Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Nucl Med ; 38(9): 677-85, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23816941

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In otosclerosis, CT of the temporal bone is used to confirm the diagnosis. Whereas CT is a static diagnostic tool displaying the demineralization caused by otosclerosis, imaging of bone metabolism by (18)F-fluoride PET may provide quantitative information. This could be useful for prognosis and stratification of patients. The aim of this study was to assess (18)F-fluoride activity in patients with otosclerosis and to evaluate its use as a complementary diagnostic tool. METHODS: All patients with otosclerosis underwent a PET/CT scan. Audiometric data were collected. The severity of otosclerosis was assessed using a recognized radiological classification. The control group consisted of patients who had undergone (18)F-fluoride PET/CT scan for orthopedic purpose. Regions of interest were drawn on PET scans which corresponded to standardized anatomical sites as defined on CT, to measure bone metabolism using standardized uptake values (SUV(max) and SUV(mean)). RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of 11 otosclerosis patients (16 eligible temporal bones) and group 2 consisted of 5 control patients (10 temporal bones). On PET scan, visual assessment of temporal bones with otosclerosis showed increased metabolic activity in the otic capsule in 11/16 cases. The SUV(max) in the entire otic capsule was significantly higher in otosclerosis patients compared to control subjects. Significant differences in SUV(mean) were found between otosclerosis and control subjects in the fenestral and saccule area. Moreover, metabolic activity in these regions significantly correlated with hearing loss and CT classification. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-Fluoride PET scanning using SUV measurements has the potential to be a diagnostic tool in otosclerosis.


Assuntos
Osso e Ossos/metabolismo , Orelha Interna/diagnóstico por imagem , Fluoretos , Otosclerose/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Idoso , Pontos de Referência Anatômicos , Osso e Ossos/diagnóstico por imagem , Orelha Interna/patologia , Feminino , Radioisótopos de Flúor , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem Multimodal , Projetos Piloto , Osso Temporal/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 60(17): 1668-77, 2012 Oct 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23021334

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to determine the prognostic value of a multimarker strategy for risk-assessment in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with dyspnea. BACKGROUND: Combining biomarkers with different pathophysiological backgrounds may improve risk stratification in dyspneic patients in the ED. METHODS: The study prospectively investigated the prognostic value of the biomarkers N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), Cystatin-C (Cys-C), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and Galectin-3 (Gal-3) for 90-day mortality in 603 patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea as primary complaint. RESULTS: hs-CRP, hs-cTnT, Cyst-C, and NT-proBNP were independent predictors of 90-day mortality. The number of elevated biomarkers was highly associated with outcome (odds ratio: 2.94 per biomarker, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.29 to 3.78, p < 0.001). A multimarker approach had incremental value beyond a single-marker approach. Our multimarker emergency dyspnea-risk score (MARKED-risk score) incorporating age ≥75 years, systolic blood pressure <110 mm Hg, history of heart failure, dyspnea New York Heart Association functional class IV, hs-cTnT ≥0.04 µg/l, hs-CRP ≥25 mg/l, and Cys-C ≥1.125 mg/l had excellent prognostic performance (area under the curve: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.89), was robust in internal validation analyses and could identify patients with very low (<3 points), intermediate (≥3, <5 points), and high risk (≥5 points) of 90-day mortality (2%, 14%, and 44% respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A multimarker strategy provided superior risk stratification beyond any single-marker approach. The MARKED-risk score that incorporates hs-cTnT, hs-CRP, and Cys-C along with clinical risk factors accurately identifies patients with very low, intermediate, and high risk.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , Dispneia/sangue , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Medição de Risco/métodos , Idoso , Intervalos de Confiança , Dispneia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA