Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 62
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 105(6): 1133-1141, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38367833

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine normative values and identify contributing factors for physical performance tests in older, Thai, community-dwelling adults. DESIGN: Nationwide cross-sectional study. SETTING: Thai older community-dwelling adults. PARTICIPANTS: Thai older community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years who had no major health problems (N=1430) between March 2021 and August 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Normative values for the timed Up and Go (TUG) test, gait speed test, and 5-times sit-to-stand (5TSTS) test were determined for sex and age groups. Multivariable quantile regression analysis was employed to evaluate the participants, considering factors that may influence physical performance, such as height, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). RESULTS: The study included 1430 eligible participants. Their mean age was 68.4±5.8 years, and 58.5% were women. Men demonstrated superior physical performance in the medians (p50) of the TUG (10.0 s vs 11.0 s), gait speed (0.98 m/s vs 0.91 m/s), and 5TSTS (14.0 s vs 16.1 s) tests compared with women. These differences were consistently observed across age groups. Moreover, age, sex, and height were significantly associated with poor physical performance. CONCLUSION: This study observed variations in the normative values of TUG, gait speed, and 5TSTS tests among different age groups of older, Thai, community-dwelling adults. Additionally, our findings identified age, sex, and height as significant contributing factors to physical performance in this population.


Assuntos
Avaliação Geriátrica , Desempenho Físico Funcional , Velocidade de Caminhada , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Etários , Estudos Transversais , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Valores de Referência , Fatores Sexuais , População do Sudeste Asiático , Tailândia
2.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 311, 2024 01 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38281041

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is an age-related condition characterized by a progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass. It leads to declining physical performance, potentially culminating in a diminished quality of life or death. This study investigated the prevalence of sarcopenia and its associated risk factors among Thai community-dwelling individuals of advanced age. METHODS: Between March 2021 and August 2022, we conducted a nationwide community-based epidemiological survey across all six major regions of Thailand. Participants with sarcopenia were identified according to the 2019 criteria of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS). The risk factors were examined using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 2456 participants, the overall prevalence of sarcopenia was 18.1%, with nearly two-thirds (66.9%) classified as having severe sarcopenia. Multivariate analysis identified six associated risk factors for sarcopenia. They are a lower body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 11.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.8-17.4), suboptimal leg calf circumference (OR = 6.3, 95% CI = 4.3-9.5), male sex (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 2.2-3.7), a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 2.3-5.0), advanced age (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.3-3.3), and an increasing time in the timed up-and-go test (OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 1.0-1.1). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large-scale national study to represent the prevalence and risk factors for sarcopenia in Thai community-dwelling individuals of advanced age using the AWGS 2019 criteria. Interventions such as lifestyle modifications and appropriate nutrition should be promoted throughout adulthood to maintain muscle strength and delay the onset of sarcopenia, particularly in males. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Central Research Ethics Committee of the National Research Council of Thailand authorized the study protocol (approval number COA-CREC023/2021).


Assuntos
Sarcopenia , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Adulto , Sarcopenia/epidemiologia , Vida Independente , Tailândia/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Transversais , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Força da Mão
3.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(4)2024 Apr 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674261

RESUMO

Background and Objectives: Achieving prefracture functional status is a critical objective following a hip fracture, yet fewer than half of patients reach this milestone. The adoption of tools for assessing functional outcomes is increasingly recognized as essential for evaluating recovery following treatment for fragility hip fractures. We developed multivariable clinical prediction criteria to estimate the likelihood of patients regaining their prefracture activities-of-daily-living (ADL) status one year after sustaining a fragility hip fracture. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients treated for fragility hip fractures at a university-affiliated tertiary care center between February 2017 and April 2019 served as the basis for developing and internally validating the clinical prediction criteria. We applied a multivariable fractional polynomial method to integrate several continuous predictors into a binary logistic regression model. Results: The study included 421 patients, 324 (77%) of whom reported regaining their prefracture activities-of-daily-living level one year after experiencing fragility hip fractures. Significant predictors, such as the prefracture Barthel index, EQ-VAS score, and treatment modality, were incorporated into the predictive model. The model demonstrated excellent discriminative power (AuROC of 0.86 [95% CI 0.82-0.91]) and satisfactory calibration. Conclusions: The predictive model has significant discriminative ability with good calibration and provides clinicians with a means to forecast the recovery trajectories of individual patients one year after a fragility hip fracture, which could be useful because prompt clinical decision-making is aided by this information. Patients and caregivers can also be counseled and encouraged to follow up with the medical activities and interventions deemed essential by doctors who used the prediction tool. Access to the model is provided through a web application. External validation is warranted in order to prove its applicability and generalizability.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Fraturas do Quadril , Humanos , Fraturas do Quadril/reabilitação , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos de Coortes , Modelos Logísticos
4.
J Clin Densitom ; 26(1): 90-96, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36567160

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dual-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (DF-BIA) devices are more accessible and affordable than dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); however, no studies have reported the accuracy of DF-BIA in body composition measurement, especially in the Thai elderly. The aims of this study were to (1) compare the accuracies of lean muscle masses measured by DF-BIA devices and DXA and (2) assess the reliability of the DF-BIA device. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on participants older than 60 years who visited the Orthopedic Clinic of Siriraj Hospital. Whole-body and appendicular skeletal muscle masses (ASMs) were measured using DF-BIA (Tanita RD-545), with DXA (GE Lunar iDXA) as the standard reference. The test-retest reliability of the DF-BIA and the agreement between the devices were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Regression analysis was used to develop an equation to estimate ASM values from BIA close to those from DXA. RESULTS: The mean age of 88 participants was 73.8 (SD 8.0) years, with women predominating (84.1%). The agreement of BIA and DXA was very high for whole-body lean mass (ICC = 0.954) and ASM (ICC = 0.954), but the mean difference in muscle mass from DF-BIA was overestimated. The ICCs of test-retest reliability for whole-body muscle mass and ASM were 0.987 and 0.988, respectively. The equation for corrected ASM was formulated from a linear equation (R2 = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Although lean muscle mass from DF-BIA was minimally overestimated relative to DXA, this device had high accuracy and reliability for lean muscle mass evaluation in the elderly. DXA and DF-BIA are interchangeable for the assessment of muscle mass.


Assuntos
Composição Corporal , Músculo Esquelético , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice de Massa Corporal , Impedância Elétrica , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Transversais , Composição Corporal/fisiologia , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagem , Músculo Esquelético/fisiologia , Absorciometria de Fóton
5.
BMC Geriatr ; 23(1): 70, 2023 02 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36737708

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: (1) To evaluate the prescription rate of anti-osteoporosis medication, and (2) to identify factors associated with patients not receiving anti-osteoporosis medication or, when prescribed, not persisting with medication 1 year after hip fracture treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all fragility hip fracture patients admitted to the orthopedic unit of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. We identified patients who did not receive anti-osteoporosis medication both 6 months and 1 year after fracture treatment. Patients who did not receive the medication 1 year after their treatment were enrolled and interviewed using a no-treatment questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 530 patients with fragility hip fractures were eligible (mean age, 79.0 years), and most (74.5%) were women. Only 148 patients (31.6%) received anti-osteoporosis medication 1 year after hip fracture. Logistic regression analysis identified predictors for not receiving the medication: male sex (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-3.0), Charlson comorbidity index score ≥ 5 (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.0-2.3), and secondary school education or below (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.3). The main reason for not receiving the medication was that healthcare providers neither discussed nor initiated pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis (48.2%). When the medication was prescribed, non-persistence primarily stemmed from transportation difficulties that resulted in patients missing follow-ups (50.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Improved physician attitudes toward anti-osteoporosis medications might enhance the treatment rate. Developing a follow-up team and facilitating access to medications (eg, courier delivery to patients) would promote therapy compliance. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: The protocol for the first phase and second phase was approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (COA no. Si 180/2021) and for the second phase, patients-informed consent forms used in the cross-sectional component were approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (COA no. Si 180/2021). The research was registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR number: 20210824002). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Each patient (or a relative/caregiver) provided informed consent in writing or by telephone to participate in this second study phase.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Fraturas do Quadril , Osteoporose , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tailândia/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico
6.
Osteoporos Int ; 33(10): 2217-2226, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35809122

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected the functional outcomes of fragility hip fracture patients. This study revealed a higher in-hospital complication rate and lower postoperative function at 3 months among patients treated during the pandemic. Therefore, modified in-hospital and post-discharge protocols should be developed for implementation during pandemic crisis periods. INTRODUCTION: This study aims to investigate the in-hospital complication rate and short-term postoperative functional outcomes of fragility hip fracture (FHF) patients compared between during the COVID-19 pandemic and the same 14-month time period 1 year prior to the pandemic. METHODS: Using data from the Siriraj Fracture Liaison Service registry, FHF patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 March 2020 to 30 April 2021) were time-matched with FHF patients treated during the pre-pandemic period (1 March 2018 to 30 April 2019). We collected the rate of in-hospital postoperative complications and the postoperative functional outcomes at discharge and 3 months as measured by the Barthel Index (BI) and EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). Functional outcome measures were compared between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. RESULTS: There were 197 and 287 patients in the pre-pandemic and pandemic groups, respectively. At the 3-month postoperative follow-up, the mean postoperative BI score and change in BI score were both significantly lower in the pandemic group indicating poorer postoperative function. Moreover, FHF patients treated during the pandemic had significantly more in-hospital complications (36.6% vs. 22.8%, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the 3-month EQ-VAS or change in the EQ-VAS between groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study revealed a higher in-hospital complication rate and lower postoperative function at 3 months among FHF patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Therefore, modified in-hospital and post-discharge protocols should be developed for implementation during pandemic crisis periods.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Fraturas do Quadril , Assistência ao Convalescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/complicações , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Humanos , Pandemias , Alta do Paciente
7.
BMC Geriatr ; 22(1): 451, 2022 05 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35610589

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fragility hip fracture increases morbidity and mortality in older adult patients, especially within the first year. Identification of patients at high risk of death facilitates modification of associated perioperative factors that can reduce mortality. Various machine learning algorithms have been developed and are widely used in healthcare research, particularly for mortality prediction. This study aimed to develop and internally validate 7 machine learning models to predict 1-year mortality after fragility hip fracture. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with fragility hip fractures from a single center (Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand) from July 2016 to October 2018. A total of 492 patients were enrolled. They were randomly categorized into a training group (344 cases, 70%) or a testing group (148 cases, 30%). Various machine learning techniques were used: the Gradient Boosting Classifier (GB), Random Forests Classifier (RF), Artificial Neural Network Classifier (ANN), Logistic Regression Classifier (LR), Naive Bayes Classifier (NB), Support Vector Machine Classifier (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbors Classifier (KNN). All models were internally validated by evaluating their performance and the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: For the testing dataset, the accuracies were GB model = 0.93, RF model = 0.95, ANN model = 0.94, LR model = 0.91, NB model = 0.89, SVM model = 0.90, and KNN model = 0.90. All models achieved high AUCs that ranged between 0.81 and 0.99. The RF model also provided a negative predictive value of 0.96, a positive predictive value of 0.93, a specificity of 0.99, and a sensitivity of 0.68. CONCLUSIONS: Our machine learning approach facilitated the successful development of an accurate model to predict 1-year mortality after fragility hip fracture. Several machine learning algorithms (eg, Gradient Boosting and Random Forest) had the potential to provide high predictive performance based on the clinical parameters of each patient. The web application is available at www.hipprediction.com . External validation in a larger group of patients or in different hospital settings is warranted to evaluate the clinical utility of this tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (22 February 2021; reg. no. TCTR20210222003 ).


Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Aprendizado de Máquina , Idoso , Teorema de Bayes , Fraturas do Quadril/diagnóstico , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tailândia/epidemiologia
8.
BMC Geriatr ; 21(1): 72, 2021 01 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33478397

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hypovitaminosis D can be observed in most fragility hip fracture patients. However, measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level is costly and may not be available in some centers. Without the baseline serum 25(OH)D level, the appropriate dose of vitamin D supplementation is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vitamin D supplementation in fragility hip fracture patients compared between high- and low-dose vitamin D supplementation. METHODS: A total of 140 patients diagnosed with fragility hip fracture were randomly allocated to either the high-dose (60,000 IU/week) or low-dose (20,000 IU/week) vitamin D2 supplementation group for 12 weeks. The number of patients who achieved optimal vitamin D level (serum 25(OH)D > 30 ng/mL), the proportion of patients who developed hypercalcemia, and the functional outcome were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 140 patients who were enrolled, 21 patients were lost to follow-up during the study period. The remaining 119 patients (58 and 61 in the high- and low-dose groups, respectively) were included in the final analysis. The high-dose group had a higher rate of serum 25(OH)D restoration to optimal level than the low-dose group (82.8% vs 52.5%, respectively; p < 0.001). Approximately 3.4 and 1.6% of patients in the high- and low-dose groups, respectively, had mild transient hypercalcemia, but none developed moderate, severe, or symptomatic hypercalcemia. There were no differences in functional outcome scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In treatment settings where baseline serum 25(OH)D level can't be evaluated in older adults with fragility hip fracture, we recommend high-dose vitamin D2 of approximately 60,000 IU/week for 12 weeks, with subsequent switch to a maintenance dose. This regimen effectively restored serum vitamin D to an optimal level in 82.8% of patients without causing symptomatic hypercalcemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of this study was retrospectively registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry database no. TCTR20180302007 on 20 February 2018.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Deficiência de Vitamina D , Idoso , Suplementos Nutricionais , Ergocalciferóis/efeitos adversos , Fraturas do Quadril/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Tailândia , Vitamina D , Deficiência de Vitamina D/complicações , Deficiência de Vitamina D/diagnóstico , Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Vitaminas
9.
BMC Geriatr ; 21(1): 548, 2021 10 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34641804

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are common among frail, older people and associated with multiple adverse outcomes, including death. Timely and appropriate care by a multidisciplinary team may improve outcomes. Implementing a team to jointly deliver the service in resource-limited settings is challenging, particularly on the effectiveness of patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study to compare outcomes of hip fracture patients aged 65 or older admitted at Siriraj hospital before and after implementation of the Fast-track program for Acute Geriatric Hip Fractures. The primary outcome was the incidence of medical complications. The secondary outcomes were time to surgery, factors related to the occurrence of various complications, in-hospital mortality, and mortality at month 3, month 6 and month 12 after the operation. RESULTS: Three hundred two patients were enrolled from the Siriraj hospital's database from October 2016 to October 2018; 151 patients in each group with a mean age of 80 years were analyzed. Clinical parameters were similar between groups except the Fast-track group comprising more patients with dementia (37.1% VS 23.8%, p < 0.012). In the Fast-track group, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients underwent surgery within 72-h (80.3% VS 44.7%, p < 0.001) and the length of stay was significantly shorter (11 days (8-17) VS 13 days (9-18), p = 0.017). There was no significant difference in medical complications. Stratified analysis by dementia status showed a trend in delirium reduction in both patients with dementia and without dementia groups, and a pressure injury reduction among patients with dementia after the program was implemented but without statistical significance. There was no significant difference in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a multidisciplinary team for hip fracture patients is feasible in resource-limited setting. In the Fast-track program, time to surgery was reduced and the length of stay was shortened. Other outcome benefits were not shown, which may be due to incomplete uptake of all involved disciplines.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fraturas do Quadril/diagnóstico , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 33(1): 125-131, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32144733

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient education about osteoporosis is an important component of osteoporosis treatment. AIM: To compare the effectiveness of osteoporosis education between video-based learning and traditional lecture-based learning. METHODS: Participants who attended the Outpatient Department of Siriraj Hospital during June 2017 to November 2017 were recruited. Ten-question pre- and post-tests were used to evaluate participant osteoporosis knowledge. After finishing the pre-test, patients were randomized to receive osteoporosis education via either traditional lecture-based or video-based learning for 25 min. After the training, patient questions about the subject matter were answered, and then the post-test was administered. Change in score was compared between groups using non-inferiority test at a non-inferiority margin of - 1. RESULTS: Of 413 participants, 207 and 206 people were allocated to the lecture-based group and the video-based group, respectively. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, change in score between pre-test and post-test, or change in score between pre-test and retention test between groups. Non-inferiority test revealed the change in score after video-based learning to be non-inferior to traditional lecture-based learning at a difference of > - 1, α = 0.05 (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Video-based osteoporosis education can be used as part of a fracture liaison service to provide essential information about osteoporosis to both patients and caregivers. Video-based education is an efficient and effective tool that will reduce dependency on clinicians to provide lecture-based osteoporosis instruction. CONCLUSIONS: Since video- and lecture-based education were found to be equally effective, a standard package for both education techniques should be developed and implemented for all patients.


Assuntos
Educação a Distância , Osteoporose , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Escolaridade , Humanos , Gravação em Vídeo
11.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 22(1): 620, 2021 Jul 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34256770

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The ATTUNE Knee System is a new prosthetic design that has theoretical advantages over the Press Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma Knee System specific to improved knee kinematics and patellofemoral joint tracking. This study aimed to evaluate functional outcomes compared between the ATTUNE and PFC Sigma designs at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who received either the ATTUNE or PFC Sigma system during November 2013 to February 2015 at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand). Functional outcomes were evaluated using Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, 2-min walk test (2MWT), modified knee score, numerical rating scale-pain, range of motion (ROM), and rate of anterior knee pain and crepitation at preoperation, 3-months, 1-year, and 5-years postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 113 patients, 59 and 54 received the PFC Sigma and ATTUNE systems, respectively. At a minimum of 5-years follow-up, all functional outcomes improved significantly from the preoperative period although TUG test and 2MWT declined significantly from 1- to 5-years postoperatively only in the PFC Sigma group. The mean ROM at 5-years postoperatively was significantly higher in ATTUNE than in PFC Sigma; however, the difference was small (116° vs. 110°, respectively; p = 0.041). There were no significant differences in any of the other outcome measurements, including anterior knee pain, clunking, and crepitation, between groups at any study time point. CONCLUSIONS: ​Our results revealed no major differences in functional outcomes between the PFC Sigma and ATTUNE TKA designs at an intermediate-term follow-up of at least 5 years. Longer-term follow-up study is needed to evaluate the benefits of the ATTUNE design relative to polyethylene wear and the rate of aseptic loosening.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Prótese do Joelho , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Desenho de Prótese , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tailândia , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 22(1): 443, 2021 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33990191

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Osteitis fibrosa cystica is the classic manifestation of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), occurs after prolonged exposure of bone to high serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) level. It has become increasingly rare due to early detection of PHPT. CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old woman was referred to our institution for fixation of multiple fractures of upper and lower extremities that had been reoccurring in the past 5 years. Her medical history showed right-shoulder, left-elbow, and right-femur fractures after a fall 5 years previously. One month ago, she sustained fractures of the right distal humerus, left tibia, and left femur without history of trauma. Upon arrival to our hospital, a thorough review of her plain radiographs demonstrated brown tumors at multiple sites, along with a salt-and-pepper appearance of the skull and a rugger-jersey spine, compatible with osteitis fibrosa cystica. Patient was diagnosed with PHPT, confirmed by high-corrected serum calcium (13.6 [8.6-10.0] mg/dl), low serum phosphate (2.2 [2.5-4.5] mg/dL), high serum alkaline phosphatase (1482 [35-105] U/L), and significantly elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH 3850 [15-65] pg/mL). A histologically confirmed, 2.5-cm parathyroid adenoma was removed by parathyroidectomy. Ten days later, closed reduction and internal fixation of the left proximal femoral shaft was performed. Pain and ambulation were significantly improved 6 months postoperatively. At the 1.5-year follow-up, fracture unions and complete mineralization of brown tumors were noted; the patient could ambulate with neither pain nor an assistive device. CONCLUSIONS: PHPT has become more asymptomatic in countries where routine calcium screening is performed. Nevertheless, the classic skeletal involvement, osteitis fibrosa cystica, should not be overlooked, particularly in young patients who present with a low-energy fracture.


Assuntos
Fraturas Espontâneas , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário , Osteíte Fibrosa Cística , Neoplasias das Paratireoides , Adulto , Feminino , Fraturas Espontâneas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Espontâneas/etiologia , Fraturas Espontâneas/cirurgia , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/complicações , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteíte Fibrosa Cística/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteíte Fibrosa Cística/etiologia , Hormônio Paratireóideo
13.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 21(1): 757, 2020 Nov 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33208120

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several risk assessments have been developed to evaluate fall risk in older adults, but it has not been conclusively established which of these tools is most effective for assessing fall risk in this vulnerable population. Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the self-rated Fall Risk Questionnaire (self-rated FRQ), a 12-item questionnaire designed to screen older adults who are at risk of falling and has been widely used in many centers. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the self-rated FRQ in older adults with osteoporosis. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from December 2019 to March 2020. Sixty-eight men or postmenopausal women aged > 65 years who were diagnosed with osteoporosis either by bone mineral density T-score or by occurrence of fragility fracture were evaluated with the self-rated FRQ, the Thai falls risk assessment test (Thai-FRAT), the timed get-up-and-go test (TUG test), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the 5 times sit-to-stand test (5TSTS test). Validity of the self-rated FRQ was assessed by evaluating the correlations (r) between the self-rated FRQ score and the scores from the other four assessments. Reliability of the self-rated FRQ was evaluated by measuring test-retest reliability and internal consistency. RESULTS: The self-rated FRQ was moderately strongly correlated with the BBS, TUG test, and 5TSTS test (r = 0.535 to 0.690; p < 0.001), and fairly correlated with the Thai-FRAT (r = 0.487; p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability of the self-rated FRQ was high, with a Kappa of 1. Internal consistency of the self-rated FRQ was excellent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.936). CONCLUSIONS: The self-rated FRQ was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluating fall risk in older adults with osteoporosis. Since assessment of fall risk requires a multifaceted measurement tool, the self-rated FRQ is an appropriate tool that can be integrated into the fall risk assessment algorithm in older adults with osteoporosis.


Assuntos
Avaliação Geriátrica , Osteoporose , Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Equilíbrio Postural , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tailândia
14.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 140(9): 1255-1263, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32424445

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Staples and subcuticular suture are commonly used wound closure techniques after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). To date, only a few studies have investigated the differences between these two wound closure methods in TKA. Accordingly, this study aimed to compare cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction between staples and subcuticular suture for post-TKA wound closure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial included patients scheduled to undergo TKA at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery of Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) during June 2018-March 2019. Patients were randomized into the staples or subcuticular suture groups. Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES), cosmetic-visual analogue scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction-VAS were evaluated at the 6-week and 3-month follow-ups. Functional outcome by the modified Knee Society Knee Scoring System and wound complications were also assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (31 per group) were included. There were no significant differences in the HWES, cosmetic-VAS, patient satisfaction-VAS, or wound complication rate between groups at the 6-week or 3-month follow-ups. Wound closure time was significantly shorter in the staples group (p < 0.001), but the total operative time was not significantly different between groups. Modified knee score was significantly better in the suture group at 6 weeks (p = 0.024), but there was no significant difference between groups at 3 months. Significant association was observed between patient satisfaction-VAS and cosmetic-VAS at the 6-week (p = 0.03) and 3-month (p = 0.021) follow-ups. CONCLUSION: Subcuticular suture and staples were found to be comparable wound-closure options after TKA relative to cosmetic outcome, patient satisfaction, functional outcome, and wound complication rate at 3-months post-operation.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Sutura , Artroplastia do Joelho/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Suturas
15.
Int Orthop ; 43(11): 2637-2647, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30968166

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cementless hemiarthroplasty is a widely used treatment for femoral neck fractures. Intra-operative femoral fracture occasionally occurs during the procedure, and the use of cerclage wire has been proposed to stabilize both the prosthesis and the bone. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of cerclage wiring to manage intra-operative fractures occurring during cementless hemiarthroplasty in older patients with a femoral neck fracture. METHODS: Medical records and radiographs of older patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent hemiarthroplasty during 2009 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received cerclage wiring were matched with a demographically matched control group that did not. Patients were followed for at least 12 months. Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life were evaluated by determining the distance of distal stem migration, Barthel Index, EuroQol-visual analog scale (VAS), and pain-VAS. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included, comprising 27 study group and 54 control group patients. A tapered wedge-shaped femoral prosthesis was implanted in all cases. No significant differences in distance of distal stem migration or rate of stem subsidence > 2 mm were observed between the case and control groups (subsidence rate 11.1 vs. 14.8%, respectively). There was also no significant difference in functional outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed a low mean distance of distal stem migration and a low subsidence rate. Functional outcomes and quality of life were similar between the two groups. Cerclage wiring technique is safe, and it should be routinely performed when intra-operative femoral fracture occurs during cementless hemiarthroplasty.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Hemiartroplastia/efeitos adversos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fios Ortopédicos , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Fêmur/etiologia , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fêmur/lesões , Hemiartroplastia/métodos , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Intraoperatórias/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas por Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
J Arthroplasty ; 33(6): 1737-1744, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29454556

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 2-minute walk test (2mwt) is a performance-based test that evaluates functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluated its validity compared with the modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), modified Knee Score, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, and Timed Up and Go test, and its responsiveness in assessing functional recovery in TKA patients. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 162 patients undergoing primary TKA between 2013 and 2015. We used patient-reported outcome measures (modified WOMAC, OKS, modified Knee Score, Numerical Pain Rating Scale) and performance-based tests (2mwt and Timed Up and Go test) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The construct validity of 2mwt was determined between the 2mwt distances walked and other outcome measurements. To assess responsiveness, effect size and standardized response mean were analyzed. Minimal clinically important difference of 2mwt at 12 months after TKA was also calculated. RESULTS: All outcome measurements improved significantly from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Bivariate analysis revealed mild to moderate associations between the 2mwt and modified WOMAC function subscales, and moderate to strong associations with OKS. Mild to moderate correlations were found for pain and stiffness between 2mwt and other outcome measurements. The effect size and standardized response mean at 12 months were large, with a minimal clinically important difference of 12.7 m. CONCLUSION: 2mwt is a validated performance-based test with responsiveness properties. Being simple and easy to perform, it can be used routinely in clinical practice to evaluate functional recovery after TKA.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/reabilitação , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Teste de Caminhada/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Dor , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Caminhada
17.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 138(12): 1671-1677, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30094561

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the validity of Barthel Index (BI) compared with de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI), EuroQol-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), 2-min walk test (2MWT), and timed get-up-and-go test (TUG), and to evaluate the responsiveness of all outcome measures for assessing functional recovery in older patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Eighty-one femoral neck fracture patients who were enrolled in a study evaluating functional recovery after bisphosphonate therapy during 2013 to 2015, and who had data available at both baseline and 12 months after surgery were included in this study. RESULTS: All scores improved significantly from baseline to the 1-year follow-up. BI had moderate to strong correlation with DEMMI, 2MWT, and TUG (r-value: 0.490-0.843), and mild to moderate correlation with EQ-VAS (r-value: 0.278-0.323). All outcome measurements had high effect estimates. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of BI at 12 months was 9.8 points. CONCLUSION: Since BI was shown to have good validity (moderate to strong correlation with DEMMI and performance-based tests, and mild to moderate correlation with EQ-VAS), BI can be used to accurately assess functional recovery in patients who undergo hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Hemiartroplastia/métodos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/fisiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 99(11): 1233-8, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29901944

RESUMO

Background: The proportion of people aged 65 years or older continues to increase in Thailand. Consistent with that trend, the number of fragility fracture patients is increasing. Hypovitaminosis D is one of the important factors associated with fragility fracture. Objective: To evaluate serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level and prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in patients with fragility hip fracture in Thailand. Material and Method: This study retrospectively reviewed 25(OH)D level in fragility hip fracture patients treated at Siriraj Hospital between January 2012 and December 2015. Results: Three hundred seventy nine fragility hip fractures were included in this study. Two hundred sixty eight of those patients had serum 25(OH)D level available within one month after fracture. Mean age of patients was 80.8±8.3 years and 74.6% were women. One hundred twenty four patients (46.3%) had vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) and 86 patients (32.1%) had vitamin D insufficiency (20 to 30 ng/mL). Parathyroid hormone level was available in 159 of 268 patients, and 31.5% of those had hyperparathyroidism (PTH level >65 pg/mL). Conclusion: Orthopedists who treat fragility hip fracture should always include treatment of vitamin D deficiency in their patient management plan. Future studies should establish treatment guidelines regarding dose and duration of vitamin D supplementation in fragility hip fracture patients.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril/complicações , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Deficiência de Vitamina D/complicações , Deficiência de Vitamina D/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo/epidemiologia , Masculino , Hormônio Paratireóideo/sangue , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tailândia/epidemiologia
19.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 97(6): 635-43, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25137881

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the prevalence of atypical femoral fracture (AFF) in Thai patients at a single institution based on the 2010 and 2013 American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) criteria and the sensitivity and specificity of each radiographic feature of AFF to identify bisphosphonate treatment. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors retrospectively reviewed plain radiographs of 856 patients who were diagnosed with subtrochanteric or femoral shaft fractures between 2002 and 2013. Only those who had major radiographic features of AFF according to the 2010 ASBMR criteria were included. Next, the prevalence of atypical fracture was recalculated based on the revised 2013 ASBMR criteria. Furthermore, the specificity and sensitivity of each radiological finding to detect bisphosphonate treatment were calculated. RESULTS: The prevalence of atypical femoral fracture based on 2010 ASBMR criteria at this institution was 5.7%. Two patients had all radiographic features of AFF but sustained a high-energy trauma and could be diagnosed with AFF based on the 2013 ASBMR criteria. Among all of the radiographic features to define AFF, a localized periosteal thickening of the lateral femoral cortex was the most specific sign to detect bisphosphonate treatment (0.98; 95% CI 0.96-0.99). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AFF in Thai patients at a single institution was approximately 6%. Although the prevalence of AFF did not dramatically change after applying the 2013 revised ASBMR criteria, this reflected some gap in the diagnosis criteria, which should require further refinement. The authors suggested that the ASBMR criteria should be used only with those having acute fractures.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Fêmur/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tailândia/epidemiologia
20.
Clin Orthop Surg ; 16(1): 7-15, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38304218

RESUMO

Background: The main objective of treating fragility hip fractures is to maximize the patients' ability to return to their basic activities of daily living (ADL) levels. This study explored prognostic factors associated with the ability to recover pre-fracture ADL levels at 1 year after fragility hip fractures. Methods: We retrospectively recruited patients admitted with fragility hip fractures between July 2016 and September 2018. Details of the following were extracted from electronic medical records: age, sex, body mass index; pre-fracture Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Barthel index, and EuroQol-Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) scores; pre-fracture ambulatory status; and fracture type and treatment. The primary endpoint was the ability to return to the pre-fracture ADL status at 1 year. Multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the prognostic ability of predictors. Results: Of 405 patients, 284 (70.1%) managed to return to their pre-fracture ADL status. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the predictor with the most apparent effect size was pre-fracture EQ-VAS scores ≥ 65 (multivariable odds ratio [mOR], 12.90; p = 0.03). Other influential predictors were CCI scores < 5 (mOR, 1.96; p = 0.01) and surgical treatment for the hip fracture. Conclusions: Three prognostic factors can predict a hip fracture patient's ability to return to the pre-fracture ambulatory status at 1 year. They are the patient's CCI score, operative treatment for the hip fracture, and the pre-fracture EQ-VAS score. This information could be used to develop a clinical prediction model based on the prognostic factors.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Fraturas do Quadril , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prognóstico , Modelos Estatísticos , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA