Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Ann Burns Fire Disasters ; 28(4): 280-287, 2015 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27777549

RESUMO

Mucor fungus infection is a rare opportunistic infection, rapidly progressive and often fatal in immunocompromised patients, or in patients with chronic debilitating diseases. We report six cases of trauma patients with mucormycosis. Three had severe thermal burns, one of them with a medical history of diabetes mellitus. The other three patients suffered from severe soft tissue injuries caused by traffic accidents. In all cases there had been spontaneous exposure and contact of the wounds with soil. During hospitalization, fungi cultures and/or biopsies of all wounds were performed and all resulted positive. The patients were treated with Amphotericin B (AmB) and surgical debridement. Two of them died and the other four were fully healed and discharged. Mucormycosis should be considered in any case of aggressive skin tissue necrosis with a history of soiled wounds. We suggest that mucormycosis is treated by intravenous and local administration of AmB, extensive and repeated debridement and cautious coverage of the wound. The plastic surgeon must wait for negative swab cultures and biopsies before covering the defects with skin grafts or flaps. Reconstruction may be challenging, depending on the extent, depth, location and special indications of the affected site and the donor site availability.


L'infection fongique (mucor mycose) est une infection rare, opportuniste, d'aggravation rapide et d'évolution souvent fatale chez les patients immunodéprimés ou porteurs d'affections chroniques fragilisantes. Nous rapportons 6 cas de traumatismes avec mucor mycoses; 3 d'entre eux présentaient des brûlures thermiques sévères: l'un était atteint de diabète, les 3 autres patients souffraient de graves lésions des parties molles secondaires à des accidents de circulation; dans tous les cas, il s'agissait de plaies largement ouvertes et souillées; pendant l'hospitalisation les cultures ou les biopsies objectivaient la présence fongique; les patients furent traités par Amphotiricine B (AmB) et détersion chirurgicale; 2 patients moururent et les 4 autres évoluèrent vers la cicatrisation complète. La mucor mycose doit être évoquée devant tout cas de lésions cutanées profondes et nécrotiques avec notion de souillure. Nous suggérons que la mucor mycose soit traitée par administration intraveineuse et locale d'AmB avec détersion répétée, large et protection prudente de la plaie. Le chirurgien plastique doit attendre la négativité des cultures après écouvillonnage et biopsie avant de couvrir les pertes de substance par greffe ou lambeau. La reconstruction est un challenge qui dépend de l'étendue, de la profondeur, de la localisation et des particularités de la lésion ainsi que de la disponibilité de zone donneuse.

3.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 28(4): 405-11, 2008 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18549462

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) fails to reach the caecum in approximately 20% of patients. Data suggest that chewing-gum, simulating sham feeding, provokes the cephalic phase of gastrointestinal (GI) motor response and may increase GI motility. AIM: To determine whether chewing-gum increases the ability of CE reaching the caecum. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial. Ninety-three consecutive patients were randomized either to use chewing-gum (n = 47) or not (n = 46). All patients received the identical bowel preparation. Patients chewed one piece of gum for approximately 30 min every 2 h. Two blinded gastroenterologists examined all studies. The number of CE that reached the caecum within 8-h, gastric transit time (GTT) and small bowel transit time (SBTT) were evaluated in all patients. RESULTS: The CE percentage passed into the caecum was higher in the chewing-gum group compared with those in the other (83.0% vs. 71.7% respectively, P = 0.19). Both GTT and SBTT were significantly shorter in the chewing-gum vs. control group [40.8 min (interquartile range: 21-61 min) vs. 56.1 min (interquartile range: 22-78 min) (P = 0.045) and 229.1 min (interquartile range: 158-282 min) vs. 266.2 min (interquartile range: 204-307 min) (P = 0.032) respectively]. Chewing-gum did not adversely affect CE image quality. CONCLUSIONS: Chewing-gum significantly reduces GTT and SBTT during CE. Its use may improve the likelihood of the capsule reaching the caecum without affecting CE image quality.


Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula/métodos , Ceco/fisiopatologia , Goma de Mascar , Trânsito Gastrointestinal/fisiologia , Catárticos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA