RESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We evaluated the efficacy of herbal combination of curcumin-QingDai (CurQD) in active ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Part I was an open-label trial of CurQD in patients with active UC, defined by a Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index score of 5 or higher and a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 2 or higher. Part II was a placebo-controlled trial conducted in Israel and Greece, randomizing active UC patients at a 2:1 ratio to enteric-coated CurQD 3 g/d or placebo for 8 weeks. The co-primary outcome was clinical response (reduction in the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index of ≥3 points) and an objective response (Mayo endoscopic subscore improvement of ≥1 or a 50% fecal calprotectin reduction). Responding patients continued either maintenance curcumin or placebo alone for an additional 8 weeks. Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor activation was assessed by cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) mucosal expression. RESULTS: In part I, 7 of 10 patients responded and 3 of 10 achieved clinical remission. Of 42 patients in part II, the week 8 co-primary outcome was achieved in 43% and 8% of CurQD and placebo patients, respectively (P = .033). Clinical response was observed in 85.7% vs 30.7% (P < .001), clinical remission in 14 of 28 (50%) vs 1 of 13 (8%; P = .01), a 50% calprotectin reduction in 46.4% vs 15.4% (P = .08), and endoscopic improvement in 75% vs 20% (P = .036) in the CurQD and placebo groups, respectively. Adverse events were comparable between groups. By week 16, curcumin-maintained clinical response, clinical remission, and clinical biomarker response rates were 93%, 80%, and 40%, respectively. CurQD uniquely up-regulated mucosal CYP1A1 expression, which was not observed among patients receiving placebo, mesalamine, or biologics. CONCLUSIONS: In this placebo-controlled trial, CurQD was effective for inducing response and remission in active UC patients. The aryl-hydrocarbon receptor pathway may merit further study as a potential UC treatment target. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ID: NCT03720002.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Colite , Curcumina , Humanos , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Curcumina/uso terapêutico , Citocromo P-450 CYP1A1/uso terapêutico , Colite/tratamento farmacológico , Complexo Antígeno L1 Leucocitário , Indução de Remissão , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Duplo-CegoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Subcutaneous (SC) formulations of infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ) are approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of switching from intravenous (IV) to SC formulations of IFX and VDZ in IBDs. METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective study collected data of adult patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) switched to SC IFX or VDZ. The primary endpoint was clinical remission at 12 months stratified based on timing of switch. A composite endpoint consisting of therapy discontinuation, reverse-switch, need for steroids, and drug optimization was evaluated. A multivariate analysis investigated the association between patients' characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-one patients (59% UC, 53% male, mean age 44 ± 15 years, 68% IFX) from 13 centres were included. The switch occurred at Week 6 in a third of cases (36%). Median time to switch was 13 months. Most patients switched to SC IFX and VDZ were in clinical remission at 3 (87% and 77%), 6 (86% and 83%) and 12 (63% and 60%) months. In the multivariate analysis, there was no difference in clinical remission rate at 12 months; however, patients switched at Week 6 had a higher rate of experiencing any therapeutic changes at 3 (false discovery rate (FDR) = .002), 6 (FDR <1 × 10-10) or 12 months (FDR = .08). Clinical disease activity at baseline (only in UC) (FDR = .07) and previous exposure to biologics (FDR = .001) were risk factors for composite endpoint at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: SC IFX and VDZ are effective in daily clinical practice in IBD patients. Switching patients in remission reduces the risk of negative outcomes.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Optimizing treatment with biological agents is an ideal goal for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Recent data suggest that mucosal inflammation patterns and serum cytokine profiles differ between patients who respond and those who do not. Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, has shown promise, but predicting treatment response remains a challenge. We aimed to identify prognostic markers of response to ustekinumab in patients with active UC, utilizing information from their mucosal transcriptome. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of 36 UC patients initiating treatment with ustekinumab. Colonic mucosal biopsies were obtained before treatment initiation for a gene expression analysis using a microarray panel of 84 inflammatory genes. A differential gene expression analysis (DGEA), correlation analysis, and network centrality analysis on co-expression networks were performed to identify potential biomarkers. Additionally, machine learning (ML) models were employed to predict treatment response based on gene expression data. RESULTS: Seven genes, including BCL6, CXCL5, and FASLG, were significantly upregulated, while IL23A and IL23R were downregulated in non-responders compared to responders. The co-expression analysis revealed distinct patterns between responders and non-responders, with key genes like BCL6 and CRP highlighted in responders and CCL11 and CCL22 in non-responders. The ML algorithms demonstrated a high predictive power, emphasizing the significance of the IL23R, IL23A, and BCL6 genes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies potential biomarkers associated with ustekinumab response in UC patients, shedding light on its underlying mechanisms and variability in treatment outcomes. Integrating transcriptomic approaches, including gene expression analyses and ML, offers valuable insights for personalized treatment strategies and highlights avenues for further research to enhance therapeutic outcomes for patients with UC.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Biologia Computacional , Ustekinumab , Humanos , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/genética , Masculino , Feminino , Biologia Computacional/métodos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Receptores de Interleucina/genética , Receptores de Interleucina/metabolismo , Estudos Prospectivos , Transcriptoma , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Subunidade p19 da Interleucina-23/genética , Subunidade p19 da Interleucina-23/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/patologia , Mucosa Intestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Aprendizado de Máquina , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Optimization of treatment with biologics is currently an unmet need for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Real-world studies provide neutral estimates of drug efficacy and safety within unselected patient populations and allow for the recognition of specific characteristics that affect response to therapy. AIMS: We aimed to depict the efficacy of vedolizumab in patients with UC in a real-world setting and identify prognosticators of improved outcomes. METHODS: Patients with active UC who commenced treatment with vedolizumab were prospectively followed up. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical/endoscopic-reported outcomes were recorded at baseline and at weeks 14 and 54. Predefined endpoints of early and persistent efficacy were analyzed against clinical characteristics to identify prognostic factors for response. RESULTS: We included 96 patients (anti-TNF-exposed = 38.5%). At week 14, 73 patients (76%) had clinical response and 54 (56.3%) clinical remission. At week 54, the primary endpoint of vedolizumab persistence was met by 72 patients (75%), whereas steroid-free clinical remission by 59.4%. Among patients who had endoscopy, rates for mucosal healing (Mayo endoscopic score of 0) were 29.8% at week 14 and 44.6% at week 54, respectively. Vedolizumab treatment led to significant improvements in quality of life. Corticosteroid-refractory or anti-TNF-refractory disease, articular manifestations, and high baseline UC-PRO2 were associated with decreased efficacy of vedolizumab in the primary and secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Vedolizumab is characterized by high efficacy and long-term treatment persistence in UC. More aggressive disease, as indicated by refractoriness to steroids or anti-TNFs and elevated baseline PROs, may predict suboptimal response and help pre-treatment prognostic stratification of patients.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Colite Ulcerativa/induzido quimicamente , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/efeitos adversos , Grécia , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose TumoralRESUMO
AIM: To evaluate the uptake of screening colonoscopy among physicians as compared to the general population. METHODS: Asymptomatic physicians, aged 45-67 years, at average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC), working in the participating National Health System hospitals were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding the uptake of screening colonoscopy. The results were compared to those in a background healthy population, aged 50-75 years, inhabitants of a Greek county, who were offered a free access to a screening colonoscopy program for CRC. High-risk adenomas were those ≥10 mm in diameter or any adenoma, regardless of size, with villous histology or high-grade dysplasia. RESULTS: Overall, 267 of 782 physicians and 402 of 6,534 nonphysicians underwent a screening colonoscopy (uptake rates 34.2 and 6.2% respectively, p = 0.00001). Screening colonoscopy has yielded 4 adenocarcinomas (1.6%), 14 high-risk adenomas (5.5%), and 61 low-risk adenomas (25.7%) in the physicians' group. Corresponding figures in the nonphysician arm were 4 (1), 26 (6.5), and 107 (26.6%), respectively. The main reason among physicians for nonadherence was indifference/negligence (n = 213). CONCLUSION: The proportion of physicians undergoing screening colonoscopy for CRC is significantly higher compared to the general population; however, it does remain suboptimal.
Assuntos
Colonoscopia , Programas de Rastreamento , Médicos , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Adenoma/epidemiologia , Idoso , Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico , Pólipos do Colo/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Feminino , Grécia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , PrevalênciaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a gastrointestinal disease that according to Rome IV criteria is subdivided into four subtypes. The pathophysiology of this disease is not well understood due to numerous factors playing multiple roles in disease development, such as diet, stress and hormones. IBS has a variety of symptoms and overlaps with many other gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal diseases. Area covered: This review aims to present an overview of implementation of proteomics in experimental studies in the field of IBS. Expert commentary: Proteomics is commonly used for biomarker discovery in and has also been extensively used in IBS research. The necessity of a sensitive and specific biomarker for IBS is apparent, but despite the intensive research performed in this field, an appropriate biomarker is not yet available.
Assuntos
Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/metabolismo , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Proteoma/química , Proteômica/métodos , Biomarcadores/química , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/etiologia , Proteoma/metabolismoRESUMO
Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) using the EsophyX device has been shown to be effective and safe in patients with Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, the subset of patients that would mostly benefit from this technique remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of the TIF procedure in patients with a history of esophagitis or proven chronic GERD who have achieved symptom control with the administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) but did not wish to continue receiving medications for life. Forty-five patients with typical GERD symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain) and a history of esophagitis grade A and B or proven GERD by esophageal pH monitoring underwent TIF using Esophyx. Patients with eosphagitis C and D or those with large hiatal hernias (>2 cm in length) were excluded. The primary clinical effectiveness measure was GERD symptom elimination at follow up based on normalization of the GERD health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire. After a median follow up period of 59 months (36-75) the median GERD-HRQL scores improved significantly from 27 (2-45) at baseline to 4 (0-26) (P < 0.001) in the 44 patients completing the study. Heartburn was eliminated in 12 out of the 21 patients included (57.1%), regurgitation was eliminated in 15 out of the 17 patients included (88.2%) and finally chest pain was eliminated in 5 patients out of the six patients included (83.3%). Overall, 32 patients out of the 44 patients (72.7%) that completed the study follow up reported elimination of their main symptom, without the need for PPI administration (none PPI usage). Furthermore, six more patients (13.6%), five with heartburn, and one with regurgitation reported half PPI dose taken for <50% of the preceding follow up period (occasional PPI usage), while six more patients (four with heartburn, one with regurgitation, and one with chest pain) reported full or half PPI dose taken for more than 50% of the preceding follow up period (daily PPI usage). Creation of an esophagogastric fundoplication using the EsophyX device abolished reflux symptoms in 72.7% of PPI-responsive GERD patients at a median 59 month follow-up.
Assuntos
Esofagite/cirurgia , Fundoplicatura/instrumentação , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/instrumentação , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Esofagite/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fundoplicatura/métodos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Boca/cirurgia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) could be an option to examine the colon after incomplete colonoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the extent that CCE complements incomplete colonoscopy and guides further workup. DESIGN: Prospective, follow-up study. SETTING: Three tertiary-care centers. PATIENTS: Consecutive outpatients after colonoscopy failure; 1-year study period. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent CCE either immediately after colonoscopy or were rescheduled. Further investigations were guided by the results of CCE. Patients were followed as long as 2 years. RESULTS: We studied 75 outpatients; 39 had a screening colonoscopy. One third of the patients underwent CCE immediately after colonoscopy. Overall, CCE reached or went beyond the colon segment at which colonoscopy stopped in 68 patients (91%). CCE technically complemented difficult colonoscopy independently of whether same-day CCE was performed (24 [96%]) or was not performed (44 [88%]). CCE detected additional significant findings in 36% of the same-day CCE cases and in 48% of the rescheduled ones. Two patients in the same-day group and 13 in the rescheduled CCE group underwent further colon examination that revealed additional significant findings in 3 of them. Ten percent of the patients reported mild adverse events (AE). If needed, 63 participants (84%) were willing to repeat CCE. Follow-up has not identified symptomatic missed colon cancers. LIMITATIONS: Selected patient population, first-generation colon capsule, old preparation scheme. CONCLUSION: CCE performed immediately or at a scheduled date after colonoscopy failure is feasible and safe. CCE after incomplete colonoscopy appears to yield significant findings, guide further workup, and has high patient acceptance.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colonoscopia/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Total proctocolectomy (TPC) followed by ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) remains the only viable option whenever different treatment modalities fail in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). OBJECTIVE: Prospective cohort pre/post study examining the anal defecatory function and competence in UC patients undergoing TPC plus IPAA using high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM). PATIENTS: Patients undergoing TPC and IPAA were enrolled in the study and subjected to HR-ARM prior to and 6 months after surgery. The anal resting, squeeze and push pressures were recorded, together with the rectal sensation and the rectal balloon expulsion test. The number of bowel movements, symptoms/signs related to fecal incontinence, as well as the IBDQ-32 quality of life questionnaires were documented during both HR-ARM visits. RESULTS: A total of 20 consecutive UC patients were recruited in our study. The mean (SD) number of bowel movements before the TPC plus IPAA was 10.1 (2.8), while the same number after the pouch surgery was 7.7 (3.1) [ P â =â 0.01]. Symptoms or signs of fecal incontinence were noted in one of our patients prior to the operation; however, none of our patients reported any such symptoms after the pouch surgery. The median (IQR) IBDQ-32 questionnaire scores before and after surgery were 121.5 (13.5) and 142.5 (16.0) respectively. At the same time, the anorectal function remained intact since both the anal resting and squeeze pressures were not significantly changed. CONCLUSION: UC patients subjected to TPC-IPAA exhibit improved bowel movements and a normal anal defecatory function and competence post-surgery.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Bolsas Cólicas , Incontinência Fecal , Proctocolectomia Restauradora , Humanos , Proctocolectomia Restauradora/efeitos adversos , Colite Ulcerativa/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Incontinência Fecal/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Bolsas Cólicas/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
We aimed to determine the diagnostic yield and outcome of patients receiving antithrombotic drug therapy subjected to small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) for the investigation of small bowel bleeding (SBB). A multicenter retrospective analysis of collected data from all patients undergoing SBCE for the investigation of SBB from March 2003 to June 2023 was performed. The diagnostic yield of SBCE was defined as the detection of positive findings that could explain the cause of the patient's bleeding. Rebleeding was defined as evidence of bleeding within 1 year after the index episode. During the study period, 8401 patients underwent SBCE for SBB investigation. Bleeding lesions were detected in 1103/2535 (43.5%) antithrombotic users, compared to 1113/5866 (18.9%) in nonusers (p < 0.00001). Following capsule endoscopy, a therapeutic intervention was possible in 390/2216 (17.5%) patients with a bleeding lesion. Rebleeding occurred in 927 (36.5%) of antithrombotic users (36.5%), compared to 795 (13.5%) of nonusers (13.5%, p < 0.00001). Both the diagnostic yield of SBCE and the rebleeding rates were higher in patients with SBB receiving antithrombotics. Therapeutic intervention was possible in a real-world setting only for a minority of patients with positive findings.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab and tofacitinib have recently been approved for the management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there is no evidence on how they should be positioned in the therapeutic algorithm. The aim of this study was to compare tofacitinib and ustekinumab as third-line therapies in UC patients in whom anti-TNF and vedolizumab had failed. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study. The primary outcome was disease progression, defined as the need for steroids, therapy escalation, UC-related hospitalization and/or surgery. Secondary outcomes were clinical remission, normalization of C-reactive protein, endoscopic remission, treatment withdrawal, and adverse events. RESULTS: One-hundred seventeen UC patients were included in the study and followed for a median time of 11.6 months (q1-q3, 5.5-18.7). Overall, 65% of patients were treated with tofacitinib and 35% with ustekinumab. In the entire study cohort, 63 patients (54%) had disease progression during the follow-up period. Treatment with ustekinumab predicted increased risk of disease progression compared to treatment with tofacitinib in Cox regression analysis (HR: 1.93 [95% CI: 1.06-3.50] p = 0.030). Twenty-eight (68%) patients in the ustekinumab group and 35 (46%) in the tofacitinib group had disease progression over the follow-up period (log-rank test, p < 0.054). No significant differences were observed for the secondary outcomes. Six and 22 adverse events occurred in the ustekinumab and tofacitinib groups, respectively (15% vs. 31%, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib was more efficacious in reducing disease progression than ustekinumab in this cohort of refractory UC patients. However, prospective head-to-head clinical trials are needed as to confirm these data.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Progressão da Doença , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Ustekinumab , Humanos , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico , Ustekinumab/efeitos adversos , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Indução de Remissão/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cirrhotic patients are predisposed to intestinal bacterial overgrowth with translocation of bacterial products which may deteriorate liver hemodynamics. Having shown that short-term administration of rifaximin improves liver hemodynamics in decompensated cirrhosis, we conducted this study to investigate the effect of intestinal decontamination with rifaximin on the long-term prognosis of patients with alcohol-related decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh > 7) and ascites. METHODS: Patients who had received rifaximin and showed improved liver hemodynamics were enrolled in the current study and continued to receive rifaximin (1200 mg/day). Each patient was matched by age, sex, and Child-Pugh grade to two controls and followed up for up to 5 years, death or liver transplantation. Survival and risk of developing portal hypertension-related complications were compared between rifaximin group and controls. RESULTS: Twenty three patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and matched with 46 controls. Patients who received rifaximin had a significant lower risk of developing variceal bleeding (35% vs. 59.5%, P = 0.011), hepatic encephalopathy (31.5% vs. 47%, P = 0.034), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (4.5% vs. 46%, P = 0.027), and hepatorenal syndrome (4.5% vs. 51%, P = 0.037) than controls. Five-year cumulative probability of survival was significantly higher in patients receiving rifaximin than in controls (61% vs. 13.5%, P = 0.012). In the multivariate analysis, rifaximin administration was independently associated with lower risk of developing variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatorenal syndrome, and higher survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with alcohol-related decompensated cirrhosis, long-term rifaximin administration is associated with reduced risk of developing complications of portal hypertension and improved survival.
Assuntos
Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão Portal/tratamento farmacológico , Cirrose Hepática Alcoólica/tratamento farmacológico , Rifamicinas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Esquema de Medicação , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/etiologia , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevenção & controle , Encefalopatia Hepática/etiologia , Encefalopatia Hepática/prevenção & controle , Síndrome Hepatorrenal/etiologia , Síndrome Hepatorrenal/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Hipertensão Portal/etiologia , Cirrose Hepática Alcoólica/complicações , Cirrose Hepática Alcoólica/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Peritonite/etiologia , Peritonite/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Rifaximina , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are concerns regarding the potential impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. We report on the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in a European prospective cohort study of patients with IBD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 5457 patients with IBD nested in the ongoing I-CARE project and still followed up in April 2020, with monthly online monitoring of clinical activity, treatment, imaging and endoscopy. Investigators were also contacted to report incidental cases. RESULTS: In total, 233 [4.3%] reported COVID-19 and 12 [0.2%] severe COVID-19, with no COVID-19 deaths. The risk of COVID-19 in patients with IBD was not increased compared to the general population (standardized incidence ratio [SIR]: 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.03-1.34], pâ =â 0.009), as well as the risk of severe COVID-19 (SIR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.35-1.20], pâ =â 0.93). We did not observe any negative impact of the different IBD-related medication on the risk of either COVID-19 or severe COVID-19. In 2020, the COVID-19 outbreak resulted in a drastic decrease in endoscopic and imaging procedures from March to May 2020 compared to 2018 and 2019. No impacts on clinical IBD disease activity as well as ongoing treatment were noted. CONCLUSION: No increases in either COVID-19 or severe COVID-19 incidences were observed in patients with IBD. There was no impact of COVID-19 on IBD-related medication and clinical activity. Access to endoscopy and imaging was restricted during the first months of the first COVID-19 outbreak.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Ambulatory 24-h pH-impedance monitoring can be used to assess the relationship of persistent symptoms and reflux episodes, despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Using this technique, we aimed to identify patients with hypersensitive esophagus and evaluate the effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on their symptoms. METHODS: Patients with normal endoscopy and typical reflux symptoms (heartburn, chest pain, and regurgitation), despite PPI therapy twice daily, underwent 24-h pH-impedance monitoring. Distal esophageal acid exposure (% time pH <4) was measured and reflux episodes were classified into acid or non-acid. A positive symptom index (SI) was declared if at least half of the symptom events were preceded by reflux episodes. Patients with a normal distal esophageal acid exposure time, but with a positive SI were classified as having hypersensitive esophagus and were randomized to receive citalopram 20 mg or placebo once daily for 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 252 patients (150 females (59.5%); mean age 55 (range 18-75) years) underwent 24-h pH-impedance monitoring. Two hundred and nineteen patients (86.9%) recorded symptoms during the study day, while 105 (47.9%) of those had a positive SI (22 (20.95%) with acid, 5 (4.76%) with both acid and non-acid, and 78 (74.29%) with non-acid reflux). Among those 105 patients, 75 (71.4%) had normal distal esophageal acid exposure time and were randomized to receive citalopram 20 mg (group A, n=39) or placebo (group B, n=36). At the end of the follow-up period, 15 out of the 39 patients of group A (38.5%) and 24 out of the 36 patients of group B (66.7%) continue to report reflux symptoms (P=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with SSRIs is effective in a select group of patients with hypersensitive esophagus.
Assuntos
Citalopram/uso terapêutico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Monitoramento do pH Esofágico , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background: Using data from the ulcerative colitis (UC) narrative Greece survey, part of a global survey of patients and physicians, we aimed to identify the impact of UC on patients' lives and to compare patients' and gastroenterologists' responses to questions relating to communication during the management of UC in our country. Methods: The survey was conducted online by The Harris Poll, and included 95 patients and 51 gastroenterologists. Eligible were adult UC patients who had seen a gastroenterologist in the past 12 months and had at some time taken a prescription medication (excluding those who had only ever taken 5-aminosalicylates). Patients with mild UC were capped at 20% of total survey respondents to focus the survey on patients with moderate-to-severe disease. Results: The mean time between first experienced symptoms and diagnosis of UC was 0.89 years. Most patients (82%) considered their UC to be in remission, while 98% felt satisfied with their communication with their treating gastroenterologist. However, the disease affected patients' daily life and employment adversely, with 78% reporting their UC to be mentally exhausting. Although nearly 7 in 10 physicians (69%) reported having taken steps to improve their communication skills, many patients (60%) wished they had more time at appointments with their physician, while 44% still felt uncomfortable talking about their sex life and personal relationships. Conclusions: Greek UC patients appear to be satisfied with their physicians and their disease management. Gaps in patient-physician communication relating to quality of life, emotional, and sexual/relationship concerns need to be addressed.
RESUMO
Since inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients were excluded from vaccine authorization studies, limited knowledge exists regarding perceptions and unfavorable effects of COVID-19 vaccination in this group. We aimed to investigate the real-world use and adverse events (AEs) of COVID-19 vaccines in Greek IBD patients. Fully vaccinated IBD patients followed in Greek centers were invited to participate. All patients filled out an anonymous online survey concerning the vaccination program, which included information regarding demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, vaccination perceptions and potential AEs. Overall, 1007 IBD patients were included. Vaccine hesitancy was reported by 49%. Total AEs to vaccination were reported by 81% after dose 1 (D1) and 76% after dose 2 (D2), including isolated injection site reactions (36% and 24% respectively). Systemic AEs were more common after D2 (51%, D2 vs. 44%, D1, p < 0.0001). Very few patients reported new onset abdominal symptoms (abdominal pain 4% (D1), 6% (D2) and diarrhea 5% (D1), 7% (D2)). There were no serious AEs leading to emergency room visit or hospitalization. In multivariate analysis, AEs occurrence was positively associated with young age and female gender (p < 0.0005 for both doses), whereas inactive disease was negatively associated with AE in D1 (p = 0.044). SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Greek IBD patients demonstrated a favorable and reassuring safety profile.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Improving treatment outcomes with biological therapy is a demanding current need for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Discovery of pretreatment prognostic indicators of response may facilitate patient selection and increase long-term remission rates. We aimed to identify baseline mucosal gene expression profiles with predictive value for subsequent response to or failure of treatment with the monoclonal antibody against integrin α4ß7, vedolizumab, in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Mucosal expression of 84 immunological and inflammatory genes was quantified in RNA extracted from colonic biopsies before vedolizumab commencement and compared between patients with or without response to treatment. Significantly differentiated genes were further validated in a larger patient cohort and within available public data sets, and their functional profiles were studied accordingly. RESULTS: In the discovery cohort, we identified 21 genes with a statistically significant differential expression between 54-week responders and nonresponders to vedolizumab. Our validation study allowed us to recognize a "core" mucosal profile that was preserved in both discovery and validation cohorts and in the public database. The applied functional annotation and analysis revealed candidate dysregulated pathways in nonresponders to vedolizumab, including immune cell trafficking, TNF receptor superfamily members mediating noncanonical NF-kB pathway, in addition to interleukin signaling, MyD88 signaling, and toll-like receptors (TLRs) cascade. CONCLUSIONS: Nonresponse to vedolizumab in UC is associated with specific pretreatment gene-expression mucosal signatures and dysregulation of particular immunological and inflammatory pathways. Baseline mucosal and/or systemic molecular profiling may help in the optimal stratification of patients to receive vedolizumab for active UC.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Colite Ulcerativa/induzido quimicamente , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/genética , Fármacos Gastrointestinais , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Transcriptoma , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Aim: To establish whether the addition of probiotics to a globally accepted Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-eradication scheme may reduce the rates of side effects and increase the eradication rates. Methods. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of patients receiving eradication therapy for H. pylori in the eight participating centers. All patients received a 10-day proton pump inhibitor containing non-bismuth quadruple therapeutic regimen for H. pylori eradication (omeprazole 20 mg, amoxycillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg all twice daily orally) and were randomized to receive either probiotics (group A) or placebo (group B). The probiotic used combined four probiotic strains, i.e., Lactobacillus Acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium lactis, and Saccharomyces boulardii. Results. Data were analyzed for 329 patients in group A and 335 patients in group B. Fifty six (17.0%) patients in group A and 170 (50.7%) patients in group B reported the occurrence of an H. pylori treatment-associated new symptom or the aggravation of a pre-existing symptom of any severity (p < 0.00001). H. pylori was successfully eradicated in 303 patients in group A (92.0%) and 291 patients in group B (86.8%), (p = 0.028). Conclusion: Adding probiotics to the 10-day concomitant non-bismuth quadruple H. pylori eradication regimen increases the eradication rate and decreases side effects.
Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Probióticos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Bismuto/farmacologia , Bismuto/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Helicobacter/microbiologia , Humanos , Probióticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Most tertiary gastroenterology centers currently offer an open-access capsule endoscopy (CE) service, including patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. However, CE may identify lesions missed by conventional endoscopy. AIMS: To determine the incidence of bleeding lesions missed by the preceding gastroscopy/colonoscopy that were revealed by CE and compare potential differences in the rate of identifying such lesions in patients that we investigated as opposed to those investigated elsewhere. METHODS: We prospectively reviewed data from patients subjected to CE for obscure bleeding. We analyzed all cases where a source of bleeding was located in the stomach, duodenum, or colon. RESULTS: A total of 317 consecutive patients were subjected to CE for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding within 28 months. Prior to CE examination, 174 patients had gastroscopy and colonoscopy in our institutions and 143 were referrals, all with negative endoscopic investigation. We identified 11 (3.5%) cases where the source of bleeding was found in the stomach (n = 4) or the cecum (n = 7). There was a significant difference of extra small intestinal lesions diagnosed by CE between referrals (9/143, 6.3%) and endoscopic investigation performed in our institutions (2/174, 1.15%), (p = 0.026). The estimated cost of re-endoscoping in our institution all CE referrals would be 50,050 euro (143 patients × 350 euro), to avoid unnecessary CE examinations (9 patients × 600 euro = 5,400 euro). CONCLUSIONS: Reading the whole CE video is important, because small-bowel CE may identify lesions responsible for obscure bleeding missed by the preceding gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Repeating conventional endoscopy by experts before CE is not a cost-effective approach.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula/economia , Colonoscopia/economia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Gastroscopia/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Pancreatic cancer is one of the highest and in fact, unchanged mortality-associated tumor, with an exceptionally low survival rate due to its challenging diagnostic approach. So far, its treatment is based on a combination of approaches (such as surgical resection with or rarely without chemotherapeutic agents), but with finite limits. Thus, looking for additional space to improve pancreatic tumorigenesis therapeutic approach, research has focused on gene therapy with unexpectedly growing horizons not only for the treatment of inoperable pancreatic disease, but also for its early stages. In vivo gene delivery viral vectors, despite few disadvantages (possible immunogenicity, toxicity, mutagenicity, or high cost), could be one of the most efficient cancer gene therapeutic strategies for clinical application due to their superiority compared with other systems (ex vivo delivery strategies). Their dominance consists of simple preparation, easy operation and a wide range of functions. Adenoviruses are one of the most common used vectors, inducing strong immune as well as inflammatory reactions. Oncolytic virotherapy, using the above mentioned in vivo viral vectors, is one of the most promising non-pathogenic, highly-selective cytotoxic anti-cancer therapy using anti-cancer agents with high anti-tumor potency and strong oncolytic effect. There have been a variety of targeted therapeutic and pre-clinical strategies tested for gene therapy in pancreatic cancer such as gene-editing systems (e.g., clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats-Cas9), RNA interference technology (e.g., microRNAs, short hairpin RNA or small interfering RNA), adoptive immunotherapy and vaccination (e.g., chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) with encouraging results.