Neurodisability care in the time of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an unprecedented societal and healthcare global crisis. Associated changes in regular healthcare provision and lifestyle through societal lockdown are likely to have affected clinical management and well-being of children/young people with neurodisability, who often require complex packages of multidisciplinary care. METHODS: We surveyed 108 families of children/young people with severe physical neurodisability and multiple comorbidities to understand how the pandemic had affected acute clinical status, routine healthcare provision, schooling and family mental and social well-being. RESULTS: A significant proportion of families reported missing hospital appointments and routine therapy, with subsequent worsening of symptoms and function. Families additionally described worsening stress and anxiety during the pandemic, regardless of their baseline level of socio-economic deprivation. CONCLUSION: This highlights the profound effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on health and function in young people with severe neurodisabilities and emphasizes the clear need to better understand how to support this vulnerable population moving forwards.

Care in COVID: A qualitative analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on the health and care of children and young people with severe physical neurodisability and their families.

AIM: To evaluate clinicians' perspectives on the impact of 'lockdown' during the COVID-19 pandemic for children and young people with severe physical neurodisability and their families. METHOD: Framework analysis of comments from families during a recent service review was used to code the themes discussed according to the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and interpreted into emergent themes to summarize the impact of lockdown (Stage 1). They were presented to a clinician focus group for discussion (consultants and physiotherapists working in a specialist motor disorders service, [Stage 2]). RESULTS: Three overarching themes 'Uncertainty and Anxiety', 'Exacerbation of Existing Inequalities' and 'Care Provision: Reaction, Adaptation, and Innovation' summed up the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health and well-being in children and young people with neurodisability and their families. All themes were influenced by time. INTERPRETATION: This study reflects clinician's perceptions of family experiences of the pandemic and lockdown. Significant impact is apparent in the entire U.K. population, but the complexity of care needs for children with physical neurodisability exacerbates this. Lobbying for government policy is vital to ensure that all children, and in particular those with significant health and social care needs, are protected and continue to access services. During the restoration and recovery phase of the pandemic, there is a need for service reconfiguration that utilizes what we have learned and is adaptive to individual family circumstances.

Efficacy and safety of nabiximols cannabinoid medicine for paediatric spasticity in cerebral palsy or traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oromucosal nabiximols cannabinoid medicine as adjunct therapy for children with spasticity due to cerebral palsy/traumatic central nervous system injury with inadequate response to existing treatment. METHOD: Overall, 72 patients (mean [SD] age 12y 4mo [3y 1mo], range 8-18y) were randomized at a ratio of 2:1 to receive nabiximols (n=47; 29 males, 18 females) or placebo (n=25; 15 males, 10 females) for 12 weeks (12 sprays/day max. based on clinical response/tolerability). The primary outcome was change from baseline in level of spasticity on a 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), assessed by the primary caregiver at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included additional measures for spasticity, sleep quality, pain, health-related quality of life, comfort, depression, and safety. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the spasticity 0 to 10 NRS between nabiximols versus placebo groups after 12 weeks. No statistically significant differences were observed for any secondary endpoint. Adverse events were predominantly mild or moderate in severity; however, three cases of hallucinations were reported. INTERPRETATION: Nabiximols was generally well tolerated; however, neuropsychiatric adverse events were observed. No significant reduction in spasticity with nabiximols treatment versus placebo was observed. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Oromucosal nabiximols is generally well tolerated by paediatric patients. However, three cases of hallucinations were observed, one of which involved auditory hallucinations and a suicide attempt. Oromucosal nabiximols versus placebo did not reduce cerebral palsy/central nervous system injury-related spasticity.