Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Operative Fixation of Acetabular Fracture: A Contemporary Series.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the operation of choice for salvage of post-traumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture. While high failure rates have been reported for these procedures, existing literature reports mainly on historical implant designs and techniques. We aimed to describe implant survivorships, complications, radiographic results, and clinical outcomes of contemporary THA following prior open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of an acetabular fracture. METHODS: We identified 104 patients undergoing THA following prior ORIF of an acetabular fracture from 2000 to 2015 via our institutional total joint registry. Mean age at THA was 50 years (range, 18 to 79 years), 71% were men, and mean body mass index was 27 (range, 18 to 52). All patients were implanted with uncemented acetabular components, and 89% had uncemented stems. Some hardware from prior fixation was retained in 94% of cases. Mean follow-up was 10 years (range, 2 to 21 years). RESULTS: The 10-year survivorships free of any revision and any reoperation were 98% and 97%, respectively. There were 4 revisions: 1 each for psoas tendonitis, dislocation, acetabular aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic joint infection. There were 9 complications that did not lead to reoperation: 5 dislocations, 2 periprosthetic femur fractures, 1 sciatic nerve palsy, and 1 case of symptomatic heterotopic ossification. All unrevised components appeared radiographically well-fixed. Mean Harris Hip Score improved from mean 50 preoperatively to mean 82 at 5 years (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this series of contemporary THAs following prior acetabular fracture ORIF, revision-free survivorship was excellent with only a single case of acetabular aseptic loosening. These results are encouraging and suggest that contemporary implants and techniques have notably improved on historic results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level IV.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Direct Anterior Versus Mini-Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: Small, Early Functional Differences Did Not Lead to Meaningful Clinical Differences at 7.5 Years.

BACKGROUND: Our previously reported randomized clinical trial of direct anterior approach (DAA) versus mini-posterior approach (MPA) total hip arthroplasty showed slightly faster initial recovery for patients who had a DAA and no differences in complications or clinical or radiographic outcomes beyond 8 weeks. The aims of the current study were to determine if early advantages of DAA led to meaningful clinical differences beyond 5 years and to identify differences in midterm complications. METHODS: Of the 101 original patients, 93 were eligible for follow-up at a mean of 7.5 years (range, 2.1 to 10). Clinical outcomes were compared with Harris Hip, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Scores (HOOS) scores and subscores, complications, reoperations, and revisions. RESULTS: Harris Hip scores were similar (95.3 ± 6.0 versus 93.5 ± 10.3 for DAA and MPA, respectively, P = .79). The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey physical and mental scores were similar (46.2 ± 9.3 versus 46.2 ± 10.6, P = .79, and 52.3 ± 7.1 versus 55.2 ± 4.5, P = .07 in the DAA and MPA groups, respectively). The HOOS scores were similar (97.4 ± 7.9 versus 96.3 ± 6.7 for DAA and MPA, respectively, P = .07). The HOOS quality of life subscores were 96.9 ± 10.8 versus 92.3 ± 16.0 for DAA and MPA, respectively (P = .046). No clinical outcome met the minimally clinically important difference. There were 4 surgical complications in the DAA group (1 femoral loosening requiring revision, 1 dislocation treated closed, and 2 wound dehiscences requiring debridement), and 6 surgical complications in the MPA group (3 dislocations, 2 treated closed, and 1 revised to dual mobility; 2 intraoperative fractures treated with a cable; and 1 wound dehiscence treated nonoperatively). CONCLUSIONS: At a mean of 7.5 years, this randomized clinical trial demonstrated no clinically meaningful differences in outcomes, complications, reoperations, or revisions between DAA and MPA total hip arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Surgical Approach and Body Mass Index Impact Risk of Wound Complications Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that wound complications may differ by surgical approach after total hip arthroplasty (THA), with particular attention toward the direct anterior approach (DAA). However, there is a paucity of data documenting wound complication rates by surgical approach and the impact of concomitant patient factors, namely body mass index (BMI). This investigation sought to determine the rates of wound complications by surgical approach and identify BMI thresholds that portend differential risk. METHODS: This multicenter study retrospectively evaluated all primary THA patients from 2010 to 2023. Patients were classified by skin incision as having a laterally based approach (posterior or lateral approach) or DAA (longitudinal incision). We identified 17,111 patients who had 11,585 laterally based (68%) and 5,526 (32%) DAA THAs. The mean age was 65 years (range, 18 to 100), 8,945 patients (52%) were women, and the mean BMI was 30 (range, 14 to 79). Logistic regression and cut-point analyses were performed to identify an optimal BMI cutoff, overall and by approach, with respect to the risk of wound complications at 90 days. RESULTS: The 90-day risk of wound complications was higher in the DAA group versus the laterally based group, with an absolute risk of 3.6% versus 2.6% and a multivariable adjusted odds ratio of 1.5 (P < .001). Cut-point analyses demonstrated that the risk of wound complications increased steadily for both approaches, but most markedly above a BMI of 33. CONCLUSIONS: Wound complications were higher after longitudinal incision DAA THA compared to laterally based approaches, with a 1% higher absolute risk and an adjusted odds ratio of 1.5. Furthermore, BMI was an independent risk factor for wound complications regardless of surgical approach, with an optimal cut-point BMI of 33 for both approaches. These data can be used by surgeons to help consider the risks and benefits of approach selection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Knee Arthroscopy Following Total Knee Arthroplasty is Not Associated With an Elevated Risk of Infection.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature has suggested that knee arthroscopy (KA) following ipsilateral primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may be associated with an increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, prior studies on this subject have relied on insurance databases or have lacked control groups for comparison. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of PJI in patients undergoing ipsilateral KA after primary TKA at a single institution. METHODS: Our total joint registry was queried to identify 167 patients (178 knees) who underwent ipsilateral KA for any indication other than infection following primary TKA (KA + TKA group). The average time from TKA to KA was 2.1 ± 2.3 years. The average follow-up from primary TKA and from KA was 8.4 ± 5.4 years and 6.3 ± 5.4 years, respectively. The mean patient age was 63 ± 11 years, the mean body mass index was 31 ± 5, and 64% were women. The most common indications for KA were patellar clunk or patellofemoral synovial hyperplasia (66%) and arthrofibrosis (16%). Patients in the KA + TKA group were matched to 523 patients who underwent TKA without subsequent KA (TKA group) based on age, sex, date of surgery, and body mass index. The primary outcome measure was survivorship free from PJI. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the overall rate of PJI between the KA + TKA group (n = 2, 1.1%) compared to the TKA group (n = 3, 0.6%) (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 12.0, P = .4). At 5 and 10 years after TKA, there was no difference in survivorship free of PJI between the 2 groups (P = .8 and P = .3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A PJI is a rare complication of KA after TKA. The rate of PJI in patients undergoing KA following TKA is not significantly increased. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Making the cut: a technical note and literature review of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy techniques with special attention to ischial osteotomy initiation and completion with an inside to anterior curved osteotomy.

Periacetabular osteotomy includes a fluoroscopy-guided ischial cut without direct visualization. Previously described techniques include a mediolateral ischial cortex cut, which is associated with the risk of injuring nearby nerves. Another drawback of that technique is the difficulty connecting an ischial cortex cut with a retroacetabular cut due to orthogonal nature of the osteotomy. In general, an additional cut from medial to lateral is required. The present study aimed to describe a technique that eliminates those problems due to use of only a central cut of the ischium and the curved nature of the osteotomy.

AAHKS Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Resurfacing the Thin Native Patella: Is It Safe?

BACKGROUND: Whether to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains debated. One often cited reason for not resurfacing is inadequate patellar thickness. The aim of this study was to describe the implant survivorships, reoperations, complications and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent patellar resurfacing of a thin native patella. METHODS: From 2000 to 2010, 7,477 patients underwent primary TKA with patellar resurfacing and had an intraoperatively, caliper-measured patella thickness at our institution. Of these, 200 (2.7%) had a preresection patellar thickness of ≤19 millimeters (mm). Mean preresection thickness was 18 mm (range, 12-19). Mean age was 69 years, mean body mass index was 31 kg/m2, and 93% of the patients were women. Median follow-up was 10 years (range, 2-20). RESULTS: At 10 years, survivorships free of any patella revision, patella-related reoperation, and periprosthetic patella fracture were 98%, 98%, and 99%, respectively. There were 3 patella revisions (1 aseptic loosening, 2 periprosthetic joint infections). There were 2 additional patella-related reoperations for patellar clunk. There were 3 nonoperatively managed periprosthetic patella fractures. Radiographically, all nonrevised knees had well-fixed patellae. Knee society scores improved from mean 36 points (interquartile range [IQR] 24-49) preoperatively to mean 81 points (IQR 77-81) at 10-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Resurfacing the thin native patella was associated with high survivorship free of patellar revision at 10-year follow-up. Nevertheless, there was 1 case of patellar loosening and 3 periprosthetic patella fractures. These risks must be weighed against the known higher incidence of revision when the thin native patella is left unresurfaced.

Modular Proximal Body Exchange for Re-Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Rarely Utilized and Moderately Successful.

BACKGROUND: Modular fluted tapered stems (MFTSs) are commonly used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and provide the option of exchanging the proximal modular portion to address future surgical problems without complete femoral revision. We are unaware of any data documenting the frequencies, indications, and outcomes of modular proximal body exchange in re-revision THA. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2019, we performed 57 modular proximal body exchanges among 8,079 revision THAs at our institution. Indications and outcomes were documented at a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (range, 0 to 12.8). RESULTS: Modular proximal body exchange was performed on 47 of 1,375 (3%) of MFTSs implanted. The indications for all 57 modular proximal body exchanges performed during the study period were dislocation in 30 (53%), partial resection for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in 13 (23%), modular junction failure in 8 (14%), surgical exposure in 4 (7%), and concurrently with trochanteric osteotomy nonunion fixation in 2 (4%). At the final follow-up, subsequent re-revisions occurred in 10 of 30 (33%) of modular proximal body exchanges indicated for dislocation and in 5 of 13 of those indicated for PJI. One modular junction subsequently fractured after modular proximal body exchange. CONCLUSION: Modular proximal body exchange of a MFTS is an uncommon procedure most often performed for treatment of hip dislocation or PJI. It is moderately successful with approximately one-third of cases requiring subsequent re-revision. This procedure is often performed with modular component exchange alone, but can also be helpful to facilitate complex acetabular exposure. These data provide useful information to surgeons and patients undergoing this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who had a Prior Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Balancing Remains the Issue.

BACKGROUND: Following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, 20% of patients will develop osteoarthritis. Despite this, there remains a paucity of data describing outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after prior ACL reconstruction. We aimed to describe survivorships, complications, radiographic results, and clinical outcomes of TKA after ACL reconstruction in one of the largest series to date. METHODS: We identified 160 patients (165 knees) who underwent primary TKA following prior ACL reconstruction between 1990 and 2016 using our total joint registry. The mean age at TKA was 56 years (range, 29-81), 42% were women, and their mean body mass index was 32. Ninety percent of knees were posterior-stabilized designs. Survivorship was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The mean follow-up was 8 years. RESULTS: The 10-year survivorships free of any revision and any reoperation were 92 and 88%, respectively. Seven patients were revised for instability (6 global and 1 flexion), 4 for infection, and 2 for other reasons. There were 5 additional reoperations: 3 manipulations under anesthesia, 1 wound debridement, and 1 arthroscopic synovectomy for patellar clunk. Nonoperative complications occurred in 16 patients, 4 of which were flexion instability. Radiographically, all nonrevised knees were well-fixed. Knee Society Function Scores significantly improved from preoperative to 5 years postoperative (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Survivorship of TKA in post-ACL reconstruction knees was lower than expected with instability being the most common reason for revision. In addition, the most common nonrevision complications were flexion instability and stiffness requiring manipulations under anesthesia, indicating that achieving soft tissue balance in these knees may be difficult.

Radiographic Accuracy of Malseated Dual-Mobility Liners Varies Based on Implant Design.

BACKGROUND: Dual-mobility constructs have gained popularity to mitigate dislocations after high-risk primary and revision total hip arthroplasties. Contemporary data have indicated that malseating of modular dual-mobility liners occurs in up to 6% of cases. The purpose of this cadaveric-based radiographic study was to determine the ability to accurately determine if modular dual-mobility liners were seated. METHODS: There were 10 hips (5 cadaveric pelvic specimens) used to implant modular dual-mobility liners of 2 designs. One had a liner that seated flush and the other had an extended rim. There were 20 constructs that were well-seated and 20 constructs were intentionally malseated. A comprehensive series of radiographs was reviewed by 2 blinded surgeons. Statistical analyses included Chi-squared testing, logistic regressions, and kappa statistics. RESULTS: Radiographic assessment of liner malseating was not accurate with an elevated rim design with misdiagnosis in 40% (16 of 40). The flush design had diagnostic errors in 5% (2 of 40; P = .0002). Logistic regressions demonstrated a significantly higher risk of misdiagnosing a malseated liner in the elevated rim group (odds ratio 13). There were 12 of 16 misdiagnoses in the elevated rim group failing to recognize a malseated liner. Each surgeon had almost perfect agreement for intraobserver reliability for flush designs (k 0.90) and fair agreement in the elevated rim design (k 0.35). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive series of plain radiographs can reliably detect a malseated modular dual-mobility liner with a flush rim design in 95% of cases. However, elevated rim designs are more difficult to accurately identify malseating on plain radiographs.

Can Selected Use of Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Components in a Broad Population Produce Comparable Results Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis?

BACKGROUND: Registry data have demonstrated lower rates of revision and periprosthetic fracture in select cohorts with cemented femoral fixation at primary total hip arthroplasty. Whether this is true of all component designs is not known. We hypothesized that selected use of ream-and-broach triple-tapered uncemented stem designs may provide comparable results to cemented stems. METHODS: From 2000 to 2018, 5,809 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed with either a cemented (1,304) or ream-and-broach triple-tapered uncemented stem (4,505). Implant choice was at surgeon discretion. The cemented group was older, more often women, and had slightly lower body mass index. A subgroup analysis was performed on patients ≥75 years of age. Statistical weighting accounted for baseline cohort differences. RESULTS: At 10 years, there was a trend toward higher all-cause revision (hazards ratio (HR) 1.6, P = .053) and higher all-cause reoperation (HR 1.6, P = .02) in the cemented fixation cohort. The cemented fixation group had fewer intraoperative periprosthetic fractures (HR 0.21, P < .001) but no difference in postoperative fractures (HR 0.99, P = .96). The same was true in patients ≥75 years. In the ≥75-years subgroup, there was no difference in revision or reoperation at 10 years. CONCLUSION: Compared to cemented stems, the use of ream-and-broach triple-tapered uncemented stems in select patients, including those ≥75 years, was associated with more intraoperative fractures but no difference in 10-year implant survivorship. These findings are different than some registry data and suggest that specific uncemented components, implanted in selected patients by experienced surgeons, can perform as well as cemented implants in a broad patient population.

Orthopedic Surgery and Anesthesiology Surgical Improvement Strategies Project - Phase III Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Our institution initiated the Orthopedic Surgery and Anesthesiology Surgical Improvement Strategies (OASIS) project in 2017 to improve the quality and efficiency for hip and knee arthroplasties. Phase III of this project aimed to: 1) increase same-day discharge (SDD) of primary total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) to 20%; 2) maintain or improve 30-day readmission rates; and 3) realize cost savings and revenue increases. METHODS: All primary TJAs performed between 2021 and 2022 represented our study cohort, with those in 2019 (prepandemic) establishing the baseline cohort. A multidisciplinary team met weekly to track project tactics and metrics through the entire episode of care from preoperative surgical visit through 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The SDD rate increased from 4% at baseline to 37%, with mean lengths of stay (LOS) decreasing from 1.5 to 0.9 days for all primary TJAs. The 30-day readmission rate decreased to 1.2 from 1.3%. Composite changes in surgical volume and cost reductions equaled $5 million. CONCLUSION: Application of a multidisciplinary team with health systems engineering tools and methods allowed SDD to increase from 4 to 37% with a mean LOS <1 day, resulting in a $5 million incremental gain in profit at a major academic medical center. Importantly, patient safety was not compromised as 30-day readmission rates remained stable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Therapeutic.

Comparative Survival of Contemporary Cementless Acetabular Components Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The advent of highly porous ingrowth surfaces and highly crosslinked polyethylene has been expected to improve implant survivorship in revision total hip arthroplasty. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the survival of several contemporary acetabular designs following revision total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Acetabular revisions performed from 2000 to 2019 were identified from our institutional total joint registry. We studied 3,348 revision hips, implanted with 1 of 7 cementless acetabular designs. These were paired with highly crosslinked polyethylene or dual-mobility liners. A historical series of 258 Harris-Galante-1 components, paired with conventional polyethylene, was used as reference. Survivorship analyses were performed. For the 2,976 hips with minimum 2-year follow-up, the median follow-up was 8 years (range, 2 to 35 years). RESULTS: Contemporary components with adequate follow-up had survivorship free of acetabular rerevision of ≥95% at 10-year follow-up. Relative to Harris-Galante-1 components, 10-year survivorship free of all-cause acetabular cup rerevision was significantly higher in Zimmer Trabecular Metarevision (hazard ratio (HR) 0.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.45), Zimmer Trabecular MetaModular (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.89), Zimmer Trilogy (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.24-0.69), DePuy Pinnacle Porocoat (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.51), and Stryker Tritanium revision (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24-0.91) shells. Among contemporary components, there were only 23 rerevisions for acetabular aseptic loosening and no rerevisions for polyethylene wear. CONCLUSION: Contemporary acetabular ingrowth and bearing surfaces were associated with no rerevisions for wear and aseptic loosening was uncommon, particularly with highly porous designs. Therefore, it appears that contemporary revision acetabular components have dramatically improved upon historical results at available follow-up.

Pairing 40-mm Femoral Heads With the Smallest Compatible Acetabular Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mid-Term Outcomes in 177 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary total hip arthroplasty (THA) often employs larger femoral heads to optimize hip stability. However, pairing 40-mm femoral heads with the smallest compatible acetabular components poses a potential risk for implant failure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of primary THAs using 40-mm femoral heads and the smallest compatible acetabular components. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2018, 177 primary THAs involving 40-mm femoral heads and acetabular components ≤56 mm with highly cross-linked polyethylene liners were identified. Mean age was 61 years, 56% were females, and mean body mass index was 32 kg/m2. Cumulative incidences of dislocation, any revision, and any reoperation were determined utilizing a competing risk model. Osteolysis and femoral head penetration were assessed at minimum 8-year follow-up (n = 16). Mean follow-up was 6 years. RESULTS: There were no cases of liner fractures or dissociations. The 10-year cumulative incidences of dislocation, any revision, and any reoperation were 3.6%, 4.2%, and 6.8%, respectively. Mean linear femoral head penetration was 0.01 mm/y and mean volumetric wear rate was 50 mm3/y. One THA demonstrated stable, asymptomatic periacetabular radiolucent lines at most recent follow-up. CONCLUSION: In 177 primary THAs pairing 40-mm femoral heads with the smallest compatible acetabular components, there were no liner fractures or dissociations. The cumulative incidence of dislocation was modest at 10 years. The cumulative incidences of any revision and any reoperation were low at mid-term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Rotating-Hinge Prosthesis Mated to a Well-Fixed Femoral Sleeve.

BACKGROUND: Some knee systems have the unique capability to mate a new hinged femoral component to a well-fixed metaphyseal sleeve from a prior revision. We compared survivorship, radiographs, and clinical outcomes of a rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty mated to a new metaphyseal sleeve vs a well-fixed sleeve. METHODS: Sixty patients with an S-ROM Noiles (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN) rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty implanted from 1998 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Nine patients (15%) had the femoral component mated to a well-fixed sleeve and 51 patients (85%) had a new sleeve. Mean age was 68 years, 68% were female, and mean body mass index was 33 kg/m2. The incidences of re-revision and reoperation were calculated, Knee Society Scores were measured, and radiographs were reviewed. Mean follow-up was 5 years. RESULTS: There were 2 re-revisions (22%) in patients with a well-fixed sleeve: 1 for infection and 1 for aseptic loosening of the femur and tibia. There were no unique failures including the taper junction. Nine patients (18%) with a new sleeve were re-revised: 7 for infection and 2 for tibial aseptic loosening. The mean Knee Society Score for all patients improved from 39 to 73. Radiographically, all components were well fixed except for one loose femur in a patient with a new sleeve. CONCLUSION: Mating an S-ROM femur to a well-fixed sleeve from a prior revision is a safe, simple, and durable option in the short term that prevents morbidity associated with removal of a well-fixed sleeve. No new modes of failure were observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (retrospective), Therapeutic.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Aseptically Failed Metal-On-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: While common, studies assessing outcomes of failed metal-on-metal (MoM) resurfacings converted to total hip arthroplasties (THAs) are limited. We determined the outcomes following revision THA of aseptic MoM hip resurfacings. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2019, we identified 52 revision THAs for failed MoM hip resurfacings through our total joint registry. Mean age was 55 years, 42% were women, and mean body mass index was 28 kg/m2. Adverse local tissue response led to THA in 67% of the cases. The most common revision articulation was metal-on-cross-linked or ceramic-on-cross-linked polyethylene (71%). Median head size was 36 mm. The acetabular component was retained in 21% and 28% used dual-mobility constructs. The mean follow-up was 6 years (range, 2-12 years). RESULTS: The 5-year survivorships free of any re-revision or reoperation were 89% and 85%, respectively. The primary cause of re-revision (6) was dislocation (4). The 5-year cumulative probability of dislocation was 19% and was 13% in those patients treated with dual-mobility constructs versus 22% in those treated with standard articulations (P = .58). No dislocations occurred in THAs with retained acetabular components and dual-mobility constructs versus a 5-year cumulative probability of dislocation of 25% in those with revised acetabular components and standard articulations (P = .24). CONCLUSION: Revision THAs for aseptically failed MoM hip resurfacings yielded a 5-year survivorship free of re-revision of 89%. The main reason for failure was dislocation, which was reduced, but not statistically significantly, when a dual-mobility construct was used, especially if the acetabular component was retained. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Incidence of Leg-Length Discrepancy After Index Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Leg-length discrepancies are not commonly associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, hinge TKA is a complex form of knee reconstruction where functionality of all knee ligaments is replaced by the TKA construct. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of leg-length discrepancies after unilateral index hinge TKA and association with patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent unilateral index hinge TKA at a single academic institution from 1999 to 2019. Among 671 patients who underwent index hinge TKA, 188 (28%) had full-length standing anteroposterior hip-to-ankle radiographs available for review both preoperatively and postoperatively. All patients with a leg-length change ≥2 cm were also contacted with a standardized questionnaire to assess for complications. The mean age was 65 years, the mean body mass index was 33 kg/m2, and 52% were female. The mean number of prior surgeries was 2 (range, 0-12). RESULTS: The absolute mean and median change in leg lengths was 20 mm and 13 mm, respectively (range, 0-130 mm). Lengthening occurred in 119 (63%) patients compared with shortening in 69 (37%) patients. An absolute change in leg lengths ≥1 cm was observed in 109 (58%) patients, ≥2 cm in 63 (34%) patients, and ≥5 cm in 15 (8%) patients. CONCLUSION: Large changes in the leg length are common after hinge TKA, likely secondary to altered soft-tissue constraints. Surgeons should be cognizant of potential changes in the leg length in the setting of hinge TKA and incorporate this into preoperative planning and patient counseling. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic.

Factors Associated With Early Return to Driving Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients often ask when they can safely return to driving a car following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Most prior research has relied on driving simulators. Our study sought to learn more about real-world patient experiences in returning to driving after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Our institutional total joint registry was used to identify living patients aged 18-85 who underwent primary TKA or primary THA for a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019. Patients who had undergone multiple TJA operations in 2019 or had a primary mailing address outside of the United States were excluded. Ultimately 2508 eligible TJA patients received a survey by mail. RESULTS: A total of 1128 of 2508 eligible patients (45%) completed surveys and returned them by mail. After 121 surveys were discarded for incompletion, inconsistency, or limited preoperative driving volume, 1007 patients were included in our study. Among these patients, 99% returned to driving postoperatively, with 23% returning within 2 weeks, and 88% returning within 6 weeks. Factors associated with the odds of a patient returning to driving within 2 weeks included laterality, gender, postoperative confidence, postoperative comfort, and surgeon advice. Ten patients (1%) have been involved in a car accident postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Almost all patients returned to driving postoperatively without being involved in a car accident. Gender, laterality, patient confidence, and comfort as well as surgeon advice were significantly associated with the odds of a patient returning to driving within 2 weeks postoperatively.

The Open Triradiate Cartilage: How Young Is Too Young for Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: There is, to our knowledge, no published literature regarding primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in pediatric patients with an open triradiate cartilage. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes following primary THA in pediatric patients with open triradiate cartilage at a single intuition. METHODS: Using a single institution's Total Joint Registry, 12 patients (13 hips) were identified as having undergone primary THA with open triradiate cartilage between the years of 2000 and 2019. The mean age and body mass index of this group were 13.1 years and 25.5 kg/m2, respectively. The cohort was composed of 10 males, and the mean follow up was 5.5 years. Indications for surgery, functional outcomes, and radiographic signs of stable fixation were analyzed. RESULTS: The most common indication for surgery was avascular necrosis secondary to corticosteroid use (31%), followed by avascular necrosis after operative management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (23%). The proportion of patients able to achieve independent, gait-aid free, ambulation improved from 23% to 100%. Mean postoperative Harris Hip Score was 92.3. All constructs were cementless, and bearing surfaces included ceramic-on-ceramic in 62% and ceramic on highly crosslinked polyethylene bearings in the remainder. Radiographic review at final follow up demonstrated osseointegration in 12 of 13 (92%) acetabular components. Although 1 patient experienced both acetabular component loosening and instability, on separate occasions, there were no incidences of infection, wound dehiscence, thromboembolic events, or failure secondary to wear. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, THA in patients with an open triradiate cartilage yielded significant clinical improvement, low complication rates and good initial implant survivorship at early follow up. Awaiting closure of the triradiate cartilage for concerns of decreased fixation and implant survivorship may be unnecessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Using Big Heads and Small Acetabular Components With Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Safe?

BACKGROUND: Contemporary total hip arthroplasty (THA) employs larger femoral heads to optimize hip stability. However, the combination of large femoral heads and comparatively small acetabular components poses a potential risk for implant failure secondary to polyethylene (PE) liner fracture or dissociation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of liner fracture or dissociation, implant survivorship, and PE wear rates in primary THAs using large femoral heads and small acetabular components. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2017, we retrospectively identified 882 primary THAs with 36 mm femoral heads and acetabular components ≤52 mm with highly cross-linked polyethylene liners. Mean age was 66 years, 88% were females, and mean body mass index was 30 kg/m2. We evaluated the cumulative incidences of dislocation, any revision, and any reoperation utilizing a competing risk model. Osteolysis and femoral head penetration were assessed with a validated radiographic technique at minimum 10-year follow-up (n = 18). Mean follow-up was 4 years. RESULTS: There were no liner fractures or dissociations in the entire cohort. The 10-year cumulative incidences of dislocation, any revision, and any reoperation were 3.2%, 5.6%, and 9.3%, respectively. Mean linear femoral head penetration was 0.042 mm/y and mean volumetric wear rate was 44 mm3/y. No THAs demonstrated evidence of osteolysis or component loosening at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of primary THAs pairing large femoral heads with small acetabular components, there was no evidence of liner fracture or dissociation. Cumulative incidences of dislocation, any revision, and any reoperation were low at mid-term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Impact of Perioperative Pain Control on Knee Range of Motion and Development of Arthrofibrosis Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate pain control following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been postulated to negatively impact knee range of motion (ROM). We sought to determine the association between perioperative pain levels and knee ROM at 3-month follow-up or need for manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2243 primary TKAs performed from 2002 to 2019 at a single academic center using an institutional total joint registry. Mean age was 68, mean body mass index was 32.8, and 59% were female. Knee ROM was measured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Change in knee ROM, rates of soft tissue contracture, and MUA were assessed in relation to in-hospital 10-point pain visual analog scale (VAS) measurements. RESULTS: Overall, 44% had improved ROM at 3-month follow-up, 29% had no change in ROM, and 27% had worsened ROM. There was no significant difference in mean VAS scores of patients with improved, unchanged, or worsened ROM postoperatively (3.0 vs 2.8 vs 3.0; P = .068). There was no significant difference in mean VAS scores of patients who developed a soft tissue contracture or required MUA vs those who did not develop these complications (2.7 vs 2.9; P = .24). Similarly, no significant relationship with these outcomes was identified when maximum and discharge VAS scores were analyzed. CONCLUSION: Comparable ROM and rates of MUA based on in-hospital pain levels were observed in this large series of primary TKA patients. While significant early pain may limit participation in ROM exercises initially, this does not appear to have a marked impact on ROM-related complications for most patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Therapeutic.