Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the heart rate response to stress during airway intubations in clinical practice and a simulated environment. METHODS: Twenty-five critical care registrars participated in the study over a 3-month period. Heart rate data during intubations was recorded by a FitBit® Charge 2 worn by each participant during their clinical practice, and during a single simulated airway management scenario. The heart rate range was calculated by subtracting the baseline working heart rate (BWHR) from the maximum functional heart rate (MFHR). For each airway intubation performed participants recorded an airway diary entry. Data from intubations performed in the clinical environment was compared to data from a simulated environment. Heart rate changes were observed in two ways: percentage rise (median) across the 20-min intubation period and; percentage rise at point of intubation (median). RESULTS: Eighteen critical care registrars completed the study, mean age 31.8 years (SD = 2.015, 95% CI = 30.85-32.71). Throughout the 20-min peri-intubation recording period there was no significant difference in the median change in heart rates between the clinical (14.72%) and simulation (15.96%) environment (p = 0.149). At the point of intubation there was no significant difference in the median change in heart rate between the clinical (16.03%) and the simulation (25.65%) environment groups (p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: In this small population of critical care trainees, a simulation scenario induced a comparable heart rate response to the clinical environment during intubation. This provides evidence that simulation scenarios are able to induce a comparable physiological stress response to the clinical environment and thus facilitates effective teaching of a high-risk procedure in a safe manner.

Development, implementation, and evaluation of a trauma-informed simulation-based training program for graduate nurses: A single arm feasibility and pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The chance of hospital staff encountering a patient with a trauma history is high. The way health services are offered and carried out are important when engaging with people who have experienced trauma. Implementing training in trauma-informed care (TIC) is part of a cultural change of benefit to both patients and staff. Simulation-based training is a well-accepted method to reduce staff fear and anxiety when working with individuals in distress and to address issues relating to bias and stigma. OBJECTIVES: To provide simulation-based TIC training to graduate nurses. DESIGN: A three-phase process was undertaken to i) create the intervention, ii) determine feasibility, and iii) evaluate the developed training. SETTING: A 600-bed inner-city tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Victoria. PARTICIPANTS: Graduate nurses undertaking their first year of employment (n = 23). METHODS: The content of the training was created using evidence derived from a literature review, a scoping study of available resources, and expert consensus. A pre/post-test within-groups design to assess the safety, acceptability, and effectiveness of the training was undertaken. RESULTS: The Trauma Informed-Simulation Based Training (TI-SBT) aims to increase TIC knowledge and promote TIC behaviours. It is delivered face-to-face over one day and encompasses an education component followed by three immersive patient simulations using professional actors. Analysis found significant improvement in TIC knowledge (p ≤ 0.001, 95% CI = -3.53, -0.47) and behaviours (p = 0.013, 95% CI = -8.88, -5.03). No significant differences were found in measures of anxiety and confidence. Satisfaction with all aspects of the training was high. Qualitatively, participants provided concrete examples of changes to their practice to facilitate TIC. CONCLUSIONS: The developed and novel TI-SBT is a feasible (safe, acceptable, and effective) way of introducing TIC to graduate nurses. These findings provide strong evidence to support a more rigorous evaluation of the training by randomised controlled trial. The TI-SBT has the capacity to not only improve patient care but the experience of hospital staff.