Minimal residual disease-guided stop and start of venetoclax plus ibrutinib for patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (HOVON141/VISION): primary analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Targeted time-limited treatment options are needed for patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided, time-limited ibrutinib plus venetoclax treatment in this patient group. METHODS: HOVON141/VISION was an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial conducted in 47 hospitals in Belgium, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with or without TP53 aberrations; had not been exposed to Bruton tyrosine-kinase inhibitors or BCL2 inhibitors; had a creatinine clearance rate of 30 mL/min or more; and required treatment according to International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 2018 criteria. Participants with undetectable MRD (<10-4; less than one chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cell per 10 000 leukocytes) in peripheral blood and bone marrow after 15 28-day cycles of oral ibrutinib (420 mg once daily) plus oral venetoclax (weekly ramp-up 20 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, up to 400 mg once daily) were randomly assigned (1:2) to ibrutinib maintenance or treatment cessation. Patients who were MRD positive continued to receive ibrutinib monotherapy. Patients who became MRD (>10-2) during observation reinitiated treatment with ibrutinib plus venetoclax. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 12 months after random assignment in the treatment cessation group. Progression-free survival was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. All patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety assessment. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03226301, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between July 12, 2017, and Jan 21, 2019, 230 patients were enrolled, 225 of whom were eligible. 188 (84%) of 225 completed treatment with ibrutinib plus venetoclax and were tested for MRD at cycle 15. After cycle 15, 78 (35%) patients had undetectable MRD and 72 (32%) were randomly assigned to a treatment group (24 to ibrutinib maintenance and 48 to treatment cessation). The remaining 153 patients were not randomly assigned and continued with ibrutinib monotherapy. Median follow-up of 208 patients still alive and not lost to follow-up at data cutoff on June 22, 2021, was 34·4 months (IQR 30·6-37·9). Progression-free survival after 12 months in the treatment cessation group was 98% (95% CI 89-100). Infections (in 130 [58%] of 225 patients), neutropenia (in 91 [40%] patients), and gastrointestinal adverse events (in 53 [24%] patients) were the most frequently reported; no new safety signals were detected. Serious adverse events were reported in 46 (40%) of 116 patients who were not randomly assigned and who continued ibrutinib maintenance after cycle 15, eight (33%) of 24 patients in the ibrutinib maintenance group, and four (8%) of 48 patients in the treatment cessation group. One patient who was not randomly assigned had a fatal adverse event (bleeding) deemed possibly related to ibrutinib. INTERPRETATION: These data point to a favourable benefit-risk profile of MRD-guided, time-limited treatment with ibrutinib plus venetoclax for patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, suggesting that MRD-guided cessation and reinitiation is feasible in this patient population. FUNDING: AbbVie and Janssen.

Measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: expert review and consensus recommendations.

Assessment of measurable residual disease (often referred to as "minimal residual disease") has emerged as a highly sensitive indicator of disease burden during and at the end of treatment and has been correlated with time-to-event outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Undetectable-measurable residual disease status at the end of treatment demonstrated independent prognostic significance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, correlating with favorable progression-free and overall survival with chemoimmunotherapy. Given its utility in evaluating depth of response, determining measurable residual disease status is now a focus of outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia clinical trials. Increased adoption of measurable residual disease assessment calls for standards for nomenclature and outcomes data reporting. In addition, many basic questions have not been systematically addressed. Here, we present the work of an international, multidisciplinary, 174-member panel convened to identify critical questions on key issues pertaining to measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, review evaluable data, develop unified answers in conjunction with local expert input, and provide recommendations for future studies. Recommendations are presented regarding methodology for measurable residual disease determination, assay requirements and in which tissue to assess measurable residual disease, timing and frequency of assessment, use of measurable residual disease in clinical practice versus clinical trials, and the future usefulness of measurable residual disease assessment. Nomenclature is also proposed. Adoption of these recommendations will work toward standardizing data acquisition and interpretation in future studies with new treatments with the ultimate objective of improving outcomes and curing chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Changes in primary and secondary hemostasis in patients with CLL treated with venetoclax and ibrutinib.

Bleeding is a common adverse event following ibrutinib monotherapy. However, it remains unclear how hemostasis is affected by venetoclax in combination with ibrutinib. Here we investigated hemostasis in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) at baseline, during ibrutinib monotherapy, and during venetoclax and ibrutinib combination therapy or venetoclax monotherapy. Primary hemostasis, assessed by Multiplate using adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (AA), and thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP-6), was impaired in all CLL patients at baseline, remained unchanged upon ibrutinib monotherapy, and improved significantly following venetoclax added to ibrutinib or as monotherapy. Secondary hemostasis assessed by thromboelastography (TEG) was normal and unchanged throughout treatment. The frequency of clinical bleeding events was the highest during ibrutinib monotherapy, in line with the demonstrated improved primary hemostasis upon addition of venetoclax, thus pointing toward a treatment option for CLL patients with increased bleeding risk.

The reversal effect of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), activated PCC and recombinant activated factor VII in apixaban-treated patients in vitro.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients under treatment with FXa inhibitors is increasing, but there is no concensus on how to reverse their anticoagulant effect in case of a life-threatening bleeding. A specific antidote is not yet commercially available. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), activated PCC (aPCC) and recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) are suggested available reversal agents. OBJECTIVES: To find the most effective reversal agent to apixaban and to determine the optimal dose. PATIENTS/METHODS: PCC, aPCC, and rFVIIa at concentrations imitating 80%, 100%, and 125% of suggested therapeutic doses were added to blood drawn from apixaban-treated patients (n=30). aPCC was also tested in a 50% dose. Samples from healthy subjects (n=40) were used as controls. Thromboelastometry in whole blood (WB) and thrombin generation in platelet-poor plasma (PPP) were measured to assess the reversal effect. RESULTS: aPCC shortened clotting time (CT) in WB, and increased the peak thrombin concentration and velocity index in PPP to a greater extent than PCC and rFVIIa. No significant differences were seen between rFVIIa and aPCC on thrombin generation lag time, or between PCC and aPCC on endogenous thrombin potential (ETP). The 50% dose of aPCC had a slightly inferior effect, but was comparable to the other reversal agents. CONCLUSIONS: In this in vitro study the 80% dose of aPCC (40 IU/kg) reversed the anticoagulant effect of apixaban more effectively than the corresponding dose of rFVIIa and PCC both in WB (CT) and PPP (peak, ETP).