Symptomatic post COVID patients have impaired alveolar capillary membrane function and high VE/VCO2.

BACKGROUND: Post COVID-19 syndrome is characterized by several cardiorespiratory symptoms but the origin of patients' reported symptomatology is still unclear. METHODS: Consecutive post COVID-19 patients were included. Patients underwent full clinical evaluation, symptoms dedicated questionnaires, blood tests, echocardiography, thoracic computer tomography (CT), spirometry including alveolar capillary membrane diffusion (DM) and capillary volume (Vcap) assessment by combined carbon dioxide and nitric oxide lung diffusion (DLCO/DLNO) and cardiopulmonary exercise test. We measured surfactant derive protein B (immature form) as blood marker of alveolar cell function. RESULTS: We evaluated 204 consecutive post COVID-19 patients (56.5 ± 14.5 years, 89 females) 171 ± 85 days after the end of acute COVID-19 infection. We measured: forced expiratory volume (FEV1) 99 ± 17%pred, FVC 99 ± 17%pred, DLCO 82 ± 19%, DM 47.6 ± 14.8 mL/min/mmHg, Vcap 59 ± 17 mL, residual parenchymal damage at CT 7.2 ± 3.2% of lung tissue, peakVO2 84 ± 18%pred, VE/VCO2 slope 112 [102-123]%pred. Major reported symptoms were: dyspnea 45% of cases, tiredness 60% and fatigability 77%. Low FEV1, Vcap and high VE/VCO2 slope were associated with persistence of dyspnea. Tiredness was associated with high VE/VCO2 slope and low PeakVO2 and FEV1 while fatigability with high VE/VCO2 slope. SPB was fivefold higher in post COVID-19 than in normal subjects, but not associated to any of the referred symptoms. SPB was negatively associated to Vcap. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with post COVID-19, cardiorespiratory symptoms are linked to VE/VCO2 slope. In these patients the alveolar cells are dysregulated as shown by the very high SPB. The Vcap is low likely due to post COVID-19 pulmonary endothelial/vasculature damage but DLCO is only minimally impaired being DM preserved.

Effects of sacubitril/valsartan on exercise capacity: a prognostic improvement that starts during uptitration.

PURPOSE: Sacubitril/valsartan is a mainstay of the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, its effects on exercise performance yielded conflicting results. Aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of sacubitril/valsartan on exercise parameters and echocardiographic and biomarker changes at different drug doses. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive HFrEF outpatients eligible to start sacubitril/valsartan. Patients underwent clinical assessment, cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), blood sampling, echocardiography, and completed the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). Sacubitril/valsartan was introduced at 24/26 mg b.i.d. dose and progressively uptitrated in a standard monthly-based fashion to 97/103 mg b.i.d. or maximum tolerated dose. Study procedures were repeated at each titration visit and 6 months after reaching the maximum tolerated dose. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients completed the study, 73 (75%) reached maximum sacubitril/valsartan dose. We observed a significant improvement in functional capacity across all study steps: oxygen intake increased, at peak exercise (from 15.6 ± 4.5 to 16.5 ± 4.9 mL/min/kg; p trend = 0.001), while minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production relationship reduced in patients with an abnormal value at baseline. Sacubitril/valsartan induced positive left ventricle reverse remodeling (EF from 31 ± 5 to 37 ± 8%; p trend < 0.001), while NT-proBNP reduced from 1179 [610-2757] to 780 [372-1344] pg/ml (p trend < 0.0001). NYHA functional class and the subjective perception of limitation in daily life at KCCQ-12 significantly improved. The Metabolic Exercise Cardiac Kidney Index (MECKI) score progressively improved from 4.35 [2.42-7.71] to 2.35% [1.24-4.96], p = 0.003. CONCLUSIONS: A holistic and progressive HF improvement was observed with sacubitril/valsartan in parallel with quality of life. Likewise, a prognostic enhancement was observed.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and heart failure: a tale born from oxygen uptake.

Since 50 years, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) plays a central role in heart failure (HF) assessment. Oxygen uptake (VO2) is one of the main HF prognostic indicators, then paralleled by ventilation to carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2) relationship slope. Also anaerobic threshold retains a strong prognostic power in severe HF, especially if expressed as a percent of maximal VO2 predicted value. Moving beyond its absolute value, a modern approach is to consider the percentage of predicted value for peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope, thus allowing a better comparison between genders, ages, and races. Several VO2 equations have been adopted to predict peak VO2, built considering different populations. A step forward was made possible by the introduction of reliable non-invasive methods able to calculate cardiac output during exercise: the inert gas rebreathing method and the thoracic electrical bioimpedance. These techniques made possible to calculate the artero-venous oxygen content differences (ΔC(a-v)O2), a value related to haemoglobin concentration, pO2, muscle perfusion, and oxygen extraction. The role of haemoglobin, frequently neglected, is however essential being anaemia a frequent HF comorbidity. Finally, peak VO2 is traditionally obtained in a laboratory setting while performing a standardized physical effort. Recently, different wearable ergo-spirometers have been developed to allow an accurate metabolic data collection during different activities that better reproduce HF patients' everyday life. The evaluation of exercise performance is now part of the holistic approach to the HF syndrome, with the inclusion of CPET data into multiparametric prognostic scores, such as the MECKI score.

Why Levosimendan Improves the Clinical Condition of Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: A Holistic Approach.

BACKGROUND: In advanced heart failure (HF), levosimendan increases peak oxygen uptake (VO2). We investigated whether peak VO2 increase is linked to cardiovascular, respiratory, or muscular performance changes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty patients hospitalized for advanced HF underwent, before and shortly after levosimendan infusion, 2 different cardiopulmonary exercise tests: (a) a personalized ramp protocol with repeated arterial blood gas analysis and standard spirometry including alveolar-capillary gas diffusion measurements at rest and at peak exercise, and (b) a step incremental workload cardiopulmonary exercise testing with continuous near-infrared spectroscopy analysis and cardiac output assessment by bioelectrical impedance analysis.Levosimendan significantly decreased natriuretic peptides, improved peak VO2 (11.3 [interquartile range 10.1-12.8] to 12.6 [10.2-14.4] mL/kg/min, P < .01) and decreased minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production relationship slope (47.7 ± 10.7 to 43.4 ± 8.1, P < .01). In parallel, spirometry showed only a minor increase in forced expiratory volume, whereas the peak exercise dead space ventilation was unchanged. However, during exercise, a smaller edema formation was observed after levosimendan infusion, as inferable from the changes in diffusion components, that is, the membrane diffusion and capillary volume. The end-tidal pressure of CO2 during the isocapnic buffering period increased after levosimendan (from 28 ± 3 mm Hg to 31 ± 2 mm Hg, P < .01). During exercise, cardiac output increased in parallel with VO2. After levosimendan, the total and oxygenated tissue hemoglobin, but not deoxygenated hemoglobin, increased in all exercise phases. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced HF, levosimendan increases peak VO2, decreases the formation of exercise-induced lung edema, increases ventilation efficiency owing to a decrease of reflex hyperventilation, and increases cardiac output and muscular oxygen delivery and extraction.

A case of myopericarditis recurrence after third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in a young subject: link or causality?

The rate of post-vaccine myocarditis is being studied from the beginning of the massive vaccination campaign against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although a direct cause-effect relationship has been described, in most cases, the vaccine pathophysiological role is doubtful. Moreover, it is not quite as clear as having had a previous myocarditis could be a risk factor for a post-vaccine disease relapse. A 27-year-old man presented to the emergency department for palpitations and pericardial chest pain radiated to the upper left limb, on the 4th day after the third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine. He experienced a previous myocarditis 3 years before, with full recovery and no other comorbidities. Electrocardiogram showed normal atrioventricular conduction, incomplete right bundle branch block, and diffuse ST-segment elevation. A cardiac echo showed lateral wall hypokinesis with preserved ejection fraction. Troponin-T was elevated (160 ng/L), chest X-ray was normal, and the SARS-CoV-2 molecular buffer was negative. High-dose anti-inflammatory therapy with ibuprofen and colchicine was started; in the 3rd day high-sensitivity Troponin I reached a peak of 23000 ng/L. No heart failure or arrhythmias were observed. A cardiac magnetic resonance was performed showing normal biventricular systolic function and abnormal tissue characterization suggestive for acute non-ischaemic myocardial injury (increased native T1 and T2 values, increased signal intensity at T2-weighted images and late gadolinium enhancement, all findings with matched subepicardial distribution) at the level of mid to apical septal, anterior, and anterolateral walls. A left ventricular electroanatomic voltage mapping was negative (both unipolar and bipolar), while the endomyocardial biopsy showed a picture consistent with active myocarditis. The patient was discharged in good clinical condition, on bisoprolol 1.25 mg, ramipril 2.5 mg, ibuprofen 600 mg three times a day, colchicine 0.5 mg twice a day. We presented the case of a young man with history of previous myocarditis, admitted with a non-complicated acute myopericarditis relapse occurred 4 days after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (3rd dose). Despite the observed very low incidence of cardiac complications following BNT162b2 administration, and the lack of a clear proof of a direct cause-effect relationship, we think that in our patient this link can be more than likely. In the probable need for additional SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses in the next future, studies addressing the risk-benefit balance of this subset of patient are warranted. We described a multidisciplinary management of a case of myocarditis recurrence after the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine.

"You can leave your mask on": effects on cardiopulmonary parameters of different airway protective masks at rest and during maximal exercise.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of protective masks has been essential to reduce contagions. However, public opinion is that there is an associated subjective shortness of breath. We evaluated cardiorespiratory parameters at rest and during maximal exertion to highlight any differences with the use of protective masks.12 healthy subjects performed three identical cardiopulmonary exercise tests, one without wearing a protective mask, one wearing a surgical mask and one with a filtering face piece particles class 2 (FFP2) mask. Dyspnoea was assessed using the Borg scale. Standard pulmonary function tests were also performed.All the subjects (40.8±12.4 years; six male) completed the protocol with no adverse events. Spirometry showed a progressive reduction of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) from no mask to surgical to FFP2 (FEV1: 3.94±0.91 L, 3.23±0.81 L, 2.94±0.98 L; FVC: 4.70±1.21 L, 3.77±1.02 L, 3.52±1.21 L; p<0.001). Rest ventilation, O2 uptake (V˙ O2 ) and CO2 production (V˙ CO2 ) were progressively lower, with a reduction in respiratory rate. At peak exercise, subjects had a progressively higher Borg scale when wearing surgical and FFP2 masks. Accordingly, at peak exercise, V˙ O2 (31.0±23.4 mL·kg-1·min-1, 27.5±6.9 mL·kg-1·min-1, 28.2±8.8 mL·kg-1·min-1; p=0.001), ventilation (92±26 L, 76±22 L, 72±21 L; p=0.003), respiratory rate (42±8 breaths·min-1, 38±5 breaths·min-1, 37±4 breaths·min-1; p=0.04) and tidal volume (2.28±0.72 L, 2.05±0.60 L, 1.96±0.65 L; p=0.001) were gradually lower. There was no significant difference in oxygen saturation.Protective masks are associated with significant but modest worsening of spirometry and cardiorespiratory parameters at rest and peak exercise. The effect is driven by a ventilation reduction due to increased airflow resistance. However, because exercise ventilatory limitation is far from being reached, their use is safe even during maximal exercise, with a slight reduction in performance.

Cardiovascular Death Risk in Recovered Mid-Range Ejection Fraction Heart Failure: Insights From Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF) represents a heterogeneous category where phenotype, as well as prognostic assessment, remains debated. The present study explores a specific HFmrEF subset, namely those who recovered from a reduced EF (rec-HFmrEF) and, particularly, it focuses on the possible additive prognostic role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data from 4535 patients with HFrEF and 1176 patients with rec-HFmrEF from the Metabolic Exercise combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes database. The end point was cardiovascular death at 5 years. The median follow-up was 1343 days (25th-75th range 627-2403 days). Cardiovascular death occurred in 552 HFrEF and 61 rec-HFmrEF patients. The multivariate analysis confirmed an independent role of the MECKI score's variables in HFrEF (C-index = 0.744) whereas, in the rec-HFmrEF group, only age and peak oxygen uptake (pVO2) remained associated to the end point (C-index = 0.745). A peak oxygen uptake of ≤55% of predicted and a ventilatory efficiency of ≥31 resulted as the most accurate cut-off values in the outcome prediction. CONCLUSIONS: Present data support the cardiopulmonary exercise test and, particularly, the peak oxygen uptake, as a useful tool in the rec-HFmrEF prognostic assessment. A peak VO2 of ≤55% predicted and ventilatory efficiency of ≥31 might help to identify a high-risk rec-HFmrEF subgroup.

Deceived by the Fick principle: blood flow distribution in heart failure.

AIMS: The Fick principle states that oxygen uptake (V̇O2) is cardiac output (Qc)*arterial-venous O2 content difference [ΔC(a-v)O2]. Blood flow distribution is hidden in Fick principle and its relevance during exercise in heart failure (HF) is undefined.To highlight the role of blood flow distribution, we evaluated peak-exercise V̇O2, Qc and ΔC(a-v)O2, before and after HF therapeutic interventions. METHODS: Symptoms-limited cardiopulmonary exercise tests with Qc measurement (inert-gas-rebreathing) was performed in 234 HF patients before and 6 months after successful exercise training, cardiac-resynchronization therapy or percutaneous-edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. RESULTS: Considering all tests (n=468) a direct correlation between peakV̇O2 and peakQc (R2=0.47) and workload (R2=0.70) were observed. Patients were grouped according to treatment efficacy in group 1 (peakV̇O2 increase >10%, n=93), group 2 (peakV̇O2 change between 0 and 10%, n=60) and group 3 (reduction in peakV̇O2, n=81). Post-treatment peakV̇O2 changes poorly correlated with peakQc and peakΔC(a-v)O2 changes. Differently, post-procedures peakQc vs. peakΔC(a-v)O2 changes showed a close negative correlation (R2=0.46), becoming stronger grouping patients according to peakV̇O2 improvement (R2=0.64, 0.79 and 0.58 in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively). In 76% of patients peakQc and ΔC(a-v)O2 changes diverged regardless of treatment. CONCLUSION: The bulk of these data suggests that blood flow distribution plays a pivotal role on peakV̇O2 determination regardless of HF treatment strategies. Accordingly, for assessing HF treatment efficacy on exercise performance the sole peakV̇O2 may be deceptive and the combination of V̇O2, Qc and ΔC(a-v)O2, must be considered.

This study aimed to understand how oxygen uptake during exercise is affected by heart failure therapeutic intervention. We evaluated 234 heart failure patients before and after treatments such as exercise training, cardiac resynchronization therapy, or mitral valve repair, finding that changes in oxygen uptake were poorly correlated with changes in cardiac output and oxygen content difference between arteries and veins. However, we observed a strong negative correlation between changes in cardiac output and oxygen content difference, especially in patients with significant improvement in oxygen uptake. This suggests that blood flow distribution is crucial for oxygen uptake during exercise, regardless of treatment. Therefore, relying solely on oxygen uptake may not accurately assess treatment effectiveness, and considering a combination of oxygen uptake, cardiac output, and oxygen content difference is important. Oxygen uptake during exercise was strongly related to cardiac output and workload.Changes in cardiac output and oxygen content difference were closely related after treatments, especially in patients with significant improvement in oxygen uptake.

What about chronotropic incompetence in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction? Clinical and prognostic implications from the Metabolic Exercise combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes score dataset.

AIMS: Chronotropic incompetence (CI) is a strong predictor of outcome in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, however no data on its clinical and prognostic impacts in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) are available. Therefore, the study aims to investigate, in a large multicentre HFmrEF cohort, the prevalence of CI as well as its relationship with exercise capacity and its prognostic role over the cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within the Metabolic Exercise combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) database, we analysed data of 864 HFmrEF out of 1164 stable outpatients who performed a maximal CPET at the cycle ergometer and who had no significant rhythm disorders or comorbidities. The primary study endpoint was cardiovascular (CV) death. All-cause death was also explored. Chronotropic incompetence prevalence differed depending on the method (peak heart rate, pHR% vs. pHR reserve, pHRR%) and the cut-off adopted (pHR% from ≤75% to ≤60% and pHRR% ≤ 65% to ≤50%), ranging from 11% to 62%. A total of 84 (9.7%) CV deaths were collected, with 39 (4.5%) occurring within 5 years. At multivariate analysis, both pHR% [hazard ratio 0.97 (0.95-0.99), P < 0.05] and pHRR% [hazard ratio 0.977 (0.961-0.993), P < 0.01] were associated with the primary endpoint. A pHR% ≤ 75% and a pHRR% ≤ 50% represented the most accurate cut-off values in predicting the outcome. CONCLUSION: The study suggests an association between blunted exercise-HR response, functional capacity, and CV death risk among patients with HFmrEF. Whether the CI presence might be adopted in daily HFmrEF management needs to be addressed in larger prospective studies.

Chronotropic incompetence is an easy-to-obtain additive parameter for cardiovascular death risk stratification in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Peak heart rate and peak heart rate reserve are associated with exercise capacity in HFmrEF. Peak heart rate and peak heart rate reserve are associated with cardiovascular death in HFmrEF.

Intrapulmonary distribution of blood flow during exercise in pulmonary hypertension assessed by a new combination technique.

Background: Hyperventilation and inadequate cardiac output (CO) increase are the main causes of exercise limitation in pulmonary hypertension (PH). Intrapulmonary blood flow partitioning between ventilated and unventilated lung zones is unknown. Thoracic impedance cardiography and inert gas rebreathing have been both validated in PH patients for non-invasive measurement of CO and pulmonary blood flow (PBF), respectively. This study sought to evaluate CO behaviour in PH patients during exercise and its partitioning between ventilated and unventilated lung areas, in parallel with ventilation partitioning between ventilated and unventilated lung zones. Methods: Eighteen PH patients (group 1 or 4) underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) with a three-step loaded workload protocol. The steps occurred at 0%, 20%, 40%, and 60% of peak workload reached during a preliminary maximum CPET. Ventilatory parameters, arterial blood gases, CO, PBF, and intrapulmonary shunt (calculated as the difference between CO and PBF) were obtained at each step, combining thoracic impedance cardiography and an inert gas rebreathing technique. Results: Dead space ventilation observed throughout the exercise was about 40% of total ventilation. A progressive increase of CO from 4.86 ± 1.24 L/min (rest) to 9.41 ± 2.63 L/min (last step), PBF from 3.81 ± 1.41 L/min to 7.21 ± 2.93 L/min, and intrapulmonary shunt from 1.05 ± 0.96 L/min to 2.21 ± 2.28 L/min was observed. Intrapulmonary shunt was approximately 20% of CO at each exercise step. Conclusions: Although the study population was small, the combined non-invasive CO measurement seems a promising tool for deepening our knowledge of lung exercise haemodynamics in PH patients. This technique could be applied in future studies to evaluate PH treatment influences on CO partitioning, since a secondary increase of intrapulmonary shunt is undesirable.

Determinants of exercise performance in heart failure patients with extremely reduced cardiac output and left ventricular assist device.

The evaluation of exercise capacity and cardiac output (QC) is fundamental in the management of patients with advanced heart failure (AdHF). QC and peak oxygen uptake (VO2) have a pivotal role in the prognostic stratification and in the definition of therapeutic interventions, including medical therapies and devices, but also specific treatments such as heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Due to the intertwined relationship between exercise capacity and daily activities, exercise intolerance dramatically has impact on the quality of life of patients. It is a multifactorial process that includes alterations in central and peripheral haemodynamic regulation, anaemia and iron deficiency, pulmonary congestion, pulmonary hypertension, and peripheral O2 extraction. This paper aims to review the pathophysiological background of exercise limitations in HF patients and to examine the complex physiology of exercise in LVAD recipients, analysing the interactions between the cardiopulmonary system, the musculoskeletal system, the autonomic nervous system, and the pump. We performed a literature review to highlight the current knowledge on this topic and possible interventions that can be implemented to increase exercise capacity in AdHF patients-including administration of levosimendan, rehabilitation, and the intriguing field of LVAD speed changes. The present paper confirms the role of CPET in the follow-up of this peculiar population and the impact of exercise capacity on the quality of life of AdHF patients.

Exercise in hypoxia: a model from laboratory to on-field studies.

Clinical outcome and quality of life of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) have greatly improved over the last two decades. These results and the availability of modern lifts allow many cardiac patients to spend leisure time at altitude. Heart failure per se does not impede a safe stay at altitude, but exercise at both simulated and real altitudes is associated with a reduction in performance, which is inversely proportional to HF severity. For example, in normal subjects, the reduction in functional capacity is ∼2% every 1000 m altitude increase, whereas it is 4 and 10% in HF patients with normal or slightly diminished exercise capacity and in HF patients with markedly diminished exercise capacity, respectively. Also, the on-field experience with HF patients at altitude confirms safety and shows overall similar data to that reported at simulated altitude. Even 'optimal' HF treatment in patients spending time at altitude or at hypoxic conditions is likely different from optimal treatment at sea level, particularly with regard to the selectivity of ß-blockers. Furthermore, high altitude, both simulated and on-field, represents a stimulating model of hypoxia in HF patients and healthy subjects. Our data suggest that spending time at altitude (<3500 m) can be safe even for HF patients, provided that subjects are free from comorbidities that may directly interfere with the adaptation to altitude and are stable. However, HF patients experience a reduction of exercise capacity directly proportional to HF severity and altitude. Finally, HF patients should be tested for functional capacity and must undergo a specific 'hypoxic-tailored treatment' to avoid pharmacological interference with altitude adaptation mechanisms, particularly with regard to the selectivity of ß-blockers.

Beyond VO2: the complex cardiopulmonary exercise test.

Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is a valuable diagnostic tool with a specific application in heart failure (HF) thanks to the strong prognostic value of its parameters. The most important value provided by CPET is the peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2), the maximum rate of oxygen consumption attainable during physical exertion. According to the Fick principle, VO2 equals cardiac output (Qc) times the arteriovenous content difference [C(a-v)O2], where Ca is the arterial oxygen and Cv is the mixed venous oxygen content, respectively; therefore, VO2 can be reduced both by impaired O2 delivery (reduced Qc) or extraction (reduced arteriovenous O2 content). However, standard CPET is not capable of discriminating between these different impairments, leading to the need for 'complex' CPET technologies. Among non-invasive methods for Qc measurement during CPET, inert gas rebreathing and thoracic impedance cardiography are the most used techniques, both validated in healthy subjects and patients with HF, at rest and during exercise. On the other hand, the non-invasive assessment of peripheral muscle perfusion is possible with the application of near-infrared spectroscopy, capable of measuring tissue oxygenation. Measuring Qc allows, by having haemoglobin values available, to discriminate how much any VO2 deficit depends on the muscle, anaemia or heart.

Is red distribution width a valid tool to predict impaired iron transport in heart failure?

Background: Impaired iron transport (IIT) is a form of iron deficiency (ID) defined as transferrin saturation (TSAT) < 20% irrespective of serum ferritin levels. It is frequently observed in heart failure (HF) where it negatively affects prognosis irrespective of anaemia. Objectives: In this retrospective study we searched for a surrogate biomarker of IIT. Methods: We tested the predictive power of red distribution width (RDW), mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC) to detect IIT in 797 non-anaemic HF patients. Results: At ROC analysis, RDW provided the best AUC (0.6928). An RDW cut-off value of 14.2% identified patients with IIT, with positive and negative predictive values of 48 and 80%, respectively. Comparison between the true and false negative groups showed that estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly higher (p = 0.0092) in the true negative vs. false negative group. Therefore, we divided the study population according to eGFR value: 109 patients with eGFR ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m2, 318 patients with eGFR 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m2, 308 patients with eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 62 patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2. In the first group, positive and negative predictive values were 48 and 81% respectively, 51 and 85% in the second group, 48 and 73% in the third group and 43 and 67% in the fourth group. Conclusion: RDW may be seen as a reliable marker to exclude IIT in non-anaemic HF patients with eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2.

Influence of exertional oscillatory breathing and its temporal behavior in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Exertional oscillatory breathing (EOV) represents an emerging prognostic marker in heart failure (HF) patients, however little is known about EOV meaning with respect to its disappearance/persistence during cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). The present single-center study evaluated EOV clinical and prognostic impact in a large cohort of reduced ejection fraction HF patients (HFrEF) and, contextually, if a specific EOV temporal behavior might be an addictive risk predictor. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 1.866 HFrEF patients on optimized medical therapy were analysed. The primary cardiovascular (CV) study end-point was cardiovascular death, heart transplantation or LV assistance device (LVAD) implantation at 5-years. For completeness a secondary end-point of total mortality at 5- years was also explored. EOV presence was identified in 251 patients (13%): 142 characterized by EOV early cessation (Group A) and 109 by EOV persistence during the whole CPET (Group B). The entire EOV Group showed worse clinical and functional status than NoEOV Group (n = 1.615) and, within the EOV Group, Group B was characterized by a more severe HF. At CV survival analysis, EOV patients showed a poorer outcome than the NoEOV Group (events 27.1% versus 13.1%, p < 0.001) both unpolished and after matching for main confounders. Instead, no significant differences were found between EOV Group A and B with respect to CV outcome. Conversely the analysis for total mortality failed to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis, albeit retrospective, supports the inclusion of EOV into a CPET-centered clinical and prognostic evaluation of the HFrEF patients. EOV characterizes per se a more advanced HFrEF stage with an unfavorable CV outcome. However, the EOV persistence, albeit suggestive of a more severe HF, does not emerge as a further prognostic marker.

The importance of re-evaluating the risk score in heart failure patients: An analysis from the Metabolic Exercise Cardiac Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score database.

BACKGROUND: The role of risk scores in heart failure (HF) management has been highlighted by international guidelines. In contrast with HF, which is intrinsically a dynamic and unstable syndrome, all its prognostic studies have been based on a single evaluation. We investigated whether time-related changes of a well-recognized risk score, the MECKI score, added prognostic value. MECKI score is based on peak VO2, VE/VCO2 slope, Na+, LVEF, MDRD and Hb. METHODS: A multi-centre retrospective study was conducted involving 660 patients who performed MECKI re-evaluation at least 6 months apart. Based on the difference between II and I evaluation of MECKI values (MECKI II - MECKI I = ∆ MECKI) the study population was divided in 2 groups: those presenting a score reduction (∆ MECKI <0, i.e. clinical improvement), vs. patients presenting an increase (∆ MECKI >0, clinical deterioration). RESULTS: The prognostic value of MECKI score is confirmed also when re-assessed during follow-up. The group with improved MECKI (366 patients) showed a better prognosis compared to patients with worsened MECKI (294 patients) (p < 0.0001). At 1st evaluation, the two groups differentiated by LVEF, VE/VCO2 slope and blood Na+ concentration, while at 2nd evaluation they differentiated in all 6 parameters considered in the score. The patients who improved MECKI score, improved in all components of the score but hemoglobin, while patients who worsened the score, worsened all parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that re-assessment of MECKI score identifies HF subjects at higher risk and that score improvement or deterioration regards several MECKI score generating parameters confirming the holistic background of HF.

Does moderate hyperkalemia influence survival in HF? Insights from the MECKI score data base.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of moderate hyperkalemia in reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients is still controversial. Despite this, it affects the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) with therapy down-titration or discontinuation. OBJECTIVES: Aim of the study was to assess the prognostic impact of moderate hyperkalemia in chronic HFrEF optimally treated patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed MECKI (Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes) database, with median follow-up of 4.2 [IQR 1.9-7.5] years. Data on K+ levels were available in 7087 cases. Patients with K+ plasma level ≥ 5.6 mEq/L and < 4 mEq/L were excluded. Remaining patients were categorized into normal >4 and < 5 mEq/L (n = 4826, 68%) and moderately high ≥5.0 and ≤ 5.5 mEq/L (n = 496, 7%) K+. Then patients were matched by propensity score in 484 couplets of patients. MECKI score value was 7% [IQR 3.1-14.1%] and 7.3% [IQR 3.4-15%] (p = 0.678) in patients with normal and moderately high K+ values while cardiovascular mortality events at two years follow-up were 41 (4.2%) and 33 (3.4%) (p = 0.333) in each group respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate hyperkalemia does not influence patients' outcome in a large cohort of ambulatory HFrEF patients.

Exploring the Prognostic Performance of MECKI Score in Heart Failure Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Edoxaban.

INTRODUCTION: Risk stratification in heart failure (HF) is essential for clinical and therapeutic management. The Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score is a validated prognostic model for assessing cardiovascular risk in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). From the validation of the score, the prevalence of HF patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as edoxaban, for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) has been increasing in recent years. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of the MECKI score in HFrEF patients treated with edoxaban for NVAF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included consecutive outpatients with HF and NVAF treated with edoxaban (n = 83) who underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). They were matched by propensity score with a retrospective group of HFrEF patients with NVAF treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) from the MECKI score registry (n = 844). The study endpoint was the risk of cardiovascular mortality, urgent heart transplantation, or Left Ventricle Assist Device (LVAD) implantation. RESULTS: Edoxaban patients were treated with a more optimized HF therapy and had different clinical characteristics, with a similar MECKI score. After propensity score, 77 patients treated with edoxaban were successfully matched with the MECKI-VKA control cohort. In both groups, MECKI accurately predicted the composite endpoint with similar area under the curves (AUC = 0.757 vs. 0.829 in the MECKI-VKA vs. edoxaban-treated group, respectively, p = 0.452). The two populations' survival appeared non-significantly different at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: this study confirms the prognostic accuracy of the MECKI score in HFrEF patients with NVAF treated with edoxaban, showing improved predictive power compared to VKA-treated patients.

Heart failure patients with improved ejection fraction: Insights from the MECKI score database.

AIMS: Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction is a major goal of heart failure (HF) treatment. However, data on clinical characteristics, exercise performance and prognosis in HF patients who improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) are scarce. The study aimed to determine whether HFimpEF patients have a distinct clinical phenotype, biology and prognosis than HF patients with persistently reduced ejection fraction (pHFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 7948 patients enrolled in the Metabolic Exercise Cardiac Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score database were evaluated (median follow-up of 1490 days). We analysed clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, exercise, and survival data from HFimpEF (n = 1504) and pHFrEF (n = 6017) patients. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite of cardiovascular death, left ventricular assist device implantation, and urgent heart transplantation. HFimpEF patients had lower HF severity: left ventricular ejection fraction 44.0 [41.0-47.0] versus 29.7 [24.1-34.5]%, B-type natriuretic peptide 122 [65-296] versus 373 [152-888] pg/ml, haemoglobin 13.5 [12.2-14.6] versus 13.7 [12.5-14.7] g/dl, renal function by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation 72.0 [56.7-89.3] versus 70.4 [54.5-85.3] ml/min, peak oxygen uptake 62.2 [50.7-74.1] versus 52.6 [41.8-64.3]% predicted, minute ventilation-to-carbon dioxide output slope 30.0 [26.9-34.4] versus 32.1 [28.0-38.0] in HFimpEF and pHFrEF, respectively (p < 0.001 for all). Cardiovascular mortality rates were 26.6 and 46.9 per 1000 person-years for HFimpEF and pHFrEF, respectively (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that HFimpEF had better a long-term prognosis compared with pHFrEF patients. After adjustment for variables differentiating HFimpEF from pHFrEF, except echocardiographic parameters, the Kaplan-Meier curves showed the same prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure with improved ejection fraction represents a peculiar group of HF patients whose clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and exercise characteristics parallel the recovery of systolic function. Nonetheless, these patients remain at risk for adverse outcome.

The double anaerobic threshold in heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) has an important role in assessing heart failure (HF) patients. Among CPET parameters, a pivotal role is attributed to the anaerobic threshold (AT), normally determined by V-slope, ventilatory equivalent and end-tidal methods. In about 10% of healthy subjects, a lack of concordance between these methods has been reported. This event was named double AT (DT). We hypothesized that DT was due to a delay in chemoreflex response. METHODS: We reanalyzed CPET data of two cross-over studies in which we compared CPET in stable HF patients treated for two months with bisoprolol and carvedilol. In chronic HF, carvedilol has a greater sympathetic inhibition than bisoprolol, as shown by a lower chemoreflex response. RESULTS: In 87 patients, we identified DT in 46% and 66% of cases during bisoprolol and carvedilol treatment, respectively (p < 0.01). Compared with bisoprolol, carvedilol treatment was associated to a lower peak oxygen uptake (from 17.4 ± 4.3 to 16.4 ± 4.1 mL/min/kg) and oxygen pulse (from 11.8 ± 2.9 to 11.1 ± 2.9 mL/min/kg) suggestive of lower peak cardiac output. CONCLUSIONS: DT is frequent in HF and more often with carvedilol than bisoprolol treatment, may be due to a greater inhibition of sympathetic tone and prolonged circulatory time. These findings open an unexplored research field.