Ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy: Brand-name (HOLOXAN®) vs generic formulation (IFOSFAMIDE EG®).

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Two forms of ifosfamide are commercially available in France: HOLOXAN® (brand-name drug) and IFOSFAMIDE EG® (generic drug). Following the marketing launch of the generic drug, there has been a significant increase in cases of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy reported in France. Our objective is to compare the incidence of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy in adult patients treated with HOLOXAN® or IFOSFAMIDE EG®. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of adult patients treated with ifosfamide in two medical centers from 2013 to 2017, with data analysed from medical records. Comparisons of patients were made, according to the formulation used and according to the occurrence of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy. The groups of patients were compared using a chi-square or Fisher's exact test for qualitative parameters and a Wilcoxon test for quantitative parameters. To include confounding factors in the analysis of the impact of drug formulation on the occurrence of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy, a generalized linear model was performed with the occurrence of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy as the dependent parameter, and the formulation and the confounding factors as explanatory parameters. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 191 patients were included: 103 patients received HOLOXAN® (53.9%) and 88 patients received IFOSFAMIDE EG® (46.1%). In the HOLOXAN® group, the median infusion time was higher (12 hours vs 3h, P < 0.001) and aprepitant was administered more frequently (78.6% vs 69.7%, P < 0.001) than for the IFOSFAMIDE EG® group. Ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy occurred in 11 patients (5.8%, CI 95% [2.9%, 10.0%]). In the ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy group, median infusion time was higher (12 hours [12; 24] vs 3 hours [2; 12] P < 0.001) and a poor performance status was more frequent (54.5% vs 13.9%, P = 0.002) than in the group without ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy. The frequency of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy in the HOLOXAN® group was 1.9% (2/103) against 10.2% (9/88) in the IFOSFAMIDE EG® group (P = 0.014). Multivariate analysis revealed that treatment with IFOSFAMIDE EG® resulted in significantly more ifosfamide-induced encephalopathies compared to HOLOXAN® (OR and CI 95%:7.4 [1.4; 39.5], P = 0.018). We identified two other risk factors for ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy: long-term infusion and a performance status of two or higher. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The formation of chloroethylamine in solution could be the cause of more frequent ifosfamide-induced encephalopathies with IFOSFAMIDE EG® compared to HOLOXAN®. Application of these data could help in the choice of ifosfamide formulation in adult patients to decrease the risk of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy, and more specifically for patients with risk factors.

Impact of Antibiotics and Proton Pump Inhibitors on Efficacy and Tolerance of Anti-PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Background: The use of antibiotics (ATB) and proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) alters the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota, which can influence the immune system, consequently interfering with response to anti-PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We assessed the impact of ATB and/or PPI use on the efficacy and safety of ICI. Methods: Two hundred twelve patients treated with anti-PD1 ICI for non-small cell lung carcinoma, melanoma, upper airway & digestive tract carcinoma or renal cell carcinoma were retrospectively included. Patients having received ATB within 60 days before ICI initiation were included in the ATB+ group. Patients having received PPI within 30 days before ICI initiation were included in the PPI+ group. Four groups were thus considered: ATB-/PPI-, ATB+/PPI-, ATB-/PPI+, ATB+/PPI+. Response rate was assessed by RECIST v1.1. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events, recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5, were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting to account for selection bias. Results: PFS at 6 months was 56.7 %, 95%CI (49.6%; 63.2%) and 47.2 %, 95%CI (39.8%;54.1%) at 12 months. OS was 81.6%, 95%CI (75.6%; 86.2%) at 6 months, and 69.4%, 95%CI (61.9%;75.7%) at 12 months. Compared to ATB-/PPI- group, PFS was lower for the ATB+/PPI- group [Hazard ratio (HR) 1.90, 95%CI (1.41;2.57)] and the ATB-/PPI+ group [HR 1.51, 95%CI (1.11;2.05)], and lowest in the ATB+/PPI+ group [HR 3.65, 95%CI (2.75;4.84)]. For OS, the use of ATB alone or PPI alone or in combination was a risk factor for death, with each increasing HR values by a similar magnitude, and the combination of ATB and PPI did not increase risk further. AEs were observed in 78 cases (36.8%) with no significant impact of ATB or PPI use. Conclusions: This study reveals that ATB and/or PPI use can alter response to anti-PD1 ICI, and the prognosis of cancer patients. The microbiota mechanisms involved in the response to ICI should be investigated to optimize patient management.

[Training of pharmacy personnel in the management of a centralized unit: the Oncolor network experience]. / Formation du personnel des pharmacies à la gestion d'une unité centralisée: expérience du réseau Oncolor.

The network of cancer care units in Lorraine area (Oncolor) developed management training for people working in chemotherapy units, and cytotoxic drug preparation. The programme was framed both for staff of executives (pharmacists), and technicians. Firstly, comparison between practices and theoretical recommendations lead to the elaboration of standardized operating procedures. Secondly, we elaborated a specific handbook for this education programme. A series of four-days independent sessions were organized for pharmacists and technicians. Each session combined theoretical and technical teaching for preparing antineoplastic drugs. Participants passing a successful final examination received a certificate from the Oncolor's network attesting their capacity to manage a chemotherapy unit. Four sessions were performed, with 35 participants. Only 31 passed at final examination. This preliminary experience will be enlarged to all members of the network and regularly brought up to date.