Methylation Analysis to Detect CIN3+ in High-Risk Human Papillomavirus-Positive Self-Samples From the Population-Based Cervical Cancer Screening Program.

Since 2017, a self-sampling device has been introduced to the Dutch population-based screening program to enable higher participation rates. However, routine triage cytology cannot be performed on self-sampling material. Methylation is an alternative triage method that can be performed directly on DNA extracted from self-samples. Recently, we tested a set of 15 published cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+)-specific methylation markers and found a panel of 3 markers with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 74%. In this study, we determined the sensitivity and specificity of 2 commercial assays using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. DNA from the same cohort of high-risk human papillomavirus-positive self-sampled material obtained through the population-based screening program in the North of the Netherlands from women with CIN2 or less (

Generating Utilities for the Château-Santé Base: A Novel, Generic, and Patient-Centered Health-Outcome Measure.

OBJECTIVES: We have developed a new patient-centered, preference-based generic health-outcome measure, Château-Santé Base (CS-Base), which is based on a novel multiattribute preference response (MAPR) measurement framework. This study aimed to generate a first utility set for the CS-Base, making it suitable for use in health-economic evaluations. METHODS: CS-Base comprises 12 health attributes: mobility, vision, hearing, cognition, mood, anxiety, pain, fatigue, social functioning, daily activities, self-esteem, and independence, each with 4 levels. Our methodology to generate utilities for the CS-Base was 2-fold. First, we derived coefficients from patient MAPR data to calculate CS-Base values. Subsequently, these were normalized to a 0.0 to 1.0 utility scale, in which 0.0 signifies dead. The dead position was estimated using general population data from a discrete choice experiment (discrete choice experiment + dead), using a division-value strategy, which localize the position of states better or worse than dead. RESULTS: We analyzed MAPR data from 3222 patients and discrete choice experiment + dead data from 1995 respondents. All MAPR coefficients were negative, logically ordered, and significantly different from the reference level. The dead position was denoted by a division value of -148.385. Utility values spanned from -0.071 to 1.0, and only 53 of 16 777 216 states were deemed worse than dead. CONCLUSIONS: This study introduced the first CS-Base utility set, underlining a 2-step utility derivation method. This method, blending societal and patient views, surpasses traditional preference-based approaches, yielding firmer results. However, improvement of the normalization procedure is expected. Estimating CS-Base utilities is an ongoing process that gains precision over time.

Sinonasal inverted papilloma and predictors of health-related quality of life after endonasal endoscopic surgery: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Existing knowledge on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after surgical removal of sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) is limited. Moreover, predictors for a better or worse post-operative HRQoL outcome are not known. Our aim was to assess HRQoL in all three health domains (physical, psychological, and social), track its post-operative trajectory, investigate if pre-operative observations could predict distinct post-operative HRQoL outcomes, and evaluate whether physicians' interventions could contribute to improved post-operative HRQoL. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-four patients who underwent surgery for an IP were included. They were asked to fill in the Endonasal Endoscopic Sinus and Skull-Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) pre-operatively, and then 2 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year post-operatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Linear mixed models analyses were performed to evaluate the overall post-operative HRQoL and the separate health domains, as well as the impact of specific variables (sex, age, American Society of Anaesthesiologists [ASA] classification, smoker, Krouse staging, pre-operative EES-Q score, type of surgery, and post-operative antibiotics) on HRQoL improvement. RESULTS: The total EES-Q score (p < .001) as well as the physical (p < .001), psychological (p = .049), and the social (p = .002) domains significantly improved post-operatively. ASA classification (p = .049), pre-operative EES-Q score (p < .001) and post-operative antibiotics (p = .036) were significant variables. CONCLUSIONS: Overall HRQoL, as well as each of the three health domains, improved significantly. A higher ASA score, a higher pre-operative EES-Q score, and the administration of post-operative antibiotics were significant predictors for better HRQoL recovery post-operatively. Further research is necessary to confirm these results.

Reliability, costs, and radiation dose of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in diagnosis of radiologic sarcopenia in surgically menopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare reliability, costs, and radiation dose of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to MRI and CT in measuring muscle mass for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive DXA scans performed in surgically menopausal women from November 2019 until March 2020 were analyzed by two observers. Observers analyzed muscle mass of the lower limbs in every scan twice. Reliability was assessed by calculating inter- and intra-observer variability. Reliability from CT and MRI as well as radiation dose from CT and DXA were collected from literature. Costs for each type of scan were calculated according to the guidelines for economic evaluation of the Dutch National Health Care Institute. RESULTS: The 34 participants had a median age of 58 years (IQR 53-65) and a median body mass index of 24.6 (IQR 21.7-29.7). Inter-observer variability had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.997 (95% CI 0.994-0.998) with a relative variability of 0.037 ± 0.022%. Regarding intra-observer variability, observer 1 had an ICC of 0.998 (95% CI 0.996-0.999) with a relative variability of 0.019 ± 0.016% and observer 2 had an ICC of 0.997 (95% CI 0.993-0.998) with a relative variability of 0.016 ± 0.011%. DXA costs were €62, CT €77, and MRI €195. The estimated radiation dose of CT was 2.5-3.0 mSv, for DXA this was 2-4 µSv. CONCLUSIONS: DXA has lower costs and a lower radiation dose, with low inter- and intra-observer variability, compared to CT and MRI for assessing lower limb muscle mass. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register; NL8068. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: DXA is a good alternative for CT and MRI in assessing lower limb muscle mass, with lower costs and lower radiation dose, while inter-observer and intra-observer variability are low. KEY POINTS: • Screening for sarcopenia should be optimized as the population ages. • DXA outperformed CT and MRI in the measured metrics. • DXA validity should be further evaluated as an alternative to CT and MRI for sarcopenia evaluation.