Heart Rate Variability Measurement Can Be a Point-of-Care Sensing Tool for Screening Postpartum Depression: Differentiation from Adjustment Disorder.

Postpartum depression (PPD) is a serious mental health issue among women after childbirth, and screening systems that incorporate questionnaires have been utilized to screen for PPD. These questionnaires are sensitive but less specific, and the additional use of objective measures could be helpful. The present study aimed to verify the usefulness of a measure of autonomic function, heart rate variability (HRV), which has been reported to be dysregulated in people with depression. Among 935 women who had experienced childbirth and completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), HRV was measured in EPDS-positive women (n = 45) 1 to 4 weeks after childbirth using a wearable device. The measurement was based on a three-behavioral-state paradigm with a 5 min duration, consisting of rest (Rest), task load (Task), and rest-after-task (After) states, and the low-frequency power (LF), the high-frequency power (HF), and their ratio (LF/HF) were calculated. Among the women included in this study, 12 were diagnosed with PPD and 33 were diagnosed with adjustment disorder (AJD). Women with PPD showed a lack of adequate HRV regulation in response to the task load, accompanying a high LF/HF score in the Rest state. On the other hand, women with AJD exhibited high HF and reduced LF/HF during the After state. A linear discriminant analysis using HRV indices and heart rate (HR) revealed that both the differentiation of PPD and AJD patients from the controls and that of PPD patients from AJD patients were possible. The sensitivity and specificity for PPD vs. AJD were 75.0% and 90.9%, respectively. Using this paradigm, an HRV measurement revealed the characteristic autonomic profiles of PPD and AJD, suggesting that it may serve as a point-of-care sensing tool in PPD screening systems.

Usefulness of heart rate variability indices in assessing the risk of an unsuccessful return to work after sick leave in depressed patients.

AIM: The present study aimed to examine whether heart rate variability (HRV) indices in depressed patients measured at return to work after sick leave are related to the outcome of reinstatement. METHODS: This study included 30 workers who took a leave of absence due to major depressive disorder. HRV was measured twice, once when participants left work and another when they returned to work. One month after returning to work, 19 participants continued their original work (successful return group), while 11 failed to perform their original work (unsuccessful return group). HRV indices including high- and low-frequency components (HF and LF) were calculated in three conditions within a session lasting for about 5 minutes, initial rest (Rest), mental task (Task), and rest after task (After), and were compared between the two participant groups. Psychological states were evaluated using Self-rating Depression Scale and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the HRV indices on leaving work between groups. On returning to work, the "unsuccessful return group" exhibited lower HF Rest score, higher HF Task/Rest ratio, and higher LF/HF Rest score than the "successful return group." Psychological scores improved in both groups. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that autonomic dysregulations revealed by HRV measurement at return to work after a leave of absence in MDD patients were related to the outcome of reinstatement and can serve as useful information for the assessment of the risk of unsuccessful return.