Pharmacogenetics of tenofovir clearance among Southern Africans living with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir is a component of preferred combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens in Africa. Few pharmacogenetic studies have been conducted on tenofovir exposure in Africa, where genetic diversity is greatest. OBJECTIVE: We characterized the pharmacogenetics of plasma tenofovir clearance in Southern Africans receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). METHODS: Adults randomized to TAF or TDF in dolutegravir-containing arms of the ADVANCE trial (NCT03122262) were studied. Linear regression models stratified by study arm examined associations with unexplained variability in tenofovir clearance. We investigated genetic associations with polymorphisms selected a priori followed by genome-wide associations. RESULTS: A total of 268 participants (138 and 130 in the TAF and TDF arm, respectively) were evaluable for associations. Among polymorphisms previously associated with any drug-related phenotype, IFNL4 rs12979860 was associated with more rapid tenofovir clearance in both arms (TAF: P = 0.003; TDF: P = 0.003). Genome-wide, the lowest P values for tenofovir clearance in TAF and TDF arms were LINC01684 rs9305223 (P = 3.0 × 10-8) and intergenic rs142693425 (P = 1.4 × 10-8), respectively. CONCLUSION: Among Southern Africans randomized to TAF or TDF in ADVANCE, unexplained variability in tenofovir clearance was associated with a polymorphism in IFNL4, an immune-response gene. It is unclear how this gene would affect tenofovir disposition.

Community-based management of a five-arm randomised clinical trial in COVID-19 outpatients in South Africa: challenges and opportunities.

BACKGROUND: Repeated COVID-19 waves and corresponding mitigation measures have impacted health systems globally with exceptional challenges. In response to the pandemic, researchers, regulators, and funders rapidly pivoted to COVID-19 research activities. However, many clinical drug studies were not completed, due to often complex and rapidly evolving research conditions. METHODS: We outline our experience of planning and managing a randomised, adaptive, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of four repurposed drug regimens versus standard-of-care (SOC) in outpatients with 'mild to moderate' COVID-19 in Johannesburg, South Africa, in the context of a partnership with multiple stakeholders. The study was conducted between 3 September 2020 and 23 August 2021 during changing COVID-19 restrictions, significant morbidity and mortality waves, and allied supply line, economic, and political instability. RESULTS: Our clinical study design was pragmatic, including low-risk patients who were treated open label. There was built-in flexibility, including provision for some sample size adjustment and a range of secondary efficacy outcomes. Barriers to recruitment included the timing of waves, staff shortages due to illness, late presentation of patients, COVID-19 misinformation, and political unrest. Mitigations were the use of community health workers, deployment of mobile clinical units, and simplification of screening. Trial management required a radical reorganisation of logistics and processes to accommodate COVID-19 restrictions. These included the delivery of staff training and monitoring remotely, electronic consent, patient training and support to collect samples and report data at home, and the introduction of tele-medicine. These measures were successful for data collection, safe, and well received by patients. CONCLUSION: Completing a COVID-19 trial in outpatients during the height of the pandemic required multiple innovations in nearly every aspect of clinical trial management, a high commitment level from study staff and patients, and support from study sponsors. Our experience has generated a more robust clinical research infrastructure, building in efficiencies to clinical trial management beyond the pandemic.