RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Incidence of anal cancer (AC) caused by persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has risen in the last years in men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV. There is consensus that this population should be screened for anal precancerous lesions, but the role of HPV DNA testing in AC screening programmes is still under debate. OBJECTIVES: This study employed two molecular test to detect anal HPV DNA and compared assay performance and prognostic value for the diagnosis of histology proven high-grade intraepithelial anal lesions. METHODS: MSM living with HIV attended their regular check-up visits consisting of detection of anal HPV infection, anal cytology, digital anorectal examination and high resolution anoscopy. HPV DNA was detected using Hybrid Capture 2 High-Risk test (HC2, total assay) and LINEAR ARRAY HPV Genotyping Test (LA, type-specific assay) RESULTS: Among 274 participant, prevalence of HPV DNA was 48.5% by HC2 and 89.4% by LA. HPV16 (30.6%) and HPV6 (19.6%) were the most common genotypes identified. Prevalence of multiple HPV infections was 56.2%. Agreement between HPV DNA assays was 75.2% (κ=0.51; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.60). Total HPV detection demonstrated high sensitivity (90%; 95% CI 68.3 to 98.8) and moderate specificity (58.4%; 95% CI 50.2 to 66.3), while type-specific HPV16/18 genotyping provided an increase in specificity and showed the highest area under the curve (0.81; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89) and Youden's index (0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Both methodologies identified a high prevalence of anal HPV infection and multiple HPV infections in MSM living with HIV, showing a moderate overall agreement between them. Either total HPV detection or type-specific HPV16/18 detection together with a threshold ≥atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance for abnormal cytology showed an acceptable diagnostic accuracy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Ânus , Infecções por HIV , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Masculino , Humanos , Homossexualidade Masculina , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Papillomavirus Humano , Papillomavirus Humano 16 , Papillomavirus Humano 18 , Canal Anal , Neoplasias do Ânus/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Ânus/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Ânus/patologia , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , PrevalênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recently, positive circumferential resection margin has been found to be an indicator of advanced disease with a high risk of distant recurrence rather than local recurrence. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to analyze the prognostic impact of the circumferential resection margin on long-term oncological outcomes in patients with rectal cancer. DESIGN: This was a multicenter, propensity score-matched (2:1) analysis comparing the positive and negative circumferential resection margins. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at 5 high-volume centers in Spain. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent total mesorectal excision with curative intent for middle-low rectal cancer between 2006 and 2014 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes were local recurrence, distant recurrence, overall survival, and disease-free survival. RESULTS: The unmatched initial cohort consisted of 1599 patients, of whom 4.9% had a positive circumferential resection margin. After matching, 234 patients were included (156 with a negative circumferential margin and 78 with a positive circumferential margin). The median follow-up period was 52.5 (22.0-69.5) months. Local recurrence was significantly higher in patients with a positive circumferential margin (33.3% vs 11.5%; p < 0.001). Distant recurrence was similar in both groups (46.2% vs 42.3%; p = 0.651). There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year overall survival (48.6% vs 43.6%; p = 0.14). Disease-free survival was lower in patients with a positive circumferential margin (36.1% vs 52.3%; p = 0.026). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design. The different neoadjuvant treatment options were not included in the propensity score. CONCLUSIONS: The positive circumferential resection margin was associated with a higher local recurrence rate and worse disease-free survival in comparison with the negative circumferential resection margin. However, the positive circumferential resection margin was not a prognostic indicator of distant recurrence and overall survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B950 . VALOR PRONSTICO DEL MARGEN DE RESECCIN CIRCUNFERENCIAL DESPUS DE LA CIRUGA CURATIVA PARA EL CNCER DE RECTO UN ANLISIS MULTICNTRICO EMPAREJADO POR PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIN: ANTECEDENTES:En los últimos años, se ha encontrado que el margen de resección circunferencial positivo es un indicador de enfermedad avanzada con alto riesgo de recurrencia a distancia más que de recurrencia local.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue analizar el impacto pronóstico del margen de resección circunferencial sobre la recidiva local, a distancia y las tasas de supervivencia en pacientes con cáncer de recto.DISEÑO:Este fue un análisis multicéntrico emparejado por puntaje de propensión 2: 1 que comparó el margen de resección circunferencial positivo y negativo.AJUSTES:El estudio se realizó en 5 centros Españoles de alto volumen.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a escisión total de mesorrecto con intención curativa por cáncer de recto medio-bajo entre 2006-2014. Las características clínicas e histológicas se utilizaron para el emparejamiento.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultadoes principales fueron la recurrencia local, la recurrencia a distancia, la supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad.RESULTADOS:La cohorte inicial no emparejada consistió en 1599 pacientes; El 4,9% tuvo un margen de resección circunferencial positivo. Tras el emparejamiento se incluyeron 234 pacientes (156 con margen circunferencial negativo y 78 con margen circunferencial positivo). La mediana del período de seguimiento fue de 52,5 meses (22,0-69,5). La recurrencia local fue significativamente mayor en pacientes con margen circunferencial positivo, 33,3% vs 11,5% [HR 3,2; IC 95%: 1,83-5,43; p < 0,001]. La recidiva a distancia fue similar en ambos grupos (46,2 % frente a 42,3 %) [HR 1,09, IC 95 %: 0,78-1,90; p = 0,651]. No hubo diferencias significativas en la supervivencia global a 5 años (48,6 % frente a 43,6 %) [HR 1,09, IC 95 %: 0,92-1,78; p = 0,14]; La supervivencia libre de enfermedad fue menor en pacientes con margen circunferencial positivo, 36,1% vs 52,3% [HR 1,5; IC 95%: 1,05-2,06; p = 0,026].LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por el diseño retrospectivo. Las diferentes opciones de tratamientos neoadyuvantes no se han incluido en la puntuación de propensión.CONCLUSIONES:El margen de resección circunferencial positivo se asocia con una mayor tasa de recurrencia local y peor supervivencia libre de enfermedad en comparación con el margen de resección circunferencial negativo. Sin embargo, el margen de resección circunferencial positivo no fue un indicador pronóstico de recidiva a distancia ni de supervivencia global. Consulte el Video del Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B950 . (Traducción- Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).
Assuntos
Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Prognóstico , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Reto/cirurgia , Margens de Excisão , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Both transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy are safe for grade III to IV hemorrhoid treatment. Whether one of them is superior regarding long-term results remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term results after transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at 6 centers. PATIENTS: Patients ≥18 years of age with grade III to IV hemorrhoids were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (n = 39) or vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy (n = 41). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was hemorrhoid symptom recurrence assessed by a specific questionnaire 2 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included long-term complications, reoperations, fecal continence, and patient satisfaction and quality of life. RESULTS: Five of the 80 patients included in the study were lost to follow-up. Thirty-six patients randomly assigned to transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and 39 patients randomly assigned to vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy were included in the long-term analysis. The differences between mean baseline and mean 2-year score in the 2 groups were similar (-11.0, SD 3.8 vs -12.5, SD 3.6; p = 0.080). Three patients in the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization group underwent supplementary procedures for hemorrhoid symptoms, compared with none in the vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy group ( p = 0.106). Four patients in the vessel-sealing hemorrhoidectomy group and none in the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization group experienced chronic opened wound ( p = 0.116). LIMITATIONS: Lack of stratification for hemorrhoid grade and power calculation based on the main outcome trial but not on the end point of this long-term study. CONCLUSIONS: Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy is associated with hemorrhoid symptom recurrence similar to vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy at 2 years. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B933 . REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ; ID: NCT02654249. DESARTERIALIZACIN HEMORROIDAL TRANSANAL CON MUCOPEXIA VERSUS HEMORROIDECTOMA CON DISPOSITIVO DE SELLADO DE VASOS PARA HEMORROIDES DE GRADO IIIIV RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DEL ENSAYO CLNICO ALEATORIZADO THDLIGARCT: ANTECEDENTES:Tanto la desarterialización hemorroidal transanal como la hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos son seguras y bien toleradas para el tratamiento de las hemorroides de grado III-IV. La primera se asocia con una necesidad más breve de analgesia posoperatoria que la hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos. No está claro si uno de ellos es superior con respecto a los resultados a largo plazo.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue comparar los resultados a largo plazo después de la desarterialización hemorroidal transanal y la hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos.DISEÑO:Se realizó un ensayo clínico aleatorizado multicéntrico.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en 6 centros.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron en el estudio pacientes de ≥18 años con hemorroides de grado III-IV.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron asignados al azar a desarterialización hemorroidal transanal (n = 39) o hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos (n = 41).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la recurrencia de los síntomas de hemorroides evaluada mediante un cuestionario específico 2 años después de la operación. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron complicaciones a largo plazo, reoperaciones, continencia fecal, satisfacción del paciente y calidad de vida.RESULTADOS:Cinco de los 80 pacientes incluidos en el estudio se perdieron durante el seguimiento. En el análisis a largo plazo se incluyeron 36 pacientes aleatorizados a desarterialización hemorroidal transanal y 39 aleatorizados a hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos. Las diferencias entre la puntuación inicial media y la puntuación media a los 2 años en los dos grupos fueron similares (-11,0, DE 3,8 frente a -12,5, DE 3,6; p = 0,080). Tres pacientes en el grupo de desarterialización hemorroidal transanal se sometieron a procedimientos complementarios por síntomas de hemorroides, en comparación con ninguno en el grupo de hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos (p = 0,106). Cuatro pacientes en el grupo de hemorroidectomía con sellado de vasos y ninguno en el grupo de desarterialización hemorroidal transanal experimentaron herida abierta crónica (p = 0,116). No se encontraron diferencias en cuanto a continencia fecal (p = 0,657), satisfacción del paciente (p = 0,483) y calidad de vida.LIMITACIONES:No hay estratificación para el grado de hemorroides ni el cálculo del poder basado en el resultado principal del ensayo, pero no en el criterio de valoración de este estudio a largo plazo.CONCLUSIONES:La desarterialización hemorroidal transanal con mucopexia se asocia con una recurrencia de síntomas de hemorroides similar a la hemorroidectomía con dispositivo de sellado de vasos a los dos años. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B933 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon )REGISTRO DE PRUEBA:Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02654249).
Assuntos
Hemorroidectomia , Hemorroidas , Humanos , Hemorroidas/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Reto/cirurgia , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Benchmark comparisons in surgery allow identification of gaps in the quality of care provided. The aim of this study was to determine quality thresholds for high (HAR) and low (LAR) anterior resections in colorectal cancer surgery by applying the concept of benchmarking. METHODS: This 5-year multinational retrospective study included patients who underwent anterior resection for cancer in 19 high-volume centres on five continents. Benchmarks were defined for 11 relevant postoperative variables at discharge, 3 months, and 6 months (for LAR). Benchmarks were calculated for two separate cohorts: patients without (ideal) and those with (non-ideal) outcome-relevant co-morbidities. Benchmark cut-offs were defined as the 75th percentile of each centre's median value. RESULTS: A total of 3903 patients who underwent HAR and 3726 who had LAR for cancer were analysed. After 3 months' follow-up, the mortality benchmark in HAR for ideal and non-ideal patients was 0.0 versus 3.0 per cent, and in LAR it was 0.0 versus 2.2 per cent. Benchmark results for anastomotic leakage were 5.0 versus 6.9 per cent for HAR, and 13.6 versus 11.8 per cent for LAR. The overall morbidity benchmark in HAR was a Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) score of 8.6 versus 14.7, and that for LAR was CCI® score 11.9 versus 18.3. CONCLUSION: Regular comparison of individual-surgeon or -unit outcome data against benchmark thresholds may identify gaps in care quality that can improve patient outcome.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal , Protectomia , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Benchmarking , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) are a vulnerable group for anal cancer (AC), a cancer with a well-described precursor lesion, which can be detected early in screening programs using anal liquid-based cytology (aLBC). We aim to compare two aLBC sample collection devices: cytology brush (CB) and Dacron swab (DS). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of two consecutive study periods, the first using CB and the second DS. Participants underwent an aLBC, a human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA test and a high-resolution anoscopy (HRA), and a biopsy was performed for suspicious lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of aLBC, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), and concordance between cytology and HRA were assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 239 participants were enrolled (CB group, 120; DS group, 119). aLBC was benign in 46% of samples, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) was detected in 11.7%. Prevalence of biopsy-proven HSIL was 15.3%. No differences in cytological and histological results were observed between the groups. aLBC-HRA concordance was weak for benign results (CB group, k = 0.309; DS group, k = 0.350) as well as for HSIL (k = 0.321 and 0.387, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 51.4%, respectively, in the CB group and 88% and 54.3% in the DS group (AUC = 0.711 and 0.759, respectively, P-value = .514). Representation of the transformation zone (TZ) was adequate in 83.3% of samples in the CB group and 50.4% in the DS group (P-value <.001). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that both devices had similar accuracy to detect anal HSIL, although samples collected with CB are more likely to have an adequate TZ representation, the presence of which could be an indicator of sample quality.
Assuntos
Canal Anal/patologia , Neoplasias do Ânus/patologia , Infecções por HIV/patologia , Soropositividade para HIV/patologia , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Adulto , Neoplasias do Ânus/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Ânus/virologia , Biópsia/métodos , Citodiagnóstico/métodos , Técnicas Citológicas/métodos , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Soropositividade para HIV/diagnóstico , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papillomaviridae/patogenicidade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Lesões Intraepiteliais Escamosas/diagnóstico , Lesões Intraepiteliais Escamosas/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy and vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy seem to reduce postoperative pain compared with classic excisional hemorrhoidectomy, but whether one of them is superior remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We compared transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy and vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy. DESIGN: This was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The study was conducted at 6 Spanish centers. PATIENTS: Patients aged ≥18 years with grade III to IV hemorrhoids were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy (n = 39) or vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy (n = 41). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the mean postoperative number of days in which patients needed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, 30-day morbidity, patient satisfaction, Vaizey score, hemorrhoid symptoms score, return to work, and quality of life. RESULTS: More patients were still taking analgesia in the vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy group during the second postoperative week compared with the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy group (87.8% vs 53.8%; p = 0.002). For the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy group, analgesia consumption continued until day 10.1 (mean; SD = 7.22 d), whereas in the vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy group it continued until day 15.2 (mean; SD = 8.70 d; p = 0.006). The mean daily average pain was similar during the first (p = 0.900) and second postoperative weeks (p = 0.265). Mean operative time was higher for the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy group versus the vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy group (45 min; range, 40-60 vs 20 min; range, 15-41 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications rate, use of laxatives, patient satisfaction, Vaizey score, hemorrhoids symptoms score, return to work, and quality of life at 1 month after surgery were similar between groups. LIMITATIONS: The main limitation of this study was that the 2 groups did not contain equal numbers of grade III and IV hemorrhoids. CONCLUSIONS: Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy is associated with a shorter need for postoperative analgesia compared with vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A915. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02654249.
Assuntos
Artérias/cirurgia , Hemorroidectomia/instrumentação , Hemorroidas/cirurgia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Satisfação do Paciente , Reto/irrigação sanguínea , Canal Anal , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemorroidas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Incidência , Ligadura/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reto/diagnóstico por imagem , Reto/cirurgia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors related with failure of conservative management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) in patients with previous colorectal surgery. METHODS: Patients admitted with the diagnosis of ASBO after previous colorectal resection, were included. All patients underwent administration of Gastrografin®. Abdominal radiography was done after 24 h, to confirm the presence of contrast in colon (incomplete obstruction) or not (complete obstruction). Several factors were investigated to study their relationship with the failure of conservative management. Failure of conservative management was considered when emergency operation was needed to solve ASBO. RESULTS: Incomplete obstruction was observed in 174 episodes (93.0%) while in 13 (7.0%) was complete. One hundred seventy-one ASBO episodes (91.4%) responded successfully to nonoperative treatment and 16 (8.6%) required emergency surgery. Five patients needed bowel resection. Results on the diagnostic test with Gastrografin® showed a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 99%, positive predictive value 92%, and negative predictive value 98%. Age over 75 years was the only predictive factor for failure of conservative management. The median waiting time from the radiologic confirmation of complete obstruction to surgery was higher in patients requiring bowel resection when compared to those who did not need resection. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Gastrografin® in ASBO after colorectal resection is a safe and useful tool for the indication of conservative management. Age over 75 years is a predictive factor for need of surgery. Surgery should be performed no later than the following 24 h of confirmed complete obstruction.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal/efeitos adversos , Tratamento Conservador , Diatrizoato de Meglumina/uso terapêutico , Obstrução Intestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Aderências Teciduais/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether patients that underwent ultra-low rectal resection for cancer can benefit from the recently reintroduced two-stage Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through procedure. METHODS: Patients with low rectal tumors undergoing radical sphincter-sparing resection are eligible for inclusion in a randomized multicenter study. Whether two-stage Turnbull-Cutait coloanal anastomosis provides significant benefits over hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis and associated lateral ileostomy in terms of postoperative morbidity is the primary endpoint. In addition, the study aims to assess secondary endpoints such as quality of life, fecal incontinence, and locoregional recurrence of the neoplasm. Patients with adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum diagnosed by rigid proctoscopy, with histological confirmation of malignancy, and who are candidates of rectal removal and coloanal anastomosis will be included in a randomized controlled and multicenter trial. Postoperative morbidity is defined as complications that occur within 30 days of the data of the second surgical procedure of the last patient included in the trial. Patients will be followed for a minimum period of 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The two-stage Turnbull-Cutait coloanal anastomosis may constitute an effective surgical alternative in the current approach to the treatment of low rectal cancer without the need of a temporary loop colostomy, preventing the wide range of complications related to stoma surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (trial number: NCT01766661). This trial is registered in January 10, 2013.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Colo/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Ileostomia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Canal Anal/patologia , Canal Anal/fisiopatologia , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Protocolos Clínicos , Colo/patologia , Colo/fisiopatologia , Defecação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Motilidade Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/fisiopatologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Risco , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
AIM: To assess factors independently associated with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) following resection or rectal cancer. METHOD: Cross-sectional study carried out in two acute-care teaching hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. Patients who had undergone sphincter preserving low anterior resection with curative intent, with total or partial mesorectal excision (with and without protective ileostomy) between January 2001 and December 2009 completed a self-administered questionnaire to assess bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery. Predictors of LARS were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 329 patients (response rate 57.7%). Six cases of incomplete questionnaires were excluded. The study population included 184 patients (66.8% men) with a mean age of 63 years. There were 44 (23.9%) patients with no LARS, 36 (19.6%) with minor LARS and 104 (56.2%) with major LARS. In the univariate analysis, total mesorectal excision (P = 0.0008), protective ileostomy (P = 0.002), preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.0000), postoperative chemotherapy (P = 0.0046) and age (P = 0.035) were significantly associated with major LARS, whereas in the multivariate analysis, total mesorectal excision (odds ratio [OR] 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-4.65), preoperative radiotherapy (OR 4.33, 95% CI 2.03-9.27) and postoperative radiotherapy (OR 9.52, 95% CI 1.74-52.24) were independent risk factors for major LARS. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the risk of having major LARS increases with total mesorectal excision and both neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiotherapy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The implantation of Gatekeeper ™ (GK) represents a new option for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI). The aim of this study was to analyze the postoperative morbidity associated with GK and to determine its clinical efficacy after at least 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective and longitudinal study of patients with FI who were treated with GK at our institutions between January 2010 and December 2015. Patients with FI without sphincter lesions or with sphincter injuries < 120° and with low anterior resection syndrome were included. Postoperative complications, long-term adverse effects and migration were recorded. FI severity was assessed using the Vaizey score. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders according to the improvement of the Vaizey score (≥ than 50 and < 50%, respectively) during the first 6 months after implantation. RESULTS: Forty-nine consecutive patients treated with GK between 2010 and 2015 were included (11 males and 38 females, mean age 63.3 years, SD 13.5). No postoperative and long-term complications were observed. Prosthesis migration was observed in 51% of patients. Twenty-three patients (48%) were classified as responders and 25 (52%) as non-responders. The mean Vaizey score at baseline, 6, 12 months and last visit post-surgery in the responder group was, respectively, 13.3 (SD 3.8), 4.3 (SD 2.1), 4.2 (SD 3.6) and 5.7 (SD 5.3). Significant differences were observed between the mean baseline Vaizey score and the mean 6, 12 and last follow-up Vaizey score values (p < 0.001). In long-term follow-up (2.7 years (SD 1.1)), responders maintained an improvement of more than 50% of the baseline Vaizey score. In the non-responder group the mean number of migrated prostheses was higher than in the responder group (2.4 SD 2.5 vs. 1.0 SD 1.6; p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: GK is a safe and effective procedure in more than 50% of the patients for at least 1 year after the implantation.
Assuntos
Incontinência Fecal/cirurgia , Próteses e Implantes , Falha de Prótese/etiologia , Implantação de Prótese , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Próteses e Implantes/efeitos adversos , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The presence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is still considered by many transplantation centers to be an absolute contraindication to liver transplantation because of the technical difficulties that it can present and its association with a higher rate of patient morbidity and mortality. Renoportal bypass (RPB) can help to remove these barriers. This study describes our institution's experience with RPB through the description of a new and successful simplified surgical strategy, a patient and graft outcome analysis, intraoperative vascular flow measurements, and the use of splenic artery embolization (SAE) as an effective adjunct for treating sporadic cases of unrelieved portal hypertension. Between January 2004 and January 2013, 10 patients with grade 4 PVT underwent RPB. At the last follow-up (42.2 ± 21.1 months), the patient and graft survival rates were 100%. Five patients (50%) experienced posttransplant ascites, and 2 of those underwent proximal SAE to modulate the liver inflow and overcome the ascites. Three patients (30%) experienced transient kidney injury in the early posttransplant period and were treated efficiently with medical therapy. The renoportal flows were close to the desirable 100 mL/100 g of liver tissue in all cases. The experience and data support RPB as a feasible and easily reproducible technique without the risks and technical challenges associated with the tedious dissection of a cavernous hilum.
Assuntos
Implante de Prótese Vascular , Transplante de Fígado , Veia Porta/cirurgia , Veias Renais/cirurgia , Trombose Venosa/cirurgia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Ascite/etiologia , Ascite/terapia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Embolização Terapêutica , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Transplante de Fígado/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Veia Porta/fisiopatologia , Veias Renais/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico , Trombose Venosa/mortalidade , Trombose Venosa/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The evidence is sparse concerning the natural history of acute diverticulitis after successful conservative management. This observational study aimed to evaluate the rate, severity, and need of surgery for recurrence after a first episode of acute diverticulitis successfully managed conservatively. METHODS: All patients admitted for acute diverticulitis between 1994 and 2011 were considered for inclusion in the study. Severity of the first episode, demographic data, comorbidities, management, recurrence, and elective or emergency surgery during the follow-up period were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: The study included 560 patients. The mean follow-up period was of 67.2 ± 44.4 months. Severe diverticulitis was diagnosed in 22.3 % of the cases. Recurrence was observed in 14.8 % of the patients, and the rate of severe recurrence was 3.4 %. Most of the recurrences occurred during the first year of follow-up evaluation. Chronic corticoid therapy (P = 0.043) and the presence of more than one abscess (P < 0.001) were significantly related to recurrence. In the event of a mild recurrence, the first episode was either mild or severe (P = 0.172). In the case of severe recurrence, most patients presented with a previous severe diverticulitis (P < 0.001). During the follow-up period, 6.8 % of the patients needed an elective operation, and 1.4 % of them underwent emergency surgery. CONCLUSION: The rate of severe recurrence after successful nonoperative management of acute diverticulitis was low, and emergency surgery was rare. Prophylactic surgery, even in cases of recovered severe diverticulitis, should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Strict follow-up assessment during the first year is advised.
Assuntos
Doença Diverticular do Colo/terapia , Abscesso/etiologia , Abscesso/terapia , Doença Aguda , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Drenagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hidratação , Seguimentos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to investigate the convergent and discriminative validity and reliability of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score in an international setting. BACKGROUND: The LARS score is a simple self-administered questionnaire measuring bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery. The score is intended to be commonly used in international research and clinical practice in the future. Therefore, a thorough validation in an international setting is of utmost importance. METHODS: The LARS score was translated using methods in keeping with current international recommendations. A total of 801 patients operated for rectal cancer in Sweden, Spain, Germany, and Denmark completed the LARS score questionnaire, including an anchor question assessing the impact of bowel function on quality of life. A subgroup of 218 patients completed the LARS score twice. Data were analyzed per country. RESULTS: The LARS score has demonstrated a high convergent validity in terms of a high correlation between LARS score and quality of life (P < 0.001). Sensitivity ranged from 67.7% to 88.3% and specificity from 58.1% to 86.3%. The LARS score was able to discriminate between groups of patients differing with regard to radiotherapy, surgery, and age (P < 0.05). The score also demonstrated high reliability at test-retest with narrow limits of agreement and no statistically significant difference between scores at the first and second test. CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish, Spanish, German, and Danish versions of the LARS score have proven to be valid and reliable tools for measuring LARS in European rectal cancer patients.
Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal/diagnóstico , Incontinência Fecal/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Constipação Intestinal/etiologia , Dinamarca , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Espanha , Suécia , Síndrome , Tradução , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients are surviving a diagnosis of rectal cancer. The majority of the patients are treated with the sphincter-sparing surgical procedure low anterior resection, and 50% to 90% of these patients experience bowel dysfunction, known as the low anterior resection syndrome. No previous studies have investigated the association between the low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life in an international setting with the use of a validated instrument for the classification of the low anterior resection syndrome. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between quality of life and the low anterior resection syndrome in European patients who have had rectal cancer. DESIGN: The study was designed as an international cross-sectional study involving 5 centers in 4 European countries. PATIENTS: All patients had undergone low anterior resection for rectal cancer, had no stoma, had no dissemination or recurrence at the time of the study, and were at least 16 months past surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The patients received by mail the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score and the quality-of-life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eight subscales were selected to be the focus of this study: global quality of life; physical, role, emotional, and social functioning; fatigue; constipation; and diarrhea. RESULTS: A total of 796 patients were included, which corresponds to a response rate of 75.0%. In comparison with patients without low anterior resection syndrome, patients with major low anterior resection syndrome fared substantially worse in all selected subscales (difference ≥ 10 points, p < 0.01), with the exception of constipation. LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional design prevents an evaluation of causality. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of life of patients who have had rectal cancer is closely associated with the severity of the low anterior resection syndrome. Therefore, it is important that clinicians and researchers focus on this syndrome to improve the prevention and the treatment of bowel dysfunction and the information given to patients.
Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Neoplasias Retais/fisiopatologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Síndrome , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: High oxygen consumption (OC) in recipients of cadaveric whole liver grafts is associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between intraoperative hepatic OC and graft function and survival in a porcine partial liver graft model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Experiments followed the Guiding Principles in the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Fourteen female pigs, 46-69 kg, received liver allografts of 17%-39% liver volume and were followed for 14 d. We measured donor and recipient body weights, percentage graft weight and expressed it as a percentage of standard liver volume, cold ischemia time, hepatic artery flow (HAF), portal vein flow (PVF), graft volume at sacrifice, serum lactate, prothrombin time, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine, albumin, total protein, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, and recipient survival. OC was calculated as follows: OC (mL/100 g/min) = ([Hemoglobin {Hb} × 1.34 × SaO2 + 0.003 × PaO2] × HAF + [Hb × 1.34 × SpO2 + 0.003 × PpO2] × PVF - [Hb × 1.34 × SvO2 + 0.003 × PvO2] × [HAF + PVF])/graft weight (100 g), and animals were divided into two groups: low OC group (OC < 2.0 mL/100 g/min) and high OC group (OC ≥ 2.0 mL/100 g/min). RESULTS: In survival analysis, four of seven low OC recipients (57% [n = 7]) survived until the end of the study period compared with one of seven high OC recipients (14% [n = 7]). The low OC group had a significantly higher survival rate than that of the high OC group (P = 0.041). Low OC was associated with higher HAF (mL/100 g/min) after reperfusion compared with that of the high OC group, 29.0 ± 13.8 versus 16.0 ± 11.1 mean ± standard deviation; P = 0.073. Serum alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin in the low OC group were significantly better than those of the high OC group. Serum lactate was comparable in both groups. Graft weight at the time of sacrifice in the low OC group tended to be higher than that in the high OC group, but not significantly (P = 0.097). CONCLUSIONS: High intraoperative OC is associated with lower HAF, decreased graft function, and decreased survival in the porcine partial liver graft model.
Assuntos
Aloenxertos/metabolismo , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Transplante de Fígado , Fígado/metabolismo , Consumo de Oxigênio , Animais , Feminino , SuínosRESUMO
Rectal ultralow, intersphincteric anterior resection (RIE) can be used in selected cases with the intention of improving the quality of life of patients avoiding permanent colostomy. RIE is indicated for tumors that are located from 1-2 cm above the anorectal ring to the top of the internal anal sphincter without involvement of the pelvic floor, puborrectalis muscle or external anal sphincter. RIE aims to get a free distal margin tumour not less than 1cm. Correct preoperative staging and anatomical tumour location and relation with adjacent structures and organs is fundamental. Intestinal transit reconstruction can be performed manually with a coloanal anastomosis according with Parks and with a lateral ileostomy or, alternatively, by a two-stage coloanal anastomosis technique as Turnbull-Cutait avoiding the stoma protection. Postoperative morbidity and mortality and the rate of local recurrence and overall disease-free survival at 5 years after RIE are comparable to those observed in standard ultra low anterior resection. Postoperative functional alterations of the RIE can affect the quality of life of patients regardless of reconstructive technique. Published studies do not provide sufficient data to establish the most efficient reconstruction method in terms of functional outcomes.
Assuntos
Canal Anal/cirurgia , Colo/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Humanos , Ileostomia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: In patients operated on for low rectal cancer, 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis provides benefits in terms of postoperative morbidity compared with standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis associated with diverting ileostomy and further ileostomy reversal. OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term results of these 2 techniques after ultralow rectal resection for rectal cancer. DESIGN, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized multicenter clinical trial, neither patients nor surgeons were blinded for technique. Patients were recruited in 3 centers. Patients undergoing ultralow anterior rectal resection needing hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis were randomly assigned to 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis (n = 46) or standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis associated with diverting ileostomy (n = 46). INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent ultralow anterior resection. Patients assigned to the 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through group underwent exteriorization of a segment of left colon through the anal canal. After 6 to 10 days, the exteriorized colon was resected and a delayed hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis performed. For patients assigned to standard coloanal anastomosis, the hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis was performed with diverting ileostomy during the first operation. Ileostomy closure was scheduled after adjuvant treatment was completed in about 6 to 8 months. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The study aimed to compare the differences between the 2 groups in terms of long-term surgery-related morbidity, functional, and oncological outcomes at 3 years postoperatively. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2018, through October 31, 2021. RESULTS: The 92 patients randomized in the first study were included for the 3-year follow-up. The overall morbidity rate in the 2 groups showed that 15 patients (16.3%) had complications with a difference of 6.52 (95% CI, -8.93 to 21.79). Nine patients (19.6%) and 6 patients (13.0%) in the 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through group and hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis group, respectively, had complications without statistically significant differences (P = .57). Oncological results were comparable between the groups. Long-term fecal continence in the CCA and TCA groups, respectively, assessed using the Wexner Incontinence Score was 10.9 (5.50-15.5) vs 13.0 (7.25-16.0; P = .92), Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score was 32.0 (21.0-37.0) vs 34.0 (23.2-38.5; P = .76), and Colorectal Functional Outcome score was 38.5 (23.0-47.1) vs 40.8 (23.3-58.2; P = .30). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, after a 3-year follow-up period, 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer could be considered as a surgical alternative that has the valuable benefit of avoiding a temporary stoma with similar results in terms of morbidity, fecal continence, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and oncological outcomes when compared with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis with ileostomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01766661.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Surgical wound infection in colorectal surgery has incidence rate of up to 26%. Peri-operative factors and those of the patients themselves play a part in these infections. The correct administration of the antibiotic, a normal temperature, and hyperoxygenation are a commonly applied triad. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of surgical wound infection in patients subjective to colorectal surgery where a surgical infection prevention protocol was applied. The second objective was the relationship between surgical infection and peri-operative factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational study was conducted on 100 patients who had undergone elective colorectal surgery. Demographic data and related surgical and post-surgical data were recorded. A surgical wound infection was defined using the criteria of Disease Control and Prevention Hospital Infection Centres. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 68 years (range 25-88), 65% were male, and 59% were ASA 3-4. There was more than 80% compliance to the protocol in its different sections. There was laparoscopic access in 31% of the cases. The incidence of superficial and deep surgical wound infection was 25%. The patients with an infection had a higher prevalence of diabetes (48% vs 24%), transfusion (56% vs 28%), paralytic ileum (48% vs 18.7%), and intra-abdominal abscess (16% vs 3%). The multivariate analysis associated, preoperative haemoglobin and blood glucose, and the duration of the surgery, with incisional infection. CONCLUSIONS: The prevention protocol did not have an impact on the incidence of surgical wound infection.
Assuntos
Doenças do Colo/cirurgia , Doenças Retais/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: As colo-anal anastomoses continue to have a high risk of post-surgical dehiscence it is recommended to combine this with a protective stoma. The main purpose of this study was to determine the post-operative morbidity and mortality rate in patients operated on using the Turnbull-Cutait (T-C) technique with delayed colo-anal anastomosis without a protective ileostomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational study was conducted on 17 patients. The surgical indication was classified as "primary" (group I), and "secondary" (group II) when rescue was performed due to complications in the short to long-term after rectal resection. The surgical technique consisted of two stages: 1) low anterior resection, circumferential mucosectomy from the pectinate line, pulling the colon through the anal canal; 2) resection of the pull-through segment and colo-anal anastomosis between the fifth and tenth day. Demographic data, associated comorbidities, and ASA score were recorded, as well as post-surgical complications, post-surgical mortality, and technical failure (defined as performing a definitive stoma). RESULTS: The review consisted of 13 patients in group I and 4 in group II. Twelve patients were operated on due to rectal cancer, one patient due to a recto-vesico-vaginal fistula, two due to rescue of early complications (from the Emergency Department), and two were operated due to chronic complications after rectal resection. Six patients (35.3%) had one or more complications, three of them required new surgery. There were no postoperative deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The T-C could be a first option in cancer of the rectum, with no need for a protective ileostomy. It could be an alternative in urgent re-interventions of patients who have rectal surgery complications.
Assuntos
Canal Anal/cirurgia , Colo/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of glucose metabolism in predicting postoperative liver graft function after transplantation is unclear. We investigated the relation between intraoperative glucose balance of the liver allograft and the postoperative graft function and survival in a porcine partial liver transplant model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiments follow Guiding Principles in the Care and Use of Animals. Fourteen female pigs received liver allografts of 17%-39% recipient liver volume. Recipients were classified into two groups based on positive glucose balance: the mean intraoperative blood glucose of the graft outflow was greater than the blood glucose of inflow, negative glucose balance: the mean blood glucose of graft outflow was less than blood glucose of inflow. Perioperative data and survival were studied. RESULTS: In the positive group (n=9) intraoperative hepatic artery flow was significantly higher (P=0.028), and oxygen consumption was lower (P=0.018) than the negative group (n=5). Postoperatively, maximal serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P=0.028), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (P=0.028), and total bilirubin (P=0.027) of the positive group were significantly lower than the negative group. In survival analysis, the positive group had significantly better survival rate than the negative group (P=0.034). Using Periodic acid-Schiff staining, glycogen content of the allograft in the positive group at 10 min post-reperfusion was significantly decreased in comparison with the baseline value in the normal liver (P=0.005), however not statistically different in the negative group (P=0.175). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative glucose balance can be used as an early predictor of the graft function following transplantation of partial liver allografts.