should no longer be considered a historically discordant NA. The results presented herein define a sensitive Ames test design that can be deployed for the assessment of NAs to support robust impurity qualifications.

Resolution of Historically Discordant Ames Test Negative / Rodent Carcinogenicity Positive N-nitrosamines using a Sensitive, OECD-aligned Design.

The in vitro Bacterial Reverse Mutation (Ames) Test is crucial for evaluating the mutagenicity of pharmaceutical impurities. For N-nitrosamines (NAs) historical data indicated that for certain members of this chemical class the outcomes of the Ames Test did not correlate with their associated rodent carcinogenicity outcomes. This has resulted in negative outcomes in an OECD aligned Ames Test alone (standard or enhanced) no longer being considered sufficient by regulatory authorities to assess potential carcinogenic risk of NAs if present as impurities in drug products. Consequently, extensive follow-up in vivo testing can be required to characterise the potential mutagenicity and genotoxic carcinogenicity of NA impurities (i.e., beyond that defined in the ICH M7 guideline for non-NA impurities). We previously demonstrated that the mutagenicity of alkyl-nitrosamines can be detected by the appropriately designed, OECD aligned Ames Test and identified those conditions that contributed most to assay sensitivity. This OECD aligned Ames Test design was used to assess seven NAs, i.e. (methyl(neopentyl)nitrosamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-2-propanamine, N-nitrosodiisopropylamine, bis(2-methoxyethyl)nitrosoamine, N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-fluoroaniline, dinitrosoethambutol, (R,R)- and mononitrosocaffeidine) that were reported to be negative in historical Ames Tests but positive in rodent carcinogenicity studies. All seven of the NAs were demonstrated to be mutagenic in the OECD aligned Ames test and therefore these compounds should no longer be considered as discordant (false negatives) with respect to the correlation of the Ames Test and rodent carcinogenicity. These results confirm the sensitivity of the OECD aligned Ames Test for the detection of NA mutagenicity and provides further support of its pivotal placement within the ICH M7 framework for the assessment of mutagenic impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk. In addition, we present data for 1-cyclopentyl-4-nitrosopiperazine, that indicates it could serve as a suitable positive control to provide further confidence in the sensitivity of the Ames Test for the NA chemical class.

The exploration of aza-quinolines as hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase (H-PGDS) inhibitors with low brain exposure.

GlaxoSmithKline and Astex Pharmaceuticals recently disclosed the discovery of the potent H-PGDS inhibitor GSK2894631A 1a (IC50 = 9.9 nM) as part of a fragment-based drug discovery collaboration with Astex Pharmaceuticals. This molecule exhibited good murine pharmacokinetics, allowing it to be utilized to explore H-PGDS pharmacology in vivo. Yet, with prolonged dosing at higher concentrations, 1a induced CNS toxicity. Looking to attenuate brain penetration in this series, aza-quinolines, were prepared with the intent of increasing polar surface area. Nitrogen substitutions at the 6- and 8-positions of the quinoline were discovered to be tolerated by the enzyme. Subsequent structure activity studies in these aza-quinoline scaffolds led to the identification of 1,8-naphthyridine 1y (IC50 = 9.4 nM) as a potent peripherally restricted H-PGDS inhibitor. Compound 1y is efficacious in four in vivo inflammatory models and exhibits no CNS toxicity.